17 Amendments of Andrey NOVAKOV related to 2017/2136(DEC)
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. Whereas budgetary principles of unity, budgetary accuracy, annuality, equilibrium, universality, specification, sound financial management and transparency shall be respected when the Union budget is implemented;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to include in its performance reports assessments on the quality of the data used and a declaration on the quality of the performance information;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to fulfil the original 20% spending target in integrating climate action into the various Union spending programmes;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the positive trend of the most likely error rate issued by the Court compared to that of recent years since the payments are affected in 2016 by a most likely error rate of 3.1%; recalls that the most likely error rate for payments was estimated in the financial years 2015 at 3.8%, 2014 at 4,4%, 2013 at 4.7%, 2012 at 4.8%, 2011 at 3.9%, 2010 at 3.7%, 2009 at 3.3%; 2008% at 5.2%, and 2007 at 6.9%; as the Court's s estimated error rate is not final, considers it important that Commission´s residual error rate is taken into account when assessing efficiency of Union´s funding;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses that the estimated level of error for cohesion does not include a quantification of 2016 disbursements to financial instruments amounting to EUR 2.5 billion that the Court considers to be outside the eligibility period defined in Article 56(1) of Council Regulation EC 1083/2006; notes that those disbursements would represent an estimated level of error of 2.0% of overall expenditure; points outnotes that if the Court had quantified this flagrant irregularity, the most likely error rate would have been estimated at 5.1% (nearly the same level as for 2008); calls on the Court to take on board all the irregularities having a financial impact when determining the most likely error rate and the Commission to table the necessary legislative proposal to put an end to this irregularityseparately (box 1.2 of the 2016 annual report) as a one-off, ring-fenced observation related to the absence of a timely Commission legislative proposal; notes the Commission´s unilateral decision to accept expenditure up to 31 March 2017;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Points out that the Court found the highest estimated levels of error in spending for economic, social and territorial cohesion (4.8. % or 6.8% with the quantified irregularity concerning the financial instruments) and for competitiveness for growth and jobs (4.1 %), whilst administrative expenditure had the lowest estimated level of error (0.2 %);
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 62
Paragraph 62
62. Notes that the programme statements for the EU’s 2017 draft general budget contain 294 objectives and 709 indicators, which are particularly highly concentrated under MFF headings 1a, 3, 4, and that through the ‘budget focused on results’ (BFOR) initiative, the Commission is currently undertaking a review of its indicators to provide input for the next generation of spending programmes; stresses that the Commission should use mainly results indicators that have performance relevant value;
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 123
Paragraph 123
123. Points out that the errors in cohesion contributed to 43% of the overall estimated level of error of 3,1%; notes that one of the reasons for the high error rate is the complexity of Union´ and Member States´ regulation;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 159
Paragraph 159
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 160
Paragraph 160
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 161
Paragraph 161
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 162
Paragraph 162
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 180 – point b
Paragraph 180 – point b
(b) management and control systems for 23 specific ESF operational programmes in Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Germany, Spain, Finland, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Slovakia and the United Kingdom for the 2007-2013 programming period; and
Amendment 302 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 180 – point c
Paragraph 180 – point c
(c) management and control systems for 3 ESF or YEI and 1 FEAD operational programmes in Bulgaria, Croatia, France and Italy for the programming period 2014-2020;
Amendment 320 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 189 – point a
Paragraph 189 – point a
Amendment 328 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 199
Paragraph 199
199. RegretAsks that DG AGRI has noto defined any objective accompanied with indicators to reduce the income inequalities between farms in the next MFF;
Amendment 339 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 211
Paragraph 211
211. Stresses that weaknesses were detected in particular in the management and control system of Hungary (s in some Member States concerning late management declaration by the paying agency and deficiencies in greening payments), Bulgaria (concerning, greening and the organic status of farmers), Poland (concerning greening payments) and Italy (concerning deficiencies in correctly establishing the eligibility of land and an active farmer);