[ParlTrack]

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5

(5) In accordance with the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme and Decision (EU) No […]/2013 of the Council of […] 2013 ~~establishing the Specific Programme implementing Horizon 2020 (2014-2020)19~~ further support ~~should~~may be provided to Joint Undertakings established under ~~Decision No 1982/2006/EC under the conditions specified in Decision (EU) No […]/2013~~the conditions specified in the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, in particular Article 25 thereof and in full compliance with the general principles laid down in the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, and in particular the principles on gender equality and open access. The Industrial Leadership priority targets two specific activity lines under Information and Communication Technologies: ‘micro- and nanoelectronics’, and ‘a new generation of components and systems, engineering of advanced and smart embedded components and systems’. Embedded computing systems (ARTEMIS) and nanoelectronics (ENIAC) should be combined into a single initiative. __________________ 19 OJ [H2020 SP]. OJ [H2020 SP].

2013/12/06
Committee: ITRE

Dimitrios DROUTSAS

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)

(12 a) Without prejudice to the interim evaluation referred to in Article 11(1) of this Regulation and in accordance with Article 32 of the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, the Joint Technology Initiatives, as a particular funding instrument, should be subject to an in-depth interim assessment, which should specifically include an analysis of their openness, transparency effectiveness and efficiency.

2013/12/06
Committee: ITRE

Dimitrios DROUTSAS

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26

(26) In accordance with Article 287(1) of the Treaty, the constituent instrument of bodies, offices or agencies set up by the Union may preclude the examination of the accounts of all revenue and expenditure of those bodies, offices or agencies by the Court of Auditors. In accordance with Article 60(5) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012, the accounts of the bodies under Article 209 of that Regulation are to be examined by an independent audit body which is to give an opinion inter alia on the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. Avoidance of duplication of the examination of the accounts justifies that the accounts of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking should not be subject to examination by the Court of Auditors.deleted

2013/12/06
Committee: ITRE

Dimitrios DROUTSAS

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26 a (new)

(26a) The ECSEL Joint Undertaking should operate in a transparent way, providing all relevant available information to its appropriate bodies as well as promoting its activities accordingly.

2013/12/06
Committee: ITRE

Dimitrios DROUTSAS

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g

(g) to provide access for all stakeholders to a world-class infrastructure for the design and manufacture of electronic components and embedded/cyber-physical and smart systems; promoting the involvement of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in its activities, in line with the objectives of the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme.

2013/12/06
Committee: ITRE

Activities of Dimitrios DROUTSAS related to 2013/0234(NLE)

Shadow reports (1)

Amendments (5)

ParlTrack - 2011-2024