BETA

14 Amendments of Franck PROUST related to 2016/2031(INI)

Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas the adoption of the CU was originally conceived as an intermediate step towards full accession in a relatively short period, and whereas the CU is becoming increasingly less well equippedCU needs to be adapted in order to address the changing dynamics of global trade integration;
2017/01/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas sectors that are currently excluded from the customs union, such as agriculture, services and public procurement, are important, and whereas the sensitive nature of certain products should be honoured and audiovisual and public services should be excluded;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the modernisation of the Customs Union is a purely commercial issue and is in no way connected to the accession negotiations which the European Parliament called to be frozen in November 2016;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the will to start the negotiations to modernise the Customs Union has no connection whatsoever to the process of Turkey joining the EU;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the free movement of technical and management professionals is essential for deeper economic integration in the CU; highlights however that the free movement of above categories is only possible if requirements in terms of security and public order are met, that they don’t represent a risk of irregular migration and that they fulfil the needs of employment in both partners’ job markets; recognises that the need for visas for business travellers is perceived as being restrictive on trade in goods, and even more so in the potential event of inclusion of the provision of services in the CU;
2017/01/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 51 #
6. Considers that visa-free travel or the creation of a long-term multiple-entry visa for business travellers would have a positive impact on bilateral trade, provided that security, public order and migration requirements are fully met;
2017/01/26
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) the strengthening of trade relations between the EU and Turkey should be set against the background of the common will of the parties to share the set of values and principles laid down in the EU's founding treaties, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and to work together to implement them fully and comprehensively; what is more, as an EU external policy, the EU's trade policy must help to protect and promote the values on which the EU is founded, such as democracy, the rule of law, and respect for human rights, fundamental rights and freedoms;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point iii
(iii) with a view to the start of the negotiations on the trade and customs aspects of EU-Turkey relations, the economic, social, political and legal conditions under which they are to take place and which, in any case, will determine the effects of those negotiations on citizens' lives, should be specifically and carefully considered;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point vi
(vi) in order to enable Turkey to become more involved in the decision- making process related to the EU's trade policy, and provided there is significant progress in terms of convergence and legislative harmonisation, it would be helpful to allow Turkey access as an observer;deleted
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point vii
(vii) in relation to the negotiation of trade agreements between the EU and third countries in which Turkey does not participate, methods of involvement that respect the sovereignty and negotiating independence of the EU need to be considered;deleted
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point i
(i) when major sectors such as agriculture, services and public procurement are included in the new framework for trade relations between the EU and Turkey, it is important that the new structure is defined on the basis of Articles 207 and 218 TFEU and, at the same time, that the sensitive nature of certain products is honoured and that audiovisual and public services are excluded from the framework;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point i
(i) when major sectors such as agriculture, services and public procurement are included in the new framework for trade relations between the EU and Turkey, it is important that the new structure is defined on the basis of Articles 207 and 218 TFEU;Does not affect the English version.)
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iv a (new)
(iva) the agricultural products in question should be identified, transitional periods and appropriate quotas should be laid down for the most sensitive products, and in some cases such products should be excluded;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iv b (new)
(ivb) takes the view that the recognition and protection of geographical indications must be included owing to their economic importance and their significance in terms of retaining know- how, particularly for SMEs;
2017/03/02
Committee: INTA