7 Amendments of Mikael GUSTAFSSON related to 2011/2273(INI)
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas Daphne is an extremely important instrument for raising visibility about the issue of violence against women and providing the possibility for women's organisations and other engaged stakeholders to develop their work and concrete actions in this field;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas in the current situation of economic crisis and budgetary austerity, women have less resources to be safe, to flee, and to protect themselves and their children from male violence; and whereas it is even more important to avert also the direct financial impact that violence against women and children has on the judiciary and on health and social services; whereas, also,it is important in this context to ensure that funding for national programmes is likely to beand NGOs are not cut;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas although an individual measure by itself will not be able to stop gender- based violence, which is a structural phenomenon linked to the unequal distribution of power between women and men in our society, it is possible to reduce significantly the incidence thereof by combining various actions in the fields of education, gender equality, awareness- raising, health, and among the police and the judiciary,;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the Commission proposes the DAPHNE III programme, the gender equality and non-discrimination sections of the PROGRESS Programme, and the Fundamental Rights and Citizenship Programme to be streamlined into ‘Rights and Citizenship’ Programme in the 2014-2020 financial period; whereas combating violence against women is not mentioned among the objectives of the Commission’s proposal; whereas the proposed budget of the new programme is smaller than those of the current programmes; whereas the proposal does not guarantee the predictability of funding for its objectives;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Wishes to see the programme's objectives, in particular combating violence against women, retained in the 20134–2020 period, its funding held at a level among the objectives of the new Rights and Citizenship Programme, its funding increased comparabled to that of the earlier programmes and its profile within the new- generation programme remain high, bearing in mind its successes and its popularity, and the need to step up EU commitments to fight violence against women;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 2 a (new)
Paragraph 3 – indent 2 a (new)
– finding solutions to the problems experienced by the recipients of DAPHNE funding, in particular to ease the administrative burden and solve the problems in the financial management that have prevented many NGOs from proposing DAPHNE projects,
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Hopes that in the future it will still be possible for a large number ofCalls for the Commission to ensure that in the future a large part of the programme funding remain targeted at beneficiaries representing smaller NGOs to be involved in partnerships of associationsworking together, as they often play a major role in identifying less well-known, taboo or new problems and in finding innovative ways to tackle them;