BETA

Activities of Kent JOHANSSON related to 2011/0276(COD)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund covered by the Common Strategic Framework and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2011/0276(COD)
Documents: PDF(351 KB) DOC(801 KB)

Amendments (18)

Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 9
9. The Commission and the Member States shall ensure the effectiveness of the CSF Funds, in particular through monitoring, reporting and evaluation, and transparency in the selection process by stressing the need for justifications to be made public.
2012/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
The Member States and the Commission shall ensure that equality between men and women and the integration of gender perspective is promoted in the preparation and, implementation and evaluation of programmes.
2012/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 4 – paragraph 9
9. The Commission and the Member States shall ensure the effectiveness of the CSF Funds, in particular through monitoring, reporting and evaluation, and transparency in the selection processes by stressing the need for justifications to be made public.
2012/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 7 – paragraph 1
The Member States and the Commission shall ensure that equality between men and women and the integration of gender perspective is promoted in the preparation and, implementation and evaluation of programmes.
2012/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) a summary analysis of the ex ante evaluations of the programmes justifying the selection of the thematic objectives and the indicative allocations of the CSF Funds, and distribution of responsibilities;
2012/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall assess the consistency of programmes with this Regulation, the Fund-specific rules, their effective contribution to the thematic objectives and the Union priorities specific to each CSF Fund, the Common Strategic Framework, the Partnership Contract, the country-specific recommendations under Article 121(2) of the Treaty and the Council recommendations adopted under 148(4) of the Treaty, taking account of the ex ante evaluation. The assessment shall address, in particular, the adequacy of the programme strategy, the corresponding objectives, indicators, targets and the allocation of budgetary resources. The decision should be preceded by a transparent process.
2012/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) community-led, by local action groups composed of representatives of public and private local socio-economic interests, where at the decision-making level neither the public sector nor any single interest group shall represent more than 49 % of the voting rights; gender equality should be pursued in the compilation of the group.
2012/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The monitoring committee shall be composed of representatives of the managing authority and intermediate bodies and of representatives of the partners. Each member of the monitoring committee shall have a voting right. Gender equality should be pursued in the compilation of the committee.
2012/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 92 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall appraise the major project on the basis of the information referred to in Article 91 in order to determine whether the proposed support from the Funds is justified. The decision should be preceded by a transparent process.
2012/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) a summary analysis of the ex ante evaluations of the programmes justifying the selection of the thematic objectives and the indicative allocations of the CSF Funds;, and distribution of responsibilities.
2012/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Its composition shall be decided by the Member State in agreement with the managing authority, respecting the principle of partnership and the promotion of gender equality in its compilation.
2012/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 143 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Coordination Committee of the Funds. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. Gender equality should be pursued in the compilation of the committee.
2012/06/05
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall assess the consistency of programmes with this Regulation, the Fund-specific rules, their effective contribution to the thematic objectives and the Union priorities specific to each CSF Fund, the Common Strategic Framework, the Partnership Contract, the country-specific recommendations under Article 121(2) of the Treaty and the Council recommendations adopted under 148(4) of the Treaty, taking account of the ex ante evaluation. The assessment shall address, in particular, the adequacy of the programme strategy, the corresponding objectives, indicators, targets and the allocation of budgetary resources. The decision should be preceded by a transparent process.
2012/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) community-led, by local action groups composed of representatives of public and private local socio-economic interests, where at the decision-making level neither the public sector nor any single interest group shall represent more than 49 % of the voting rights; gender equality should be pursued in the compilation of the group.
2012/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – Article 42 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The monitoring committee shall be composed of representatives of the managing authority and intermediate bodies and of representatives of the partners. Each member of the monitoring committee shall have a voting right. Gender equality should be pursued in the compilation of the committee.
2012/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – Article 92 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall appraise the major project on the basis of the information referred to in Article 91 in order to determine whether the proposed support from the Funds is justified. The decision should be preceded by a transparent process.
2012/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – Article 97 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Its composition shall be decided by the Member State in agreement with the managing authority, respecting the principle of partnership and promoting gender equality in its compilation.
2012/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – Article 143 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Coordination Committee of the Funds. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. Gender equality should be pursued in the compilation of the committee.
2012/05/08
Committee: ITRE