BETA

48 Amendments of Anthea McINTYRE related to 2011/0288(COD)

Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Where a Member State accredits more than one paying agency, it is important that it designates a single coordinating body to ensure consistency in the management of the funds, to provide liaison between the Commission and the various accredited paying agencies and to ensure that the information requested by the Commission concerning the operations of several paying agencies is made rapidly available. The coordinating body should also be responsible for ensuring that remedial action is taken and that the Commission is kept informed of the follow-up and it should ensure homogeneous application of commoninternationally accepted rules and standards.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Only paying agencies accredited by the Member States offer reasonable assurance that the necessary checks have been carried out before granting Union aid to beneficiaries. It should therefore be explicitly laid down that only expenditure effected by accredited paying agencies can be reimbursed from the Union budget, and that these checks shall be carried out on the basis of single integrated sample.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) Budget discipline also demands a continuous examination of the medium- term budget situation. The Commission, when submitting the draft budget for a given year, should therefore present its forecasts and analyses to the European Parliament and the Council and propose, if necessary, appropriate measures to the legislator. Furthermore, the Commission should make full use of its management powers at all times to ensure compliance with the annual ceiling and, if necessary, propose appropriate measures to the European Parliament and to the Council or to the Council to redress the budget situation. If, at the end of a budget year, the annual ceiling cannot be complied with as a result of the reimbursements requested by the Member States, the Commission should be able to take measures allowing provisional distribution of the available budget, taking into account a margin of EUR 300 000 000 below that ceiling, among the Member States in proportion to their requests for reimbursement not yet paid, as well as compliance with the ceiling fixed for the year concerned. Payments for that year should be charged to the following budget year and the total amount of Union financing per Member State should be definitively established, as should compensation between Member States in order to comply with the established amount.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) When implementing the budget, the Commission should operate a monthly early-warning and monitoring system for agricultural expenditure, so that, if there is a risk of the annual ceiling being exceeded, the Commission may at the earliest opportunity take the appropriate measures under the management powers at its disposal and propose other measures if those measures appear to be insufficient, taking into account the margin laid down in Recital (19). A periodic report by the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council should compare the evolution of the expenditure effected in relation to the profiles so far and give an assessment of the foreseeable implementation for the remainder of the budget year.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) The rural development programmes are financed from the Union budget on the basis of commitments in annual instalments. Member States should be able to draw on the Union funds provided for as soon as they begin the programmes. Member States may indicate to the Commission within two months of this decision that it does not wish to receive a pre-financing amount. A suitably restricted prefinancing system ensuring a steady flow of funds so that payments to beneficiaries under the programmes are made at the appropriate time is therefore needed.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) The main elements of that integrated system and, in particular, the provisions concerning a computerised database, an identification system for agricultural parcels, aid applications or payment claims and a system for the identification and recording of payment entitlements should be maintained. Member States may make appropriate use of technology when setting up these systems.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
(53) Statutory management requirements need to be fully implemented by Member States in order to become operational at farm level and ensure the necessary equal treatment between farmers. The Commission should issue guidelines on the interpretation of the rules on animal identification and registration for cross compliance purposes. Such guidelines should reflect, particularly in the case of electronic systems, that 100% accuracy is often not possible and therefore some tolerance should be built into guidelines. Guidelines should, where appropriate, such as in the case with electronic systems, provide for flexibility at farm level in order to strike the necessary balance between safeguarding the spirit of the legislation and applying proportionate administrative penalties only in the case of non-compliance directly and unequivocally attributable to the beneficiaries, in particular in respect of repeated failure of the technology in use.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
(54) As regards Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy28 the provisions will only be operational under cross compliance when all Member States will have fully implemented them in particular with clear obligations for farmers. According to the Directive the requirements at farm level will be applied at the latest by 1 January 2013.deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57 a (new)
(57a) Member States should be required to report annually about the implementation and results of the cross compliance and the greening measures. On the basis of the national reporting the European Commission shall submit an annual report to the European Parliament regarding the effect of these measures on agricultural production and their environmental impact in the Member States.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Paying agencies shall be dedicated departments or bodies of the Member States responsible for the management and control of expenditure referred to in Article 4(1) and Article 5.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
With the exception of payment, tThe execution of thoese tasks may be delegated.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The certification body shall be a public or private audit body designated by the Member State which shall provide an opinion, drawn up in accordance with internationally accepted audit standards, on the management declaration of assurance covering the completeness, accuracy and veracity of the annual accounts of the paying agency, the proper functioning of its internal control system, the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions, as well as the respect of the principle of sound financial management.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, lay down rules concerning the status of the certification bodies, the specific tasks, including the checks, which they have to carry out on a single integrated sample as well as the certificates and the reports, together with the documents accompanying them, to be drawn up by those bodies. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 112(3).
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the requirements or actions related to climate change mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity, protection of water, animal and plant disease notification and innovation at minimum as laid down in Annex I to this Regulation;deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the sustainable development of the economical activity of the small farms as defined by the Member States and at least of the farms participating in the small farmers scheme referred to in Title V of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx[DP].deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the sustainable development of the economical activity of holdings other than those referred to in paragraph (2)(d);the small farms as defined by the Member States, of the farms participating in the small farmers scheme referred to in Title V of Regulation (EU) no xxx/xxx[DP] and of other holdings
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(ba) the minimum requirements or actions in the field of climate change mitigation and adaption, biodiversity, protection of water, animal and plant disease notification and innovation, as laid down in Annex 1 to this regulation
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. With a view to ensuring that the annual ceilings set out in the Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx [MFF] for the financing of the market related expenditure and direct payments are respected, an adjustment rate of the direct payments shall be determined when the forecasts for the financing of the measures financed under that subceiling for a given financial year indicate that the applicable annual ceilings, taking into account a margin of EUR 300 000 000 below that ceiling, will be exceeded.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 6
6. Before applying this Article, account shall first be taken of the amount authorised by the budget authority for the Reserve for crises in the agricultural sector referred to in point 14 of the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management.deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
2. If, on drawing up the draft budget for financial year N, there appears to be a risk that the amount referred to in Article 16 for financial year N will be exceeded, taking account of the margin laid down in Article 25 (1) of this Regulation, the Commission shall propose to the European Parliament and the Council or to the Council the measures necessary to ensure compliance with that amount.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29
Without prejudice to the eligibility for support under Article 29 and 30(2) of Regulation (EU) No RD/xxx, expenditure financed under the EAFRD shall not be subject of any other financing under the EU budget.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. Following the Commission decision approving the programme, an initial prefinancing amount for the whole programming period shall be paid by the Commission, unless the Member State concerned notifies the Commission within 2 months of the decision that it does not wish to receive a pre-financing amount. This initial pre-financing amount shall represent 4% of the EAFRD contribution to the programme concerned. It may be split into a maximum of three instalments depending on budget availability. The first instalment shall represent 2% of the EAFRD contribution to the programme concerned.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall assess the amounts to be excluded on the basis of the gravity of the non-conformity recorded. It shall take due account of the nature and gravity of the infringement and of the financial damage caused to the Unionamounts excluded shall be based on an assessment of the risk to the Agricultural Funds consequent on the infringement.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall base its financial corrections on individual cases of irregularity identified, or by taking account of the systemic nature of the irregularity to determine whether an extrapolated or flat rate correction should be applied. Flat rate corrections shall only be applied where it is impossible, due to the nature of the case, to either identify the extent and amount of the irregularity found or to extrapolate the amount to be corrected
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
If agreement is not reached, the Member State may request opening of a procedure aimed at reconciling each party's position within four months. A report of the outcome of the procedure shall be given to the Commission, which shall examine it before deciding on any refusal of financingtake into account the recommendations of the report before deciding on any refusal of financing. The Commission shall give reasons if it does not decide to follow the recommendations in the report.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the conformity clearance provided for in Article 54 with regard to the measures to be taken in connection with the adoption of the decision and its implementation, including the information exchange between the Commission and the Member States and, the rates of cofinancing corrections to be applied, the deadlines to be respected as well as the conciliation procedure provided for in that Article, including the establishment, tasks, composition and working arrangements of the conciliation body.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 2
2. As regards the on-the-spot checks, the authority responsible shall draw its check sample from the entire population of applicants comprising, where appropriate, a random part and a risk-based part in order to obtain a representative error rate, while targeting also highest errorthe areas in which the risk of error is highest. When selecting the sample for checks, the Member State may take account of the following factors: – the size of the sums involved; – the outcome of earlier audits of the management and control systems; – voluntary participation in management schemes certified on the basis of recognised international standards.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Member States may reduce checks where the error rates are at an acceptable level.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the rules on the minimum level of on- the-spot checks, which shall be set at the rate of 1% for schemes covered by a operational IACS or, in other cases, at the minimum rate necessary for an effective management of the risks, as well as the conditions under which Member States have to increase such checks, or may reduce them where the management and control systems function properly and the error rates are at an acceptable level;error rates are at an acceptable level, including time limits by which the Commission should respond to an indication that the MS intends to reduce its on-the-spot checks
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States may make appropriate use of technology when setting up their 'integrated system'.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) a single system to record the identity of each beneficiary of the support referred to in Article 68(2) who submits an aid application or a payment claim.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may set up decentralised databases on condition that these, and the administrative procedures for recording and accessing data, are designed homogeneously throughout the territory of the Member State and are compatible with one another in orderin such a way as to allow for cross- checks.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 1
The identification system for agricultural parcels shall be established on the basis of maps or land registry documents or other cartographic references. Use shall be made of computerised geographical information system techniques, including aerial or spatial orthoimagery, with a homogenous standard guaranteeing accuracy at least equivalent to cartography at a scale of 1:510,000.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) a farmer does not have to declare his agricultural parcels with landscape features or buffer strips. That farmer shall however indicate in his application that he has these agricultural parcels at his disposal and shall, at the request of the competent authorities, indicate their location.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States may decide that an aid application or a payment claim that fulfils the requirements laid down in Paragraph 1 is to remain valid for a number of years provided that beneficiaries concerned are under the obligation to report any change to the information they first submitted.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 481 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 74 – paragraph 1
The single system to record the identity of each beneficiary of support referred to in Article 68(2) shall guarantee that all aid applications and payment claims submitted by the same beneficiary can be identified as such.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 75 – paragraph 1
1. In accordance with Article 61, Member States, through the paying agencies or the bodies delegated by them, shall carry out administrative checks on the aid application to verify the eligibility conditions for the aid. Those checks shall be supplemented by on-the-spot checks whose purpose shall be to monitor compliance with the provisions of the aid schemes and the level of inherent risk and whose number shall be adjusted in the light of inherent and control risks.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 543 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 91 – paragraph 3
3. For the purpose of this Title ‘holding’ means all the production units and areas managed by the beneficiary referred to in Article 92 situated within the territory of the same Member State.deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 553 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 92 – paragraph 2
However, Article 91 shall not apply to beneficiaries participating in the small farmers scheme referred to in Title V of Regulation (EU) No xxx/xxx[DP] and to the beneficiaries receiving aid under Article 29(9) of Regulation (EU) No RD/xxx.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 3
Directive 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy will be considered as being part of Annex II once this Directive is implemented by all Member States and the obligations directly applicable to farmers have been identified. In order to take account of those elements the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 111 for the purpose of amending the Annex II within 12 months starting at the moment the last Member State has notified the implementation of the Directive to the Commission.deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 609 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall carry out on-the- spot checks to verify whether a beneficiary complies with the obligations laid down in this Title. Member States shall submit an annual report about the implementation and the results of the cross compliance and greening measures. The European Commission shall submit an annual report to the European parliament regarding the effects of these measures on agricultural production and on their environmental impact in the Member States.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 615 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The penalty provided for in Article 91 shall be applied when the rules on cross compliance are not complied with at any time in a given calendar year (hereinafter referred to as ‘the calendar year concerned’), and the non-compliance in question is the result of a wilful act or omission which is directly attributable to the beneficiary who submitted the aid application or the payment claim in the calendar year concerned.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 652 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. By way of derogation from paragraph 3, Member States may convert the amount of aid expressed in euro into the national currency on the basis of the average of a maximum of the thirty most recent exchange rates set by the Member States' national central bank or the European Central Bank prior to 1 October of the year for which aid is granted.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 725 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II — Main Issue "Soil and carbon stock" — GAEC 6
Maintenance of soil organic matter level through appropriate practices including ban on burning arable stubble
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 734 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II — Main Issue "Biodiversity" — SMR 2 — last column
Article 3(1), Article 3(2)(b), Article 4 (1), (2) and (4), Article 5(a), (b), (d)
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 742 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II — Main Issue "Biodiversity" — SMR 3 — last column
Article 6 (1) and (2), Article 13(1)(a)
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 749 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II — Main Issue "Landscape, minimum level of maintenance" GAEC 8
Retention of landscape features, including where appropriate, hedges, ponds, ditches, trees in line, in group or isolated, field margins and terraces, and including a ban on cutting hedges and trees during the bird breeding and rearing season and possible measures for avoiding invasive species and peststake all reasonable steps to avoid encroachment of unwanted vegetation, such as invasive species on agricultural land.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 757 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II — Main Issue "Identification and registration of animals" SMR 6 —last column
Articles 3, 4 and 5
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI