[ParlTrack]

2013/2238(DEC)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7

7. ~~Regret~~Observes that one contract related to the design of a financial database was subdivided into four lots of EUR 60 000 each, which were all directly awarded to two companies; is of the opinion that given the total value of the services to be procured for the same project (EUR 240 000), an open or restricted procedure should have been applied and that the related commitments and payments are thus irregular; acknowledges that according to the response provided by the Authority, the four lots concerned were awarded in full compliance with the procurement procedure for low value contracts of Article 129(1) of the Implementing Rules of the Financial Regulation;

2014/02/26
Committee: CONT

2013/2196(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)

Fa. whereas Parliament’s annual discharge procedure provides added value, involving as it does a thorough examination of the accounts, the object being to enable Parliament to fulfil its responsibility to Union citizens and to act with complete transparency by giving them a detailed insight into its financial management; whereas, secondly, it affords an opportunity for self-criticism and to do better in those areas in which there is still room for improvement in terms of quality, efficiency, and effectiveness in the management of public finances and hence of taxpayers’ money;

2014/02/28
Committee: CONT

2013/2196(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8

8. Points out the high level of carry-overs into 2012 (EUR 244 600 38423[1]) and ~~calls for the improved~~urges that the planning of expenditure be improved; __________________ 23 Automatic carry-overs: EUR 222 900 384, non-automatic carry-overs: EUR 21 700 000.

2014/02/28
Committee: CONT

2013/2196(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 b (new)

48b. Calls on the administration to apply further smart cost-cutting measures, to enable savings to be made without impairing the effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of parliamentary activities;

2014/02/28
Committee: CONT

2013/2196(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49 d (new)

49d. Points out that over 1 500 members of Parliament’s staff have children enrolled at the European Schools; and maintains that Parliament has to play a leading role within the organisational structure of the Schools;

2014/02/28
Committee: CONT

2013/2196(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Subtitle and paragraph 53 c (new)

Travel agency 53c. Welcomes the fact that, as called for by the Committee on Budgetary Control, the new travel agency contract, which entered into force on 1 January 2014, allows financial and performance audits to be carried out; notes that the only company to bid for the contract was BCD Travel N.V., the agency which held the previous contract, and that the present contract is to run for two years;

2014/02/28
Committee: CONT

2013/2196(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 58 a (new)

58a. Notes that, on 22 October 2012, the Bureau fundamentally endorsed the concept for the permanent exhibition at the House of European History;

2014/02/28
Committee: CONT

2013/2196(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 63

63. Takes note that repairing the ceiling support frame in Parliament’s Brussels Chamber will involve costs just above EUR 2 million, a figure below the EUR 3 million estimated, and that due to the age of the building, no legal proceedings could subsequently be undertaken; acknowledges that the regular on-going inspection and preventive maintenance policy for Parliament’s buildings introduced in 2012 detected the structural defects in the wooden ceiling beams thus preventing a major disaster, potentially including loss of life and huge damage to the building in question; takes note that it was possible to relocate the services displaced to Parliament’s other buildings, with zone A of the Paul-Henri Spaak (PHS) being temporarily closed and that the Chamber should be available for use again at the beginning of April 2014;

2014/02/28
Committee: CONT

2013/2196(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 66 a (new)

66a. Maintains that Parliament must have the final say in all ICT-related matters;

2014/02/28
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants the Commission ~~discharge/Postpones its decision on granting the Commission~~ discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012;

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Heading 1

~~Agricultural and regional policy, subject to political approval~~deleted

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Heading 1- Subheading 1

LTakes note of the letter of 5 November 2013 from the rapporteur and shadow rapporteurs to the President of the Commission, in which:

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3

3. Notes that, according to the Communication from the Commission on Protection of the European Union budget1, eight Member States are responsible for 90% of the financial corrections in the fields under shared management; __________________ 1deleted COM(2013) 682, 26 September 2013.

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4

4. ~~Recall~~Notes that in the 2012 financial year the rapporteur and shadow rapporteurs for the discharge to the Commission called for more stringent financial corrections to be imposed on those Member States whose ~~audit~~management and monitoring systems display persistent and systematic weaknesses;

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8

8. ~~Stresses that~~Urges the Commission to continue to focus on the application of net financial corrections in the field of agriculture does not yet constitute the anticipated progress, as (a) the Commission’s existing internal rules already stipulate that the duration of conformity procedures must not exceed two yearsas laid down in the internal rules relating to agriculture and ~~(b)~~in the so-called ‘new’ criteria and methodology for applying financial corrections mentioned in Annex I to the Communication refer explicitly to guidelines that will be based on the existing ones adopted by the Commission as long ago as 23 December 1997new rules for cohesion policy for the 2014-2020 period;

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9

9. Notes that it depends on many factors whether the new instrument will lead to more net corrections and hence to a lower error rate in cohesion policy; considers it problematic, moreover, that there are ways in which Member States can avoid net financial corrections (no limit on the replacement of projects until 15 February of year ‘n+1’, no time limit on notification by Member States of their own past errors, protracted objection procedures);deleted

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11

11. Notes furthermore that the audit reports of the Member States, on which the Commission’s risk analysis is based, are themselves often faulty and therefore unreliable; notes furthermore that the Court of Auditors only recently confirmed that ‘(…) the European Commission cannot unquestioningly rely on the results of audits performed by the Member States in relation to EU regional funding appropriations’2; __________________ 2 Press release ECA/13/47 of the Court of Auditors on Special Report 16/2013 on the ‘single audit’, 18 December 2013.deleted

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Heading 1 - Subheading 4

~~Grounds for the political reservation. . .~~deleted

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13

13. ~~Observe~~Regrets that in the 2012 financial year the error rate rose for the third time in succession, partly owing to a change in the methodology used;

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14

14. ~~Is not prepared to accept the situation that for years~~Emphasises that the majority of the errors identified by the Court ought to be have been identified by the Member States themselves; considers, therefore, that in some Member States the audit results and procedures constitute an inadequate basis for assessments and financial corrections by the Commission;

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15

15. Observes that the error rate in the field of rural development is 7.9 %; iexpresses concern~~ed th~~ at the ~~Commission does not anticip~~quality of audits in some Member States an~~y improvement in the situation before 2014, although an action plan was adopted in~~d that the comprehensive action plan drawn up by the Commission will be unable to make any significant impact on the residual error rate until at least the end of 20123;

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17

17. Points out with concern that, in particular ~~that~~, despite decisions on flat-rate corrections, the errors detected in 2006 in France and Portugal were still not fully remedied in 2012; stresses that from 2006 to 2013 direct payments were made whose legality and regularity were not fully guaranteed and highlights that European tax-payers’ money has been paid to final beneficiaries without a legal basis and without being recovered;

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33

~~33. Regards the newly~~ delected ~~Parliament as being in a position to investigate the reservations in the fields of agriculture and regional policy and lift them if appropriate progress is made;~~

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 58

58. Notes that the 2012 accounts record a EUR 1.8 billion financial correction on the 2000-2006 use of cohesion policy funds in Spain, which corresponds to 49 % of the total corrections in 2012; ~~regret~~welcomes and accepts the explanations offered by the Spanish authorities to the Committee on Budgetary Control in respect of this correction and recalls that, in accordance with current rules, the authorities in Spain weare entitled to further funding amounting to EUR 1 390 million;

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 104

104. States with deep concern that the Court found systemic deficiencies in the LPIS audited in Italy and Spain in 2008, 2009 and 2010 and that since 2007 deficiencies were found in the LPIS of 12 Member States1; notes the reply by the Commission and the Spanish authorities to the effect that, despite the limited extent of the deficiencies, an error correction system is being applied, involving the incorporation of an eligibility coefficient into regulation of the next period; __________________ 1 Lithuania, Slovakia, Cyprus, Malta, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, France, Greece, Portugal, Austria, Sweden (see the annual reports of the ECA since 2007).

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 115

115. Notes with concern that the weaknesses detected in 2012 in the above- mentioned Member States were ~~very~~ similar to those found and reported in the six different Member States which were audited in 2011 ~~(Denmark, Spain, Italy, Hungary, Austria and Finland)~~;

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 136

136. For this reason, reserves its position as regards the regularity of transactions and the effectiveness of systems in the common agricultural policy (direct payments and rural development); will lift this reservation only on the basis of a commitment to fully protect the budget of the European Union given by the relevant Commissioners-designate during the parliamentary hearing preceding their appointment as Members of the Commission in 2014 and on condition that convincing plans for doing so are presented;deleted

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 151

151. Stresses that, according to statistics from the 2012 activity report of DG REGIO, risk-affected payments ranged between EUR 755.8 million (minimum) and 1 706.8 million (maximum); observes that, in this context, the Commission expressed 61 reservations for programmes or parts thereof and 25 reputation reservations, primarily concerning Spain, Sweden, European territorial cooperation and the Czech Republic; impresses on the Commission that it needs to continue to pursue the greatest possible simplification in order to avoid to the maximum any possibility of error;

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 157

157. Reserves its final judgment of this policy sector in the light of the above considerations, particularly for the following reasons: (a) it is not clear that the audit authorities of some Member States take their auditing task seriously and that they make lasting improvements to supervisory and control systems; (b) it is not clear that the Commission, on the basis of an independent audit procedure, is performing more audits of final beneficiaries and granting authorities in year ‘n’ in those Member States which have attracted attention because of shortcomings in administrative and audit systems in year ‘n-1’; (c) it is not clear that the Commission itself audits all operational programmes at least once in the course of a programming period; (d) the time limits in adversarial procedures are too long, and (e) it is uncertain whether the operational application of the term ‘serious deficiencies’ will lead to any improvement; calls on the newly elected Parliament to inquire into the weaknesses in regional policy which have been highlighted here during the hearings of the designated members of the new Commission in order to protect the EU budget more effectively;deleted

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 158

~~158. Regards the newly elected Parliament as being in a position to investigate the reservations in the fields of agriculture and regional policy and lift them if appropriate progress is made;~~deleted

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 171

171. Regrets that the 2012 activity report of DG EMPL contains a reservation relating to EUR 68 million of the payments made for the 2007-2013 programming period, pertaining to 27 out of 117 operational programmes (Spain 9, Italy 4, United Kingdom 3) and insists on the need for simplification;

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 175

175. Calls for a policy to reduce youth unemployment which possesses European added value; regards the role of the EU as being in particular to improve infrastructure for vocational training and further training; calls, in this regard, for an ‘honest’ European subsidy policy which focuses far more on transfers of know-how from Member States with low youth unemployment rates to Member States where those rates are high, but without further arousing false expectations and without further making promises on matters for which the European Union cannot assume primary responsibility;deleted

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2195(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 177

177. Observes that European citizens and tax-payers cannot be shown what has been achieved by making payments amounting to billions from the ESF and Structural Funds to combat youth unemployment; draws attention to the fact that those carrying out labour market measures on the ground dispute the alleged failure to keep statistics on them; reminds the Commission of its accountability for the use of European tax revenue for young unemployed people, and considers the results of European subsidy policies to be inadequate, particularly in relation to the expectations which have been aroused in terms of reducing youth unemployment;deleted

2014/02/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2173(INI)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Recital H

H. whereas several years of economic and financial crisis have meant that the European Social Fund’s (ESF) measures are more important than ever as one of the tools for tackling high unemployment, and lessons learned from implementing previous measures will be vital when the new programmes are put in place from 2014;

2014/01/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2173(INI)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)

Ka. whereas older workers account for less than 5 % of participants in the lifelong learning activities of the ESF, which is evidence of lower levels of participation in training programmes but not of a lack of training or qualifications on the part of those workers;

2014/01/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2173(INI)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Recital O

O. whereas the implementation of the ESF must comply with the EU’s Financial Regulations, in particular the fundamental principles of sound financial management, i.e. economy, efficiency and effectiveness;(Does not affect English version.)

2014/01/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2173(INI)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1

1. Regrets the fact that in the OPs for the period 2007-2013, the definition of ‘older workers’ is not used consistently; notes that many MAs do not use in their respective OPs the definition of ‘older workers’ as defined in the Lisbon Agenda, namely any person of working age between 55 and 64 years old, but instead use different age groups;

2014/01/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2173(INI)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4

4. Notes that no priority theme dealing with initiatives for older workers, such as ‘encouraging active ageing and prolonging working lives’, is included in the OPs for the period 2007-2013, mainly because of differing interpretations of the form a priority of this kind should take;

2014/01/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2173(INI)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5

5. Is concerned about the fact that, in the OPs for the period under assessment, ‘older workers’, although identified as a target group, did not always have their own indicators or target values, leading to a situation where it is difficult or even impossible to assess the effectiveness of the measures addressing the needs of older workers; notes that, when indicators are in fact present in projects, they refer mostly to output such as the number of participants, and results rather than to any specific impacts;

2014/01/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2173(INI)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)

9a. Welcomes the fact that the new focus of the Common Strategic Framework funds for the next programming period 2014-2020 is on results, under which any measure proposed must be designed to achieve a specific objective;

2014/01/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2173(INI)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)

9b. Stresses that setting clear priorities in the new programmes with a view to achieving results will enable synergies to be found between the various funds and other sources of financing, thereby helping to ensure that measures to achieve the proposed objectives are as effective as possible at both national and transnational level;

2014/01/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2173(INI)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)

9c. Believes it necessary for the indicators used under the new OPs to include alerts in respect of financial and physical factors, and welcomes the fact that these are subject to special monitoring so that the reasons for any deviation from a given threshold in respect of the programmed objectives is analysed by the evaluation unit in cooperation with the intermediary bodies for the programmes, with a view to determining whether the deviations are caused by temporary situations or structural problems requiring more in-depth analysis or, where necessary, modifications to the programme;

2014/01/27
Committee: CONT

2013/2173(INI)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 d (new)

9d. Believes it also necessary to monitor whether or not changes occur in the socio-economic context and in the national and/or Community priorities, and whether problems arise when the programmes are being implemented which require a programme to be evaluated and substantially modified;

2014/01/27
Committee: CONT

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

~~The Commission shall, by means of an implementing act, establish a~~A list of pests fulfilling the conditions referred to in Article 3(b), (c) and (d) shall be established in respect of the Union territory, referred to as 'list of Union quarantine pests'.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

That list shall be include ~~the pests listed in Part A of Annex I to Directive 2000/29/EC and Section I of Part A of Annex II to that Directive~~d in Annex Ia .

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1

The Commission shall ~~amend the implementing act referred to in paragraph 2~~, under the terms of Article 98, be authorised to adopt delegated acts modifying the annex, where an assessment shows that a pest not listed in that actnnex fulfils the conditions referred to in Article 3(b), (c) and (d) in respect of the Union territory, or a pest listed in that act no longer fulfils one or more of those conditions. In the first case it shall add the pest concerned to the list referred to in paragraph 2, in the second case it shall delete the pest concerned from that list.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3

~~The implementing acts amending the implementing act referred to in paragraph 2 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 99(3).~~ The same procedure shall apply to a repeal or a replacement of the ~~implementing ac~~list referred to in paragraph 2.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1

The Commission shall ~~amend the implementing act referred to in paragraph 2~~, by means of a delegated act, amend the list by amending the scientific name of a pest, where such an amendment is justified by the development of scientific knowledge.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2

~~Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 99(2).~~deleted

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

~~The Commission shall, by means of an implementing act, establish and amend a list of the priority pests, hereinafter: 'list of priority pests'~~A list of the priority pests, hereinafter: 'list of priority pests' shall be established in Annex1b. The Commission shall, under the terms of Article 98, be authorised to adopt delegated acts modifying the list.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

Where the results of an assessment show that a Union quarantine pest fulfils the conditions referred to in paragraph 1, or a pest no longer fulfils one or more of those conditions, the Commission shall ~~amend the implementing ac~~, under the terms of Article 98, be authorised to adopt delegated acts modifying the list referred to in the first subparagraph by adding the pest concerned to, or removing it from, that list.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

As regards priority pests whose presence in one Member state could have impacts for neighbouring Member States, the simulation exercises ~~shall~~may be carried out together by the Member States concerned on the basis of their respective contingency plans.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4

~~4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt~~ delegated acts, in accordance with Article 98, setting out the following: a) the frequencies, contents and format of simulation exercises; b) simulation exercises covering more than one priority pest; c) co-operation between Member States, and of Member States with third countries; d) contents of the reports on simulation exercises provided for in paragraph 3.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

The Commission ~~may, by means of implementing~~shall, under the terms of Article 98, be authorised to adopt delegated acts, to set out measures against specific Union quarantine pests. Those measures shall implement, specifically for each of the pest(s) concerned, one or more of the following provisions:

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 5

5. The ~~implementing~~delegated acts referred to in paragraph 1 may provide that the measures, referred to in points (a) to (j) of paragraph 1, taken by the Member States are to be repealed or amended. Until a measure has been adopted by the Commission, the Member State may maintain the measures that it has employed.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Where a quarantine pest is present in the Union territory but not present in the Member State concerned, ~~and is not a Union quarantine pest,~~ the Commission may, upon application of that Member State pursuant to paragraph 4, recognise the territory of that Member State as a protected zone in accordance with paragraph 3.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point f

~~f) feasible and effective measures are available to prevent its presence on the plants for planting concern~~deleted.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

~~The Commission shall, by means of an implementing act, establish a~~A list setting out the Union quality pests and the specific plants for planting, as referred to in Article 36(d), where appropriate with the categories referred to in paragraph 4 and thresholds referred to in paragraph 5 shall be established. This list shall be contained in Annex Ic (new).

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

That list shall include the pests, and the respective plants for planting, as set out in the following acts: a) Section II of Part A of Annex II of Directive 2000/29/EC; b) points (3) and (6) of Annex I to Council Directive 66/402/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of cereal seed24 and point (3) of Annex II thereto; c) the Annex of Commission Directive 93/48/EEC of 23 June 1993 setting out the schedule indicating the conditions to be met by fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production, pursuant to Council Directive 92/34/EEC25; d) the Annex of Commission Directive 93/49/EEC of 23 June 1993 setting out the schedule indicating the conditions to be met by ornamental plant propagating material and ornamental plants pursuant to Council Directive 91/682/EEC26; e) point (b) of Annex II to Council Directive 2002/55/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of vegetable seed27; f) point (6) of Annex I to Council Directive 2002/56/EC28 of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of seed potatoes and point B of Annex II thereto; g) point (4) of Annex I to Council Directive 2002/57/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants29 and point (5) of Annex II thereto. __________________ 24 25 26 27 28deleted OJ 125, 11.7.1966, p. 2309/66. OJ L 250, 07.10.1993, p. 1. OJ L 250, 07.10.1993, p. 9. OJ L 193, 20.07.2002, p. 33. OJ L 193, 20.07.2002, p. ~~60. 29~~74.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1

The Commission shall amend the ~~implementing act referred to in paragraph 2~~list by means of a delegated act, where an assessment shows that a pest not listed in that act fulfils the conditions referred to in Article 36, a pest listed in that implementing act no longer fulfils one or more of those conditions or where amendments to that list are necessary, as regards categories referred to in paragraph 4 or thresholds referred to in paragraph 5.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – title

~~Prohibi~~Authorisation of introduction of plants, plant products and other objects into the Union territory - special and equivalent requirements

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

The Commission shall adopt an implementing act, containing the plants, plant products and other objects, and the ~~prohibi~~authorisations and containment measures and the third countries concerned~~, as set out in Part A of Annex III to Directive 2000/29/EC~~. The containment measures shall meet special or equivalent requirements.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new)

The criteria for drawing up the abovementioned list shall be established through the adoption of delegated acts.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

In case a plant, plant product or other object, originating in or being dispatched from a third country, poses a phytosanitary risk of an unacceptable level by its likelihood to host a Union quarantine pest, and that risk cannot be reduced to an acceptable level by applying one or more of the measures set out in points 2 and 3 of Section 1 of Annex IV on measures and principles for the management of the risks of pests, the Commission shall amend, as appropriate, the implementing act referred to in paragraph 1~~, to include in it that plant, plant product or other object and the third countries, concerned~~.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

In case a plant, plant product or other object not included in that implementing act does not pose a phytosanitary risk of an unacceptable level, or it poses such a risk but that risk can be reduced to an acceptable level by applying one or more of the measures set out in points 2 and 3 of Section 1 of Annex IV on measures to manage the risks and pathways of quarantine pests, the Commission shall amend that implementing act, as appropriate, to include in it the plant, plant product or other object and the third country concerned. Those measures, along with those referred to in paragraph 1, are hereinafter referred to as ‘special requirements’. Those measures may take the form of specific requirements, adopted in accordance with Article 42(1), for the introduction into the Union territory of particular plants, plant products or other objects, which are equivalent to special requirements for the movement of those plants, plant products or other objects within the Union territory (hereinafter: 'equivalent requirements').

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 3

3. A plant, plant product or other object listed in the implementing act provided for in paragraph 1 ~~shall not~~may be introduced into the Union territory from the third country, concerned by that listing.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41

~~[…]~~deleted

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 1 – introductory part

1. ~~Equivalent requirements, as referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 41(2) shall be set out, by means of an implementing act~~The Commission shall, with a view to drawing-up the list referred to in Article 40, be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 98 in order to establish the equivalent requirements as referred to in Article 40, on request of a particular third country, if all of the following conditions are fulfilled:

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 3

~~3. The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 99(3).~~deleted

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Member States ~~and~~shall ensure that international transport operators ~~shall~~ make information available to passengers concerning the ~~prohibitions, set out pursuant to~~list of plants, plant products and other objects under Article 40~~(3)~~, the requirements, set out pursuant to Article~~s 41(1) and~~ 42(2), and the exemptions, set out pursuant to Article 70(2), as regards the introduction of plants, plant products and other objects into the Union territory.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

That information ~~shall~~may be provided in the form of posters or brochures, which, where appropriate, shall be made available through the internet.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

a) they are grown or produced in areas of third countries in the vicinity of their land border with Member States (hereinafter: '‘third country frontier zones'’);

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – title

~~Exception from prohibitions and r~~Requirements for phytosanitary transit

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

~~By way of derogation from Article 40(3) and Article 41(3),~~ Member States may authorise the introduction of plants, plant products and other objects into, and their passing through, the Union territory to a third country (hereinafter 'phytosanitary transit'), where those plants, plant products and other objects fulfil the following conditions:

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b

b) they are packed and moved in such a way that there is no risk of spreading of Union quarantine pests during their introduction into, and passing through, the Union territory, using an officially-approved phytosanitary seal that serves to guarantee the original packaging and means of transport (sealed lorry) and prevents the shipment being split up, hence providing official assurance of risk-free phytosanitary transit through the EU;

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c

c) they are introduced into, passed through and, without delay, moved out of the Union territory under official control by the competent authorities concerned. and under the supervision of customs officers. The competent authority of the Member State where those plants, plant products or other objects are introduced into, or for the first time moved within, the Union territory shall inform the competent authorities of all other Member States through which those plants, plant products or other objects are to be moved prior to being moved out of the Union territory.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)

(ca) Plants, plant products and other objects in phytosanitary transit through Union territory from one third country to another must satisfy the plant health requirements under Article 40, without prejudice to other applicable plant health rules.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c b (new)

(cb) In accordance with subparagraph (ca), the competent authority of the Member State where those plants, plant products or other objects are introduced into, or for the first time moved within, the Union territory, must perform the documentary check on that introduction and shall be responsible for the sealing of goods pursuant to subparagraph (b).

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c c (new)

(cc) Similarly, the competent authority of the Member State from which the goods are moved out of Union territory shall inform the competent authorities of the Member State into which they have been introduced, and the Member State/s through which they have moved, of the fact that the goods have been moved out of Union territory.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

The competent authority of the Member State where those plants, plant products or other objects are introduced into, or for the first time moved within, the Union territory shall inform the competent authorities of all other Member States through which those plants, plant products or other objects are to be moved prior to being moved out of the Union territory.deleted

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d

d) plants, plant products and other objects listed pursuant to Articles 4~~1(1) and (2).~~0. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout the text.)

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3

Points (a) to (d) shall not apply, however, where the act adopted pursuant to Articles 27(1), 29(1) or 4~~1(1) and (2)~~0 requires proof of compliance in the form of an official mark, as referred to in Article 91(1), or another official attestation, as referred to in Article 93(1). (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout the text.)

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I a (new)

ANNEX Ia List of Union quarantine pests under Article 5(2) That list shall include the pests listed in Part A of Annex I to Directive 2000/29/EC and Section I of Part A of Annex II to that Directive31i. HARMFUL ORGANISMS NOT KNOWN TO OCCUR IN ANY PART OF THE COMMUNITY AND RELEVANT FOR THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY a) Insects, mites and nematodes, at all stages of their development Acleris spp. (non-European species) Aculops fuchsiae Keifer Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire Aleurochantus spp. Amauromyza maculosa (Malloch) Anomala orientalis Waterhouse Anoplophora chinensis (Thomson) Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky) Anoplophora malasiaca (Forster) Anthonomus bisignifer (Schenkling) Anthonomus signatus (Say) Aonidella citrina Coquillet Aphelenchoïdes besseyi Christie (*) Arrhenodes minutus Drury Aschistonyx eppoi Inouye Bemisia tabaci Genn. (non-European populations) known to carry the following viruses: a) Bean golden mosaic virus b) Cowpea mild mottle virus c) Lettuce infectious yellows virus d) Pepper mild tigré virus e) Squash leaf curl virus f) Euphorbia mosaic virus g) Florida tomato virus Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner et Buher) Nickle et al. Carposina niponensis Walsingham Cicadellidae (non-European species) known to carry Pierce’s disease (caused by Xylella fastidiosa), such as: a) Carneocephala fulgida Nottingham b) Draeculacephala minerva Ball c) Graphocephala atropunctata (Signoret) Choristoneura spp. (non-European species) Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) Dendrolimus sibiricus Tschetverikov Diabrotica barberi Smith & Lawrence Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi Barber Diabrotica undecimpunctata undecimpunctata Mannerheim Diabrotica virgifera zeae Krysan & Smith Diaphorina citri Kuway Enarmonia packardi (Zeller) Enarmonia prunivora Walsh Eotetranychus lewisi McGregor Grapholita inopinata Heinrich Heliothis zea (Boddie) Hirschmanniella spp., distinta de Hirschmanniella gracilis (de Man) Luc & Goodey Hishomonus phycitis Leucaspis japonica Ckll. Liriomyza sativae Blanchard Listronotus bonariensis (Kuschel) Longidorus diadecturus Eveleigh & Allen Margarodes, non-European species, such as: a) Margarodes vitis (Phillipi) Margarodes vredendalensis de Klerk c) Margarodes prieskeansis Jakubski Monochamus spp. (non-European species) Myndus crudus Van Duzee Nacobbus aberrans (Thorne) Thorne et Allen Naupactus leucoloma Boheman Numonia pyrivorella (Matsumura) Oligonychus perditus Pritchard et Baker Pissodes spp. (non-European species) Premnotrypes spp. (non-European species) Pseudopityophthorus minutissimus (Zimmermann) Pseudopityophthorus pruinosus (Eichhoff) Radopholus citrophilus Huettel Dickson et Kaplan Rhynchophorus palmarum (L.) Scaphoideus luteolus (Van Duzee) Scirtothrips aurantii Faure Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood Scirtothrips citri (Moultex) Scolytidae spp. (non-European species) Scrobipalpopsis solanivora Povolny Spodoptera eridania (Cramer) Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) Spodoptera litura (Fabricus) Tachypterellus quadrigibbus Say Toxoptera citricida Kirk. Thaumatotibia leucotreta Thrips palmi Karny Tephritidae (non-European species) such as: a) Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) b) Anastrepha ludens (Loew) c) Anastrepha obliqua Macquart d) Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) e) Dacus ciliatus Loew f) Dacus cucurbitae Coquillet g) Dacus dorsalis Hendel h) Dacus tryoni (Froggatt) i) Dacus tsunconis Miyake j) Dacus zonatus Saund. k) Epochra canadensis (Loew) l) Pardalaspis cyanescens Bezzi m) Pardalaspis quinaria Bezzi n) Pterandrus rosa (Karsch) o) Rhacochlaena japonica Ito p) Rhagoletis cingulata (Loew) q) Rhagoletis completa Cresson r) Rhagoletis fausta (Osten-Sacken) s) Rhagoletis indifferens Curran t) Rhagoletis mendax Curran u) Rhagoletis pomonella Walsh v) Rhagoletis ribicola Doane w) Rhagoletis suavis (Loew) Trioza erytreae Del Guercio Unaspis citri Comstock Xiphinema americanum Cobb sensu lato (non-European populations) Xiphinema californicum Lamberti et Bleve-Zacheo b) Bacteria Citrus greening bacterium Citrus variegated chlorosis Erwinia stewartii (Smith) Dye Xanthomonas campestris (all strains pathogenic to Citrus) Xanthomonas campestris pv. oryzae (Ishiyama) Dye and pv. oryzicola (Fang. et al.) Dye Xylella fastidiosa (Well et Raju) c) Fungi Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler (non-European pathogenic isolates) Anisogramma anomala (Peck) E. Müller Apiosporina morbosa (Schwein.) v. Arx Atropellis spp. Ceratocystis fagacearum (Bretz) Hunt Ceratocystis virescens (Davidson) Moreau. Cercoseptoria pini-densiflorae (Hori et Nambu) Deighton Cercospora angolensis Carv. et Mendes Ciborinia camelliae Kohn Chrysomyxa arctostaphyli Dietel Cronartium spp. (non-European species) Diaporthe vaccinii Shaer Endocronartium spp. (non-European species) Elsinoe spp. Bitanc. et Jenk. Mendes Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. albedinis (Kilian et Maire) Gordon Guignardia citricarpa Kiely (all strains pathogenic to Citrus) Guignardia laricina (Saw.) Yamamoto et Ito Guignardia piricola (Nosa) Yamamoto Gymnosporangium spp. (non-European species) Inonotus weiril (Murril) Kotlaba et Pouzar Melampsora farlowii (Arthur) Davis Monilinia fructicola (Winter) Honey Mycosphaerella larici-leptolepis Ito et al. Mycosphaerella populorum G. E. Thompson Phoma andina Turkensteen Phyllosticta solitaria Ell. et Ev. Puccinia pittieriana Hennings Septoria lycopersici Speg. var. malagutii Ciccarone et Boerema Scirrhia acicola (Dearn.) Siggers Stegophora ulmea (Schweinitz: Fries) Sydow & Sydow Thecaphora solani Barrus Tilletia indica Mitra Trechispora brinkmannii (Bresad.) Rogers Venturia nashicola Tanaka et Yamamoto d) Virus and virus-like organisms Elm phlöem necresis mycoplasm Potato viruses and virus-like organisms such as: a) Andean potato latent virus b) Andean potato mottle virus c) Arracacha virus B, oca strain d) Potato black ringspot virus e) Potato spindle tuber viroid f) Potato virus T g) Non-European isolates of potato viruses A, M, S, V, X, and Y (including Y o, Y n and Y e) and Potato leafroll virus Tobacco ringspot virus Tomato ringspot virus Viruses and virus-like organisms of Cydonia Mill., Fragaria L., Malus Mill., Prunus L., Pyrus L., Ribes L., Rubus L. and and Vitis L. such as: a) Blueberry leaf mottle virus b) Cherry rasp leaf virus (American) c) Peach mosaic virus (American) d) Peach phony rickettsia e) Peach rosette mosaic virus f) Peach rosette mycoplasm g) Peach X-disease mycoplasm h) Peach yellows mycoplasm i) Plum line pattern virus (American) j) Raspberry leaf curl virus (American) k) Strawberry latent ‘C’ virus l) Strawberry vein banding virus m) Strawberry witches’ broom mycoplasm n) Non-European viruses and virus-like organisms of Cydonia Mill., Fragaria L., Malus Mill., Prunus L., Pyrus L., Ribes L., Rubus L. and Vitis L. Viruses transmitted by Bemisia tabaci Genn., such as: a) Bean golden mosaic virus b) Cowpea mild mottle virus c) Lettuce infectious yellows virus d) Pepper mild tigré virus e) Squash leaf curl virus f) Euphorbia mosaic virus g) Florida tomato virus Beet curly top virus (non-European isolates) Black raspberry latent virus Blight and blight-like Cadang-Cadang viroid Cherry leafroll virus (*) Chrysanthemum stem necrosis virus Citrus mosaic virus Citrus tristeza virus (non-European isolates) Leprosis Little cherry pathogen (non-European isolates) Naturally spreading psorosis Palm lethal yellowing mycoplasm Prunus necrotic ringspot virus (**) Satsuma dwarf virus Tatter leaf virus Witches’ broom (MLO) e) Parasitic plants Arceuthobium spp. (non-European species) HARMFUL ORGANISMS KNOWN TO OCCUR IN THE COMMUNITY AND RELEVANT FOR THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY a) Insects, mites and nematodes, at all stages of their development Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte Globodera pallida (Stone) Behrens Globodera rostochiensis (Wollenweber) Behrens Meloidogyne chitwoodi Golden et al. (all populations) Meloidogyne fallax Karssen Opogona sacchari (Bojer) Popillia japonica Newman Rhizoecus hibisci Kawai & Takagi Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) b) Bacteria Clavibacter michiganensi (Smith) Davis et al. ssp. sepedonicus (Spieckermann et Kotthoff) Davis et al. Pseudomonas solanacearun (Smith) Smith c) Fungi Melampsora medusae Thümen Synchytrium endobioticum (Schilhersky) Percival d) Virus and virus-like organisms Apple proliferation mycoplasm Apricot chlorotic leafroll mycoplasm Pear decline mycoplasm e) other Pomacea spp. __________________ 31i OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p.1

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I b (new)

ANNEX I(b) List of Union priority pests under Article 6(2) a) Insects, mites and nematodes, at all stages of their development Anoplophora chinensis (Thomson) Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky) Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner et Buher) Nickle et al. Cicadellidae (non-European species) known to carry Pierce’s disease (caused by Xylella fastidiosa), such as: a) Carneocephala fulgida Nottingham b) Draeculacephala minerva Ball c) Graphocephala atropunctata (Signoret) Diaphorina citri Kuway Thaumatotibia leucotreta Trioza erytreae Del Guercio b) Bacteria Citrus greening bacterium Pseudomonas solanacearun (Smith) Smith Pseudomonas syringae Xanthomonas campestris (all strains pathogenic to Citrus) Xanthomonas campestris pv. oryzae (Ishiyama) Dye and pv. oryzicola (Fang. et al.) Dye Xylella fastidiosa (Well et Raju) c) Fungi Elsinoe spp. Bitanc. et Jenk. Mendes gibberella circinata Guignardia citricarpa Kiely (all strains pathogenic to Citrus) Hypoxylon mammatum Phythoptora ramorum Trechispora brinkmannii (Bresad.) Rogers Venturia nashicola Tanaka et Yamamoto d) Virus and virus-like organisms Potato viruses and virus-like organisms such as: a) Andean potato latent virus b) Andean potato mottle virus c) Arracacha virus B, oca strain d) Potato black ringspot virus e) Potato spindle tuber viroid f) Potato virus T g) Non-European isolates of potato viruses A, M, S, V, X, and Y (including Y o, Y n and Y e) and Potato leafroll virus Grapevine flavescence dorée MLO e) other Pomacea spp.

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2013/0141(COD)

Pilar AYUSO, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I c (new)

ANNEX I(c) List of quality pests under Article 37(2) INSECTS Acanthoscelides obtectus Sag. Pelargonium flower break carmovirus Aceria essigi. Aculops fockeui. Agromyzidae Aleurodidae, particularly Bemisia tabaci Aleurothrixus floccosus (Mashell) Anarsia lineatella. Aphelenchoides spp. Blastophaga spp. Bruchus affinis Froel. Bruchus atomarius L. Bruchus pisorum L. Bruchus rufimanus Boh. Cacoecimorpha pronubana Cecidophyopsis ribis Circulifer haematoceps Circulifer tenellus Scale insects, particularly Epidiaspis leperii, Pseudaulacaspis pentagona, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus Daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Fitch) Diarthronomia chrysanthemi Ditylenchus destructor Thorne Ditylenchus dipsaci Epichoristodes acerbella Epidiaspis leperii Eriophis avellanae Eriophyes similis Eriosoma lanigerum Eumerus spp. Eusophera pinguis Eutetranychus orientalis Klein Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) Lepidoptera Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard) Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) Meloidogyne spp. Merodon equestris Myzus ornatus Otiorrhynchus sulcatus Parabemisia myricae (Kuwana) * Parasaissetia nigra (Nietner) Paysandisia archon (Burmeister) Pratylenchus penetrans Pratylenchus spp. Pseudaulacaspis pentagona Quadraspidiotus perniciosus Quadraspidiotus perniciosus Radopholus similis (Cobb) Thorne Rhizoglyphidae Rhyacionia buoliana Rhyzoglyphus spp. Rotylenchus robustus Salssetia oleae Sciara Tarsonemidae * Tetranychus urticae Thysanoptera Tylenchulus semipenetrans Pelargonium line pattern virus BACTERIA Agrobacterium rhizogenes Agrobacterium tumefaciens * Clavibacter michiganensis spp. insidiosus (McCulloch) Davis et al. Clavibacter michiganensis spp. michiganensis (Smith) Davis et al. Corynebacterium sepedonicum Erwinia amylovora (Burr.) Winsi. et al. Erwinia carotovora subsp. Carotovora Erwinia chrysanthemi Pseudomonas caryophylli (Burkholder) Starr et Burkholder Pseudomonas marginata Pseudomonas solanacearum Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea Pseudomonas syringae pv. mors prunorum Pseudomonas syringae pv. persicae (Prunier et al.) Young et al. Pseudomonas syringae pv. savastanoi Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Rhodococcus fascians Xanthomonas campestris pv. Begoniae Xanthomonas campestris pv. corylina Xanthomonas campestris pv. juglandi Xanthomonas campestris pv. Pelargonii Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni (Smith) Dye Xanthomonas campestris pv.phaseoli (Smith) Dye Xanthomonas campestris pv.vesicatoria (Doidge) Dye Xanthomonas fragariae Kennedy et King Xylophilus ampelinus Vitis (Panagopoulos) Willems et al. FUNGI Stem rot pathogens (Botrytis spp., Pythium spp.) Fusarium oxisporum f. sp. lilii Fusarium oxisporum sp. gladioli Rhizoctonia spp. Alternaria dianthicola Armillariella mellea Ceratocystis fimbriata f. sp. platani Walter Chondrostereum purpureum Claviceps purpurea Cryphonectria parasitica (Murrill) Barr Curvularia trifolii Cylindrocarpon destructans Diaporthe phaseolorum var. caulivora and var. sojae Didymella applanata Didymella ligulicola (Baker, Dimock et Davis) v. Arx Exosporium palmivorum Fusarium fujikuroi Fusarium oxisporum f. sp. dianthi Fusarium oxisporum sp. chrysanthemi Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. narcissi Fusarium spp. Gliocladium wermoeseni Graphiola phoenicis Helminthosporium Lophodermium seditiosum Mycosphaerella dianthi Nectria galligena Powdery mildew Penicillium gladioli Peronospora rubi Pestalozzia Phoenicis Phialophora cinerescens (Wollenweber) van Beyma Phialophora gregata Phoma tracheiphila (Petri) Kanchaveli et Gikashvili Phyllactinia guttata Phytophthora cactorum Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi Phytophthora spp. Plasmopara halstedii (Farlow) Berl. et de Toni Stem rot: Fusarium spp. and Pythium Puccinia chrysanthemi Puccinia horiana Hennings Puccinia pelargonii zonalis Pythium spp. Rhizoctonia spp. Rhizopus spp. Rosellinia necatrix Scirrhia pini Funk et Parker Sclerotinia spp. Septoria gladioli Slerotium bulborum Synchytrium endobioticum Taphrina deformans Thielaviopsis basicola Tilletia Urocystis gladiolicola Uromyces dianthi Uromyces trasversalis Ustilaginaceae Venturia spp. Verticillium spp VIRUS AND VIRUS-LIKE ORGANISMS Narcissus white streak agent Carnation mottle carmovirus Carnation etched ring caulimovirus Carnation necrotic fleck carmovirus Aster yellow micoplasm Corky pit agent Anarsia lineatella Apple mosaic virus Arabis mosaic virus Fragaria Beet leaf curl virus Black currant infectious variegation Black currant reversion virus Cherry leaf roll virus Chondrostereum purpureum Chrysanthemum stunt viroid Citrus leaf rugose Citrus tristeza virus (European isolates) Citrus vein enation/woody gall Scale insects, particularly Epidiaspis leperii, Pseudaulacaspis pentagona, Quadraspidiotus perniciosus Coniothyrium spp. Tomato aspermy cucumovirus Diplocarpon rosae Diseases that induce in young leaves posorosis and psorosis-like symptoms such as ring-spot, cristacortis, impietratura and concave gum. Eriosoma lanigerum Grapevine flavescence dorée MLO Hazel maculatura lingare MLO Infectious variegation Arabis mosaic nepovirus Peronospora sparsa Phragmidium spp. Plum pox virus Potato stolbur mycoplasm Prune dwarf virus Prunus necrotic ringspot virus Raspberry bushy dwarf virus Raspberry leaf curl virus Raspberry ringspot virus Leaf curl Rosellinia necatrix Citrus leaf rugose Sphaeroteca pannosa Spiroplasma citri Saglio. et al. Strawberry crinkle virus Strawberry green petal MLO Strawberry latent ringspot virus Strawberry mild yellow edge virus Tomato black ring virus Tomato spotted wilt virus Tomato yellow leaf curl virus Pelargonium leaf curl tombusvirus Tospoviruses (Tomato spotted wilt virus, Impatiens necrotic spot virus) Infectious variegation Venturia spp. Verticillium spp. Viroids such as exocortis, caquexia- xyloporosis. Lily symptomless virus Tulipbreaking virus Gladiolus ringspot virus (syn. Narcissus latent virus) Narcissus yellow stripe virus Chrysanthemum B mosaic virus Cucumber mosaic virus Tobacco rattle virus Lily virus x NEMATODES Heterodera rostochiensis OTHER HARMFUL ORGANISMS Cyperus esculentus (truffle) Orobanche (parasitic plant)

2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI

2012/2168(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1

1. Grants its President discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Parliament budget for the financial year 2011; ~~/ Postpones its decision on granting its President discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Parliament budget for the financial year 2011;~~

2013/02/27
Committee: CONT

2012/2168(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22

22. Welcomes the fact that the audit of the Court of Auditors found that the ~~Parliament's~~ supervisory and control systems of administrative expenditure as a whole, that are required by the Financial Regulation, were effective and that~~, as regards~~ the payments of administrative expenditure in 2011~~, the transactions affected by one or more errors are not material to administrative expenditure as a whole~~ were not affected by material errors;

2013/02/27
Committee: CONT

2012/2168(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42

42. Welcomes the fact that the internalisation of the security services ~~will~~is expected to reduce costs in Brussels and Strasbourg by EUR 16 000 000 in the period up to 2015 and by EUR 6 000 000 for each year thereafter; asks the administration for a yearly report with detailed information on the development of the costs of the security service, including the accrued costs for pensions of staff employed for these services, and the measures taken to ensure the scope and quality of the service;

2013/02/27
Committee: CONT

2012/2119(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5

5. Special Report No 7/2012 indicates that although demand for grubbing-up exceeded 350 000 ha its impact was limited by the fixed target of 175 000 ha and at the end only 160 550 ha were grubbed up with the help of EU aid; the Court of Auditors estimates that the grubbing-up scheme finally reduced the vineyard inventory area by around 5 % corresponding to approximately 10,2 million hl of wine withdrawn or 6 % of the usable wine production; points out, however, that far more land – 300 000 ha in all – has been grubbed up since the reform, and that no such aid was provided in respect of around 140 000 ha of that land, a figure that does not appear in the Court of Auditors’ report.

2012/10/18
Committee: CONT

2012/2119(DEC)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11

11. Takes note of the Court of Auditors' concerns on the fact that the EU financed the grubbing-up measure in order to reduce the surplus of wine, while ~~at the same tim~~the restructuring and conversion measure led in certain cases to some increases in vineyard yields; takes the view, however, that greater yields may make the wines more competitive, but strongly encourages the Commission to ensure that an appropriate ~~policy mix is availabl~~strategy is in place to avoid ~~future~~ unbalances;

2012/10/18
Committee: CONT

2011/0294(COD)

Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL, Inés AYALA SENDER, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA, Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO, Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA, Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA, Carmen ROMERO LÓPEZ, Josefa ANDRÉS BAREA, Andrés PERELLÓ RODRÍGUEZ

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1 – indent 1 a (new)

- major airports with more than 1% passenger air traffic within the EU.

2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN

2011/0294(COD)

Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL, Inés AYALA SENDER, Francisco José MILLÁN MON, Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA, Rosa ESTARÀS FERRAGUT, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO, Josefa ANDRÉS BAREA

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 16/33

add the following sea ports to the comprehensive network: – Marín y Ría de Pontevedra – Vilagarcía de Arousa – Gandía – Alcudía – Guía de Isora – Salinetas – Arinaga

2012/10/11
Committee: TRAN

2011/0294(COD)

add the following multimodal platforms to the comprehensive network: – Pontevedra – Zalia – Torrelavega – Júndiz – Monzón – El Vallés – El Prat – El Gorguel – Ciudad Real – Albacete – San Roque – Mérida – Ponferrada/El Bierzo – Castellón – Alicante – Benavente – Zamora – Miranda de Ebro – Burgos – Palencia – Área Central – Aranda de Duero – Soria – Arévalo – Ávila – Segovia

2012/10/11
Committee: TRAN

2011/0294(COD)

Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL, Inés AYALA SENDER, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA, Josefa ANDRÉS BAREA

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 17/33

add the airport of Castellón to the comprehensive network

2012/10/11
Committee: TRAN

2011/0294(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 17/33

add the following rail passenger transport sections to the core network: – Madrid – Toledo – Madrid – Alcázar – Albacete – Murcia – Almería – Málaga – Algeciras (along the coast) – Avilés – Oviedo – Bilbao – Santander – Oviedo – El Ferrol – A Coruña – Castejón – Logroño – Miranda – Mora – Alcázar – Linares – Moreda/Jaén/Córdoba – Ourense – Vigo (via Cercedo) – Ourense – Monforte – Lugo – A Coruña – Palencia – Santander – Segovia – Ávila – Sevilla – Cádiz – Sevilla – Huelva – Portuguese border – Valencia – Alicante (along the coast) – Motilla – Albacete – La Encina – Santiago – Vigo – Portuguese border – Granada – Motril – Antequera – Málaga – Madrid – Ávila – Salamanca – León – Monforte – Torralba – Soria – Castejón – Plasencia – León – Gijón

2012/10/11
Committee: TRAN

2011/0294(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 17/33

add the following rail passenger transport sections to the comprehensive network: – Almendricos – Águilas – Barcelona – Massanet – Barcelona – Puigcerdá – Játiva – Alcoy – Lleida – Manresa – Barcelona – Los Rosales – Zafra – Madrid – Burgos – Villalba – Segovia

2012/10/11
Committee: TRAN

2011/0294(COD)

add the following high-quality road sections to the comprehensive network: – Valladolid – Aranda de Duero – Soria – Ourense – Santiago – Ourense – Guntín – Ponferrada – Ourense – Monforte – Chantada – Astorga – León – Burgos – Burgos – Logroño – Pamplona – Ávila – Salamanca – León – Valladolid – Segovia – Valladolid – Ávila – Maqueda – Toledo – Ocaña – Tarancón – Cuenca – Teruel – Alfajarín – Fraga -Catalayud – Daroca – Alcolea del Pinar – Monreal del Campo – Badajoz – Zafra – Córdoba – Baena – Granada – Huelva – Jabugo – Zafra – Estepa – Lucena – Baena – Jaén – Úbeda – Blanca – Avarán – La Font de la Figuera – Alicante – Alcoy – Játiva – Elche – Cartagena – Vera – Figueras – Puigcerdá – Ávila – Villacastín – San Rafael – Segovia

2012/10/11
Committee: TRAN

2011/0294(COD)

Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA, Teresa JIMÉNEZ-BECERRIL BARRIO, Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA, Francisco José MILLÁN MON, Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 17/33 (new)

to add the following airports to the core network: - Alicante - Gran Canaria - Málaga - Tenerife Sur - Santiago de Compostela

2012/11/08
Committee: TRAN

2011/0281(COD)

Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Pilar AYUSO, María Auxiliadora CORREA ZAMORA, Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 121 – title

Implementation of international and other agreements

2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI

2011/0270(COD)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)

(5a) Taking into account the limited funds available to the programme and the pre- allocation of these funds to the various axes, funding priority should be given to the development of structures with a clear multiplier effect which will benefit further projects and initiatives, thereby adding more value to the investment. Appropriate measures should also be put in place to avoid any possibility of overlap and/or double-financing with other funds or programmes, in particular the European Social Fund.

2012/05/08
Committee: CONT

2011/0270(COD)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12

(12) EURES’ scope should be widened to develop and support targeted mobility schemes at Union level with a view to filling vacancies where labour market shortcomings have been identified. In accordance with Article 47 of the Treaty, the scheme should facilitate mobility among young workers. To enable it to achieve its objectives, it would be advisable for the three axes that make up the programme to retain a degree of financial independence.

2012/05/08
Committee: CONT

2011/0270(COD)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3

3. The Commission may, without exceeding 3% except in duly justified cases, make use of the appropriations referred to in paragraph 1, to finance technical and/or administrative assistance, in particular relating to auditing, outsourcing of translation, meetings of experts, and information and communication activities for the mutual benefit of the Commission and the beneficiaries.

2012/05/08
Committee: CONT

2011/0270(COD)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1

1. The Commission shall take appropriate preventive measures ~~ensuring~~and shall carry out effective checks to ensure that, when actions financed under this Regulation are implemented, the financial interests of the Union are protected against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities, by effective checks and, if irregularities are detected, by the recovery of amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate, by effective, proportional and deterrent penalties, in accordance with Article 325 of the Treaty, Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests and the Financial Regulation.

2012/05/08
Committee: CONT

2011/0270(COD)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new)

1a. In accordance with Article 325 of the Treaty, Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests and the Financial Regulation, if irregularities are detected, the amounts wrongly paid shall be recovered and the Commission may further decide on effective, proportional and deterrent penalties.

2012/05/08
Committee: CONT

2011/0269(COD)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2

(2) The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established by Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for the duration of the Financial Framework from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 to enable the Union to show solidarity towards workers made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation and to provide support for their rapid reintegration into employment. ~~This initial objective of the EGF remains valid~~Given the current state of uncertainty in which many Member States still find themselves, this initial objective of the EGF remains valid, as it enables, albeit on a modest scale, individually tailored services to be provided to workers who have lost their jobs as a result of collective redundancies caused by economic globalisation, which have a major impact at business, sectoral and regional levels.

2012/05/04
Committee: CONT

2011/0269(COD)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3

(3) The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on 'A budget for Europe 2020' recognises the role of the EGF as a flexible fund to support workers who lose their jobs and help them to find another job as rapidly as possible. The Union should continue to provide, for the duration of the Multiannual Financial Framework from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020, specific, one-off support to facilitate the re- integration into employment of redundant workers in areas, sectors, territories or labour markets suffering the shock of serious economic disruption. Given its purpose, which is to provide support in situations of urgency and unexpected circumstances, the EGF should remain outside the Multiannual Financial Framework, thereby equipping the Union with a rapid response mechanism to provide support during unemployment crises.

2012/05/04
Committee: CONT

2011/0269(COD)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3

3. At the initiative of the applicant Member State, a financial contribution may be made, not exceeding 5% of the total costs, for the preparatory, management, information and publicity, control and reporting activities.

2012/05/04
Committee: CONT

2011/0269(COD)

Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1

1. The Commission shall, on the basis of the assessment carried out in accordance with Article 8(3), particularly taking into account the number of targeted workers, the proposed actions and the estimated costs, evaluate and propose as quickly as possible the amount of a financial contribution, if any, that may be made within the limits of the resources available. The amount may not exceed 560% of the total of the estimated costs referred to in Article 8(2)(e) or 675% of these costs in the case of applications submitted by a Member State on the territory of which at least one region at NUTS II level is eligible under the "Convergence" objective of the Structural Funds. The Commission, in its assessment of such cases, will decide whether the 65% co- funding rate is justifiedthat is receiving assistance under the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism or through Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 of 18 February 2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term financial assistance for Member States' balances of payments1. _______________ 1 OJ L 53, 23.2.2002, p. 1.

2012/05/04
Committee: CONT

108 Amendments of Eva ORTIZ VILELLA

ParlTrack - 2011-2024