Activities of Inês Cristina ZUBER related to 2015/2210(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2015 priorities (A8-0307/2015 - Dariusz Rosati) PT
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: implementation of 2015 priorities
Amendments (7)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the single market remains fragmented and the great potential for growdeepening of the single market, often called internal market, emphasized the dismantling of th,e innovation and jobs largely untapped; calls on the Commission and the Member States to honour their commitments and to safeguard the revival of the single market as one of the Union’s main prioritistruments of sovereign regulation of economies, which had significant negative consequences in terms of economic growth, job creation and therefore in the reduction of socioeconomic disparities among the different Member States;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses that the Single Market has not been representing either convergence, cooperation or solidarity, but rather economic domain, development divergence and asymmetries;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the Commission’s new approach to streamlining the European Semester process; lauds, in this context, the Commission’s work on defining CSRs relating to the single market, but calls for more determined efforts to guide and coordinate economic policiRejects any streamline, by the Commission, regarding the European Semester process, which is an instrument that has been imposing the denominated austerity policies in a wide range of Member States and which has led to devastating social-economic consequences; in order to ensure consistent and fair implementation of the economic governance framework across the Member Statesthis context, also rejects the Commission’s work on defining CSRs relating to the single market;
Amendment 29 #
5. Urges the Commission to take additional measures to improve access to finance for SMEs and to ensure an improved business environment, simplify proced, being against, however, to new sources and reduce administrative burdens in the single market; stresses the importance of sound business regulation for the success of the European Fund for Strategic Investmentof funding similar to the ones that led to the 2007/2008´s financial crisis;
Amendment 39 #
7. Emphasises that the European Semester is a great opportunity to urge Member States to step up their efforts towards the digital single market (DSM); welcomes, in this context, the Commission’s communication on the roadmap for completing the DSM; considers it essential to remedy the current fragmentation of national rules on digital services and to build a more innovative and transparent DSM based on sound competition andDigital Single Market is an instrument to defend the liberalization of the digital market as well as the mercantilization of new digital technologies in order to promote the deregulation of trade regarding goods and commodities and the free movement of capital, which, once again, affects the weaker countries in economic terms; in this context, and as in proeviding a high level of accessibility and consumer protectionous phases of the deepening of the single market process, this will contribute to emphasize the economic domain of the multinational companies and the major European powers;