BETA

8 Amendments of Rebecca TAYLOR related to 2011/0438(COD)

Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Other categories of services continue by their very nature to have a limited cross- border dimension, namely what are known as services to the person, such as certain social, health and educational services. These services are provided within a particular context that varies widely amongst Member States, due to different cultural traditions. A specific regime should therefore be established for public contracts for these services, with a higher threshold of EUR 51 000 000. Services to the person with values below this threshold will typically not be of interest to providers from other Member States, unless there are concrete indications to the contrary, such as Union financing for transborder projects. Contracts for services to the person above this threshold should be subject to Union-wide transparency. Given the importance of the cultural context and the sensitivity of these services, Member States should be given wide discretion to organise the choice of the service providers in the way they consider most appropriate. The rules of this directive take account of that imperative, imposing only observance of basic principles of transparency and equal treatment and making sure that contracting authorities are able to apply specific quality criteria for the choice of service providers, such as the criteria set out in the voluntary European Quality Framework for Social Services of the European Union's Social Protection Committee. Member States and/or public authorities remain free to provide these services themselves or to organise social services in a way that does not entail the conclusion of public contracts, for example through the mere financing of such services or by granting licences or authorisations to all economic operators meeting the conditions established beforehand by the contracting authority, without any limits or quotas, provided such a system ensures sufficient advertising and complies with the principles of transparency and non-discrimination.
2012/06/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) In view of the detrimental effects on competition, negotiated procedures without prior publication of a contract notice should only be used in very exceptional circumstances and under the threshold as set out in Article 4 and with adequate justification. This exception should be limited to cases where publication is either not possible, for reasons of force majeure in line with the standing case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, or where it is clear from the outset that publication would not trigger more competition, not least because there is objectively only one economic operator that can perform the contract. Only situations of objective exclusivity can justify the use of the negotiated procedure without publication, where the situation of exclusivity has not been created by the contracting authority itself with a view to the future procurement procedure, and where there are no adequate substitutes, the availability of which should be assessed thoroughly.
2012/06/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) EUR 58 000 000 for public works contracts;
2012/06/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) EUR 13200 000 for public supply and service contracts awarded by central government authorities and design contests organised by such authorities; where public supply contracts are awarded by contracting authorities operating in the field of defence, that threshold shall apply only to contracts concerning products covered by Annex III;
2012/06/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) EUR 2300 000 for public supply and service contracts awarded by sub-central contracting authorities and design contests organised by such authorities.
2012/06/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) EUR 5800 000 for public contracts for social and other specific services listed in Annex XVI.
2012/06/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 71 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may provide that at the, if request ofed by the subcontractor and where the nature of the contract so allows, the contracting authority shall transfer due payments directly to the subcontractor for services, supplies or works provided to the main contractor. In such case, Member States shall put in place appropriate mechanisms permitting the main contractor to object to undue payments. The arrangements concerning that mode of payment shall be set out in the procurement documents.
2012/06/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 84 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Member States that have particular constitutional arrangements which would prevent them from establishing a single independent body, and already have in place a structure of several administrative bodies can retain these arrangements, as long at the bodies concerned fulfill all responsibilities as stated below.
2012/06/29
Committee: JURI