2 Amendments of Rebecca TAYLOR related to 2012/2066(INI)
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that the criteria for defining endocrine disruptors should be based on criteria for defining ‘'adverse effect’' and ‘'endocrine mode of action’'; considers that both these criteria must be weighed up in parallel in order to carry out a comprehensive assessment; considers that proven effects should be assumconsidered to be harmful as long as there is no scientific data to indicate the oppositeat they would come within the WHO "adverse effect" definition; stresses that any possible combination effects should be taken into consideration;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that endocrine disruptors should be regarded as substances for which it is not possible to setany new regulatory framework governing endocrine disruptors should take into account the difficulty of setting a limit value at which effects may occur (‘'non- threshold’' substances) and that any low exposure to suchome substances may entail a risk;