7 Amendments of Jozo RADOŠ related to 2018/0138(COD)
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The establishment of a single competent authority at national level integrating all permit granting procedures (one-stop shop) should reduce the complexity, lower the cost, improve the efficiency and increase the transparency and the speed of adoption of the procedures. It should also enhance the cooperation between Member States where appropriate. The procedures should promote a real cooperation between investors and the single competent authority and should therefore allow for the scoping in the pre-application phase of the permit granting procedure. Such scoping should be integrated in the detailed application outline and follow the procedure set out in Article 5(2) of 2011/92/EU, as amended by Directive 2014/52/EU.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Given the urgency tof completeing the TEN-T core network, the simplification of permit granting procedures should be accompanied by a time limit within which competent authorities responsible should make a comprehensive decision regarding the construction of the project. This time limit should stimulate aensure more efficient handling of procedures and should, under no circumstances, compromise the Union's high standards for environmental protection and public participation.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Cross-border TEN-T infrastructure projects face particular challenges as regards the coordination of permit granting procedures. The European Coordinators, assisted by local and regional authorities, should be empowered to monitor these procedures and facilitate their synchronisation and completion.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Public procurement in cross-border projects of common interest should be conducted in accordance with the Treaty and Directives 2014/25/EU and/or 2014/24/EU. In order to ensure the efficient completion of the cross-border core network projects of common interest, public procurement carried out by a joint entity should be subject to a single national legislation. By way of derogation from the Union public procurement legislation, the applicable national rules should in principle be those of the Member State where the joint entity has its registered office. It should remain possible to define, or the applicable legislation should be defined in an intergovernmental agreement.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. To ensure fast and efficient administrative procedures related to projects of common interest, project promoters and all authorities concerned shall ensure that the most rapid treatment legally possible is given to these projects, including as regards the resources allocated.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b – point i v
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point b – point i v
(iv) major milestones to be accomplished and their deadlines in view of the comprehensive decision to be taken, and the overall scheduled time-frame;
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The European Coordinator referred to in Article 45 of Regulation (EU)² No 1315/2013 and representatives of the local and regional authorities shall be empowered to closely follow the permit granting procedure for cross-border projects of common interest and to facilitate contacts between the involved competent authorities involved.