9 Amendments of Alda SOUSA related to 2011/0276(COD)
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) A performance framework should be defined for each programme with a view to monitoring progress towards the objectives and targets set for each programme over the course of the programming period. The Commission should undertake a performance review in cooperation with the Member States in 2017 and 2019. A performance reserve should be foreseen and allocated in 2019 where milestones set in the performance framework have been attained. Due to their diversity and multi-country character, there should be no performance reserve for ‘European Territorial Cooperation’ programmes. In cases where the shortfall in the achievement of milestones or targets is significant, the Commission should be able to suspend payments to the programme or, at the end of the programming period, apply financial corrections, in order to ensure that the Union budget is not used in a wasteful or inefficient way.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Establishing a closer link between social and territorial cohesion policy and the economic governance of theEuropean Union will ensure that the effectiveness of expenditure under the CSF Funds is underpinned by sound economic policies and that the CSF Funds can, if necessary, be redirected to addressing the economic problems a country is facing. This process has tocan be gradual, starting with amendments to the Partnership Contract and to the programmes in support of Council recommendations to address macroeconomic imbalances and social and economic difficulties. Where, despite the enhanced use of CSF Funds, a Member State fails to take effective action in the context of the economic governance process, the Commission should have the right to suspend all or part of the payments and commitments. Decisions on suspensions should be proportionate and effective, taking into account the impact of the individual programmes for addressing the economic and social situation in the relevant Member State and previous amendments to the Partnership Contract. When deciding on suspensions, the Commission should also respect equality of treatment between Member States, taking into account in particular the impact of the suspension on the economy of the Member State concerned. The suspensions should be lifted and funds be made available again to the Member State concerned as soon as the Member State takes the necessary actionto address social and economic difficulties.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
Recital 58
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 59
Recital 59
(59) As regards the Funds and with a viewdespite trying to ensuringe an appropriate allocation to each category of regions, resources should cannot be transferred betweenfrom less developed, transition and more developed regions except in duly justified circumstances linked to the delivery of one or more thematic objectives and for no more than 2 % of the total appropriation for that category of and transition to more developed regions.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 12 – paragraph 1
Part 2 – article 12 – paragraph 1
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Part 2 – article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 18
Part 2 – article 18
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 20
Part 2 – article 20
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 2 – article 21
Part 2 – article 21