5 Amendments of Martina ANDERSON related to 2015/2353(INI)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for thea full and meaningful involvement of the European Parliament in the interinstitutional debate on the role, structure, goals, priorities and results of the multiannual financial framework (MFF);
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Insists that all expenditure and revenue resulting from decisions taken by, or in the name of, the EU institutions, including borrowing, lending and loan guarantee operations, must be summarised in a document annexed every year to the Draft Budget, providing an overall view of the financial and budgetary consequences of European Union activities; expects that this will ensure full information for citizens and adequate parliamentary control;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers it necessary to reform the system of financing of the MFF, particularly through the creation of new and genuine o; however, considers it imperative that the revision of the forecast of Traditional Own rResources; urges the Council to commit to reflecting on this issue, without prejudice to the final report from the High-Level Group on Own Resources; also urges the Council to reflect on the establishment of a fiscal capacity within the eurozone in order to assist and the budgeting of GNI balances and VAT remains free from political interference, and based solely on the latest economic data, thereby providing a greater degree of certainty for both Member States inand the implementation of agreed structural reforms; underlines that any new instrument should be placed within the EU budget, but above the ceilCommission alike in the forward plannings of the MFF, and financed from real own resourceboth National and European Union budgets;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the regulations implementing the MFF and respective funds could be further streamlined and simplified, in line with the objectives set out in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making; however, notes with concern that the Better Law-Making Agreement will make it more difficult to propose new laws, thereby resulting in less regulation as opposed to more streamlined and simplified legislation.