5 Amendments of Astrid LULLING related to 2012/2031(INI)
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Expresses concern that there is a risk that the data from the Member States contained in the Report, without any possibility of verification owing to the increase in the number of journeys, may not fully reflect the actual state of affairs with regard to the transport of animals because of the differing methods and control mechanisms used in individual Member States and therefore recommends introducing a monitoring system based on a risk analysis;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Insists on a reconsideration of the issue of limiting the transport time of animals destined for slaughter and fattening to eight hours, with some exceptions based on geographic conditions, and the option of longer transport of some animal species confirmed by scientific research results, provided that the rules on animal welfare are complied with;
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the fact that in its report the Commission used the scientific research presented by the EFSA, which highlights the need to significantly reduce the length of transport time for horses to the abattoir, which correlates with the suggestions advanced in Parliament’s Written Declaration of 25 February 2010; notes however that sports horses and/or breeding horses are generally transported under entirely satisfactory conditions due to their high value;
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Notes that in view of the EFSA test results the transport time of horses to the abattoir should be greatly reduced, and that with regard to other farm animals, the requirement for such a reduction should be carefully considered;
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the information on the introduction of a navigation system for monitoring the transport of animals, but is disappointed that this system is being used only to a limited extent in Member States for the purposes of monitoring the transport of animals; notes that technical means such as GPS exist and are widespread; is of the opinion that this monitoring system should be obligatory for certain types of transport; centralised monitoring of this system at Community level would make it possible to check transport conditions such as length of transport time, compliance with resting periods, etc.