Activities of Ivana MALETIĆ related to 2015/2052(INI)
Plenary speeches (2)
European Structural and Investment Funds and sound economic governance (A8-0268/2015 - José Blanco López) HR
EU strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian region - Cohesion policy and review of the Europe 2020 strategy - European Structural and Investment Funds and sound economic governance - Towards simplification and performance orientation in cohesion policy for 2014-2020 (debate) HR
Amendments (9)
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the importance of the European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds in providing urgently needed investment for jobs and growth for regions in the EU, also including those which are suffering most from the financial, economic and social crisis; welcomes the objective of making the use of these funds more effective and efficient by strengthening their link with the EU's economic governance framework; underlines that good economic governance is basic precondition for effective Cohesion policy and linkage between these two is crucial for reaching development potential of ESI Funds.
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises the importance of cohesion policy instruments and resourceESI Funds in maintaining the level of European added- value investment in Member States and regions; when national and regional public and private investments fell significantly due to negative effects of economic and financial crisis.
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that an increased emphasis on economic governance mechanisms cannot jeopardise the achievement of the ESI Funds' policy objectives and goals; stresses that stable fiscal and economic environment is basic precondition for the effectiveness and successful implementation of Cohesion policy;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the Commission's intention to use its reprogramming powers carefully, preferring stability over too frequent reprogramming; stresses the need for a well-founded and detailed justification for reprogramming, with a detailed assessment of why it delivers more effective and efficient results; therefore calls on Commission, while taking decision on reprogramming, to focus more on efficiency and implementation of CSRs than on indicators if influenced by trends outside the Member State;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that macroeconomic conditionality must only be used to contribute to asupport more focused and result- driven implementation of the ESI Funds;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. RecallEmphasises the multiannual and long- term nature of programmes and objectives under the ESI Funds, as well as their strong result-driven nature, as opposed to the annual cycle of the European semester and the rather weak implementation of the semester recommenwhich should be aligned with national strategies and sectorial policies; therefore underlines the need for coordination with European semester as an annual cycle of economic policy coordination involving Member States' plans for structural reforms, investments and fiscal consolidations;.
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Highlights that important part of good economic governance is sound financial management and timely payments; therefore calls on the Commission to solve problems with backlog and to take into account negative effects of late payments and caused liquidity problems in the Member States when assessing link between ESI Funds and good economic governance;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that Parliament will carefully apply its scrutiny rights in the decision- making process via the structural dialogue.; therefore asks the Commission to formalise in the guidelines the involvement of the Parliament in line with CPR;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that the partnership agreements and programmes adopted in the current programming period have taken account of the relevant CSRs and the relevant Council recommendations, thus making any reprogramming unnecessary in the medium term, unless the conditions are changed and strong need for new economic policy's approach is required;