20 Amendments of Christine REVAULT D'ALLONNES BONNEFOY related to 2016/2010(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
– having regard to Article 9 TFEU on the promotion of a high level of employment and the guarantee of adequate social protection,
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls the fundamental role of the universal service obligation (USO) in the postal sector with regard to the development of a fair single market for citizens and consumers; notes the trend towards a narrower scope for the USO; and the flexibility for Member States to define the universal service to fit their domestic circumstances; underlines the possibility for national regulatory authorities (NRAs) to grant derogations from minimum obligations, based on objective and published criteria and subject to regular monitoring; recognises the benefits of the Keep Me Posted EU campaign to promote consumer choice;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
Citation 7 a (new)
– having regard to Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on temporary agency work, 5a __________________ 5a OJ L 327, 5.12.2008, p. 9.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the growth in employment opportunities in the parcel delivery sector; underlines the benefits of quality and sustainable jobs in postal and delivery services, including on providing high and consistent standards of service to consumers; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that decent rights for workers in this sector are guaranteed, irrespective of employment status;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Considers that any expansion of the role of NRAs under new regulation in the parcels market should tackle 'cherry picking' in the deliveries sector and establish minimum standards for all operators to ensure fair and equal competition;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Highlights the findings of the Commission’s public consultation on cross-border parcel delivery; notes that the Commission intends to launch measures in 2016 to improve price transparency and enhance regulatory oversight of parcel delivery;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Underlines the potential role of EU funding mechanisms such as Horizon 2020 and the European Structural and Investment Funds in facilitating innovation in postal and delivery services including e-commerce options of benefit for consumers, the environment and SMEs and solutions with social inclusion and accessibility objectives;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Asks the Commission to facilitate and reinforce cooperation and coordination between NRAs with a view to greaterfulfilling their primary task ensuring provision of the universal service, and improving efficiency and interoperability in cross-border deliverydelivery services;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes the Commission's confirmation that the Postal Services Directive does not require any particular ownership structure for universal service providers (USPs); believes that USPs should not be prevented from investing and innovating in the provision of efficient and quality postal services;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to monitor the provision of postal services as a public service in order to ensure a common level playing field among providers and prevent cross- subsidisation, and to review whether that public service compensation is implemented in a manner that is proportionate, transparent and fair;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. CRecognises that postal networks and services are of general public interest; calls on the Member States to use State aid tools in a transparent and non- discriminatory manner and to ensure that customers continue to have access to postal services, by maintaining a minimum number of services at the same access point;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to work on a harmonised definition of universal service which stipulates a minimum level of service for consumerguidance that sets out minimum levels of service for consumers under the USO, whilst recognising variations in consumer requirements and the provision of the USO across Member States; calls on the Member States to further harmonisereview licensing procedures in order to reduce unjustified barriers within the internal market;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Asks the Commission to lay downconsider minimum standards for value-added services such as track-and-trace, pick- up/drop-off locations, the ability to choose a delivery time, and suitable return procedures;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that parcel delivery is a highly competitive, innovative and fast- growing sector, and; notes the importance of affordable and reliable parcel delivery services in realising the full potential of the Digital Single Market; believes that any new regulation in the parcel delivery market must therefore be proportionate and supported by souwhilst effectively addressing the problems faced by retailers and economic evidencesumers, protecting employment rights, tackling social exclusion and encouraging environmental sustainability;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Encourages the Commission to strengthen market oversight of parcel delivery where necessary, specifically by improving national regulators’ capacity to assess competition and identify unfair anti-competitive practices;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses the importance of improving consumer confidence and trust in cross-border delivery; considers that greater transparency as regards prices, delivery options, modalities and quality/performance (speed, geographical coverage, delays and the handling of damaged or lost items), as well as trust labels, could address the lack of confidence;
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Asks the Member States and the Commission to improve transparency as regards pricing conditions and service performance (delivery options, final delivery, reliability), especially when it comes to e-commerce; stresses the importance of ensuring affordable cross- border delivery prices inand closing the gap between domestic and cross-border prices, particularly for consumers and SMEs; calls on the Commission to work with NRAs to explore why prices on some cross-border routes are higher in one direction than the otherconsiderably higher than the EU average;
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Underlines the potential role of EU funding mechanisms such as Horizon 2020 , CEF and the European Structural and Investment Fund in facilitating innovation in postal and delivery services including e-commerce options of benefit for consumers, the environment and SMEs and solutions with social inclusion and accessibility objectives;
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to investigate the functioning of cross-border parcel delivery in accordance with the various rules resulting from either international trade agreements (e.g. the rules of the Universal Postal Union (UPU) and the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) or EU law (e.g. the Union Customs Code), especially the universal service obligation, which can be misused and create market distortion;