BETA

Activities of Pascal DURAND related to 2021/0378(COD)

Legal basis opinions (0)

Amendments (28)

Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The information to be made publicly accessible on ESAP should be collected by collection bodies designated for the purpose of collecting the information that the entities are under an obligation to make public. In order to ensure the efficient functioning of ESAP, the collection bodies should make the information available to ESAP in automated ways through a single application programming interface. For the information to be digitally usable and searchable, entities should make such information available in a data extractable format or, where required by Union law, in a machine- readable format. Compared to data extractable formats, machine-readable formats are file formats structured so that software applications can easily identify, recognise and extract specific data, including individual statements of fact, and their internal structure. To ensure that entities submit the information in the correct format and to address possible technical issues encountered by the entities, the collection bodies should provide technical assistance to those entities.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) Apart from the information in relation to financial services, capital markets and sustainability that has to be made public under Union law, investors, market participants, advisors, academia and the public at large may have an interest in obtaining other information that an entity wants to make accessible. Small and medium-sized enterprises, that are not subject to the mandatory disclosure requirements under Union law, may want to make more information publicly accessible in order to become more visible to potential investors and thereby increase funding and diversify funding opportunities. Also, market participants may want to provide more information than that required by law or to make public the information required by national law but not available at Union level in order to complement the information provided to the public at the Union level. Any entity should therefore be allowed to make financial, sustainability- related and other relevant information accessible on ESAP. Pursuant to the principle of data miniSuch voluntary submisatsion, entities should ensure that no personal data are included, except where those data constitute a necessary element of the information about their economic activities, including when the name of the entity coincides with the name of the owner. Where such information contains personal data, the entities should ensure that they can rely for such disclosure on one of the lawful grounds of processing laid down in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council26 . _________________ 26 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1) should, nonetheless, be subject to the same format and data quality requirements so as not to jeopardise the integrity of the ESAP. Moreover, entities that are not subject to mandatory reporting, in accordance with the Union law listed in the Annex to this Regulation, that choose to voluntarily submit information corresponding to that due under Union law, should ensure that they submit a complete data set to facilitate comparison and contextualise the data.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
(5 a) Pursuant to the principle of data minimisation, entities should ensure that no personal data are included, except where those data constitute a necessary element of the information about their economic activities, including when the name of the entity coincides with the name of the owner. Where such information contains personal data, the entities should ensure that they can rely for such disclosure on one of the lawful grounds of processing laid down in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a . _________________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In order to enable entities and the public to identify the collection bodies providing information to ESAP, ESMA should publish on its website a list of the collection bodies and keep it up to date. The designation of collection bodies should be at the discretion of Member States but should respect the “file-once principle”.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Re-using information that is available on ESAP can improve the functioning of the internal market and promote the development of new services that combine and make use of such information. It is therefore necessary, where justified on grounds of a public interest objective, to allow re-use of the information that is available on ESAP for purposes other than the purposes for which the information was drawn up. However,, unless it is justified on grounds of a public interest objective to place conditions on the use and re-use of that information. These conditions should be subject to objective, proportionate and non- discriminatory conditions. For that purpose, conditions corresponding to those laid down in open, standard licences within the meaning of Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council27 should apply. The licensing terms of those standard licences should allow for data and content to be freely accessible, used, modified and shared by anyone for any purpose. ESMA should bear no liability for the use and re-use of information accessible on ESAP. The submission of information by the collection bodies should either not be subject to conditions or be subject to an open standard licence enabling the licensing terms applying for information accessible in the ESAP. _________________ 27 Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the re-use of public sector information (OJ L 172, 26.6.2019, p. 56).
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11 a) The validation procedure should be limited to verifying compliance with this Regulation, including the formatting requirements. Collection bodies should not be responsible for verifying the accuracy of the content of the information, unless mandated to do so in accordance with the relevant Union law listed in the Annex to this Regulation. Entities subject to mandatory reporting should be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the information submitted owing to their legal obligations under the relevant Union law listed in the Annex to this Regulation or national law.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) ESAP should provide users with access to information for free and without discrimination and should make it possible for those users to search, access and download the information through ESAP. However, taking into account the need to protect ESMA from an excessive financial burden in relation to costs incurred for serving the needs of intensive users, if any, ESMA should have the ability to generate revenues. Therefore, by way of derogation from the principle that information should be accessible free of charge, ESMA should be allowed to impose fees for those specific services, including for services with high maintenance costs due to searches for and downloads of very large volumes of information or to frequent access to ESAP. Public bodies, academic institutions, and civil society organisations should not be subject to fees. The calculation of fees should be transparent and based on clear principles. Any fees imposed should, however, not exceed the cost of the service provided.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) ESAP should provide users with access to information for free and without discrimination and should make it possible for those users to search, access and download the information through ESAP. However, taking into account the need to protect ESMA from an excessive financial burden in relation to costs incurred for serving the needs of intensive users, if any, ESMA should have the ability to generate revenues. Therefore, by way of derogation from the principle that information should be accessible free of charge, ESMA should be allowed to impose fees for those specific services, including for services with high maintenance costs due to searches for very large volumes of information or to frequent access to ESAP. Any fees imposed should, however, not exceed the cost of the service provided. Entities responding to at least one of the overriding reasons in the public interest as defined in Directive (EU) 2018/958 of the European Parliament and of the Council should always be exempted from such fees.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) In order to build and maintain public trust in ESAP and to protect each entity from undue alteration of its information, ESAP should ensure data integrity and credibility of the source of the information submitted to the collection bodies. Therefore, information submitted by the entities should include a qualified electronic seal attached to the information submitted as defined in Article 3(20), of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council29 . A specific legal entity identifier may be a mandatory attribute of that certificate. That seal or signature acquired by ESAP should be made available to users. Where available, the legal entity identifier should be based on a globally recognised standard in order to facilitate interoperability. _________________ 29 Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC (OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 73).
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) To ensure a smooth processing of the information received or drawn-up by the collection bodies and made available to ESAP, it is necessary to lay down certain clear and detailed requirements specifying the format and the metadata of that information and which collection bodies should collect such information. In order to ensure the quality of the information submitted to ESAP by the collection bodies, it is also necessary to define the characteristics of the automated validations to be carried out on each information reaching the collection bodies, and the characteristics of the qualified electronic seal to be attached to that information by the entities. To ensure the use and re-use of data on ESAP, a list of the designated open standard licences would need to be defined. To facilitate the searching, finding, retrieving of the data in a timely manner, the characteristics of the application programming interface and the metadata to be implemented will also need to be designed. Additional requirements as regards efficient search functions will need to be implemented such as the specific legal entity identifier, the classification of the type of information, and the categories of the size of the entities. To that purpose, the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities should develop draft implementing technical standards. Additionally, ESMA might develop draft implementing technical standards to determine the nature and extent of the specific services for which fees may be charged and the associated fee structureIn respect of standards concerning sustainability information, the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities should consult the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on the development of these draft implementing standards, in particular on standards defining requirements for the accessibility formats of sustainability information. All standards should seek to make ESAP future-proof and consider potential interoperability at a global level in the future, thus should draw upon global standards and best practices where relevant. Additionally, ESMA might develop draft implementing technical standards to determine the nature and extent of the specific services for which fees may be charged and the associated fee structure. To ensure full transparency of the cases when fees may be charged, ESMA should make public and easily available on ESAP the thresholds of volumes of information and the frequencies above which those fees apply. The Commission should be empowered to adopt those implementing technical standards by means of implementing acts pursuant to Article 291 TFEU and in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council30 , No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council31 and No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council32 . _________________ 30 Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12). 31 Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/79/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 48). 32 Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84).
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
(7) ‘metadata’ means structured information that makes it easier to retrieve, use, contextualise or manage an information resource, including by describing, explaining, or locating that information resource.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) use, at least, a data extractable format for drawing up that information;
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) ensure that no personal data are included, except where the personal data constitute a necessary element of the information about its economic activities, including when the name of the entity coincides with the name of the owner. If personal data is justifiably included, this shall be specified.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Information submitted on a voluntary basis that corresponds to the information referred to in Article(1), point (a), must be done so in a manner that ensures the information is comprehensive, contextualised, and comparable with information submitted on a mandatory basis.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(c a) the minimum data fields that must be completed if information corresponding to that referred to in Article 1(1), point (a) is submitted on a voluntary basis.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Collection bodies shall notify the entities of the rejection and the reasons thereof within a reasonable timeframe.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. Entities shallubject to mandatory reporting shall be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the information submitted owing to their legal obligations under the relevant Union law listed in the Annex to this Regulation or national law. Entities shall also ensure the accuracy of the information they submit to the collection bodies on a voluntary basis.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. As regards the information falling under this Regulation, the collection bodies shall not exercise the right of the maker of a database, referred to in Article 7(1) of Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council33 , tor any other intellectual property rights, in a way that prevents or restricts the use and re- use of the contents of the database or to restrict re- use of those contentspursuant to Article 9. _________________ 33 Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases (OJ L 77, 27.3.1996, p. 20).
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the legal entity identifier of the entity that submitted the information and, where applicable, the legal entity identifier of its subsidiaries;
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) the type of information submitted by the entity that submitted the information;
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)
(e a) the country of establishment of the entity;
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point e b (new)
(e b) the industry sector(s) of the entity’s economic activities;
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new)
(d a) the categories of industry sectors referred to in paragraph 3, point (eb).
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. To ensure consistency with the digital mark-up of sustainability information, for the purpose of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities shall consult the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group on the development of draft implementing standards pertaining to the disclosure of sustainability information.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
ESMA may, however, charge fees for specific services that involve searches and downloads for a very large volume of information or for frequently updated information, except when those services are used by civil society organisations, public bodies and academic institutions. Those fees shall not exceed the cost incurred by ESMA for the provision of the service.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)
(e a) any entity responding to at least one of the overriding reasons in the public interest as defined in article 6 of Directive (EU) 2018/95835a . _________________ 35a Directive (EU) 2018/958 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 June 2018 on a proportionality test before adoption of new regulation of professions
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. If ESMA decides to charge fees to certain users of ESAP or for certain services of ESAP, it shall publish and make easily accessible on the ESAP website the fee structure, the volume thresholds, if relevant, and rate, and review the rate and thresholds on an annual basis.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. ESMA shall implement appropriate technical processes to automatically notify a collection body that the information submitted does not comply with the requirements laid down in Article 5(1), point (b). The collection body shall notify the submitting entity of the rejection and the reasons for in accordance with Article 2(2), subparagraph 2.
2022/11/11
Committee: ECON