14 Amendments of Marju LAURISTIN related to 2016/2225(INI)
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas big data refers to the recurring accumulation of large amounts of data, including personal data, from a variety of sources, which are subject to automatic processing by computer algorithms and advanced data-processing techniques in order to generate certain correlations, trends and patterns (big data analytics);
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas the big data market is growing as the technology and process of data-driven decision making is increasingly accepted as a solution;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
C b. whereas there is no methodology yet to make an evidence-based assessment of the impact of big data but there is evidence proving that big data analytics and decision making solutions have the potential to have a significant impact in a wide range of application areas horizontally across both the public and private sectors;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C c (new)
Recital C c (new)
C c. whereas big data in decision making would ultimately provide a competitive advantage to European companies by improving business-critical management while the public sector would benefit from an increase in efficiency through greater insights on socio-economic developments at different scales;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas we observe a blurring difference between personal and non- personal data emerging from the use of big data and big data analytics has the potential to create new personal data;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas biased algorithms and other analytical tools, low quality of data, spurious correlations, errors, the underestimation of legal, social and ethical implications and the marginalisation of the role of humans in these processes can trigger flawed decision-making procedurethe misuse of big data results can have legal, social and ethical implications;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
F a. Whereas leaks of personal data or non- personal data that can re-identify a data subject would obviously impact upon the reputation of companies as a breach of security can have significant business implications;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Emphasises that there is a need to promote an education system creating the basis for understanding the opportunities and risks of big data and develop accordingly the curricula in informatics throughout the Member States at all levels of education;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Stresses that the poor knowledge of citizens about the nature of big data allows the use of personal information in unintended ways;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Highlights that privacy by design is an indispensable tool for big data, allowing for early implementation of relevant controls that are protecting the individuals' personal data by default;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges corporations and other data controllers to make use of instruments provided for by the GDPR, such as codes of conduct and, certification schemes, privacy by design and privacy by default, to seek greater certainty over their specific obligations under Union law and to bring their practices and activities into compliance with the appropriate Union legal standards and safeguards;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Takes the view that a privacy impact assessment should be obligatory for the public sector and for the companies using big data analytics in their everyday activities;