3 Amendments of Jana TOOM related to 2016/0397(COD)
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) Article 6 of Regulation 987/2009 should also apply in situation where a worker has been wrongly affiliated to a Member State due to breach of applicable legislation, irrespective of the existence of a dispute between institutions. This refers to situations where the employer has wrongly kept the worker registered in the Member State of the employer rather than the Member State where the worker resides.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 5 b
Recital 5 b
(5b) Member States should ensure that economically inactive EU mobile citizens are not prevented from satisfying the condition of having comprehensive sickness insurance cover in the host Member State, as laid down in Directive 2004/38/EC, in particular in systems where access is granted on the basis of residency. This may entail allowing such citizens to contribute in a proportionate manner to a scheme for sickness coverage in the Member State in which they habitually reside.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Recital 24 a (new)
Recital 24 a (new)
(5a) After recital 24, the following is inserted: “(24a) Nothing within this Regulation should give ground to any Member State other than the competent Member State to refuse residence to economically inactive persons solely on the basis of the application for the branches of social security covered by this Regulation.ˮ