5 Amendments of Stanislav POLČÁK related to 2018/2114(INI)
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that representatives appointed by Parliament have an important role to play in Management Board meetings as they reinforce Parliament’s scrutiny role; is of the opinion that the Joint Statement should not have to indicate how many members Parliament should be able to appoint;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets that the Parliament was not fulproperly involved in the procedure to select the new seat of EMA and requests that the procedure followed for the selection of the new location for EMA ishould not be used anymore in this form in the future;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Expects the prerogativestatus of Parliament as co-legislator to be fully respectedtaken into account in future decisions on the location or relocation of agencies; considers that Parliament should be systematically involved, and on equal terms with the Council and the Commission, and calls on the Commission to come up with suitable measures to this effect;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the Joint Statement can act as a useful tool to strengthen and streamline mechanisms on dealing withpreventing conflict of interests, in particular for fee- financed agencies;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that in case of budgetary decisions regarding decentralised agencies the specificity and workload of the agency has to be taken into account and that possible budgetary cuts cannot be taken on a one size fits all-basis; furthermore stresses the need to take into account the new climate and sustainabilityenvironmental protection priorities within the next MFF and the tasks attributed to particular agencies for the implementation of the MFF.