BETA

1155 Amendments of Tamás MESZERICS

Amendment 5 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
- having regard to Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP of 8 December 2008 defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment, and Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items (Recast),
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 26 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas internal and external security are increasingly intertwined; whereas the EU has always prided itself on its soft powercivilian means and will keep doing so; whereas an evolving reality, however, requires the EU not to remain an exclusively ‘civilian power’, but to extend its hard power, since soft and hard power go hand in handalso use military means, whose use should be consistent and coherent with all other EU external action; whereas development in third countries is not possible without security and peace; whereas the military plays a key role in this, especially in countries where civilian authorities are unable to fulfil their tasks in the light of the security situation; whereas the European Peace Facility (EPF or the Facility) willhas the clear potential to lead to a stronger engagement of the EU towards partner countries and will increase the effectiveness of EU external action;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 32 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas it is of great importance to modify the title of the EPF as the use of the word ‘peace’ gives the impression that this facility is exclusively about the scope of the African Peace Facility, in particular support to peacekeeping operations; whereas it would be appropriate to name the facility ‘European Military Cooperation Facility”;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 47 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas all military tasks under the Facility, such as joint disarmament operations, humanitarian and rescue tasks, military advice and assistance tasks, conflict prevention and peacekeeping tasks, tasks of combat forces in crisis management, including peacemaking and post-conflict stabilisation, the fight against terrorism, including by supporting third countries in combating terrorism in their territories as listed in Article 43(1) TEU, fall within the remit of the CSDP; whereas the exception of Article 41(2) TEU applies to the operating expenditure arising from those military missions only; whereas all other operating expenditure arising from the CSDP, including expenditure arising from any other action referred to in Article 42 TEU, should be charged to the Union budget; whereas the administrative expenditure of the EPF should be charged to the Union budget;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Ma. whereas according to the Treaty no Union military operations are possible outside of the CSDP framework;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M b (new)
Mb. whereas Article 2 (d) of the proposal for a European Peace Facility describes Union operational military or defence actions outside CSDP which are not foreseen by the Treaty and should be abandoned;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 61 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Q a (new)
Qa. whereas the Commission’s Service for Foreign Policy Instruments (FPI) has the duty to manage EU budget funds of civilian foreign policy instruments and missions; whereas this Facility is a purely military mechanism which should be managed by the dedicated military structures of the European External Action Service (EEAS);
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 67 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) to modify the title of the facility and to name it ‘European Military Cooperation Facility’ or ‘European Facility for Military Cooperation’ in order to better reflect its broad scope, in particular former Athena mechanism functions, other than Article 43(1) peacekeeping tasks, but also the scope of CBSD;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 73 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e
(e) to ensure that operations, action programmes, ad hoc assistance measures and other operational actions funded by the Facility will not in any way violate or be used to violate the fundamental principles laid down in Article 21 TEU or be used to violate international law, in particular international humanitarian and human rights law, and as regards the transfer of military equipment, technology and services, the criteria of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP of 8 December 2008 defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment, and Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items (Recast);
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 78 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 2
- to add a new recital (10a) as follows: ‘(10a) Military advice and assistance tasks referred to in Article 43(1) TEU may take the form of strengthening the military and defence capacities of third states, regional and international organisations to preserve peace, to prevent, manage and resolve conflicts and to address threats to international security. while strictly complying international humanitarian law and international human rights law and the criteria of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP of 8 December 2008 defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment, and Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items (Recast)’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 85 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 4 a (new)
- to delete point d) of Article 2;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 86 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 4 b (new)
- to add new point after point c) of Article 2 as follows: ‘contributing to the financing of, and strengthening cooperation between Member States on: common military research and development, joint acquisition and procurement of military capabilities, technology and services, joint maintenance of capabilities and technology, joint training and measures in the field of security of supply.’
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 89 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 7
- to amend point c) of Article 5 as follows: ‘c) ‘operation’ means a military missoperation established under the Common Security and Defence Policy in accordance with Article 42 TEU to fulfil the tasks referred to in Article 43(1) TEU having military or defence implications, including a task entrusted to a group of Member States in accordance with Article 44 TEU;’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 90 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 7 a (new)
- to amend point h) of Article 5 as follows: ‘h) ‘other operational action’ means any other Union operational action under the Common Security and Defence Policy having military or defence implications which the Council may decide to finance under the Facility on a proposal from the High Representative’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 94 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 8 a (new)
- to amend paragraph 2 of Article 9 as follows: ‘2. For the purposes of the financial implementation of this Decision, the High Representative shall be assisted by the administrative structure referred to in Chapter 2. He/she shall exercise this responsibility with the support of the competent military structures referred to in Article 4 (3) (a) of Council Decision 2010/427/EU.’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 100 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10 a (new)
- to amend paragraph 8 of Article 13 as follows: ‘8. The administrator shall ensure continuity of his/her functions through the administrative structure of the competent military EEAS structures referred to in article 9.’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 109 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 12 a (new)
- to amend paragraph 4 of Article 47 as follows: ‘4.The final destination of equipment and infrastructure financed in common shall be approved by the Committee, taking into account operational needs, human rights, security and diversion risk assessment as regards certified end-use and end-users, and financial criteria. The final destination may be as follows: a) in the case of infrastructure, be sold or transferred through the Facility to the host country, a Member State or a third party; b) in the case of equipment, be sold through the Facility to a Member State, the host country or a third party, or be stored and maintained by the Facility, a Member State or such a third party, for use in a subsequent operation.’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 110 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 12 b (new)
- to amend paragraph 6 of Article 47 as follows: ‘6. Sale or transfer to the host country or a third party shall be in accordance with the relevant security rules in force and strictly comply with the criteria of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP of 8 December 2008 defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment, and Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items (Recast).’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 117 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 13 a (new)
- to amend point b) of Article 53, paragraph 1, as follows: ‘b) delivered effectively to the armed forces of the third state concerned provided that compliance with the criteria of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP of 8 December 2008 defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment, and Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items (Recast) has been assessed;’
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 119 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 13 b (new)
- to amend point d) of Article 53, paragraph 1, as follows: ‘d) used in accordance with Union policies, with due regard for international law, notably concerning human rights, and end-user certificates, in particular clauses on retransfers;’
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 121 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 13 c (new)
- to amend point e) of Article 53, paragraph 1 as follows: ‘e) managed in compliance with any restriction or limitation on their use, sale or transfer decided by the Council or by the Committee, and according to relevant end-user certificates, the criteria of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP of 8 December 2008 defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment, and Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items (Recast);’
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 125 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(a a) to ensure that the competent military structures of the European External Action Service and not Commission services are in charge of implementing this military facility, act as administrator and exercise all financial management responsibilities;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 129 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point e
(e) to ensure, in line with Article 18 TEU, the consistency of the EPF with all other aspects of the EU’s external action, notably as regards the Capacity Building for Security and Development initiative (CBSD), which should in all cases be implemented in the framework of the wider security sector reform programme, which shall have strong components on good governance, provisions against gender based violence, and in particular of civilian oversight over the security system and democratic control of armed forces;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 10 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point a a (new)
(aa) provide for regular and in-depth dialogue, notably on the ongoing political and democratic reforms aimed at creating independent institutions, such as the judiciary, and a genuinely independent parliament, on protecting human rights, media freedoms, and creating an environment in which a strong civil society can operate without undue interference from the state and where civil society is involved in the reform process;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point b a (new)
(ba) stress the importance that the reforms so far undertaken are fully implemented and ensure their effective incorporation into relevant laws and government policies;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 23 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point c
(c) recognise the ongoing reforms to improve the business climate, the judicial system and security services, labour conditions, and administrative accountability and efficiency; highlight that Uzbekistan’s comprehensive reform plan, the Development Strategy for 2017– 2021, must be backed up by measures facilitating external trade and improving the business environment;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point c a (new)
(ca) support the reforms in the justice sector and its full independence from the executive branch; support the strengthening of the rule of law, as well as the development of a strong framework for the protection of human rights and gender equality; encourage similar reforms in the security sector to ensure that this service stop surveillance of citizens critical or perceived to be critical to the government;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 36 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point e
(e) welcome the release of political prisoners and encourage the authorities to resolve cases of prisoners of conscience; encourage the full rehabilitation of those who served lengthy prison sentences on politically motivated grounds; stress the need to cease the practice of politically motivated persecutions and surveillance on civil society representatives and journalist such as Agzam Turgunov, Bobomurod Abdullayev and others;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 43 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point e a (new)
(ea) ensure that all those who are convicted of criminal and other offences are automatically given copies of the court sentences on their cases so as to enable them to access their right to appeal and apply for rehabilitation; draw the attention, in this regard, to the case of the late Member of Parliament Murad Djuraev who spent more than 20 years in jail on politically motivated charges and died in jail in 2017, whose family has been unable to receive copies of the court sentences passed in relation to him, thus hindering the process of application for posthumous rehabilitation;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 48 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point e b (new)
(eb) urge the Uzbek government to invite the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture to visit the country and implement the recommendation from the last visit of the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture from 2003 to close the prison colony 64/73 in Zhaslyk in Karakalpakstan and to set up an independent national preventive mechanism (NPM), including civil society, which will be allowed to visit prisons and other places of detention to monitor the treatment of prisoners;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point e c (new)
(ec) express concern at several closed- door trials with regard, in particular, to the trial of Rashitjon Kadyrov and 12 co- defendants ongoing since 7 January 2019, where there are serious allegations of torture, and urge the government to end the practice of such closed-door trials;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point e d (new)
(ed) ensure a review of the passport system in order to solve the problem of all those Uzbek citizens who from 1993 to 2016 were deprived of their citizenship after being granted refugee status abroad in violation of the Convention on the Prevention of Statelessness;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 54 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point f
(f) welcome the progress made towards the eradication of child labour and the phasing-out of forced labour, as well as the recent visits to Uzbekistan by UN Special Rapporteurs and the reopening of the country to international non- governmental organisations in this field; point out that, despite the measures taken by the government, state-sponsored forced labour in the cotton and silk industries and other areas remains a systemic and deeply-rooted problem affecting tens of thousands of people; expect steps by the government of Uzbekistan to begin to dismantle the structures which perpetuate and drive forced labour and in particular the system of mandatory quotas and the state control over all aspects of the cotton production; stress that more efforts need to be done and further legal measures must be adopted to consolidate progress in this area;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 73 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point h
(h) continue holding annual Human Rights Dialogues, while mainstreaming human rights issues in all meetings; encourage compliance with international human rights instruments; set benchmarks ahead of each round of dialogues and evaluate the dialogues on an annual basis, based on the deliverables; encourage and support the implementation of comprehensive reforms of the judiciary;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 93 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point m
(m) ensure effective cooperation in the fight against corruption, money laundering and tax evasion; note that criminal justice proceedings on the grand scale bribery scandal in Uzbekistan’s telecommunications sector and related money laundering continue in several EU jurisdictions; ensure that the assets stemming from corruption currently frozen in several EU and EEA Member States are repatriated responsibly for the benefit of all the Uzbek people – the ultimate victim of corruption; stress that officials responsible for these crimes who are still in office must be brought to justice;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 127 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point u
(u) support Uzbekistan’s renewed efforts towards multilateral and international cooperation on global and regional challenges, such as international security and countering violent extremism, organised crime, environmental degradation, climate change and migration, among others;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 128 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point u a (new)
(ua) ensure that the comprehensive agreement facilitates and strengthens regional cooperation and peaceful conflict resolution of the existing controversies paving the way for genuine good-neighbourly relations;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 129 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point u b (new)
(ub) support and strengthen the cooperation with Uzbekistan on environmental issues with regard, in particular, to sustainable policies and practices of water management and conservation and a credible gradual plan of clean-up and restoration of the Aral sea basin with all the countries concerned and the competent regional organisations;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 135 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point x a (new)
(xa) ensure that before the conclusion of the negotiations Uzbekistan improves substantially the operating environment for civil society removing the obstacles that hinder all new groups from registering and legally start activities in the country and from receiving foreign funding; ensure that NGOs are not subject to excessive and unnecessary reporting requirements to various government agencies and that international monitors and human rights organisations are allowed to operate freely in Uzbekistan including by opening local branch offices for monitoring purposes;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 136 #

2018/2236(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Point y
(y) include terms on the potential suspension of cooperationa clearly-defined suspension clause in the event of the breach of essential elements by either party with regard, in particular, to the respect for democracy, human rights and the rule of law, including consultation of Parliament in such cases;
2019/01/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #

2018/2183(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Reiterates the need to urgently implement independent disclosure, advice and referral mechanisms with sufficient budgetary resources, in order to help whistleblowers use the right channels to disclose their information on possible irregularities affecting the financial interests of the Union, while protecting their confidentiality and offering needed support and advice in line with the directive on persons reporting on breaches of Union law;
2018/12/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2018/2179(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls that staffing cuts have been implemented with great difficulty and reiterates ourits grave concern regarding any further cuts which it is strongly convinced would limit Eurofound’s ability to carry out their mandate;
2018/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 8 #

2018/2179(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Expresses concern on the budgetary impact of the Irish country coefficient increase to 119,8 in 2017; Askunderlines that action must be taken by the Institutions to offset the budgetary consequences without any further delay as expressed in Parliament's position in the draft budget;
2018/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2018/2179(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Reiterates the need to establish an independent disclosure, advice and referral body with sufficient budgetary resources, in order to help whistleblowers use the right channels to disclose their information on possible irregularities affecting the financial interests of the Union, while protecting their confidentiality and offering needed support and advice in line with the directive on persons reporting on breaches of Union law;
2018/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2018/2178(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Reiterates the need to establish an independent disclosure, advice and referral body with sufficient budgetary resources, in order to help whistleblowers use the right channels to disclose their information on possible irregularities affecting the financial interests of the Union, while protecting their confidentiality and offering needed support and advice in line with the directive on persons reporting on breaches of Union law;
2018/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 7 #

2018/2178(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8 b. Reitarates its call for the Centre to make public the minutes of its management board meetings;
2018/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2018/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. Reminds that an empowered civil society is a key feature of a vibrant democracy and strategically important for Albania's transformation into an EU member state; encourages the Albanian authorities to review the registration process for civil society organisations without delay as the current process is characterised by lengthy procedures and high financial costs; calls also on the authorities to modify the legal and regulatory framework of the tax regime for civil society organisation as the current system imposes a significant financial burden on non-profit organisations and hampers both corporate and individual donations;
2018/09/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 134 #

2018/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27 a. Expresses concern about certain economic projects that have led to environmental damage in protected areas, such as large scale touristic resorts and hydropower plants which, in many cases, do not meet local community acceptance;
2018/09/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 138 #

2018/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Expresses concern over economic activity that has led to environmental damage in protected areas, such as the hydropower plants along the Vjosa river; calls therefore on the authorities to abandon plans for the construction of any hydropower along the Vjosa River such as Kalivaç or Poçem and to reconsider the sustainable development of the area; urges the authorities to step up environmental impact assessments and public consultations on such projects;
2018/09/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 146 #

2018/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28 a. Urges the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and European Investment Bank (EIB) to review its support for hydropower plant projects, and to stop projects in protected areas, and projects which lack sound ex ante strategic environmental assessment and environmental impact assessments;
2018/09/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 147 #

2018/2147(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 b (new)
28 b. Recommends Albania to review its strategy as regards renewable energy and to decrease dependency on hydropower for its electricity generation as this source of energy does not only generate, in many cases, negative effects for the environment, in particular biodiversity, but has also significant shortcomings as regards security of supply as it is highly vulnerable to unfavourable hydrological conditions as recently experienced in 2017;
2018/09/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2018/2145(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the agreement of 12 June 2018 on the settlement of differences and the establishment of a strategic partnership between the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Greece sends a much- needed positive signal for stability and reconciliation in the whole Western Balkans region and paves the way for the European integration of the country;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 39 #

2018/2145(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Commends the positive diplomacy and active trust-building efforts of the governments of the Republic of North Macedonia and Greece leading to compromise and to the settlement of open bilateral issues; welcomes the entry into force on 14 February 2018 of the friendship treaty with Bulgaria;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 67 #

2018/2145(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that the country has already achieved a high level of alignment with the acquis; regrets, nevertheless, that some of this legislation has not yet been implemented; welcomes its continued alignment with EU declarations and Council decisions on the Common Foreign and Security Policy and notes that full alignment is a prerequisite for the Euro- Atlantic future of the country;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 131 #

2018/2145(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Regrets that according to the latest compliance report issued by GRECO the Republic of North Macedonia made no substantial progress in implementing most of GRECO’s recommendations on preventing corruption among MPs, judges and prosecutors issued 4 years ago; calls on the Macedonian authorities to adopt a more effective and resolute action in this field by fully implementing all the remaining recommendations;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 132 #

2018/2145(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Points out that corruption and organized crime are widespread in the region and also represent an obstacle to the country's democratic, social and economic development; considers that a regional strategy and enhanced cooperation between all the countries in the region are essential to tackle these issues more effectively;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 135 #

2018/2145(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Expresses concern at the Global Slavery Index 2018, developed by the UN and Walk Free Foundation, saying that about 18,000 citizens of the country live in modern slavery; welcomes the measures adopted by the government in response to some forms of modern slavery, with victim support services, a strong criminal justice response, evidence of coordination and collaboration, and protections in place for vulnerable populations and calls for further and more effective action to tackle the problem;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 158 #

2018/2145(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Underlines the need to ensure autonomy and adequate human and financial resources for independent oversight bodies; commends the role of the Ombudsman’s Office in enforcing human rights and underlines the need to ensure a systemic follow-up of the Ombudsman’s decisions; welcomes the country’s participation as an observer in the Fundamental Rights Agency;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 166 #

2018/2145(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Welcomes the initial steps taken in enhancing the prevention of discrimination and urges the authorities to effectively address hate crime and hate speech against minorities, including the Roma and the LGBTI community; deplores persistent deficiencies in the work of the Commission for Protection from Discrimination; welcomes the setting-up of the Inter-party parliamentary group for the rights of the LGBTI community and also the Inter- party parliamentary group for the rights of Roma;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 175 #

2018/2145(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Welcomes the substantial improvement in the operational environment for, and the consultations with, civil society organisations (CSOs) and stresses the need to enhance the legal, financial and policy framework, including through laws on foundations and donations; highlights the importance of a regular and constructive dialogue with the civil society and stresses the fundamental role that NGOs can play in the public opinion as regards the positive aspects of strategic partnership agreement with Greece;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 196 #

2018/2145(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Expresses its concern at the new electoral code adopted at the end of July by the Macedonian parliament in a fast- track procedure and in particular to the amendment that foresees a fine of up to 4000 Euros for the media over the way they report during elections; takes note of the legitimate objections and remarks of the press and journalists associations in this regard and calls on the Macedonian government to start a frank and open dialogue with them in order to reach an agreement on the eventual correction of the legislation;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 212 #

2018/2145(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Encourages Macedonia to develop competition in the gas and energy market towards the complete unbundling of utilities in line with the EU Third Energy Package; calls for a substantial improvement as regards energy efficiency, the production of renewable energy and the fight against climate change; welcomes the ratification of the Paris Climate agreement and calls for the prompt transposition and implementation of the climate acquis;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 215 #

2018/2145(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 b (new)
31b. Takes note of a number of planned infrastructure projects or being implemented within protected areas that would be likely to cause significant impacts on future Natura 2000 sites (current Emerald site); calls, in this regard, for respecting the recommendation of the Bern Convention's Standing Committee (No. 184(2015)) by suspending the implementation of the projects within the territory of the Mavrovo National Park until a Strategic Environmental Assessment is completed in full compliance with the EU environment legislation; further calls for respecting the Decision (40 COM 7B.68) concerning the Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region to put in place moratorium on the urban and costal transformations and prepare an overall Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) before any further work is undertaken; urges the development of a national hydropower strategy/plan that will include NO-GO zones for hydropower development in protected areas and areas with high ecological value in line with EU environmental legislation;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 221 #

2018/2145(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Draws attention to extremeExpresses its concern at the alarming level of air pollution indicators in Skopje and other heavily polluted cities; calls for effective action for air quality monitoring and improvementcities that according to a study of the Public Health Institute of Macedonia causes annually 30% - 35% of the diseases in the country and over 1300 deaths; draws the attention, in particular, to Skopje urban area and calls on the state and local authorities to urgently take adequate measures to cope with this emergency including the improvement of public transport and effective mobility plans for the main cities;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 31 #

2018/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the efforts made to improve the transparency of public administration and information sharing but would encourage steps towards establishing a more citizen-friendly, professional and de-politicised public administration; calls for improved regulatory impact assessments and inclusive public consultations; stresses the importance of the free access to information for the effective fight against corruption and encourages to revise legislative changes made in June 2017;
2018/09/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 62 #

2018/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Is particularly concerned by the attack on 8 May 2018 against Vijesti journalist Olivera Lakić, as well as the car bomb explosion on 1 April 2018 outside the home of TV Vijesti journalist Sead Sadiković, which has been described as a ‘targeted threat’; notes that both journalists have been seeking to uncover stories related to corruption and organised crime, and calls for full investigations into both cases; finds it unacceptable that no notable developments regarding investigations into old cases of violence against journalists are to be observed; strongly recommends competent authorities to address ongoing impunity without any further delay;
2018/09/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 69 #

2018/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Underlines the crucial role of civil society organisations (CSOs) in improving the functioning of state institutions and fighting corruption and organised crime; condemns strongly the recent intimidation of and unacceptable smear campaign against CSOs that were critical of the overall slow progress, or lack thereof, in key rule-of-law areas; is therefore deeply concerned about reduction of CSO presence in key institutions, such as the recent dismissal of MANS executive director from the Council of the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption;
2018/09/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 72 #

2018/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Reiterates its call for systematic, inclusive, timely and genuine consultations with civil society on key EU-related legislative reforms, including their implementation at local level; recommends the provision of additional resources and the setting of clear rules as regards governmental mechanisms for CSO consultation;
2018/09/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 110 #

2018/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27 a. Recalled with satisfaction that according to Article 1 of its constitution Montenegro is an ecological state; welcomes the possible opening of chapter 27 in the negotiations with Montenegro this year; calls on the authorities to better protect the most valuable areas in particular as regards biodiversity and to review in particular hotels and hydropower plants construction projects;
2018/09/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 115 #

2018/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Notes thaIs concerned about the development of additional hydropower and tourism capacities must meet EU environmental standards; urge, in particular those occurring in protected areas, and their impact on biodiversity; urges in this respect to meet EU environmental standards; expresses concern about unsustainable hydropower development as many of the 80 hydropower plant projects are being planned without sound environmental impact assessment as required by EU legislation; recommends the further sustainable exploitation of potential renewables (especially solar) and energy-efficiency measures and the improvement of water and waste management;
2018/09/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 118 #

2018/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28 a. Urges the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and European Investment Bank (EIB) to review its support for hydropower plant projects, and to stop projects in protected areas, and projects which lack sound ex ante environmental impact assessments;
2018/09/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 119 #

2018/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 b (new)
28 b. Expresses concern regarding the special-purpose spatial plan for the Skadar Lake National Park; stresses the need to abandon the large scale hydropower projects on the Morača river, as these have significant adverse effects on Lake Skadar and the Tara river, both of which are protected are as under national and international legislation;
2018/09/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 120 #

2018/2144(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Repeats its call for the Ulcinj Salina site to be given protected status in line with the EU’s Natura 2000 networkUrges the Montenegrin government to protect Ulcinj Salina both at national and international level in line with the recommendations given in the EU financed Study on Protection of Ulcinj Salina; underlines the urgent need to ensure Ulcinj Salina's integration into the EU’s Natura 2000 network; calls on the government to clarify the ownership of the Salina and, in this respect, to to ensure that it is managed in way which preserves its ecological value;
2018/09/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 9 #

2018/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c
(c) to ensure a firm engagement from both sides to respect and advance democratic principles, human rights and the rule of law, in compliance with the criteria required for the GSP+ status granted to the Kyrgyz Republic, including the ratification of the relevant international conventions and the effective implementation of the conclusions and recommendations of the relevant monitoring bodies established under those conventions; to pursue a regular dialogue on human rights in coordination with local NGOs;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 19 #

2018/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) to step up cooperation in crisis management, conflict prevention, the fight againstcountering terrorism and organised crime, the prevention of violent radicalisation and cross- border crime, and integrated border management, in full respect for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 45 #

2018/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point s a (new)
(sa) to consult with NGOs on developing and improving the country’s legislation and policies, in particular with respect to any instruments or mechanisms that directly affect the action of civil society organizations; to suspend the criminal persecution and investigation against Bir-Duino human rights movement;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 49 #

2018/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point t a (new)
(ta) to ensure the government of Kyrgyzstan implements the finding of the UN Human Rights Committee and complies with EP resolution of 15 January 2015 to immediately release human rights defender Azimjon Askarov, quash his conviction, and provide him with rehabilitation and reparation, in line with its obligations under core human rights treaties and its commitment to effectively implement the conclusions and recommendations of the relevant monitoring bodies, as also enshrined in the criteria of the GSP+status granted by the European Union on 2 February 2016;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #

2018/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point u a (new)
(ua) to ensure that Kyrgyzstan ends and further prevents harassment of civil society activists, and allows banned human rights activists and journalists to enter Kyrgyzstan and continue their work without undue interference;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 53 #

2018/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point v
(v) to urge Kyrgyzstan to reverse any negative authoritarian trends such as the political instrumentalisation of the administration of justice, unfair judicial punishments, unfair and non-transparent trials, interference in media freedom and retaliations against journalists deemed critical of the authorities, the impunity of law enforcement agents and the alleged ill- treatment and torture of those held in custody, extraditions to countries where individuals face a risk of torture or ill treatment, as well as discrimination against minorities and the limitations placed on the freedom of assembly and expression, and to urge Kyrgyzstan to thoroughly investigate all allegations of evidence planting, extortion, torture, and other ill- treatment;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 61 #

2018/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point w a (new)
(wa) to ensure that Kyrgyzstan fully respects its human rights obligations in the context of countering terrorism and violent extremism, that those suspected, detained, prosecuted, or imprisoned on terrorism or extremism charges are afforded their full rights at all stages, that Kyrgyzstan implements the December 2016 amendments to article 299-2 of the Criminal Code as scheduled in January 2019, and amends national Law No. 150 on Countering Extremist Activity of 2005 to excise overly broad or vague definitions of extremism and extremist acts;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 73 #

2018/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point y
(y) to support, promote and facilitate further regional cooperation in Central Asia, which is one of the least integrated regions in the world, following the current positive dynamics;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 84 #

2018/2118(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point ac
(ac) to acknowledge Kyrgyzstan’s security concerns in connection with the deteriorating security situation in Afghanistan and in responding to increasing radicalisation in the Central Asian region; to provide assistance in relation to returning Islamist foreign fighters and their family members from abroad and preventive measures against increasing violent religious radicalisation;
2018/09/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas EU external action has a direct impact on our citizens’ lives, be it by supporting security and stability and facilitating peaceful conflict resolution in our neighbourhood or preventing crises before they happen;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the new world order is characterised by asymmetry, with numerous non-state actors becoming increasingly influential over the past decade: from NGOs advocating human rights, to transnational corporations influencequitable and fair trade relations and a sustainable management of natural resources and , to transnational corporations and financial groups influencing and conditioning government policy, to social media activists calling for democratic change; whereas, nevertheless, no emergent state or non-state actor can impose an incontestable world view;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas globalisation has increased interdependence, with decisions taken in Beijing or Washington having a direct impact on our lives; whereas, in turn, interdependence has resulted in global public opinion becoming cognisant of transnational problems, which require transnational solutions and effective multilateral organisations to improve global governance;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 44 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the EU’s aspirational global leadership has been undermined as a result of the financial crisis, rising Euroscepticism, the proliferation of crises on our doorstep and declining perception of EU benefits and rising scepticism of European public opinion on the projection of force abroad, which has given rise to a tendency to respond to events rather than to shape them;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 53 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas Western democracies have become more vulnerable, protectionist and inward- looking, and are swinging to the extremes at a time when multilateral cooperation is the only way to respond to global challenges effectively; whereas this power vacuum is being filled by other powers such as China or Russia;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 64 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas an ambitious, credible and effective common foreign policy must be supported by adequate financial resources and means and must be based on a coherent, timely and consistent action and approach of the EU Member States;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 91 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Is convinced that no single EU Member State can respond effectively to today’s global challenges on its own; believes that, by pulling their weight together within the EU, the Member States can exert an influence on the world stage that they would not otherwise possess; is convinced that 28 Member States together, representing 500 million citizens, have more leverage in international negotiations and in setting international regulations and political, democratic, environmental, social and economic standards; believes, moreover, that under the protection of the EU, globalisation can represent an opportunity for EU citizens and not a threat;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 104 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets the fact that the Member States all too often prioritise their national interests, regardless of the possible consequences at a European level, thereby undermining the EU’s credibility and effectiveness as a global player; calls for a greater division of responsibilities and enhanced coordination between the EU and its Member States in line with EU Treaties; believes that good cooperation among the Member States is essential to safeguard our democracy, our freedom, and our social and environmental standards;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 121 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 2
- a commitment to multilateralism and international law, with the support of the UN system and regional organisations at its core;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 126 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 2 a (new)
- the promotion of sustainable development, fair trade and climate- friendly agreements;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 131 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 4
- an emphasis on conflict prevention, peaceful conflict resolution, peacebuilding and institution building;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 137 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that the EU should stay true to its principles of democracyRecalls the Union's Treaty-based obligation to consolidate and support democracy, the rule of law, human rights and the ruprinciples of lawinternational law throughout its external dealings; emphasises the importance of assessing wthether the promotion of these principles in third countries has been successful compliance with this obligation regularly, including in relation to sectoral policies such as trade, energy or security;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 149 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the European External Action Service (EEAS), the Commission and the Member States to act strategically by using all the means at their disposal, including trade, development, and diplomatic and militaryCSDP civilian tools, to strengthen the EU’s geopolitical influence and protect its interests;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 163 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for sufficientadequate financial resources to be made available for the EU’s external action under the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) (2021-2027); takes the view that the growing challenges in the EU’s neighbourhood and beyond call for significantly higher appropriations for external action;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 170 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Believes that the Union's preferred policy response to emerging risks, conflicts and threats should remain civilian; reminds that economic sanctions, if well-designed, targeted, and implemented in a uniform manner, are a powerful tool of coercive diplomacy, in particular as regards the trade in fossil fuels from states with aggressive foreign policies; deeply deplores the significant decrease of funds available for civilian conflict prevention and peacebuilding of two thirds for the 202012-2027 MFF compared to the current financial perspective; urges the Council and the Commission to review this position and to triple investments in civilian conflict prevention for the upcoming MFF; equally calls for an initiative to significantly strengthen civilian CSDP, be it via a Civilian CSDP Compact or others means; reminds that according to the treaty, civilian CSDP has the task to manage crisis, stabilise institutions in fragile post-conflict countries, and not to manage migration;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 178 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the EEAS to invest in collective leadership and develop ‘issue- based coalitions’ with like-minded countries, to support a rules-based international order, multilateralism and free and fair trade, and to pursue cooperative solutions to global challenges; calls on the EEAS to engage with emerging powers in the provision of global public goods such as peace and security, including by working together on crisis management operations around the world, climate change mitigation, sustainable management of natural resources, promotion and development of renewable energy, financial stability, and clean air and access to water;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 219 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Highlights that transatlantic relations are indispensable for the security and prosperity of both sides of the Atlantic; regrets the US’s progressive retreat from the multilateral, rules-based world order, namely its withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreemen, UNESCO, the UN Human Rights Council and the withdrawal of the funding of UNRWA; deplores the US threats to prosecute the judges of the International Criminal Court;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 235 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses that investing in the stability and prosperity of the Western Balkans means investing in the security and future of our Union; reiterates that the European perspective for the countries in the Western Balkans must lead to the full membership of the countries concerned provided that all the criteria are met; highlights that the enlargement process is merit-based and must depend on nothing other than the concrete results achieved by each individual country; reiterates the importance, throughout this process, of the rule of law, reconciliation and good neighbourly relations, security and migration, socio-economic development, transport and energy connectivity and the digital agenda;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 244 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. CRecognises the importance of the stability of the Eastern Neighbourhood for the Union's own stability and encourages developing ever closer relations with the Eastern Partnership countries; calls on the Commission and the EEAS to continue using the EU’s transformative power at its Eastern borders, using political, partnership and trade agreements and access to the single market and integration in the EU policies and programmes and people-to-people contacts as incentives to foster democratic reforms and the adoption of European rules and standards;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 268 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Recalls that the Mediterranean is one of the most unequal borders in the world; reiterates the urgent need to stimulate the economic development of the Southern Mediterranean basin and Sub- Saharan Africa in order to create local economic opportunities in the countries of origin of migrants; welcomnotes, in this regard, Commission President Juncker’s proposal to build a new Alliance for Sustainable Investment and Jobs between Europe and Africa, andbut expresses some doubts concerning the additionality of its concrete elements; welcomes his initiative to develop the various European-African trade agreements into one continent-to- continent free trade agreement, as an economic partnership between equals; highlights the EU's constant lack of policy coherence and regrets that several policy actions, for example in trade policies, run counter to the declared aim of developing Africa;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 284 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 e (new)
17e. Emphasises that strengthening regional security in the Indo-Pacific is of critical importance to the interests of the EU and its Member States; stresses that all disputes should be settled through peaceful means based on international laws; takes note that official dialogue between China and Taiwan has been frozen over the past two years; encourages a quick resumption of bilateral talks to de-escalate tensions between the two sides and maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait; reiterates its firm support for Taiwan's meaningful participation in international organisations, mechanisms and activities;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 297 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Believes that, despite their importance, soft powerdiplomacy and institution building alone are not sufficient to exert influence in a world where power politics and hard power are increasingly significant; believes that the effectiveness of the EU’s foreign policy will ultimately depend, to a large extent, on the resources and capabilities that support it; urges therefore Member States to pool and share military capabilities needed for Articles 42(1) and 43(1) TEU military operations at EU level and enlarged to the maximum extent possible mechanisms such as ATHENA in order to generate speed, effectivity and solidarity among states when it comes to common costs of military CSDP operations;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 298 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Underlines, in this respect, that this can only happen once the EU is supported by adequate financial resources and means as well as by a strong, coherent and unified political will and commitment of its Member States;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 306 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the steps taken to increase the EU’s military autonomy, namely the establishment of a European single command centre in Brussels for European military training missions, and removing obstaeffectiveness as regards CSDP tasks, namely the establishment of a Military Planning and Conduct Capability (MPCC) in Brussels for European military training missions, whose competency should be enlarged to executive military operations in order to become the nucleus to the deployment of EU Battlegroupof a single operational headquarters of the Union; believes that it is time to abolish ad hoc structures like the EU Battlegroups and use PESCO and other mechanisms to establish permanent multinational military units which perform different military functions necessary for Article 42(19 and 43(1) TEU military tasks; believes that the establishment of Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) on defence projects and the coordinated review of national defence budgets will help the Member States to spend their defence budgets more effectively; iciently, in particular via pooling at European level;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 315 #

2018/2097(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Believes that the capacity to dispatch forces to global conflicts in the neighbourhood and beyond is an essential pre-condition for becoming a credible political power; calls on the EEAS andimplementing the objectives of Article 21 and the tasks of Articles 42(1) and 43(1) TEU, and, in some cases, for becoming a credible political power which is able structure and trigger the prevention of armed conflict, the enforcement of peace agreements and the stabilisation of very fragile post- conflict situations; calls on the Member States to develop sufficient military capabilities to defend their values and interests around the worldobjectives of the Treaty;
2018/10/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 71 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) In a context of rapid and profound changes, induced by technological revolution and glvesting in learning mobailisation, investing in learning mobilty, education for democracy and solidarity, cooperation and innovative policy development in the fields of education, training, youth and sport, sport, arts and environmentalism is key to building inclusive, democratic, cohesive and resilient societies and sustaining the competitiveness ofsolidarity in the Union, while contributing to strengthening European identity and to a more democratic Union.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 80 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) In its Communication on Strengthening European Identity through Education and Culture of 14 November 2017, the Commission put forward its vision to work towards a European Education Area by 2025, in which learning would not be hampered by borders; a Union, where spending time in another Member State for purposes of studying and learning in any form or setting would become the standard and where, in addition to one's mother tongue, speaking two other languages, including minority languages and languages supporting mobility, would become the norm; a Union in which people would have a strong sense of their identity as Europeans, of Europe's cultural heritage and its diversity. In this context, the Commission emphasised the need to boost the tried-and- tested Erasmus+ programme in all categories of learners that it already covers and reaching out better to learners with fewer opportunities.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The European Pillar of Social Rights, solemnly proclaimed and signed on 17 November 2017 by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, lays down, as its first key principle, that everyone has the right to quality and inclusive education, training and lifelong learning in order to maintain and acquire skills that enable them to participate fully in society and manage successfully transitions in the labour market. This right has to become a reality for everyone and sufficient EU funding should be geared towards that.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) On 16 September 2016 in Bratislava, leaders of twenty-seven Member States stressed their determination to provide better opportunities for youth. In the Rome Declaration signed on 25 March 2017, leaders of twenty-seven Member States and of the European Council, the European Parliament and the European Commission pledged to work towards a Union where young people receive the best education and training and can work, learn, exchange, study and find jobs across the Union; a Union which preserves our cultural heritage and promotes solidarity, democracy and cultural diversity.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The mid-term evaluation report of the 2014-2020 Erasmus+ programme confirmsidered that the creation of a single programme on education, training, youth and sport resulted in significant simplification, rationalisation and synergies in the management of the Programme while further improvements are necessary not only to further consolidate the efficiency gains of the 2014-2020 Programme but also to ensure that the creation of a single programme does not happen at the detriment of smaller beneficiaries and certain target groups. In the consultations for the mid- term evaluation and on the future Programme, Member States and stakeholders made a strong call for continuity in the Programme's scope, architecture and delivery mechanisms, while calling for a number of improvements, such as making the Programme more inclusive and manageable also for smaller beneficiaries and smaller project sizes. They also expressed their full support for keeping the Programme integrated and underpinned by the lifelong learning paradigm. The European Parliament, in its Resolution of 2 February 2017 on the implementation of Erasmus+, welcomed the integrated structure of the programme and called on the Commission to exploit fully the lifelong learning dimension of the programme by fostering and encouraging cross-sectoral cooperation in the future programme. Member States and stakeholders also highlighted the need to keep a strong international dimension in the Programme and to extend it to other sectors of education and training.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) In its Communication on 'A modern budget for a Union that protects, empowers and defends - the multiannual financial framework for 2021-2027'26 adopted on 2 May 2018, the Commission called for a stronger “youth” focus in the next financial framework, notably by more than doubling the size of the 2014-2020 Erasmus+ Programme, one of the Union’s most visible success stories. The focus of the new Programme should be on inclusiveness, and to reach more young people with fewer opportunities and promoting the overall personal development of young people as active citizens in diverse and democratic societies. This should allow more young people to move to another country to live, learn or work. _________________ 26 COM(2018) 321 final.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) In this context, it is necessary to establish the successor programme for education, training, youth and sport (the 'Programme') of the 2014-2020 Erasmus + programme established by Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council27. The integrated nature of the 2014-2020 programme covering learning in all contexts - formal, non- formal and informal, and at all stages of life - should be maintained to boost flexible learning paths allowing individuals to develop those competences that are necessary to develop as individuals and to face the challenges of the twenty-first century. _________________ 27 Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing 'Erasmus+': the Union programme for education, training, youth and sport and repealing Decisions No 1719/2006/EC, No 1720/2006/EC and No 1298/2008/EC (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 50).
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) The Programme shall provide students, teachers and adult learners with the opportunity to broaden their horizons and reduce prejudice regarding LGBTI people. Teacher-training activities should train teachers on how to introduce LGBTI topics in a positive light into the curriculum, how to support LGBTI students and fellow colleagues, and how to protect LGBTI students in school legislation. Additionally, the adult education and vocational education and training opportunities should help those LGBTI students who dropped out of school or university due to the unsafe school/studying environments they were exposed to.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) The Programme should be coherent with the new European Union youth strategy30, the framework for European cooperation in the youth field for 2019- 2027, based on the Commission's Communication of 22 May 2018 on 'Engaging, connecting and empowering young people: a new EU Youth Strategy'31, including as regards the strategy’s aspirations to support quality youth work and non-formal and informal learning. This entails attention for mobility, inclusiveness, capacity building, innovation and recognition of youth work and non-formal or informal learning within the context of the 2012 Council Recommendation on the validation of non-formal and informal learning. This also calls for the promotion of quality tools and systems that should be used in the training of youth workers and that correspond to the changing circumstances of young people’s lives. These should be embedded in a broader quality approach to empower youth organisations. _________________ 30 [Reference - to be adopted by the Council by the end of 2018]. 31 COM(2018) 269 final. COM(2018) 269 final.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The Programme should contribute to strengthening the Union's innovation capacity notably by supporting mobility and cooperation activities that foster the development of competences in forward- looking study fields or, especially those promoting sustainable development as a horizontal approach and disciplines such as liberal arts, science, technology, engineering and mathematics, climate change, the environment, clean energy, artificial intelligence, robotics, data analysis and arts/design, to help people develop knowledge, skills and competences needed for the future. To this end, particular measures should address women and girls, who are still underrepresented in these disciplines.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The Programme should be more inclusive by improving its outreach to those with fewer opportunities, including through more flexible learning mobility formats, and by fostering participation of small organisations, in particular newcomers and community-based grassroots organisations that work directly with disadvantaged learners of all agesmobility formats, simplified administrative procedures, targeting of beneficiary organisations working with groups underrepresented in Erasmus+, youth-friendly and clear information and communication about the programme and by fostering and supporting the participation of local organisations and small organisations, in particular newcomers, youth organisations, volunteer-based grassroots organisations and community-based grassroots organisations that work directly with disadvantaged learners of all ages, and organisations working with and supporting people from marginalised groups such as people with an ethnic minority background, people with disabilities and LGBTI people. Virtual formats, such as virtual cooperation, blended and virtual mobility, should be promoted as a complementary aspect of a physical mobility to reach more participants, in particular those with fewer opportunities and those for whom moving physically to a country other than their country of residence would be an obstacle.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) The Programme should contribute to the full implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, in particular Article 24 (right to education), and the European Disability Strategy, to ensure that people with disabilities are able to fully and equally enjoy all their human rights and fundamental freedoms.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In its Communication on Strengthening European identity through education and culture, the Commission highlighted the pivotal role of education, culture and sport in promoting active citizenship and common values amongst the youngest generations. Strengthening European identity and fostering the active participation of individuals in the democratic processes and civil society is crucial for the future of Europe and our democratic societies. Going abroad to study, learn, train and work or to participate in youth, andrt, environmental or sport activities contributes to strengthening this European identity in all its diversity and the sense of being part of a cultural community as well as to fostering such active citizenship, among people of all ages. Those taking part in mobility activities should get involved in their local communities for example by volunteering in local initiatives as well as engage in their host country local communities to share their experience. Activities linked to reinforcing all aspects of creativity in education, training and youth and enhancing individual key competencies should be supported. The Programme recognises a particularly important role of civil society organisations such as youth organisations, in achieving this goal through non-formal education and informal learning.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 115 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) The basic architecture of the 2014- 2020 programme in three chapters - education and training, youth and sport/arts/environment - structured around three key actions has proved successful and should be maintained. Improvements to streamline and rationalise the actions supported by the Programme should be introduced.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) The Programme should reinforce existing learning mobility opportunities, notably in those sectors where the Programme could have the biggest efficiency gains, to broaden its reach and meet the high unmet demand. This should be done notably by increasing and facilitating mobility activities for higher education students, school pupils and learners in vocational education and training. Mobility of low-skilled adult learnergroups currently reached less, especially young people not in formal education and learners in vocational education and training as well as school pupils. Higher education students could continue to be targeted at the existing high level. Mobility of low-skilled, disadvantaged learners or those with fewer opportunities should be embedded in partnerships for cooperation. Mobility opportunities for youth participating in non-formal or informal learning activities should also be fundamentally extended to reach more young people, especially newcomers, those with fewer opportunities and hard-to- reach population. Mobility of staff in education, training, youth and sport should also be reinforced, considering its leverage effect. In line with the vision of a true European Education Area, the Programme should also boost mobility and exchanges and promote student participation in educational and cultural activities by supporting digitalisation of processes, such as the European Student Card. This initiative can be an important step in making mobility for all a reality first by enabling higher education institutions to send and receive more exchange students while still enhancing quality in student mobility and also by facilitating students' access to various services (library, transport, accommodation) before arriving at the institution abroad.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The Programme should encourage youth participation in Europe's democratic life, including by supporting participation projects for young people to engage and learn to participate in civic society, raising awareness about European common values including fundamental rights, bringing together young people and decision makers at local, national and Union level, as well as contributing to the European integration process. The Programme recognises the key role of youth organisations and youth work in reaching this objective and will focus on building a stronger youth sector in Europe by supporting and promoting the operation and projects of youth organisations across Europe, neighbouring countries and cooperation with the rest of the world.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 126 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) The Programme should offer young people more opportunities to discover Europe through learning experiences abroad. Eighteen year oldsYoung people regardless of age, in particular those with fewer opportunities, should be given the chance to have a first- time, short- term individual or group experience travelling throughout Europe in the frame of an informal educational activity aimed at fostering their sense of belonging to the European Union discovering its diversity and the variety of youth participation and discovering its cultural diversity. The Programme should identify bodies, including civil society organisations and youth organisations, in charge of reaching out and selecting the participants and support activities to foster the learning dimension of the experience. Preparation and debriefing seminars, providing language training, intercultural skills and stimulating reflection should be an integral part of the travelling experience. Those seminars should be organised by the responsible sending or receiving organisations. These should also be involved in the selection of participants and serve as a point of contact for the traveller for the duration of the journey. The Programme should as well integrate the European Capitals of Culture, the European Youth Capitals, the European Volunteering Capitals and European Green Capitals as a key component of the experience.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) The Programme should also enhance the learning of languages, in particular through widened use of online tools, as e-learning offers additional advantages for language learning in terms of access and flexibility. In order to support European mobility those languages that provide the possibility of broader intercultural exchange should be supported as well as those languages that increase the cultural heritage and language diversity of the EU.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 136 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) The Programme should support measures that enhance the cooperation between institutions and organisations active in education, training, youth, arts and sport, recognising their fundamental role in equipping individuals with the knowledge, skills and competences needed in a changing world as well as to adequately fulfil the potential for sustainable development, social progress, innovation, creativity and entrepreneurship, in particular within the digital economy.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) The 2010 Bruges Communiqué called for support of vocational excellence for smart and sustainable growth. The 2017 Communication on Strengthening Innovation in Europe's Regions points to linking vocational education and training to innovation systems, as part of smart specialisation strategies at regional level. The Programme should provide the means to respond to these calls and support the development of transnational platforms of Centres of vocational excellence closely integrated in local and regional strategies for sustainable development, social inclusion, growth, innovation and competitiveness. These centres of excellence should act as drivers of quality vocational skills in a context of sectorial challenges, while supporting overall structural changes and socio-economic policies in the Union.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) As a way to ensure cooperation with other Union instruments and support to other policies of the Union, mobility opportunities should be offered to people in various sectors of activity, such as the public sector, agriculture and enterprise, to have a learning experience abroad allowing them, at any stage of their life, to grow and develop professionally but also personally, in particular by developing an awareness of their European identity and an understanding of European cultural diversity. The Programme should offer an entry point for Union transnational mobility schemes with a strong learning dimension, simplifying the offer of such schemes for beneficiaries and those taking part in these activities. The scaling-up of Erasmus projects should be facilitated; specific measures should be put in place to help promoters of Erasmus projects to apply for grants or develop synergies through the support of the European Structural and Investment Funds and the programmes relating to migration, security, justice and citizenship, health and culture as well as the European Solidarity Corps.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) The Program shall be in line with the central aim of the Paris Agreement to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by raising awareness and improve responsible and environment conscious behavioural patterns in order to keep the global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius. Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and achieve the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, this Programme will contribute to mainstream climate action in the Union's policies and to the achievement of an overall target of 25% of the Union budget expenditures supporting climate objectives. Relevant actions will be identified during the Programme's preparation and implementation and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review process.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 154 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32 a (new)
(32a) The Programme and its tools in this unique international environment should play a crucial role in educating people about global sustainability, and global studies, environmental protection, climate change and beside targeted programs these studies should appear in all key activities as a horizontal element in the form of formal, non-formal education or informal learning.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 155 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32 b (new)
(32b) Given the legal obligation of the European Union to eliminate inequalities and promote equality between men and women through all its activities established by Article 8 TFEU on the European Union, this Programme should contribute to mainstream gender in the Union's policies. Relevant actions will be identified during the Programme's preparation and implementation and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review process. Improvements are especially needed regarding gender balance of participants from 3rd countries.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 156 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) Within a basic envelope for actions to be managed by the national agencies in the field of education and training, a breakdown of minimum allocation per sector (higher education, school education, vocational education and training and adult education) should be defined in order to guarantee a critical mass of appropriations to reach the intended output and results in each of these sectors. In addition, a minimum allocation per target group should also be defined in order to guarantee a critical mass of appropriations to reach the intended output and results in each of these sectors.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 160 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
(40) In compliance with the Financial Regulation, the Commission should adopt work programmes and inform the European Parliament and the Council thereof. The work programme should set out the measures needed for their implementation in line with the general and specific objectives of the Programme, the selection and award criteria for grants, as well as all other elements required, especially the targeting of those with fewer opportunities. Work programmes and any amendments to them should be adopted by implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 161 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) Pursuant to paragraph 22 and 23 of the Inter-institutional agreement for Better Law-Making of 13 April 201638, there is a need to evaluate the Programme on the basis of information collected through specific monitoring requirements, while avoiding overregulation and administrative burdens, in particular on beneficiary organisations but also on Member States. Such requirements should include specific, measurable and realistic indicators which can be measured over time as a basis for evaluating the effects of the Programme on the ground. _________________ 38 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016 (OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1).
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 163 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
(43) In order to ensure greater efficiency in communication to the public at large and stronger synergies between the communication activities undertaken at the initiative of the Commission, the resources allocated to communication under this Regulation should also contribute to covering the corporate communication of the political priorities of the Union, provided that these are related to the general objective of this Regulation.deleted
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 165 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44 a (new)
(44a) As a general rule, grant requests and project applications will be submitted to the national agency of the country where the applicant organisation is based, however the European Commission shall guarantee that all provisions and targets are sufficiently met during implementation. Grant requests and project applications for activities organised by Union-wide networks, European non-governmental organisations and international organisations, shall be submitted to and managed by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency of the European Commission.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
(46) Member States should endeavour to adopt all appropriate measures to remove legal and administrative obstacles to the proper functioning of the Programme. This includes resolving, where possible, and without prejudice to Union law on the entry and residence of third-country nationals issues that create difficulties in obtaining visas and residence permits and other legal or administrative difficulties that could prevent access to the programme. In line with Directive (EU) 2016/801 of the European Parliament and of the Council39, Member States are encouraged to establish fast-track admission procedures. _________________ 39 Directive (EU) 2016/801 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of research, studies, training, voluntary service, pupil exchange schemes or educational projects and au pairing (OJ L 132, 21.5.2016, p. 21).
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 170 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) The performance reporting system should ensure that data for monitoring programme implementation and evaluation are collected efficiently, effectively and in a timely manner, and at the appropriate level of granularity. Such data should be sex-disaggregated and communicated to the Commission in a way that complies with relevant data protection rules.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49 a (new)
(49a) It is important to ensure the sound financial management of each programme and its implementation in the most effective and user-friendly manner possible. Member States or National Agencies should refrain from adding rules that complicate the use of funds for the beneficiary.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 176 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) 'lifelong learning' means learning in all its forms (formal, non-formal and informal learning) taking place at all stages in life, including early childhood education and care, general education, vocational education and training, higher education, and adult education, and resulting in an improvement in knowledge, skills and attitudes or participation in society, sensitivity to global and local environmental and social issues in a personal, civic, cultural, social and/or employment-related perspective, including the provision of counselling and guidance services;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) 'learning mobility' means moving as a choice physically to a country other than the country of residence voluntarily, in order to undertake study, training or non-formal or informal learning; IAt maythe request of the participant it shall be accompanied by measures such as language support and training and/or be complemented by online learning and virtual cooperation. In some specific cases, it may take the form of learning through the use of information technology and communications tools;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 182 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) 'informal learning' means learning resulting from daily activities and experiences which is not organised or structured in terms of objectives, time or learning support. It may be unintentional from the learner's perspective and it should provide for a learning outcome beneficial for the learner;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 183 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
(8) 'staff' means any person who, on either a professional or a voluntary basis, is involved in education, training or non- formal learning, and may include professors, teachers, trainers, school leaders, youth workers, sport coachevolunteers, civil society activists, sport coaches, social service staff and social workers, non- educational staff and other practitioners involved in promoting learning;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 184 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
(10) 'school pupil' means any person enrolled in a learning capacity at an institution providing general education at any level from early childhood education and care to upper secondary education, or child schooled outside an institutional setting considered by the national or regional authorities as eligible to participate in the Programme, in their respective territories;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 186 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(11) 'adult education' means any form of non-vocational education for adults after initial education, whether of a formal, non- formal or informal nature; A main aim of adult education is the promotion of social inclusion, active citizenship and well- being, alongside the transmission of knowledge, competences and skills;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 189 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18
(18) 'higher education institution' means any type of higher education institution which, in accordance with national or regional law or practice, offers recognised degrees or other recognised tertiary level qualifications, whatever such establishment may be called as well as any other type of higher education institution which is considered by the national or regional authorities as eligible to participate in the Programme, in their respective territories;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 190 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19
(19) 'transnational' relates to any action involving at least two countries or regions in two countries which are either Member States or third countries associated to the Programme;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 191 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20
(20) 'youth participation activity' means an out-of-school activity carried out by informal groups of young people or groups including young people and/or youth organisations, and characterised by a non- formal or informal learning approach;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 193 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21
(21) 'youth worker' means a professional or a volunteer involved in non-formal or informal learning who supports young people in their personal development, including socio-educational and professional development and the development of their competences. Youth workers together with young people are involved in planning, steering, coordination, implementation and evaluation of youth work activities and related youth work development;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 22
(22) 'EU Youth dialogue' means the dialogue with young people and youth organisations whichinvolving policy and decision makers, as well as experts, researchers and other relevant civil society actors. It serves as a forum for continuous joint reflection on the priorities, implementation and follow-up of European cooperation in all fields of relevance to the yYouth fieldng;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 196 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 25
(25) 'people with fewer opportunities' means people facing obstacles that prevent them from having effective access to opportunities under the Programmein one or more areas of life among others for economic, social, socio- economic cultural, geographical or health reasons, including psychological, discriminatory reasons, sexual orientation, gender identity, race, age, ethnicity, a migrant background, legal barriers or for reasons such as disability and educational or learning difficulties; such difficulties require for them to have additional support services to enable them to overcome such obstacles and fully participate in the programme;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 201 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 27 a (new)
(27a) “support services” means long or short-term services, that empower participants or their families with fewer opportunities or support needs to fully and successfully participate in all the activities of the programme and the life of the local community in which they reside;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 202 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of the Programme is to support the educational, professional and personal development of people in education, training, youth, adult learning and sport, in Europe and beyond, thereby contributing to a sustainable growth, jobs and social cohesion andfuture, especially quality jobs, social cohesion and inclusion, reduction of poverty, global and local environmental protection, furthermore promote active citizenship, participation in democratic life in order to strengthening European identity. As such, the Programme shall be a key instrument for building a European education area, supporting the implementation of the European strategic cooperation in the field of education and, training, adult learning and youth work with its underlying sectoral agendas, strengthening the youth sector, advancing youth policy cooperation under the Union Youth Strategy 2019-2027 and developing the European dimension in sport, art and environmental protection.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 208 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) promote learning mobility of individuals, as well as cooperation, inclusion, sustainability, gender equality, excellence, creativity and innovation at the level of organisations and policies in the field of education and training;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 209 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) promote non-formal and informal learning mobility, intercultural dialogue, critical thinking, volunteering and active participation among young people, as well as cooperation, inclusion, sustainability, gender equality, creativity and innovation at the level of organisations and policies in the field of youth, including youth work;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 211 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) promote learning mobility of sport coaches, art teachers, environmental educators and staff, as well as cooperation, inclusion, sustainability, gender equality, creativity and innovation at the level of sport, art and environmental organisations and sport policies.;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 214 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the mobility of those participating in any type of learning activities regardless of age, especially: (a) vocational education and training learners and staff; (b) school pupils or children in childcare and staff; (c) the mobility of those outside formal education settings (d) higher education students and staff;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 215 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) the mobility of those outside formal education settings;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 216 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the mobility of school pupils or children in childcare and staff;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 217 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the mobility of adult education participants and staff;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 219 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) language learning opportunities, including minority languages supporting language diversity and those supporting mobility activities.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 222 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
In the field of learning, education and training, the Programme shall support the following actions under key action 2:
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 224 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) partnerships for innovation in education and other forms of learning through large-scale actions such as adult education alliances;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 225 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) partnerships for innovation, especially sustainable and green innovation to strengthen Europe's sustainable innovation capacity;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 226 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) partnerships for social inclusion and cohesion and reduction of poverty;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 227 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
In the field of learning, education and training, the Programme shall support the following actions under key action 3:
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 230 #

2018/0191(COD)

(c) policy dialogue and cooperation with key stakeholders, including Union- wide networks, European, non- governmental organisationsational, regional and local non-governmental organisations, especially in less privileged regions or working with disadvantaged people and international organisations in the field of learning, education and training; This cooperation shall entail structural support;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 232 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) measures that contribute to the high qualitative and inclusivy and socially more inclusive and environmentally sustainable implementation of the Programme;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 238 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) intergenerational exchange activities between youth and older persons
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 239 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) Partnerships for innovation in youth participation through large-scale actions such as youth work alliances;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 240 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) partnerships for increased outreach of the programme, especially with the use of mass media and new digital tools
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 241 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) policy dialogue, support and cooperation with relevant key stakeholders, including Union-wide networks, European non- governmental organisations, and international organisations in the field of youth, the EU Youth dialogue as well as structural support to the European Youth Forum and other European Youth organisations;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 244 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) measures that contribute to the dialogue with young people and youth organisations serving as a forum for continuous input and joint reflection on the priorities, implementation and follow- up of European cooperation in all fields of relevance to the Young;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 245 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)
(db) structured intergenerational dialogue;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 247 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
In the field of sport, the Programme shall support, under key action 1, the mobility of sport coaches art teachers, environmental educators and staff.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 248 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
In the field of sport, arts and environmental protection the Programme shall support the following actions under key action 2:
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 249 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) not for profit sport, art and environmental protection related events aiming at further developing the European dimension of sport, arts and environmental protection.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 250 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
In the field of sport, art and environmental protection the Programme shall support the following actions under key action 3:
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 251 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) policy dialogue and cooperation with relevant key stakeholders, including European non-governmental organisations and international organisations in the field of sport, arts and environmental protection;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 253 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) dissemination and awareness- raising activities about European policy outcomes and priorities and about the Programme, including sport, art and environmental protection prizes and awards.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 254 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. The financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme for the period 2021-2027 shall be EUR 30 00044 322 000 000 in current prices.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 257 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
(a) EUR 24 940 000 00080% for actions in the field of learning, education and training, from which:
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 259 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a – point 1
(1) at least EUR 8 640 000 00030% should be allocated to higher education actions referred to in point (a) of Article 4 and point (a) of Article 5;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 261 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a – point 2
(2) at least EUR 5 230 000 00030% to actions in vocational education and training referred to in point (b) of Article 4 and point (a) of Article 5;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a – point 3
(3) at least EUR 3 790 000 00018% to school education actions referred to in point (c) of Article 4 and point (a) of Article 5;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 263 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a – point 4
(4) at least EUR 1 190 000 00010% to adult education actions referred to in point (d) of Article 4 and point (a) of Article 5;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 264 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a – point 5
(5) EUR 450 000 0001,8% for Jean Monnet actions referred to in Article 7;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 265 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a – point 5 a (new)
(5a) 2% as a margin of flexibility with regards to all actions in Chapter II
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 266 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) EUR 3 100 000 00015% for actions in the field of youth referred to in Articles 8 to 10;
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 267 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) EUR 550 000 0001,8% for actions in the field of sport referred to in Articles 11 to 13; and
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 269 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) at least EUR 960 000 0003,2% as a contribution to the operational costs of the national agencies.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 271 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The levels of financial support such as grants, travel or administrative lump sums, flat rates and unit costs, shall be regularly revised and adjusted to the living and subsistence costs of the host country or region as well as travelling conditions.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 276 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. To support the inclusion of those who face additional barriers and require special needs assistance a dedicated budget to cover the costs of such assistance will be provided, separate from the main project budget.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 277 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. As a general rule, grant requests and project applications will be submitted to the national agency of the country where the applicant organisation is based. Grant requests and project applications for activities organised by Union-wide networks, European non-governmental organisations and international organisations, shall be submitted to and managed by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency of the European Commission
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 278 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. When implementing the Programme, inter alia in the selection of participants and the award of grants, the Commission and the Member States shall ensure that efforts are made to promote social inclusion and improve outreach to people with fewer opportunities. National Agencies will ensure that and be held responsible for additional appropriate support services to be available to enable people with fewer opportunities to fully participate and have full access to the benefits of the programme.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 281 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. The performance reporting system shall ensure that data for monitoring Programme implementation and evaluation are sex-disaggregated and are collected efficiently, effectively, in a timely manner and at the appropriate level of detail by beneficiaries of Union funds within the meaning of Article [2(5)] of the Financial Regulation. To that end, proportionate reporting requirements shall be imposed on beneficiaries of Union funds and Member States.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 285 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall implement information and communication actions relating to the Programme, and its actions and results. Financial resources allocated to the Programme shall also contribute to the corporate communication of the political priorities of the Union, as far as they are related to the objectives referred to in Article 3.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 290 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. The Member States shall take all necessary and appropriate measures to remove any legal and administrative obstacles to the proper functioning of the Programme, including, where possible, measures aimed at resolving issues that give rise to difficulties in obtaining visas. residence permits and other legal or administrative difficulties that could prevent access to the programme
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 297 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. The National Agency shall regularly consult the beneficiaries of the programme (individuals and organisations) in order to collect their feedback on the programme, report this to the European Commission and improve its implementation at national level based on their feedback and expertise.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 300 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 a (new)
Article 25a Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency At Union level, the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency - EACEA shall be responsible for managing all stages of grant and project applications for actions of the Programme listed in Chapter II, III and IV of this Regulation submitted by Union-wide networks, European non-governmental organisations and international organisations.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 301 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2
2. The committee may meet in specific configurations to deal with sectoral issues. Where appropriate, in accordance with its rules of procedure and on an ad hoc basis, external experts, including representatives of the social partners, may becivil society organisations and representatives of beneficiaries shall be regularly invited to participate in its meetings as observers.
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 302 #

2018/0191(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The European Youth Forum shall be included as permanent observer without voting rights in the committee and its participation laid out in the rules of procedures of the committee
2018/10/24
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas Western values and unitythe liberal word order, an international system based on the rule of law and unity among members of both the EU and NATO are under stress in an era of geoeconomic and political turbulence and growing armed conflict; whereas the West’s two major organisations that have Europe at the centre of their activities, the EU and NATO, are making progress on enhancing their cooperation in facing complex challenges, risks and threats, both conventional and hybrid, generated by state and non-state actors, coming from the South and the Eastcoming from the South and the East but also other directions, generated by state and non-state actors, in the field of the economy, energy, security but also with regards to climate change; whereas neither organisation has the full range of tools to address them all on its own;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 40 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the EU is better equipped to deal with internal securitycurrent challenges in a comprehensive manner via its various policies ranging from agriculture, trade, energy, development, humanitarian aid, justice and home affairs to enlargement, civilian conflict prevention and military crisis management, peace enforcement and post-conflict stabilization, and NATO to manage externterritorial defence collectively; whereas the EU is developing in an accelerated way to bolster its defenceCommon Security and Defence Policy through mechanisms such as PESCO;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 106 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Is convinced that the EU and NATO, sharing the same values, have identical strategic interests too in protecting their citizens against any threatsuniversal norms and values such as rule of law based international system, have shared goals too in protecting their citizens against any threats as well as the UN charter objectives of international peace and security;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 141 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Is convinced that for its Members NATO must remain the cornerstone of collective territorial defence and deterrence in Europe and that a stronger EU of security and defence fully capable of honouring the provisions of Article 42(7) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU)more effective CSDP through PESCO and multiple pooling and sharing projects between Member States coupled with an efficient European defence market will contributes to a stronger NATO as Member States have a single set of forces; underlines that EU-NATO cooperation must also take into account the security and defence policy of those six EU Member States which are not NATO members;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 152 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that the potential of EU- NATO relations has not yet been fully exploited and that further development and deepening of the partnership should not be limitedimplemented in particular with regards to athe common response to crises outside Europe, particularly in the neighbourhood, but also to crises on the continentset of proposals of the Joint Declaration which includes 42 concrete actions;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 166 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the tangiblsome results in the implementation of the Joint Declaration, in particular regarding countering hybrid threats, strategic communications and maritime cooperation, and encourages further progress; welcomes the change in the culture of engagement and the smooth functioning of staff-to-staff cooperation in the implementation of each action; welcomes the engagement also of Members of both the EU and NATO; considers it important to ensure proper resources forolitical will for continued implementation and further improvement of cooperation;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 189 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that EU-NATO cooperation inside NATO should be strengthened on the Eastern flank for the security of both organisations and that Russian penetration in Eastern flank countriesEurope and that Russian influence should be countered; underlines that the current transport infrastructure in Europe, which is mainly West-East oriented, should be complemented by the development of a new North-South dimension, responding to the requirements for military mobility; underlines that the EU has answered the illegal Russian annexation of Crimea and Russia’s failure with strong and far reaching non- military coercive measures which could be further extended to the energy sector;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 206 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the launch of Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) and stresses that it does not represent a competitor for NATO and should be a driver for further EU-NATO cooperation in capabilities development making CSDP more effective and relevandt for a stronger EU pillar in NATOresponding to today’s security and military challenges;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 216 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Recalls that both the EU and NATO have made far reaching commitments with regard to strengthening the UN peacekeeping capabilities but have only rarely directly contributed to past and on-going such missions; calls on both organisation to honour their commitments and to significantly contribute to such UN missions which maintain international peace and stability;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 236 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Notes cumbersome procedures in sharing classified information between the two organisations; considers that both organisations share the sameface similar strategic challenges and, implicitly, will be dealing with one part of the consequences together; believes that – by building mutual trust – cooperation in the exchange of classified information and intelligence analysis could be improved; is of the opinion that fostering a ‘need-to-share’ approach to intelligence exchange would also benefit missions and operations of both organisations; is of the view that the Parallel and Coordinated Intelligence Assessment could be used in fighting hybrid threats more effectively together;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 251 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Considers it important to ensure the complementarity of maritime capacity- building efforts in order to safeguard maritime security more efficiently; welcomes increased EU-NATO operational cooperation and coordination in the Mediterranean theatre, including the sharing of maritime information and situational awarenesssharing of maritime information, situational awareness, in particular as regards arms trafficking off the coast of Libya;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 272 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Reiterates that the EU initiatives aimed at strengthening European security and defence should also help ensure that those EU Member States which are NATO Allies meet their NATO commitments; sStresses that EU Member States should be capable to launch autonomous military missions also where NATO is not willing to act or where EU action is more appropriate;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 290 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Strongly believes that the EU and NATO need to cooperate on strengthening their technological and industrial base; considers it important that effective transatlantic defence industrial cooperation should be a strategic priority for both organisations; supports the measures envisaged under the European Defence Fund (EDF) to supportEuropean NATO Member States need to pool defence technological and industrial investments; supports a review of the ATHENA mechanism or the creation of similar mechanisms between Member States which aim at boosting joint research and, development of, procurement, maintenance, and training as regards European capabilities;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 307 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Reiterates its viewBelieves that the ‘Berlin Plus’ arrangements should be adapted to the current strategic context and enable NATO to make use of EU instruments, including civihave been instrumental in launching CSDP and are still highly relevant for operations such as EUFOR Althea in Bosnia and Herzegovina; underlines the need to maintain the current ‘Berlian tools where appropriatePlus’ arrangements;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 316 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. ConsiderBelieves that the next EU-NATO Joint Declaration, to be adopted at the upcoming NATO summit in July 2018, should initiate the process of reviewire is no need for further declarations on future EU-NATO cooperation but more efforts with regards to the implementation of the many commitments already made; believes that PESCO has the potential to also streng the ‘Berlin Plus’ arrangements; considers in this context that capabilities developed under PESCO should be available for NATO operations and that PESCO projects should ben European military capabilities in general as it should increase interoperability of European armed forces; however, recalls that PESCO is not opened to non-EU members of NATO, such as Norway and, in view of Brexit, the UK; stresses that the review of ‘Berlin Plus’ should provide the framework of cooperation not only for crisis management but also for ensuring securitythird countries and is, according to Article 42(6) TEU, an exclusive mechanism for those Member States whose military capabilities fulfil higher criteria and which have made more binding commitments to one another in this area with a view toge ther on the continent most demanding missions;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 342 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Considers that the EU and NATO should do more together to bolster the resilience, defence and security of the neighbours and partners of both organisations and to strengthen international peace and security; strongly supports the fact that assistance to partner countries for building their capacities and fostering resilience, including on counterterrorism, strategic communication, cyber defence, ammunition storage and security sector reform, is a common objective, particularly in three pilot countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Moldova and Tunisia);
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Warmly welcomesTakes note of the signature of the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement, which constitutes a significant step forward in EU-Armenian relations and embodies a commitment to a further deepening of political and economic relations;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 17 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the signing of the Agreement is not the end point in terms of EU-Armenian cooperation, but instead emphasises the importance of swift and effective implementation and of the respect for international law before moving on to consider the potential for further enhancing cooperation and integration between the two parties, at a pace and on a scale mutually agreeable to both;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 22 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that significant progress in terms of upholding core values such as the rule of law, a functioning democratic system, good-neighbourly relations, defending the independence of the judiciary and delivering results in the fight against corruption, is key to unlocking further prospects, notably that of a possible visa liberalisation dialogue;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 28 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. NotStresses that the territorial application of the Agreement covers the internationally recognised territory of Armenia and that of the European Union;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 29 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to ensure coherence of EU policy on situations of occupation or annexation of territory and ensure, therefore, that no products from the occupied territories of Azerbaijan are exported illegally to the EU;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 31 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the Agreement is in keeping with the spirit andmost of the principles expressed in the European Parliament recommendation of 15 November 2017, which unambiguously states that no comprehensive agreement will be ratified with a country that does not respect EU values; urges the authorities in Armenia nevertheless to ensure, with the support of the EU, there is no backsliding on these values, which could trigger suspension of the application of the Agreement through its Article 379;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 42 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. NoteRegrets that the Agreement is also in keepnot in linge with the spirit and principles expressed in the European Parliament recommendation of 15 November 2017 as regards making the ratification of a new agreement with Armenia or Azerbaijan conditional upon meaningful commitments to and substantial progress towards solving the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict; urges both sides to increase the pace and output of their negotiations following the 2018 elections in both countries in order to make history by ending a conflict which has claimed too many lives, especially those of civilians, and which has prevented the establishment of peace and hampered socio-economic development in the region for almost three decades;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Expresses, in this regard, deep concern at the military build-up and the disproportionate defence-spending in the region and highlights the importance of defusing tension and prevent the risk of new fights with regard, in particular to a negotiated disengagement and disarmament around the ceasefire line; supports the enhancement of the OSCE mission and the substantial increase of the number of international observers;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 51 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Calls on the EEAS and the Commission find ways to set up programmes aimed at facilitating meetings on specific issues and common problems between the representatives of Azeri and Armenians NGOs and youth organisations with regard, in particular, to the environment and peaceful conflict- resolution;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 55 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 f (new)
9f. Takes note of the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights according to which Armenia exercises effective control over Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding territories, including the district of Lachin and calls on the Armenian authorities to fully implement the ruling of the case of Chiragov and Others versus Armenia;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 61 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Emphasises the need to protect the rights of the opposition and ofcreate a level playing field for the opposition and the environment where civil society, including media representatives and human rights defenders work and exercise their rights without the fear of reprisal; calls on Armenia, in this context, to ensure a swift and fair trial for all prisoners, including Andreas Ghukasyan, free from any political considerations;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 64 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 c (new)
11c. Calls on the Armenian government to ensure the right to freedom of assembly as guaranteed by the constitution; urges, in particular, to an ensure impartial investigation into the disproportionate and excessive use of force by the police during June 2015 and July 2016 peaceful rallies;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 65 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 d (new)
11d. Calls on the Armenian authorities to ensure a fair trial in all cases including the ongoing “Sasna Tsrer” case, during which defence lawyers faced unprecedented obstacles to access to court rooms, and to provide legal aid to the defendants;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 74 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Encourages the Armenian authorities to start a deep and genuine process of economic reforms with a view to overcoming the current oligarchic structure and eliminating the relevant monopolies;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 80 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Welcomes the draft Law of the Republic of Armenia “On Ensuring Equality”; calls, in this regard, on the Armenian government to improve the draft law in a comprehensive manner, and to ensure its effectiveness; urges, in particular to complete the list of prohibited acts of discrimination by specifying all relevant areas, including but not limiting to, maternity, pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender identity etc., and maintain the definition of discrimination in line with international standards;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 81 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on Armenia to address the issue of non-discrimination, gender equality through taking swift, yet effective, steps aimed at achieving equal opportunities for all, notably in terms of employment, equal pay and public office and ensure effective, adequately resourced and supported protection mechanisms;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 85 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 d (new)
16d. Welcomes Armenia’s commitment to reducing the number of children, including children with disabilities, in residential institutions, and steps underway to guarantee inclusive education for all children by 2025; calls on Armenia to take further actions to end institutionalization of all children equally and ensure reasonable accommodations for children with disabilities to receive quality inclusive education;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 97 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the EU assistance is not directed to those sectors of the Armenian economy exporting to the Russian Federation that could potentially damage the European firms affected by Russian sanctions with regard, in particular, to the agricultural sector;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 101 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Welcomes the emphasis placed, notably in Article 42, on nuclear safety on the basis of the standards and practices of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and of the European Union; regrets the decision of the Armenian authorities to extend the life of the Medzamor nuclear plan contrary to the previous agreement reached with the EU and reiterates its grave concerns about the safety of the Medzamor nuclearis plant, not least due to its location in a seismic area, and; praises the negotiators for the inclusion of specific cooperation on ‘the closure and safe decommissioning of Medzamor nuclear power plant and the early adoption of a road map or action plan to that effect, taking into consideration the need for its replacement with new capacity to ensure the energy security of the Republic of Armenia and conditions for sustainable development’;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 103 #

2017/2269(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Calls on the Commission to assist and support the Armenian government in its ambitious plan to develop renewable energy both technically and financially;
2018/04/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 3 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the Eastern Partnership is based on a shared commitment between Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine and the European Union to international law and fundamental values, including democracy, the rule of law, respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms and gender equality, as well as to thesocial market economy, sustainable development and good governance;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 9 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the Eastern Partnership pursues the common goals of promoting stability, confidence-building and cooperation, supporting democratic reforms, good neighbourly relations, peaceful conflict resolution and regional cooperation, enhancing people-to- people contacts and boosting trade, in order to increase political dialogue and association as well as economic cooperation and integration;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 16 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas, given that the EU considers cooperation to be a value in itself and strongly believes that it leads to win- win situations for all parties concerned, there is a commitment on the side of the EU to continue to work with all Eastern Partnership countries regardless of their strategic choices as long as the European core values are not questioned or undermined;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 26 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas since the launch of the Eastern Partnership in Prague some founding members experienced an overall deterioration of the human rights situation and a reversal of democratisation trends; whereas one of the main challenges should be to facilitate the ongoing transition towards inclusive, accountable, stable and viable democracies;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 28 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas increased mobility and the enhancement of people-to-people contacts between the partner countries and the EU remains an indispensable instrument for the promotion of European values;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 39 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas the EU should play a more active role in the peaceful resolution of the existing conflicts, notably those of frozen or protracted nature, which represent currently an insurmountable obstacle to the full development of the EaP hindering good-neighbourly relations and regional cooperation;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 43 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I b (new)
Ib. whereas the EU and its eastern partners are vulnerable to hybrid threats stemming from the Russian Federation aimed at dividing the EU and sowing discord and mistrust within the EU and the Eastern Neighbourhood;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 45 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas the Eastern Partnership policy is based on the sovereign right of each partner to choose the level of ambition and the goals to which it aspires in its relations with the EU; whereas, at the same time, on the part of the EU the effective use of the "more for more" principle is of fundamental importance in shaping and differentiating the relations with partner countries;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 59 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) to live up to the high expectations of citizens in all the partner countries as regards eradicating corruption, fighting organised crime and bolstering the rule of law and good governance; to therefore seek a renewed commitment by the partners to adopt and fully implement reforms related to the judiciary, public administration and the fight against corruption and organised crime;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) to encourage electoral reforms that are in line with international standards, that implement recommendations by OSCE-led international observation missions and Venice Commission opinions and that are the subject of a transparent process, broad consultation and, as far as possible, consensus with opposition and civil society, in order to improve electoral frameworks without any bias towards ruling parties;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 65 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) to stress once again that the Eastern Partnership is not aimed at cutting traditional and historic relations of partner countries with other neighbours;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 82 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point h a (new)
(ha) to promote and actively support the implementation of anti-discrimination policies in all the sectors of society;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 95 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point l a (new)
(la) to promote and support a genuine reform of the economic system aimed at phasing out monopolies and oligopolies circumscribing the role of oligarchs through the introduction of adequate laws on the conflict of interests as well as a deep reform of the banking and financial sector aimed at combatting money laundering and tax evasion;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 104 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point n
(n) to improve both energy independence and efficiency, to reduce the dependence on fossil fuels and to promote the use of renewables through specific investments, strengthened cooperation in all priority areas covered by the EU Energy Union and by closer integration of the partners’ energy markets with the European energy market with a particular focus on interconnectivity and infrastructure, whilst scrutinising closely the consequences of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 113 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point o
(o) to also increase prioritisation of the highest levels of nuclear safety standards in the existing power plants and of the phase-out of the obsolete ones and environmental protection and the fulfilment of climate change commitments, including through raising public awareness;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 162 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point r
(r) to call for an immediate end to military hostilities between Armenia and Azerbaijan which unnecessarily claim the lives of civilians and soldiers whilst hampering socioeconomic development; to reaffirm support to the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of both countries as well as to the OSCE Minsk Group co-Chairs’ efforts to solve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and to their 2009 Basic Principles; to call on Armenia and Azerbaijan to re-launch negotiations in good faith with a view to implementing these principles to solve the conflict; to make the ratification of new agreements between the EU and each of the parties conditional on meaningful commitments and substantial progress as to solving the conflict through maintaining the ceasefire and supporting the implementation of the 2009 Basic Principles and the respect for international law;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 176 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point s a (new)
(sa) to step up confidence-building programmes in conflict areas with a view to restoring dialogue and facilitating people-to-people exchanges; to involve citizens and the engage public actors in conflict areas in horizontal partnerships and twinning with counterparts from the Union, and to engage with society and the younger generation as a factor for change;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 205 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point y a (new)
(ya) to monitor closely the implementation of DCFTAs in order to avoid social and environmental dumping calling for more transparency and engagement of all relevant stakeholders in the process of reforms and policy formulation, notably in the areas of trade, investment, energy and migration; to make systematic impact assessments of trade and investment and migration agreements as well as of EU assistance within the framework of the EaP, notably in relation to human rights, public services, decent work and social development;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 206 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point z
(z) to ensure that strict conditionality is always attached to current and further levels of cooperation and support for the partners, and that it is also observed; to underline that EU financial support to its partners will be conditional on concrete reform steps and that the EU’s incentive- based approach will continue to benefit those partners most engaged in ambitious reforms; to emphasise in particular that no comprehensive agreement will be ratified with a country that grossly violates EU values, notably through the non- implementation of ECHR decisions and the harassment, intimidation and persecution of human rights defenders, NGOs and journalists; to implement accountability measures to ensure that those responsible for violations in partner countries are neither supported nor encouraged; to also highlight that clear benchmarks need to be met before any new dialogue on visa-free regimes is launched and concluded; to reiterate that backsliding on prior achievements will systematically lead to the suspension of agreements, including in the area of visa-free regimes and EU funding;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 212 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point aa a (new)
(aaa) to complement the multilateral dimension by increasing the number of activities and initiatives in this context paying particular attention to strengthening cross-border projects, stepping up people-to-people programmes, developing incentives for regional cooperation and further enhancing an active dialogue with civil society;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 229 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point ad a (new)
(ada) to envisage possibility of further macro-financial assistance for those partners who successfully completed previous programmes and are still in need of assistance;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 230 #

2017/2130(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point ae
(ae) to reiterate its strong support for parliamentary input to and scrutiny of the Eastern Partnership policy; in this respect, to enhance the role of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly within the new multilateral architecture of the Eastern Partnership, as well as of the Parliamentary Association or Cooperation Committees (PAC/PCC) within the Association or Cooperation Councils; to welcome the Comprehensive Democracy Support Approach (CDSA) programmes that are being implemented; to invite parliamentarians from the partner countries to work together to scrutinise implementation and exchange best practices; to step up the involvement in this process of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society forum;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 22 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses that the current decision- making process in the EU Foreign Policy based on unanimity at Council level is the main obstacle to an effective and timely external action of the EU; is of the opinion that qualified majority voting should be applied also in foreign policy and urges Member States from now on to refrain from using or from threatening to use the veto power in Foreign Affairs Council meetings;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 24 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Underlines the role of the European Parliament in shaping a genuine common foreign policy in line with the expectations of the European citizens; calls on the Council to take in due account the positions, the stances and the requests of the European Parliament and to act in concert with the EP during the main phases of the decision-making process and the follow-up;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 34 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Regrets the inability of the EU to communicate and present properly to the European public opinions the actions, merits and achievements of the Common Security and Defence policy with regard, in particular, to its numerous CSDP missions and the assistance provided in many parts of the world; urges the Council, the Commission and the Member States to fill up this gap making the EU external action more accountable and visible;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 56 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 3
– cooperation within coalitions and with institutions protecting peace and delivering security;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 59 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 3 a (new)
– preserving a rules-based international order, countering global authoritarian trends and upholding universal human rights;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 67 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that guaranteeing the security of EU citizens and the integrity of the EU’s territory, stabilising the neighbourhood and preserving a rules- based, cooperative international order, tackling the root causes of armed conflicts and enhancing policies of conflict prevention and peaceful conflict resolution are the key conditions for the stability of the EU;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 85 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Is of the view that, in an international environment that is increasingly conflict-ridden and unstable and where democracy is on the retreat, only a joint soft power with credible hard power can confront major short and long term security challenges, notably the refugee crisis, terrorism, conflicts in the Eastern and Southern neighbourhoods, proxy wars and hybrid warfare, and challenging assertive behaviour by Russia and China and contradictory unilateral US policies; takes the view that it is necessary to tackle the root causes of instability and of forced and irregular migration, namely poverty, dramatic economic inequalities, the lack of economic opportunities, armed conflicts, bad governance, corruption and climate change;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 103 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the need to intensify thecounter autocratic and nepotistic trends, to intensify the support to democratic forces and to fight against Islamist terrorism in the Southern neighbourhood and among the neighbours of our neighbours; urges the need for concerted diplomatic efforts on the part of the EU, the US and other international allies, to convince players in the region, such as Turkey, the Gulf states and Iran, of the need for a clear positioning against religious extremism and terrorism as well as a common strategy to address thisese global challenges in line with their commitment at UN level to uphold international law and universal values; believes that these diplomatic efforts should be accompanied by the wide range of other tools and instruments at the EU’s disposal;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 126 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that a sustainable political solution to the Syrian crisis needs to be based on an inclusive, Syrian-led political settlement involving all relevant national and international stakeholders; supports the call of the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Syria on the ceasefire guarantor states to undertake urgent efforts to uphold the ceasefire regime; stresses the importance of ensuring accountability for the mass and widespread abuses committed during the conflict; calls on all parties involved, inside and outside Libya, to support both the Libyan political agreement signed on 17 December 2015 and its resulting Presidential Council, which is the only authority recognised by the international community and by the UN; underlines that solving the Libyan crisis is a prerequisite for stability in the Mediterranean;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 133 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses the importance of ensuring coherence of EU policy towards situations of occupation or annexation of territory; recalls that international humanitarian law should guide EU policy towards all such situations, including in cases of protracted occupation such as in Palestine, Western Sahara and the multiple frozen conflicts in the Eastern Partnership countries;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 136 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Underlines that the lack of progress towards a negotiated two-state solution in the Middle East only leads to further violence and bloodshed; calls on the EU to take its responsibility and become a genuine actor and facilitator in the diplomatic process; calls on the EU institutions and Member States to take urgent steps to protect the viability of the two-state solution and to create a positive dynamic towards genuine peace negotiations; in this regard, calls on the EU and Member States to respond to the expansion of Israeli settlements by applying measures based on international law, notably by distinguishing in their dealings between the State of Israel and the occupied territories, as required by UNSC Resolution 2234; calls on the Israeli authorities to immediately halt and revert its settlement policy; stresses that respect for international human rights and humanitarian law by all parties and in all circumstances remains an essential precondition for achieving a just and lasting peace; underlines the particular responsibility under international law of Israel, as the occupying power, to comply with international humanitarian and human rights law;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 151 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Acknowledges that further efforts should be made to make legal migration and mobility possible, including at bilateral level, by fostering well-managed mobility between and within continents, as well as encouraging policies that promote regular channels for migration; regrets, in this regard, the lack of a genuine, balanced and credible European migration and asylum policy as shown by the ongoing crisis in the Mediterranean and calls on the Council and the Member States to act accordingly;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 167 #

2017/2121(INI)

9. Strongly believes that a new approach to the EU’s relations with its Eastern neighbours is needed; believes that supporting those countries that wish to have closer ties to the EU through an effective and strengthened application of the "more for more" principle must be a top priority for EU foreign policy; welcomes the prolongation of sanctions against Russia and continues to see full implementation of the Minsk agreements as the basis for a sustainable political solution to the conflict in Eastern Ukraine; reiterates its commitment to the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognised borders as well as of all the Eastern Partnership countries; stresses that Russia’s decision of 21 March 2014 to incorporate Crimea into the Russian Federation remains illegal, and deplores the subsequent decision of the Russian authorities to give all inhabitants of Crimea Russian passports;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 171 #

2017/2121(INI)

9a. Points out, in this respect, that protracted and frozen conflicts in the Eastern neighbourhood deeply undermine the resilience and the independence of our Eastern partners; regrets that over the last years no significant progress was made as regards the resolution of these conflicts and calls on the High Representative/Vice-President and Council to play a more active and effective role in the ongoing peace processes;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 184 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recognises the importance of a coherent selective engagement and, where possible, dialogue with Russia so as to ensure accountability and to maintain the possibility of future cooperation on resolving global crises where there is a clear EU interest;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 198 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, giving a fresh impetus to EU enlargement policy and subsequent membership perspective and strengthening the rule of law and the resilience of state institutions; is convinced that regional reconciliation and integration including through the transatlanticEuropean institutional architecture is the best means to address the dangers stemming from destabilising foreign interference, organised crime, disinformation and hybrid threats;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 208 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Regrets that the EU enlargement, in practice, has been put on hold until 2019; expresses its concern at the growing frustration of most candidate countries about some contradicting messages coming from Brussels; urges the Council and the EEAS to adopt a coherent approach based on objective and transparent criteria in the negotiations with the accession countries and send a clear message that the doors of the EU are open for membership once all these criteria are met;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 239 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses that preserving peace, stability and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region is of substantial interest to the EU and its Member States; calls on all the parties concerned to solve differences through peaceful means and to refrain from taking unilateral actions to change the status quo, including in the East and South China sea and the Taiwan strait, in order to safeguard regional security; acknowledges the continued good will and flexibility shown by the government of Taiwan in maintaining cross-strait relations and encourages the resumption of bilateral dialogues, which will be conducive to regional peace and stability; reiterates its commitment to supporting Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organisations and activities;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 256 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Urges the Commission, the EEAS and the Member States to adopt an EU comprehensive approach at every relevant opportunity, and believes that coherent, coordinated action across EU polices, in particular in the areas of humanitarian aid, agriculture, development, trade, energy, climate and science, should be applied in the EU’s external action in a consistent and structured manner; believes that energy security, the respect for human rights and climate diplomacy remain important complementary aspects of the EU’s common foreign and security policy to be addressed as part of the comprehensive approach, and that the Energy Union should be further advanced;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 264 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Takes the view, in this regard, that in order to make the Common Foreign and Security policy more assertive, effective and value-based the EU should enhance its energy security reducing immediately and freeing it in the medium term from the current dependence on oil and gas supplied by authoritarian regimes;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 274 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Takes the view that the EU institutions must improve their capacity to anticipate conflicts and crises including through an adequate short and long term impact assessment of its policies in the regions concerned and to address the root causes of the problems; believes that the EU needs to be able to react more swiftly and effectively to developing crises and should place a greater emphasis on preventing conflicts by primarily using civilian tools such as mediation, reconciliation and dialogue at an early stage;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 295 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Is of the view that Europe’s power lies in its ability to build a community of values and culture that binds together all Europeans; believes in that context that the EU plays a major role as a promoter of democracy and should continue to promote its values outside the EU; highlights that cultural diplomacy should become a substantial part of the EU’s external action and urges the Commission to expand the Erasmus+ program notably the youth part and to foster the development of ambitious science diplomacy;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 297 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Underlines the role of Non State Actors and Civil Society Organisation as actors of diplomacy and key partners of the EU and stresses the importance of EU assistance to and engagement with them;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 315 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses the role of independent media in promoting cultural diversity and intercultural competences, and the need to strengthen such media as a source of credible information, especially in the EU and its neighbourhood, and to further strengthen the EU’s capacity to fight fake news and disinformation; underlines that common EU TV and radio stations should be further enhanced; highlights in this context the need to develop stronger resilience at EU level against such information spread over the Internet; calls on the Commission to coordinate better with the EEAS on those issues;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 327 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Believes that Europe should increase defence cooperation with European security priorities in mind, including territorial integrity, the link between external and internal sin order to defend the values and principles of Article 21 such as security and stability; calls on the Member States to unleash the Lisbon Treaty’s full potential with regard to the Common Security, and risk control in the periphery of Europe;Defence Policy in an efficient manner and welcomes in this context the Implementation Plan on Security and Defence; considers that the European Defence Agency (EDA) capabilities and its proposals with regard to capabilities, command and control, and permanent structured cooperation (PESCO) should be used to their full potential;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 335 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Believes that there is the urgent need to advance nuclear disarmament both regionally and globally; reiterates its calls expressed in its resolution of 17 January 2013 on the Recommendations of the Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference regarding the establishment of a Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction and its resolution of 27 October 2016 on nuclear security and non-proliferation; calls on all EU Member States to sign the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons adopted by 122 states at the UN on 7 July 2017 which will be open for signature on 20September 2017, at the UN in New York;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 346 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for the EU to continue to deepen the transatlantic partnership, while focusing on creating own capabilities to better address regional and international conflicts that have an impact on the EU; believes that the EU and US should focus on adapting transatlantic structures to today’s challenges, such as defending human rights, combating international terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and countering third- party countries’ efforts to destabilise the EU and NATO; calls on the Vice- President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign and Security Policy and the Council to make clear to the US that unilateral moves deeply weaken the transatlantic partnership and undermine the effectiveness of the external action of both partners;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 368 #

2017/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls for increased interinstitutional intelligence sharing and coordination between the EU and NATO, and insists that the EU and NATO must continue to cooperate as closely as possible in a complementary manner while fully respecting European core values and norms such as the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the European Human Rights Convention, national constitutions, international human rights law and international humanitarian law and proper parliamentary oversight; acknowledges that information sharing and coordinated action between the EU and NATO will produce results in areas such as response to hybrid threats, situational awareness, resilience building, strategic communications, cyber security and capacity building vis-à- vis the EU’s partners; believes that further coordination and closer cooperation with other existing multilateral entities such as Eurocorps is needed in order to increase the EU’s securitypotential to manage crisis and stabilise peace;
2017/09/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 16 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas gender employment gaps, gender pay and pension gaps remain significant despite continuous increases in the labour market participation of women and this has negative economic impact;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 22 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas poverty is decreasing but remains very high in some Member States; ; additionally energy poverty remains so high that for the concerned 11% of the EU population it leads to a cycle of economic disadvantage;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas restrictions on public spending and austerity measures are seriously hindering urgently needed investment in critical sectors of the economy and society and therefore withholding economic growth; whereas austerity measures and lack of public investment overly affect the most vulnerable households and may cause social crisis;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas economic policies of the euro area highly affect other Member States’ economies too;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas the increasingly cross- national tax evasion and corruption affect all Member States and undermines the EU’s economic performance, the rule of law and the credibility of democratic institutions;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D c (new)
Dc. whereas new forms of employment and labour are becoming more widespread with digital revolution of labour market;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital D d (new)
Dd. whereas investment, being it private or public is a key tool to increase cohesion and real economy growth, as well as productivity and global competitiveness;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Takes the view that further efforts are needed to achieve a balance betweenstrengthen the social dimension of the European Semester process and put it on equal footing with the economic and sofinancial dimensions of the European Semester proces; calls for a greater focus on structural imbalances on the labour market in the CSRs;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 55 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to continue and better fund the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) up tobeyond the end of the current MFF, while at the same time improving its functioning and implementation; regrets budget shifts out of the ESF including YEI towards the European Solidarity Corps which needs fresh money;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the scope, efficiency and effectiveness of active and sustainable labour market policies should be increased with focus on environmental, employer, worker, health and consumer protection;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Points out that the European economy has not recovered enough to provide employment for all job seekers and unemployed; stresses that alongside job creation, including through public investment, integrating those further from the labour market through individually tailored measures benefits the individual, stabilises social security and supports the economy;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 85 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the fact that insufficient and inadequately focused investment in digital and green job skills and programming may undermine the Union’s competitive position; calls on the Commission to help foster skills development through the updating of qualifications and corresponding education and training curricula at EU level;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 107 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that better skills matching and improved mutual recognition of qualifications is necessary to address skills shortages and mismatches; calls on the Commission to develop a pan- European skills needs forecasting tool, including the skills needed in growing sectors, such as the low carbon and circular economy; believes that in order to anticipate future skills needs, all labour market stakeholders must be strongly involved at all levels;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 111 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the social partners and the Commission to prepare in collaboration and the Commission to present a framework directive on decent working conditions in all forms of work, extending minimum standards to new forms of labour; stresses the importance of the joint understanding of new forms of employment and work, and the importance of collecting comparable data on this issue, in order to increase the efficiency of labour market legislation, therefore to increase employment and sustainable growth;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 112 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Calls for joint efforts to reduce gender based inequalities in Member States and for continuous support for designated, locally adjusted plans to reduce gender employment, pay and pension gaps through economic policies;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for an integrated anti-poverty strategy in order to achieve the Europe 2020 poverty target; underlines the role of Member States’ minimum income schemes in seeking to reduce poverty. ; calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a framework directive on adequate minimum income schemes in the European Union, which should lay down common rules and indicators including reference budgets, and provide methods for monitoring its implementation; requests Member States to work towards the progressive realisation of adequate minimum income schemes addressing the issues of adequacy, coverage and take-up of the schemes; considers that adequate minimum income is an income that is indispensable to live a life in dignity and to fully participate in society, across the life span; points out that in order to be adequate, it has to be above the poverty line in order to meet people’s fundamental needs, including also non- monetary aspects, such as access to education and lifelong learning, decent housing, quality healthcare services, social activities or civic participation;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for more efficient, targeted and more carefully monitored use of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) by national, regional and local authorities in order to promote investment in quality social, health, education and employment services, and to tackle energy poverty, increasing living costs, social exclusion, housing deprivation, and the insufficient quality of the housing stock;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Deplores that the Commission’s and the Council’s goals regarding the fiscal consolidation processes do not prioritize the reduction of social inequalities and demands that this is changed;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 127 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Calls on the Commission to devote next Spring Council to social investment in the sectors where strong evidence exists that it promotes social and economic returns (e.g. early childhood education and care, primary and secondary education, training and active labour market policies, affordable and social housing, and healthcare);
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 130 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6d. Calls on the Commission and Council to adopt a ‘golden’ rule ensuring that Member State’s social investment level do not fall under a previously adopted benchmark of social investment; calls on the Commission and Council to adopt the ‘silver’ rule on social investment to be applied when implementing the Stability and Growth Pact, namely to allow and incentivise Member States to pursue higher levels of public social investment in the sectors where it generates a positive impact on economic growth;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6e. Urges the Commission to set up a forum, with independent experts and relevant stakeholders, to develop a methodology to measure the economic and social returns of social investment in the five above-mentioned piloting sectors;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 132 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 f (new)
6f. Recalls that, as stated by Parliament, socially responsible reforms must be based on solidarity, integration, social justice and a fair distribution of wealth, a model that ensures equality and social protection, protects vulnerable groups and improves living standards for all citizens;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 133 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 g (new)
6g. Calls for the completion of the EMU with full transparency towards non- euro area Member States;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 134 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 h (new)
6h. Calls on the Commission, after due consultation of the civil society, notably the social partners, to submit a proposal by 2020 to the European Parliament and the Council, to establish a European Unemployment Insurance scheme, complementing national benefit schemes; considers that such an appropriately funded automatic stabiliser can play an important role in reducing inequality between countries and in neutralising the consequences arising from the absorption of asymmetric shocks; this scheme should be targeted to Eurozone countries, with the possibility for other Member States to join afterwards;
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 135 #

2017/2114(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 i (new)
6i. Calls for additional joint efforts to improve the integration of migrants and people with a migrant background into the labour market.
2017/07/20
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 44 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to ensure that the deepening of relations between the EU and Azerbaijan is linked to and undertaken on the basis of mutually agreed ambitions and the upholding of the core values and principles of democracy, the rule of law, good governance, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, in the interest of both parties and especially their citizens;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 61 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c
(c) to remind the Azerbaijani authorities about the European Parliament position expressed in the same resolution according to which the ratification of new agreements between the EU and each of the parties to the Nagorno Karabakh conflict must be made conditional on meaningful commitments to and substantial progress towards solvingthe peaceful resolution of the conflict, such as maintaining the ceasefire and supporting the implementation of the OSCE 2009 Basic Principles and the efforts of the OSCE Minsk Group Co- Chairs;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 75 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) to inform and consult with the main stakeholders about the ongoing negotiations and actively communicate about the aims of the new agreement to improve public awareness, both in Azerbaijan and in the EU, about the expected opportunities and benefits that would arise from its conclusion, thereby countering all disinformation campaigns;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 78 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
(g) to provide for regular and in-depth dialogue, notably on political and democratic reforms aimed at bolsteringcreating independent institutions, such as the judiciary in order to make them more democratic, and and independent, on upholding of human rights, and on fostering a strong civil society parliament and on protecting human rights, media, and creating an environment in which a strong civil society can operate without undue interference and ensuring its involvement in the reform process;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 107 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
(ka) to ensure coherence of EU policy on situations of occupation or annexation of territory and ensure, therefore, that no products from the occupied territories of Azerbaijan are exported illegally to the EU;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 129 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point k s (new)
(ks) to express deep concern at the military build-up and the disproportionate defence-spending in the region and highlight the importance of defusing tension and prevent the risk of new fights with regard, in particular to a negotiated disengagement and disarmament around the ceasefire line; to support, in this regard, the enhancement of the OSCE mission and the substantial increase of the number of international observers;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 149 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m a (new)
(ma) to ensure independence of judiciary by allowing independent practicing lawyers to continue practicing and representing clients under the notarized power of attorney and to put an end to arbitrary disbarment of lawyers;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 157 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point n
(n) to put in place specific provisions to support Azerbaijan in fighting corruption, money laundering and tax evasion including greater transparency of beneficial owners of companies and trusts, transparency of large companies 'financial activities in terms of profits realised and tax paid and strengthening of the tax administration' and financial intelligence unit's capacities to prevent these crimes;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 172 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p
(p) to include provisions related to the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms aimed at ending political prosecutions and abductions, the targeting of political dissidents, independent journalists, human rights defenders, NGO representatives and members of some minority groups including the LGBTQ community; to set up a reinforced forum for aregret that the current format of the EU- Azerbaijan Subcommittee on Justice, Freedom, Security and Human Rights and Democracy did not produce substantial results and to set up a reinforced forum for an effective and result-oriented human rights dialogue between the EU and Azerbaijan to encourage and support in particular the implementation of comprehensive reforms of the judiciary, all in line with EU standards; to prepare this dialogue in consultation with the main international and genuinely independent Azeri NGOs;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 183 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p b (new)
(pb) to define clear benchmarks ahead of every round of the human rights dialogue between the EU and Azerbaijan and to evaluate the dialogue on the annual basis, based on the deliverables; to encourage and support in particular the implementation of comprehensive reforms of the judiciary, all in line with EU standards; to include clearly defined provisions on a suspension mechanism of the agreement in case of continued human rights violations;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 205 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point r b (new)
(rb) to comply with the ECtHR ruling on Ilgar Mammadov’s case and fully cooperate with the ECtHR on the cases involving allegations of violations of the right to freedom of association and execute the decisions handed down;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 207 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point r d (new)
(rd) to condemn, in particular, the recent sentencing of Afgan Mukhtarli to a 6 year prison term on trumped-up charges after his abduction from Georgia, to call firmly for his immediate release and to grant asylum and find ways to protect all the Azerbaijani dissidents entering the EU;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 214 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point r f (new)
(rf) to respect the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and refrain from restricting this right in ways that are not compatible with its obligations under international law, including the European Convention on Human Rights; to promptly and effectively investigate all cases of excessive use of force, arbitrary arrest and detention of peaceful protesters, including in connection with the opposition rallies in September 2016 and September 2017 and bring the perpetrators to justice;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 215 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point r g (new)
(rg) to ensure, before the conclusion of the negotiations, that Azerbaijan takes tangible measures to ease the operating environment for civil society by amending the legislation so that registration of non- governmental organisations and receiving foreign funding is possible without administrative and legal barriers; to ensure that NGOs are not subject to excessive and unnecessary reporting to various government agencies (including on various occasions to the Tax Agency, the Social Protection Fund, the State Statistical Committee and the Finance Ministry);
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 220 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point s
(s) to seek, before the conclusions of the negotiations, that Azerbaijan commits to investigations into all cases of mistreatment of political prisoners and prisoners of conscience, notably in the case of the late Mehman Galandarov, who died in custody as well as to investigate alleged torture and ill-treatment of Taleh Bagirzade, Giyas Ibrahimov, Beyram Mammadov, Mehman Huseynov; to investigate torture and ill-treatment allegations of the LGBTQ community members, who were arrested and harassed en mass (around 150 people) in September 2017;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 227 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point t
(t) to underline the importance of a free and independent media, both off and on-line andensure that free and independent media, both off and on-line can operate in the country without undue interference; to lift travel bans on 4 journalists of Meydan TV; to unblock access to the websites of Azadliq, and of three news outlets that have to operate from abroad (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL)Azerbaijan Service, Meydan TV, and Azerbay can Saati); to ensure a strengthened EU support for free and pluralistic media in Azerbaijan, with editorial independence and in line with EU standards, and pointing out that a reinforced attention to press and media freedom could take the form of a regional initiative encompassing all the Eastern Partnership countries;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 248 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point x
(x) to also support the diversification of Azerbaijan’s energy mix, promoting non- carbon energy sources and preparing for the post-carbon age in line with the commitments of the Paris Agreement; to note the important dimension given to climate change and the necessity, in this regard, to set ambitious targets and to the impact on local communities in the pending decision by the European Investment Bank on the funding of the Trans-Anatolian Gas Pipeline (TANAP);
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 249 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point x a (new)
(xa) to assist effectively Azerbaijan in its efforts to diversify the economy currently over relying on hydrocarbons; to ensure, at the same time, that the EU assistance is not directed to those sectors of the Azeri economy exporting to the Russian Federation that could potentially damage the European firms affected by Russian sanctions;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 256 #

2017/2056(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point z
(z) to provide new perspectives for enhanced cooperation in non-energy related areas in order to diversify the Azerbaijani economy, boost job creation and allow for more people-to people contacts both at a regional and European level, in particular in the fields of education, health, transport and tourism; to find ways, in this regard, to set up programmes aimed at facilitating meetings on specific issues and common problems between the representatives of Azeri and Armenians NGOs and youth organisations;
2018/04/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 2 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the EPCA should constitute an importa(article 2) could strengthen the framework for the fulfilment of essential elements step in the deepening of political and economic ties between the two parties for the benefit of the people of both Kazakhstan and the EUuch as respect for democracy, the rule of law, human rights and market economy already provided for in the PCA as long as the implementation of all the clauses is subjected to a strict and effective monitoring mechanism based on clear benchmarks and deadlines, whereas countering proliferation of weapons of mass destruction is added as a new essential element (Article 11);
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 10 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the high importance of enhancingat the enhancement of political and economic relations ofbetween the EU withand Kazakhstan, which should be based on shared must be based on shared common values with regard, in particular, to democracy, the rule of law and the respect for human rights as well as on commitments to international values and guided by mutual interests;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Acknowledges that the EPCA introduced the possibility of negotiating a visa facilitation agreement between the EU and Kazakhstan; points out the importance of stepping up exchanges in particular at youth and academic level and calls, in this respect, for a substantial expansion of Erasmus + programme for Kazakhstan;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 49 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes Kazakhstan’s constructive cooperation in international relations and its multi-vector foreign policy; welcomes, in particular, the decision of Kazakhstan not to join the Russian ban on EU agricultural products and considers this a concrete and encouraging sign of the willingness of this country to step up the dialogue and the cooperation with the EU;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 70 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Recommends that the EU consistently includprioritise in its political dialogue with Kazakhstan, the issues of the rule of law and democracy, fundamental freedoms and human rights;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 76 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Takes note of the efforts of Kazakhstan to improve the country's international image as shown by the recent opening of the EXPO-2017 in Astana; points out, nevertheless, that these efforts are contradicted by the crackdown on dissenting voices that over the last months has continued unabated, dashing hopes that the Kazakh authorities may take some steps to ease pressure on civil society;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 89 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Notes the existence of civil society dialogue platforms; reiterates its concern about the legislation on NGOs, undermining their independence and ability to operate; recalls the importance of a vibrant civil society for the sustainable future of Kazakhstan; takes the view that the EPCA implies also an enhanced support for the development of a genuine civil society and calls on the Kazakh authorities to act accordingly and on the Commission to step up programmes aimed at strengthening and consolidating the action of independent NGOs;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 98 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Calls on Kazakhstan’s authorities to stop harassing, detaining and prosecuting independent journalists, civil society activists, trade union leaders and other outspoken individuals in retaliation for their exercise of freedom of expression and other fundamental freedoms and calls for their immediate release;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 101 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the annualfor a substantial review of the EU- Kazakhstan Human Rights Dialogues as well as all other forums to exchange views on hum in order to make it more effective and rights in the countryesult-oriented;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 123 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Recognises Kazakhstan as an important player in foreign and security policy not least due to the consistent role it plays in global nuclear disarmament and security, and its non-permanent membership on the UN Security Council in 2017-2018,; welcomes Kazakhstan's initiative to facilitate the negotiations between the parties in Astana for a comprehensive solution to end the war in Syria and urges the Kazakh authorities to coordinate better their action with the EU and United Nations;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 145 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 a (new)
39a. Notes that Kazakhstan's economy is largely based on the exploitation and export of raw materials and hydrocarbons; takes the view that the EU could play an important role in helping Kazakhstan diversify its economy and calls, in particular, on the Commission to assist Kazakhstan so as to make its economy environment-friendly and sustainable;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 146 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 b (new)
39b. Environment Recalls that Kazakhstan is heavily affected by the consequences of two of the most devastating man-made environmental disasters in the world namely the dry-up of the Aral sea and the Soviet nuclear test site of Semey/ Semipalatinsk; calls on the Commission to step up the assistance to the Kazakh authorities both at technical and financial level in order to improve substantially water management and water conservation as regards the Aral sea basin and to develop an effective action plan for the cleaning-up of the former nuclear polygon area;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 51 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Minimum requirements relating to information on the essential aspects of the employment relationship and relating to working conditions that apply to every worker should therefore be established at Union level in order to guarantee all workers in the Union an adequat, regardless of their formal status, in the Union the highest possible degree of transparency and predictability as regards their working conditions.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 53 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure effectiveness of the rights provided by the Union law, the personal scope of Directive 91/533/EEC should be updated. In its case law, the Court of Justice of the European Union has established criteria for determining the status of a worker34 which are appropriate for determining the personal scope of application of this Directive. Additionally the ILO’s tripartite constituents adopted Recommendation 198 Employment Relationship (2006) with indicators for an employment relationship, among others subordination and/or economic dependency, primacy of facts and presumption of an employment relationship. The definition of worker in Article 2(1) isneeds to be based on these criteria developed by both ECJ and ILO. They ensure a uniform implementation of the personal scope of the Directive while leaving it to national authorities and courts to apply it to specific situations. Provided that they fulfil those criteria, domestic workers, on-demand workers, intermittent workers, voucher based-workers, platform workers, trainees and apprentices could come within scope of this Directive. __________________ 34 Judgments of 3 July 1986, Deborah Lawrie-Blum, Case 66/85; 14 October 2010, Union Syndicale Solidaires Isère, Case C-428/09; 9 July 2015, Balkaya, Case C-229/14; 4 December 2014, FNV Kunsten, Case C-413/13; and 17 November 2016, Ruhrlandklinik, Case C- 216/15.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 57 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) In line with ILO recommendation 198, where, under direction “cannot be directly established, economic dependency should be considered the core additional criterion in assessing whether the person is a worker.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 58 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 b (new)
(7b) In line with ILO Recommendation 198, the determination of the existence of an employment relationship should be based on the facts related to the actual performance of work and not on the parties’ description of the relationship.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 59 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 c (new)
(7c) In line with ILO recommendation 198, it should be automatically provided for a legal presumption that an employment relationship exists where one or more relevant indicators are present.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 61 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) In view of the increasing number of workers excluded from the scope of Directive 91/533/EEC on the basis of derogations made by Member States under Article 1 of that Directive, it is necessary to replace these derogations with a possibility for Member States not to apply the provisions of the Directive to a work relationship equal to or less than 8 hours in total in a reference period of one month. That derogation does not affect the definition of a worker as provided for in Article 2(1).deleted
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 62 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) Due to the unpredictability of on- demand work including zero-hour contracts, the derogation of 8 hours per month should not be used for employment relationships in which no guaranteed amount of paid work is determined before the start of the employment.deleted
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 65 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Several different natural or legal persons may in practice assume the functions and responsibilities of an employer. Member States should remain free to determine more precisely the person(s) who are considered totally or partially responsible for the execution of the obligations that this Directive lays down for employers, as long as all those obligations are fulfilled. Member States should also be able to decide that some or all of these obligations are to be assigned to a natural or legal person who is not party to the employment relationship. Member States should be able to establish specific rules to exclude individuals acting as employers for domestic workers in the household from the obligations to consider and respond to a request for a different type of employment, to provide cost-free mandatory training, and from coverage of the redress mechanism based on favourable presumptions in the case of missing information in the written statementIf several natural and or legal persons are responsible as employer, they are jointly and severally liable.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 67 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Several different natural or legal persons may in practice assume the functions and responsibilities of an employer. Member States should remain free to determine more precisely the person(s) who are considered totally or partially responsible for the execution of the obligations that this Directive lays down for employers, as long as all those obligations are fulfilled. Member States should also be able to decide that some or all of these obligations are to be assigned to a natural or legal person who is not party to the employment relationship. Member States should be able to establish specific rules to exclude individuals acting as employers for domestic workers in the household from the obligations to consider and respond to a request for a different type of employment, to provide cost-free mandatory training, and from coverage of the redress mechanism based on favourable presumptions in the case of missing information in the written statementIf several natural and or legal persons are responsible as employer, they are jointly and severally liable.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 69 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Directive 91/533/EEC introduced a minimum list of essential aspects on which workers have to be informed in writing. It is necessary to adaptclarify that lthist in order to take account of developments on the labour mas an open minimum list and to adapt that list to the need to better protect worketrs, in particular regarding the growth of non- standard forms of employment.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 71 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) Information on remuneration to be provided should include but not be limited to all elements of the remuneration, as well as the method of calculation, including contributions in cash or kind, directly or indirectly received by the worker in respect of his or her work, overtime payments, bonuses and other entitlements, such as sick pay. The provision of such information should be without prejudice to the freedom for employers to provide for additional elements of remuneration such as one-off payments. The fact that elements of remuneration due by law or collective agreement have not been included in that information should not constitute a reason for not providing them to the worker.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 74 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Information on social security systems should include, where relevant, at least sickness, maternity and equivalent, parental, paternity, old-age, invalidity, survivors', unemployment, pre-retirement or family benefits and all other risks covered by Regulation (EC) 883/2004. Information on social security protection provided by the employer should include, where relevant, coverage by supplementary pension schemes within the meaning of Council Directive 98/49/EC36 and Directive 2014/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council.37 __________________ 36 Council Directive 98/49/EC of 29 June 1998 on safeguarding the supplementary pension rights of employed and self- employed persons moving within the Community (OJ L 209, 25.7.1998, p. 46). 37 Directive 2014/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on minimum requirements for enhancing worker mobility between Member States by improving the acquisition and preservation of supplementary pension rights (OJ L 128, 30.4.2014, p. 1).
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 75 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) Workers should have the right to be informed about their rights and obligations resulting from the employment relationship in writing atfrom the start of employment. The relevant information should therefore reach them at the latest on, where applicable, when the employment contract is signed and before the first day of the employment.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 80 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Workers posted or sent abroad should receive additional information specific to their situation. For successive work assignments in several Member States or third countries, such as in international road transport, that information may be grouped for several assignments before the first departure and subsequently modified before the commencement of the relevant assignment or in case of change. Where they qualify as posted workers under Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council,38 they should also be notified of the single national website developed by the host Member State where they will findand be provided in paper or electronically with the relevant information on the working conditions applying to their situation. Unless Member States provide otherwise, these obligations apply if the duration of the work period abroad is more than four consecutive weeks. __________________ 38 Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ L 18, 21.1.1997, p. 1).
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 81 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) Probationary periods allow employers to verify if that workers are suitable for the position for which they have been engaged while providing them with accompanying support and training. Such periods may be accompanied by reduced protection against dismissal. Any entry into the labour market or transition to a new position should not be subject to prolonged insecurity. As established in the European Pillar of Social Rights, probationary periods should therefore be of reasonable duration. A substantial number of Member States have established a general maximum duration of probation between three and six months, which should be considered reasonable. Probationary periods may be longer than six months where this is justified by the nature of the employment such as for managerial positions and where this is in the interest of the worker, such as in the case of long illness or in the context of specific measures promoting permanent employment notably for young worker and therefore by no means be exceeded beyond 6 months.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 83 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Employers should not prohibit workers from taking up employment with other employers, outside the time spent working for them, within the limits set out in Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.39 Incompatibility clauses, understood as a restriction on working for specific categories of employers, may be necessary for objective reasons, such as the protection of business secrets or the avoidance of conflicts of interests. __________________ 39 Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ L 299, 18.11.2003, p. 9).
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 87 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Since the adoption of Council Directive 91/533/EEC,33 labour markets have undergone far-reaching changes due to demographic developments and digitalisation leading to the creation of new forms of employment, which have supported job creation and labour market growth. New forms of employment are often not as regular or stable as traditional employment relationships and lead, among others, to reduced predictability for the workers concerned, creating uncertainty as to applicable rights and social protection. In this evolving world of work, there is therefore an increased need for workers to be not only fully informed about, but also better protected as regards their essential working conditions, which should occur in a written form and in a timely manner. In order adequately to frame the development of new forms of employment, workers in the Union should also be provided with a number of new minimum rights aimed at promoting security and predictability in employment relationships while achieving upward convergence across Member States and preserving labour market adaptability. __________________ 33 Council Directive 91/533/EC of 14 October 1991 on an employer's obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship (OJ L 288, 18.10.1991, p. 32).
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) A reasonable minimum advance notice, understood as the period of time between the moment a worker is informed about a new work assignment and the moment the assignment starts, constitutes another necessary element of predictability of work for employment relationships with work schedule which are variable or mostly determined by the employer. The length of the advance notice period may vary according to the needs of sectors, while ensuring adequate protection of workersshould where possible be negotiated by the responsible Social Partners and may not fall below the standards established by this directive. It applies without prejudice to Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.40 __________________ 40 Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities (OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p. 35).
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 91 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
(25) Where employers have the possibility to offer full-time or open-ended labour contracts to workers in non-standard forms of employment, a transition to more secure forms of employment should be promoted. Workers should be able to requestconvert to another more predictable and secure form of employment, where available, and receive a written response from the employer,to their request for a conversion from the employer, based on objective grounds which takes into account the needs of the employer and of the worker.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 93 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
(26) Where employers are required by legislation or collective agreements or internal rules to provide training to workers to carry out the work for which they are employed, it is important to ensure that such training is provided equally and without discrimination, including to those in non-standard forms of employment. The costs of such training should not be charged to the worker nor withheld or deducted from the worker's remuneration. The training should take place during working hours.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 96 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) Social partners may consider that in specific sectors or situations different provisions are more appropriate, for the pursuit of the purpose of this Directive, than the minimum standards set in Chapter Three ofas long as these are in full compliance with this Directive. Member States should therefore be able to allow social partners to conclude collective agreements modifying the provisions contained in that chapter,is Directive as long as the overall level of protection of workers isrights established by this Directive are not lowered.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 97 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Minimum requirements relating to information on the essential aspects of the employment relationship and relating to working conditions that apply to every worker should therefore be established at Union level in order to guarantee all workers in the Union an adequat, regardless of their formal status, in the Union the highest possible degree of transparency and predictability as regards their working conditions.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27 a (new)
(27a) The Member States should ensure the elimination of all kind of discrimination with regard to all aspects of remuneration and terms and conditions of employment and regardless of the contract type of the worker.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 99 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) The consultation on the European Pillar of Social Rights showed the need to strengthen enforcement of Union labour law to ensure its effectiveness. As regards Directive 91/533/EEC, the REFIT evaluation41 confirmed that strengthened enforcement mechanisms could improve its effectiveness. It showed that redress systems based solely on claims for damages are less effective than systems that also provide for sanctions (such as lump sums or loss of permits) for employers who fail to issue written statements. It also showed that employees rarely seek redress during the employment relationship, which jeopardises the goal of the provision of the written statement to ensure workers are informed about their essential features of their employment relationship. It is therefore necessary to introduce enforcement provisions which ensure the use either of favourable presumptions where information about the employment relationship is not provided, orand of an administrative procedure under which the employer may be required to provide the missing information and subject to sanction if it does not. That redress should be subject to a procedure by which the employer is notified that information is missing and has 15 days in which to supply complete and correct information. __________________ 41__________________ 41 SWD(2017)205 final, page 26. SWD(2017)205 final, page 26.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 101 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) An extensive system of enforcement provisions for the social acquis in the Union has been adopted since Directive 91/533/EEC, notably in the fields of anti-discrimination and equal opportunities, elements of which; this system should be fully applied to this Directive in order to ensure that workers have access to effective and impartial dispute resolution and a right to redress, including adequate compensation, reflecting the Principle 7 of the European Pillar of Social Rights. It should be also urgently considered to broaden these enforcement provisions to all matters relating to working conditions.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 104 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33 a (new)
(33a) The burden of proof that there has been no employment relationship should fall on the natural or legal person identifiable as employer based on the primacy of facts.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 105 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33 b (new)
(33b) Persons reporting situations of infringements of the rights provided under this Directive, should be fully protected by current and future European rules regarding the protection of whistleblowers.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 110 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
(38) The Member States mayshould entrust social partners with the implementation of this Directive, where social partners jointly request to do so and as long as the Member States take all the necessary steps to ensure that they can at all times guarantee the results sought under this Directive.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 112 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure effectiveness of the rights provided by the Union law, the personal scope of Directive 91/533/EEC should be updated. In its case law, the Court of Justice of the European Union has established criteria for determining the status of a worker34 which are appropriate for determining the personal scope of application of this Directive. Additionally the ILO’s tripartite constituents adopted Recommendation 198 Employment Relationship (2006) with indicators for an employment relationship, among others subordination and/or economic dependency, primacy of facts and presumption of an employment relationship. The definition of worker in Article 2(1) isneeds to be based on these criteria developed by both ECJ and ILO. They ensure a uniform implementation of the personal scope of the Directive while leaving it to national authorities and courts to apply it to specific situations. Provided that they fulfil those criteria, domestic workers, on-demand workers, intermittent workers, voucher based-workers, platform workers, trainees and apprentices could come within scope of this Directive. __________________ 34 Judgments of 3 July 1986, Deborah Lawrie-Blum, Case 66/85; 14 October 2010, Union Syndicale Solidaires Isère, Case C-428/09; 9 July 2015, Balkaya, Case C-229/14; 4 December 2014, FNV Kunsten, Case C-413/13; and 17 November 2016, Ruhrlandklinik, Case C- 216/15.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Directive lays down minimum rights that apply to every worker in the Union. These minimum rights apply to every person who is de facto a worker regardless of their formal status or the existence of a written employment contract.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 120 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may decide not to apply the obligations in this Directive to workers who have an employment relationship equal to or less than 8 hours in total in a reference period of one month. Time worked with all employers forming or belonging to the same enterprise, group or entity shall count towards that 8 hour period.deleted
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 121 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) In line with ILO Recommendation 198, where “under direction” cannot be directly established, economic dependency should be considered the core additional criterion in assessing whether the person is a worker.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 b (new)
(7b) In line with ILO Recommendation 198, the determination of the existence of an employment relationship should be based on the facts related to the actual performance of work and not on the parties’ description of the relationship - “primacy of facts”.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 123 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Paragraph 2 is without prejudice to workers who are undergoing training including trainees and apprentices.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 124 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 c (new)
(7c) In line with ILO Recommendation 198, it should be automatically provided for a legal presumption that an employment relationship exists where one or more relevant indicators are present.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 124 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 5
5. Member States may determine which persons are responsible for the execution of the obligations for employers laid down by this Directive as long as all those obligations are fulfilled. They may also decide that all or part of these obligations shall be assigned to a natural or legal person who is not party to the employment relationship. This paragraph is without prejudice to Directive 2008/104/EC. Where one or more natural or legal person(s) who is or are directly or indirectly party to an employment relationship with a worker, they shall be jointly and severally liable for obligations under this Directive.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 126 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) In view of the increasing number of workers excluded from the scope of Directive 91/533/EEC on the basis of derogations made by Member States under Article 1 of that Directive, it is necessary to replace these derogations with a possibility for Member States not to apply the provisions of the Directive to a work relationship equal to or less than 8 hours in total in a reference period of one month. That derogation does not affect the definition of a worker as provided for in Article 2(1).deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 127 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 6
6. Member States may decide not to apply the obligations set out in Articles 10 and 11 and Article 14(a) to natural persons belonging to a household where work is performed for that household.deleted
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 129 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 7
7. Chapter II of tThis Directive applies to seafarers and fishermen without prejudice to Council Directive 2009/13/EC and Council Directive (EU) 2017/159, respectively.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 131 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘worker’ means a natural person who for a certain period of time performs services for and under the direction of another natural or legal person in return for remuneration; direction includes where the person is in a situation of economic dependency.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 136 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) 'employer' means one or morea natural or legal person(s) who i that engages wor arekers directly or indirectly party to an employment relationship with a worker;.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 139 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) 'reference hours and days' means time slots in specified days during which work can take place at the request of the employer.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 141 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) Due to the unpredictability of on- demand work including zero-hour contracts, the derogation of 8 hours per month should not be used for employment relationships in which no guaranteed amount of paid work is determined before the start of the employment.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 146 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall include at least:
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 148 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) in the case of a temporary employment relationship, the end date or the expected duration thereof, the name of the user undertaking in case of temporary agency workers as well as the pay scales of the user undertaking in order to provide for equal pay;
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 150 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Several different natural or legal persons may in practice assume the functions and responsibilities of an employer. Member States should remain free to determine more precisely the person(s) who are considered totally or partially responsible for the execution of the obligations that this Directive lays down for employers, as long as all those obligations are fulfilled. Member States should also be able to decide that some or all of these obligations are to be assigned to a natural or legal person who is not party to the employment relationship. Member States should be able to establish specific rules to exclude individuals acting as employers for domestic workers in the household from the obligations to consider and respond to a request for a different type of employment, to provide cost-free mandatory training, and from coverage of the redress mechanism based on favourable presumptions in the case of missing information in the written statementIf several natural and or legal persons are responsible as employer, they are jointly and severally liable.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i
(i) the procedure, including the length of the periods of notice, to be observed by the employer and the worker should their employment relationship be terminated or, where the length of the period of notice cannot be indicated when the information is given, the method, as well as the formal requirements for determining such period of notice;, as well as the deadlines for taking action contesting the dismissal
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 154 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) the initial basic amount, any other component elements, indicated separately, such as payments of overtime, bonuses and other entitlements, such as sick pay; the method of calculation; the frequency and method of payment of the remuneration to which the worker is entitled;
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 156 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point l – point ii a (new)
(iia) the conditions and the level of financial compensation in case of cancellation of work by the employer.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 158 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Directive 91/533/EEC introduced a minimum list of essential aspects on which workers have to be informed in writing. It is necessary to adaptclarify that lthist in order to take account of developments on the labour mas an open minimum list and to adapt that list to the need to better protect worketrs, in particular regarding the growth of non- standard forms of employment.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point m
(m) any collective agreements governing the worker's conditions of work; in the case of collective agreements concluded outside the business by special joint bodies or institutions, the name of the competent body or joint institution within which the agreements were concluded, and the cut off periods if there are any;
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 160 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) Information on remuneration to be provided should include but not be limited to all elements of the remuneration, as well as the method of calculation, including contributions in cash or kind, directly or indirectly received by the worker in respect of his or her work, overtime payments, bonuses and other entitlements, such as sick pay. The provision of such information should be without prejudice to the freedom for employers to provide for additional elements of remuneration such as one-off payments. The fact that elements of remuneration due by law or collective agreement have not been included in that information should not constitute a reason for not providing them to the worker.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 162 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The information referred to in paragraph 2(f) to (k) and (n) may, where appropriate, be given in the form ofshall be accompanied by a reference to the laws, regulations and administrative or statutory provisions or collective agreements governing those particular points.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 164 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. The information referred to in 1. Article 3(2) shall be provided individually to the worker in the form of a document at the latest ons early as possible and at the latest, where applicable, the moment the employment contract is signed and before the first day of the employment relationship. That document may be provided and transmitted electronicallysent electronically directly to the worker as long as it is easily accessible by the worker and it may also be accessible to the entity controlling working conditions and can be stored and printed.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 167 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The document shall be provided at the same moment in time to the worker representative and the responsible social protection authorities.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 173 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) Zero-hour and on-demand type of contracts should be prohibited. They are a danger to the worker and a damage to both society and employers respecting a level-playing field.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 174 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14 b (new)
(14b) In order to limit the flexibility of the work schedule, it should by all means respect the daily minimum rest of 11 hours as guaranteed in the Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 175 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14 c (new)
(14c) In order to reduce the abuse of extreme flexibility clauses in contracts, workers should by default be entitled to be paid for the announced hours; additionally a premium rate for non- guaranteed hours is to be paid. The hours worked shall become the guaranteed hours of the worker if he/she does not object.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Information on social security systems should include, where relevant, sickness, maternity and equivalent, parental, paternity, old-age, invalidity, survivors', unemployment, pre-retirement or family benefits as well as future risks covered by updates to the Social Security Coordination Regulation 883/2004/EC. Information on social security protection provided by the employer should include, where relevant, coverage by supplementary pension schemes within the meaning of Council Directive 98/49/EC36 and Directive 2014/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council.37 __________________ 36 Council Directive 98/49/EC of 29 June 1998 on safeguarding the supplementary pension rights of employed and self- employed persons moving within the Community (OJ L 209, 25.7.1998, p. 46). 37 Directive 2014/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on minimum requirements for enhancing worker mobility between Member States by improving the acquisition and preservation of supplementary pension rights (OJ L 128, 30.4.2014, p. 1).
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 182 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) where applicable, the changes to the worker’s social security situation.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 189 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the employment conditions under Article 3.1 of Directive 96/71/EC including remuneration to which the worker is entitled in accordance with the applicable law of the host Member State;
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 193 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. The information referred to in paragraph 1(b) and 2(a) may, where appropriate, be given in the form of ashall be given in writing clearly outlining the reference to the laws, regulations and administrative or statutory provisions or collective agreements governing those particular points.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 194 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. Unless Member States provide otherwise, paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply if the duration of each work period outside the Member State in which the worker habitually works is four consecutive weeks or less.deleted
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 195 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) Workers should have the right to be informed about their rights and obligations resulting from the employment relationship in writing at the start of employment. The relevant information should therefore reach them at the latest onbefore the first day of the employment.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 195 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that, where an employment relationship is subject to a probationary period, that period shall not exceed six months, including any extension. Any time worked with the same enterprise, group or entity shall count towards that six months period. During a probationary period an employment relationship shall not be declared dormant.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 198 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may provide for longer probationary periods in cases where this is justified by the nature of the employment or is in the interest of the worker.deleted
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 200 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. A probation period shall not hamper the accrual of rights.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 201 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) In order to help employers to provide timely information, Member States should ensure the availability of templates at national level including relevant and sufficiently comprehensive information on the legal framework applicable. These templates mayshould be further developed at sectoral or local level, by national authorities and social partnersby social partners or in their absence by authorities at sectorial, national or local level.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 201 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. A probation period can only be agreed in cases of open-ended contracts.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 204 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Employers may however lay down conditions of incompatibility where such restrictions are justified by legitimate reasons such as the protection of business secrets or the avoidance of conflicts of interests.deleted
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 207 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Workers posted or sent abroad should receive additional information specific to their situation. For successive work assignments in several Member States or third countries, such as in international road transport, that information may be grouped for several assignments before the first departure and subsequently modified before the commencement of the relevant assignment or in case of change. Where they qualify as posted workers under Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council,38 they should also be notified of the single national website developed by the host Member State where they will findand be provided in paper or electronically with the relevant information on the working conditions applying to their situation. Unless Member States provide otherwise, these obligations apply if the duration of the work period abroad is more than four consecutive weeks. __________________ 38 Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ L 18, 21.1.1997, p. 1).
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 212 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) Probationary periods allow employers to verify if that workers are suitable for the position for which they have been engaged while providing them with accompanying support and training. Such periods may be accompanied by reduced protection against dismissal. Any entry into the labour market or transition to a new position should not be subject to prolonged insecurity. As established in the European Pillar of Social Rights, probationary periods should therefore be of reasonable duration. A substantial number of Member States have established a general maximum duration of probation between three and six months, which should be considered reasonable. Probationary periods may be longer than six months where this is justified by the nature of the employment such as for managerial positions and where this is in the interest of the worker, such as in the case of long illness or in the context of specific measures promoting permanent employment notably for young worker and therefore by no means be exceeded beyond 6 months.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 213 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that workers with at least six months' seniority with the same employer may requestconvert into a form of employment with more predictable and secure working conditions where available. Time worked with the same enterprise, group or entity or natural or legal person shall count towards that six months period.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 215 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The employer shall provide a written reply within one month of the request. With respect to natural persons acting as employers and micro, small, or medium enterprises, Member States may provide for that deadline to be extended to no more than three months and allow for an oral reply to a subsequent similar request submitted by the same worker if the justification for the reply as regards the situation of the worker remains unchangedgenuinely consider the conversion. A refusal is only allowed if provided in writing arguing an objective business needs within one month of the request.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 218 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Should the employer not reply to the demand for conversion within one month, the conversion is presumed to have taken effect from the first day following this period.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 220 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) Employers should not prohibit workers from taking up employment with other employers, outside the time spent working for them, within the limits set out in Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.39 Incompatibility clauses, understood as a restriction on working for specific categories of employers, may be necessary for objective reasons, such as the protection of business secrets or the avoidance of conflicts of interests. __________________ 39 Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ L 299, 18.11.2003, p. 9).
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 222 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The worker shall continue to be remunerated, as if he/she would have been working.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 223 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 b (new)
The training shall take place, where possible, during normal working hours. In all cases, the time spent on training shall be considered working time.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 225 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 a (new)
Article 11 a Equal treatment The Member States shall ensure the principles of equal pay and equal terms and conditions apply to all workers and ensure in this regard the elimination of all discrimination, regardless of the employment status.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 228 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Member States may allow social partners to conclude collective agreements, in conformity with the national law or practice, which, while fully respecting the overalllevel of protection of workersprovided by this directive, establish arrangements concerning the working conditions of workers which differ from but may not fall below those referred to in Articles 7 to 11.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 230 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that pProvisions contrary to this Directive and less beneficial for the worker in individual or collective agreements, internal rules of undertakings, or any other arrangements shall be declared null and void or arand shall be amended in order to bring them at least into line with the provisions of this Directive.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 234 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) Workers whose work schedule is mostly variable should benefit from a minimumn improved predictability of work where the work schedule is mainly determined by the employer, be it directly – for instance by allocating work assignments – or indirectly – for instance by requiring the worker to respond to clients' requests.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 234 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 a (new)
Article 14 a Primacy of facts The determination of the existence of an employment relationship shall be guided by the facts relating to the actual performance of work and not on the basis of how the parties describe the relationship.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 235 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Member States shall introduce measures necessary to protect all workers regardless of their legal or formal status, including workers who are employees'’ or trade union representatives, from any adverse treatment by the employer or adverse consequences resulting from exercising a right provided in this Directive or from a complaint lodged with the employer or from any legal proceedings initiated with the aim of enforcing compliance with these rights provided for in this Directive.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 237 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Persons reporting situations of infringements of the rights provided under this Directive, shall be fully protected by European legislation regarding the protection of persons reporting on breaches of Union law.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 238 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to prohibit and declare as null and void the dismissal or its equivalent and all preparations for dismissal or other detriments or less favourable treatments of workers, on the grounds that they exercised the rights provided for in this Directive. The necessary measures shall also include the right to reinstatement and compensation.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 239 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) A reasonable minimum advance notice, understood as the period of time between the moment a worker is informed about a new work assignment and the moment the assignment starts, constitutes another necessary element of predictability of work for employment relationships with work schedule which are variable or mostly determined by the employer. The length of the advance notice period may vary according to the needs of sectors, while ensuring adequate protection of workersshould where possible be negotiated by the responsible Social Partners and may not fall below the standards established by this directive. It applies without prejudice to Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.40 __________________ 40 Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities (OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p. 35).
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 241 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. Workers who consider that they have been dismissed, or have been subject to measures with equivalent effect, on the grounds that they have exercised the rights provided for in this Directive may request the employer to provide duly substantiated grounds for the dismissal or its equivalent. The employer shall provide those grounds in writing. Member States shall ensure that the deadline for bringing an action contesting the dismissal is suspended as long as the worker has not received written justification from the employer.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 246 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 a (new)
Article 17a Burden of proof of the existence of and employment relationship The burden of proof of absence of an employment relationship shall be on the natural or legal person identifiable as employer.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 247 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive or the relevant provisions already in force concerning the rights which are within the scope of this Directive. Member States shall take all measures necessary to ensure that those penalties are applied. Penalties shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. They may take the form of a fine. They mayshall also comprise an appropriate and at least proportional payment of compensation.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 252 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20 a Facilitation of complaints Member States shall ensure that there are effective mechanisms through which workers may lodge complaints against their employers, directly or through third parties designated by Member States such as trade unions or other associations or a competent authority of the Member State when provided for by national legislation.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 254 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 1
The rights and obligations set out in this Directive shall apply to existing employment relationships as from [entry into force date + 2 years]. However, employers shall provide or complement the documents referred to in Article 4(1), Article 5 and Article 6 only upon request of a worker. The absence of such request shall not have the effect of excluding workers from the minimum rights established under this Directive.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 255 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1
By [entry into force date + 8 years], the Commission shall, in consultation with the Member States and social partners at Union level and taking into account the impact on small and medium-sized micro-enterprises, review the application of this Directive with a view to proposing, where appropriate, the necessary amendments.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 256 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
(25) Where employers have the possibility to offer full-time or open-ended labour contracts to workers in non-standard forms of employment, a transition to more secure forms of employment should be promoted. Workers should be able to requestconvert to another more predictable and secure form of employment, where available, and receive a written response from the employer, based on objective grounds which takes into account the needs of the employer and of the worker.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
(26) Where employers are required by legislation or collective agreements or internal rules to provide training to workers to carry out the work for which they are employed, it is important to ensure that such training is provided equally and without discrimination, including to those in non-standard forms of employment. The costs of such training should not be charged to the worker nor withheld or deducted from the worker's remuneration. The training should take place during working hours.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 270 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) Social partners may consider that in specific sectors or situations different provisions are more appropriate, for the pursuit of the purpose of this Directive, than the minimum standards set in Chapter Three ofas long as these are in full compliance with this Directive. Member States should therefore be able to allow social partners to conclude collective agreements modifying the provisions contained in that chapter, as long as the overall level of protection of workers is not lowereddoes not fall below the rights established by this Directive.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 275 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 27 a (new)
(27a) The Member States should ensure the elimination of all kind of discrimination with regard to all aspects of remuneration and terms and conditions of employment and regardless of the contract type of the worker as defined by this Directive.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 278 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) The consultation on the European Pillar of Social Rights showed the need to strengthen enforcement of Union labour law to ensure its effectiveness. As regards Directive 91/533/EEC, the REFIT evaluation41 confirmed that strengthened enforcement mechanisms could improve its effectiveness. It showed that redress systems based solely on claims for damages are less effective than systems that also provide for sanctions (such as lump sums or loss of permits) for employers who fail to issue written statements. It also showed that employees rarely seek redress during the employment relationship, which jeopardises the goal of the provision of the written statement to ensure workers are informed about their essential features of their employment relationship. It is therefore necessary to introduce enforcement provisions which ensure the use either of favourable presumptions where information about the employment relationship is not provided, orand of an administrative procedure under which the employer may be required to provide the missing information and subject to sanction if it does not. That redress should be subject to a procedure by which the employer is notified that information is missing and has 15 days in which to supply complete and correct information. __________________ 41__________________ 41 SWD(2017)205 final, page 26. SWD(2017)205 final, page 26.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 285 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) An extensive system of enforcement provisions for the social acquis in the Union has been adopted since Directive 91/533/EEC, notably in the fields of anti-discrimination and equal opportunities, elements of which; this system should be fully applied to this Directive in order to ensure that workers have access to effective and impartial dispute resolution and a right to redress, including adequate compensation, reflecting the Principle 7 of the European Pillar of Social Rights. It should be also urgently considered to broaden these enforcement provisions to all matters relating to working conditions.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 288 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 31 a (new)
(31a) The right to reinstatement and compensation of dismissed workers should be introduced.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 294 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33 a (new)
(33a) The burden of proof that there has been no employment relationship should fall on the natural or legal person identifiable as employer based on the primacy of facts.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 306 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) In implementing this Directive Member States should avoid imposing administrative, financial and legal constraints in a way which would hold back the creation and developmentprotection of workers of small and medium-sized undertakings. Member States are therefore invited to assess the impact of their transposition act on SMEs in order to make sure that SMEs are not disproportionately affected, with specific attention for micro- enterprises and for administrative burden, and to publish the results of such assessments.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 310 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
(38) The Member States mayshould entrust social partners with the implementation of this Directive, where social partners jointly request to do so and as long as the Member States take all the necessary steps to ensure that they can at all times guarantee the results sought under this Directive.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 319 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. The purpose of this Directive is to improve working conditions by promoting more secure and predictable employment while ensuring labour market adaptability.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 325 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Directive lays down minimum rights that apply to every worker in the Union. These minimum rights apply to every person who is de facto a worker regardless of the formal status of the person.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 334 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may decide not to apply the obligations in this Directive to workers who have an employment relationship equal to or less than 8 hours in total in a reference period of one month. Time worked with all employers forming or belonging to the same enterprise, group or entity shall count towards that 8 hour period.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 349 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Paragraph 2 is without prejudice to workers who are undergoing training including trainees and apprentices.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 352 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 5
5. Member States may determine which persons are responsible for the execution of the obligations for employers laid down by this Directive as long as all those obligations are fulfilled. They may also decide that all or part of these obligations shall be assigned to a natural or legal person who is not party to the employment relationship. This paragraph is without prejudice to Directive 2008/104/EC. Where one or more natural or legal person(s) who is or are directly or indirectly party to an employment relationship with a worker, they shall be jointly and severally liable for obligations under this Directive.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 359 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 6
6. Member States may decide not to apply the obligations set out in Articles 10 and 11 and Article 14(a) to natural persons belonging to a household where work is performed for that household.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 371 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 7
7. Chapter II of tThis Directive applies to seafarers and fishermen without prejudice to Council Directive 2009/13/EC and Council Directive (EU) 2017/159, respectively.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 379 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘worker’ means a natural person who for a certain period of time performs services for and under the direction of another natural or legal person in return for remuneration; direction includes where the person is in a situation of economic dependency.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 394 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) ‘employer’ means one or morea natural or legal person(s) who i that engages wor arekers directly or indirectly party to an employment relationship with a worker;.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 406 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) ‘reference hours and days’ means time slots in specified days during which work can take place at the request of the employer.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 408 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) ‘trainee’ means a worker who does a traineeship, this being a limited period of work practice which includes a learning and training component, in line with the Council Recommendation of 10 March 2014 on a Quality Framework for Traineeships.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 409 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. For the purposes of this Directive the terms ‘microenterprise’, ‘small enterprise’ and ‘medium-sized enterprise’ shall have the meaning set out in the Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises43 or in any subsequent act replacing that Recommendation. __________________ 43 OJ L 124/36, 20.05.2003.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 418 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall includeat least include, but not be limited to:
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 429 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) in the case of a temporary employment relationship, the end date or the expected duration thereof; the name of the user undertaking in case of temporary agency workers as well as the pay scales of the user undertaking in order to provide for equal pay;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 440 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) the amount of paid leave to which the worker is entitled or, where this cannot be indicated when the information is given, the procedures for allocating and determining such leave entitlement;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 443 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i
(i) the procedure, including the length of the periods of notice, to be observed by the employer and the worker should their employment relationship be terminated or, where the length of the period of notice cannot be indicated when the information is given, the method, as well as the formal requirements for determining such period of notice, as well as the deadlines for taking action contesting the dismissal;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 452 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) the initial basic amount, any other component elements, indicated separately, such as payments of overtime, bonuses and other entitlements, such as sick pay; the method of calculation; the frequency and method of payment of the remuneration to which the worker is entitled;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 469 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point l – introductory part
(l) if the work schedule is entirely or mostly variable, the principle that the work schedule is variable, the amount of guaranteed paid hours, the additional, higher remuneration of work performed in addition to the guaranteed hours and, if the work schedule is entirely or mostly determined, by the employer:
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 478 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point l – point ii
(ii) the minimum reasonable advance notice the worker shall receive before the start of a work assignment;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 481 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point l – point ii a (new)
(iia) the conditions and the level of financial compensation in case of cancellation of work by the employer.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 485 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point m
(m) any collective agreements governing the worker’s conditions of work; in the case of collective agreements concluded outside the business by special joint bodies or institutions, the name of the competent body or joint institution within which the agreements were concluded, and the cut off periods if there are any;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 505 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The information referred to in paragraph 2(f) to (k) and (n) may, where appropriate, be givenshall be accompanied by in the form of a reference to the laws, regulations and administrative or statutory provisions or collective agreements governing those particular points.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 507 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The minimum reasonable advance notice the worker shall receive before the start of a work assignment and the financial compensation of work assignment cancelled by the employer, as set out in paragraph 2, shall, where appropriate be agreed upon by the social partners at the appropriate level.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 517 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. The information referred to in Article 3(2) shall be provided individually to the worker in the form of a document as early as possible but at the latest onat the first daycommencement of the employment relationship. That document may be provided and transmitted electronicallysent electronically directly to the worker as long as it is easily accessible by the worker and it may also be accessible to the entity controlling working conditions and can be stored and printed.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 534 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The document shall be provided at the same moment in time to the worker representative and the responsible social protection authorities.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 539 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall together with the social partners develop templates and models for the document referred to in paragraph 1 and put them at the disposal of workers and employers including by making them available on a single official national website and by other suitable means. Those models should be provided in all EU languages and published on the EURES website.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 550 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that the information on the laws, regulations and administrative or statutory provisions or applicable collective agreements governing the legal framework applicable which are to be communicated by employers is made generally available free of charge in a clear, transparent, comprehensive and easily accessible way at a distance and by electronic means, including through existing online portals for Union citizens and businesses.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 578 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) where applicable the changes to the worker’s social security situation;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 586 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the employment conditions under Article 3.1 of Directive 96/71/EC including remuneration to which the worker is entitled in accordance with the applicable law of the host Member State;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 594 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. The information referred to in paragraph 1(b) and 2(a) may, where appropriate, be given in the form of ashall be given in writing clearly outlining reference to the laws, regulations and administrative or statutory provisions or collective agreements governing those particular points.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 601 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. Unless Member States provide otherwise, paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply if the duration of each work period outside the Member State in which the worker habitually works is four consecutive weeks or less.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 608 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that, where an employment relationship is subject to a probationary period, that period shall not exceed six months, including any extension. Any time worked with the same enterprise, group or entity shall count towards that six months period. During a probationary period an employment relationship shall not be declared dormant.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 618 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may provide for longerA probationary periods in cases wh shall not hampere this is justified by the nature of the employment or is in the interest of the workere accrual of rights.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 629 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. A probation period can only be agreed in cases of open-ended contracts.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 632 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that an employer shall not prohibitprohibit employers from sanctioning or punishing workers forom taking up employment with other employers, outside the work schedule established with that employer.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 639 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Employers may however lay down conditions of incompatibility where such restrictions are justified by legitimate reasons such as the protection of business secrets or the avoidance of conflicts of interests.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 651 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States shall ensure that the open-ended contract remains the norm.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 655 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1 Zero-hour or on-demand type of contracts are prohibited.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 686 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall ensure that: (a) the predetermined work schedule may not stretch above the legislative maximum weekly working hours and the reference hours/days need to respect the 11 hours consecutive rest period as laid down in Directive2003/88/EC;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 697 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Where notice is given of work, the worker shall be entitled to be paid for the hours of which they were notified;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 699 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. if work is cancelled, the worker shall be entitled to be paid in full for the hours of which they were notified;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 700 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. employers shall pay a premium for non-guaranteed hours;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 701 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. that after working for three months for an employer, a worker has a right to a contract guaranteeing their normal hours of work which are to be calculated based on the average of working hours of the past 3 months;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 702 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 f (new)
1f. time worked with the same enterprise, group or entity shall count towards that three-month period
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 708 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that workers with at least six months' seniority with the same employer may requestconvert into a form of employment with more predictable and secure working conditions where available. Time worked with the same enterprise, group or entity or natural or legal person shall count towards that six months period.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 721 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The employer shall provide a written reply within one month of the request. With respect to natural persons acting as employers and micro, small, or medium enterprises, Member States may provide for that deadline to be extended to no more than three months and allow for an oral reply to a subsequent similar request submitted by the same worker if the justification for the reply as regards the situation of the worker remains unchangedgenuinely consider the conversion. A refusal is only allowed if provided in writing arguing objective business needs within one month of the request.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 732 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Should the employer not reply to the demand for conversion, the conversion is presumed to have taken effect.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 737 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that where employers are required by Union or national legislation or relevant collective agreements or internal rules to provide training to workers to carry out the work for which they are employed, such training shall be provided cost-free to the worker. The same shall apply to training which took place before the start of the employment relationship but trained the worker for it.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 749 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The worker remains entitled to its remuneration, as if he/she would have been working.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 754 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. The training shall take place during working hours.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 757 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. The employers shall not make unfair deductions from the remuneration.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 758 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 a (new)
Article 11a Equal treatment The Member States shall ensure the principle of equal pay and terms and conditions to apply to all workers regardless of their employment status. The Member States shall ensure the elimination of discrimination with regard to all aspects and conditions of remuneration and terms and conditions of employment; the employment status not being of relevance.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 764 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Member States may allowshall have the right to invite social partners to conclude collective agreements, in conformity with the national law or practice, which, while fully respecting the overalllevel of protection of workersprovided by this directive, establish arrangements concerning the working conditions of workers which differ from but may not fall below those referred to in Articles 7 to 11.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 777 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that pProvisions contrary to this Directive in individual or collective agreements, internal rules of undertakings, or any other arrangements shall be declared null and void or arand shall be amended in order to bring them at least into line with the provisions of this Directive.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 784 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – title
Legal presumption and early settlement mechanism
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 786 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Member States shall ensure that, where a worker has not received in due time all or part of the documents referred to in Article 4(1), Article 5, or Article 6, and the employer has failed to rectify that omission within 15 days of its notification, one of the following systems shall applyies:
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 803 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the worker shall have the possibility to submit a complaint to a competent authority in a timely manner. If the competent authority finds that the complaint is justified, it shall order the relevant employer(s) to provide the missing information. If the employer does not provide the missing information within 15 days following receipt of the order, the authority shall be able to impose an appropriate administrative penalty, even if the employment relationship has ended. Employers shall have the possibility to lodge an administrative appeal against the decision imposing the penalty. Member States may designate existing bodies as competent authorities.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 812 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 a (new)
Article 14a Early settlement mechanism The worker shall have the possibility to submit a complaint to a competent authority in a timely manner. If the competent authority finds that the complaint is justified, it shall order the relevant employer(s) to provide the missing information. If the employer does not provide the missing information within 15 days following receipt of the order, the authority shall be able to impose an appropriate administrative penalty, even if the employment relationship has ended. Employers shall have the possibility to lodge an administrative appeal against the decision imposing the penalty. Member States may designate existing bodies as competent authorities. This settlement mechanism is without prejudice to any judicial procedure.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 813 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 b (new)
Article 14b Primacy of facts The determination of the existence of an employment relationship shall be guided by the facts relating to the actual performance of work and not on the basis of how the parties describe the relationship.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 819 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Where one or more natural or legal person(s) who is or are directly or indirectly party to an employment relationship with a worker, they shall be jointly and severally liable for obligations under this Directive.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 823 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Member States shall introduce measures necessary to protect all workers regardless of their legal or formal status, including workers who are employees' and trade union representatives, from any adverse treatment by the employer or adverse consequences resulting from a complaint lodged with the employer or from any legal proceedings initiated with the aim of enforcing compliance with theexercising a rights provided for in this Directive.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 829 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to prohibit and declare as null and void the dismissal or its equivalent and all preparations for dismissal or other detriments or less favourable treatments of workers, on the grounds that they exercised the rights provided for in this Directive. The necessary measures shall also include the right to reinstatement and compensation.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 838 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. Workers who consider that they have been dismissed, or have been subject to measures with equivalent effect, on the grounds that they have exercised the rights provided for in this Directive may request the employer to provide duly substantiated grounds for the dismissal or its equivalent. The employer shall provide those grounds in writing. Member States shall ensure that the deadline for bringing an action contesting the dismissal is suspended as long as the worker has not received written justification from the employer.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 848 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 a (new)
Article 17a Burden of proof of the existence of an employment relationship The burden of proof of absence of an employment relationship shall be on the natural or legal person identifiable as employer.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 854 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive or the relevant provisions already in force concerning the rights which are within the scope of this Directive. Member States shall take all measures necessary to ensure that those penalties are applied. Penalties shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. They may take the form of a fine. They mayshall also comprise an appropriate and at least proportional payment of compensation.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 858 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Financial sanctions shall increase in amount according to the number of infringements or to the delay the employer is taking in providing the document to the worker.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 876 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20a Facilitation of complaints Member States shall ensure that there are effective mechanisms through which workers may lodge complaints against their employers, directly or through third parties designated by Member States such as trade unions or other associations or a competent authority of the Member State when provided for by national legislation.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 881 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 1
The rights and obligations set out in this Directive shall apply to existing employment relationships as from [entry into force date + 2 years]. However, employers shall provide or complement the documents referred to in Article 4(1), Article 5 and Article 6 only upon request of a worker. The absence of such request shall not have the effect of excluding workers from the minimum rights established under this Directive.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 887 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 21 a (new)
Article 21a Inspections Member States shall ensure that effective and adequate inspections are carried out to control the rights laid down in this Directive.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 891 #

2017/0355(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1
By [entry into force date + 8 years], the Commission shall, in consultation with the Member States and social partners at Union level and taking into account the impact on small and medium-sized micro-enterprises, review the application of this Directive with a view to proposing, where appropriate, the necessary amendments.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 131 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Welcomes the work of the Ombudsman, in particular related to the rights of the most vulnerable groups; stresses the need to further increase his impact by overcoming funding and staffing problems at his central and local offices;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 168 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Underlines that the right to life, including the right for children to attend school and to have a normal social life, is still heavily undermined by the existence of blood feuds in Albania; urges the authorities to implement the March 2015 resolution and recommendations by the Parliament and to reactivate the Coordination Council without any further delay;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 180 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Deplores that the ecological and socio-economic impacts of hydropower plants and projects are not properly assessed in order to ensure compliance with international standards and relevant EU nature legislation; is deeply concerned about the fact that 44 of 71 hydropower plant projects are under construction in protected areas; underlines the need to improve the quality of environmental impact assessments as well as to guarantee public participation and consultation of civil society in relevant projects in particular as regards the Pocem hydropower project on the Vjosa river;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 184 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15 b. Welcomes the 2015-2020 national action plan for renewable energy sources (RES) and its 38% target; stresses, however, the crucial importance to attend climate change objectives without negatively impacting biodiversity, the landscape, water resources, fauna, flora and affected local population;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 185 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15 c. Urges the government to stop hydropower projects inside protected areas and other areas with high natural value; urges the government to declare a three-year moratorium on hydropower projects constructions and to urgently develop a national strategy defining go and no-go areas for future hydropower development; advises the government to consider the establishment of a Vjosa National Park and to abandon plans for new hydropower plants along the Vjosa River and its tributaries;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 302 #

2016/2311(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes Serbia's continued engagement in the normalisation process with Kosovo, and its commitment to the implementation of the agreements reached in the EU- facilitated dialogue; reiterates its call to move forward with the full implementation, in good faith and in a timely manner, of all the agreements already reachedurges, at the same time, the Serbian authorities to refrain from provocations and acts aimed at destabilising the neighbouring state like the train from Belgrade to North Mitrovica painted with provocative slogans on 15 January; reiterates its call to move forward with the full implementation of all the already reached agreements in good faith and in a timely manner and to determinedly continue the normalisation process; encourages Serbia and Kosovo to identify new areas of discussion for the dialogue, with the aim of improving the lives of people and comprehensively normalising relations; reiterates its call on the EEAS to carry out an evaluation of the performance of the sides in fulfilling their obligations;
2017/01/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 27 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas reforms and accession preparations are being hampered by political polarisationzation, deep mutual mistrust and lack of a genuine dialogue between the parties; whereas backsliding in some important areas can be observed;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 53 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas accession negotiations should be opened upon the fulfilment of required conditions; whereas the country has been wrongly considered for many years as one of the most advanced countries in terms of alignment with the acquis;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 55 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
E a. whereas the recent political crisis has shown the lack of an effective system of checks and balances in the Macedonian institutions and the necessity to increase transparency and public accountability including adequate mechanisms of oversight of the main services and internal structures;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 66 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas bilateral disputes should be duly addressed in compliance with EU and UN standards and in the framework of international organs of arbitration and should not represent an obstacle to the opening of accession negotiations;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 85 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the overall peaceful conduct and the respect for fundamental freedoms shown at the elections of 11 December 2016; urges all political parties to accept its results in the interest of domestic stability and underlines their responsibility to ensure that there is no backsliding into political crisis; calls for a swift formation of a new government in order to make use of the mandate to carry on with necessary reforms; considers cross- party cooperation essential for addressing pressing domestic and EU-related challenges;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 104 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Expects the new government, in cooperation with other parties, to accelerate EU-related reforms; reiterates its support for the opening of accession negotiations, conditional on the progress of the implementation of the Przhino Agreement and the Urgent Reform Priorities; continues to be convinced that negotiations can create a new dynamic, revitalize the European perspective and generate much-needed reforms and positively influence the resolution of bilateral disputes;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 153 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the Special Prosecutor has raised the first criminal indictments concerning wrongdoings arising from the wiretaps; is concerned about attacks and obstruction against her work and the lack of cooperation from other institutions; considers it essential for the democratic process to enable the Special Prosecutor's Office to carry out thorough investigations in full autonomy and with the necessary adequate means;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 167 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Points out that corruption and organized crime are widespread in the region and also represent an obstacle to Macedonia's democratic, social and economic development; considers that a regional strategy and enhanced cooperation between all the countries in the region are essential to tackle these issues more effectively;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 177 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Remains concerned about radicalDeplores the harsh and unjustified public attacks on CSOs and foreign representatives by some politicians and the media; is concerned about limited government commitment and insufficient cooperation with CSOs at all levels; highlights the importance of a regular and constructive dialogue with the civil society and urges the competent authorities to include CSOs in policymaking in a regular and structured manner;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 211 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Reiterates that the interethnic situation remains fragile; urges all political parties and CSOs to actively promote an inclusive and tolerant multi-ethnic, multi- cultural and multi-religious society and to strengthen coexistence and dialogue; reminds the government and party leaders of their commitment to fully implement the OFA and to complete its review, including policy recommendations; stresses the importance to start the long-awaited census without further delay;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 257 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Expresses its concern at the alarming level of air pollution that according to a recent study of the Public Health Institute of Macedonia causes annually 30% - 35% of the diseases in the country and over 1300 deaths; draws the attention, in particular, to Skopje urban area and calls on the state and local authorities to urgently take adequate measures to cope with this emergency;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 259 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19 b. Takes note of a number of planned infrastructure project within protected areas that would be likely to cause significant impacts on future Natura 2000 sites (current Emerald site); calls, in this regard, for respecting the recommendation of the Bern Convention's Standing Committee (No. 184(2015)) by suspending the implementation of the projects within the territory of the Mavrovo National Park until a Strategic Environmental Assessment is completed in full compliance with the EU environment legislation; further calls for respecting the Decision (40 COM 7B.68) concerning the Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region to prepare an overall Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) before any further work is undertaken; urges the development of a hydropower strategy for the Western Balkans as a whole in line with EU environmental legislation;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 260 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 c (new)
19 c. Encourages Macedonia to develop competition in the gas and energy market towards the unbundling of utilities in line with the EU Third Energy Package; calls for a substantial improvement as regards energy efficiency, the production of renewable energy and the fight against climate change; calls for the ratification of the Paris Climate agreement;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 313 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. WHighlights the constructive commitment of Macedonia to bilateral relations with the neighbours and neighbouring EU Member States and positively notes its engagement in regional initiatives; welcomes the activities in the framework of the Berlin Process, which demonstrates the strong political support for the European perspective of the Western Balkans countries; welcomes the tangible results from the joint initiative for confidence-building measures with Greece; strongly reiterates its invitation to the Vice- President/High Representative (VP/HR) and the Commission, to develop new initiatives to overcome the remaining differences and to work, in cooperation with the two countries and the UN Special Representative, on a mutually acceptable solution on the name issue and to report back to Parliament thereon;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 316 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23 a. Recalls the ruling of the International Court of Justice of 5 December 2011; supports the proposal by UN envoy Nimetz of a composite name with geographical qualifier as long as Macedonian nationality, identity, culture and language are not affected;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas digitalisation, ambitious climate change goals, migration issues and, community development and provision of essential services, as well as the fight against poverty and gender inequality offer great potential for social entrepreneurship at the service of society and sustainable development;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the vital importance of the hundreds of thousands of social economy enterprises in Europe, which employ around 15 million people, and their invaluable contribution to continued sustainable economic growth, social progress and inclusion in the EU internal market;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 37 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the Commission and national authorities to respect the historical and legal specificities of social economy enterprises when it comes to market regulation;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 43 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that, given the constantly rising demand for social services, social enterprises in the EU bear enormous social responsibility and are becoming increasingly important; therefore recommends that a favourable legal framework for social economy and social enterprises is developed in all Member States;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Highlights that social enterprises often have a positive environmental and ecological impact compared to traditional purely profit oriented businesses, therefore the gained social benefit might be larger and broader than the direct impact on the life of participating people;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises the importance of networking among social enterprises, and calls on the Member States to optimise knowledge transfer throughout the EU; and to encourage the setup of national focal points to facilitate the exchange of best practises; calls for a joint effort by the European Commission, Member States and social economy representative organisations to promote mutual knowledge sharing and business relations between traditional businesses and social enterprises;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 64 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Encourages public authorities to make the best use of the new public procurement rules, namely the possibility to include social considerations and reserved contracts in their tendering procedures;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises the need to introduce at EU level a ‘European social label’ for social enterprises, based on clear criteriarules, namely the possibility to include social considerations and res, where the promotion of gender equality should be an important priority;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 92 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Believes that investment priorities for social economy and social enterprises should not be limited to social inclusion, but should include employment and education, to reflect the wide range of economic activities in which they are present;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 98 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to proactively promote the “European social label” and advertise the social benefits of social enterprises;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 105 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for the funds to be used effectively, and stresses that access to EU funds, including EFSI, needs to be made easier, not least in order to rule out the emergence of consultancy services provided solely for profit.
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses that the European Commission and Member States, as well as regional and local authorities, should mainstream the social enterprise dimension in relevant policies, programmes and practices.
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 113 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Social enterprises have a great potential to make a meaningful contribution to fight gender inequalities and promote a fairer economy for women and girls’ empowerment. By integrating gender equality objectives social enterprises can promote a greater gender balance in decision making, equal pay for equal work, anti-sexual harassment policies, encourage the equal distribution of care and reproductive work and encourage better work-life balance policies for both women and men, among other.
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Greater gender balance indecision-making has been consistently shown to produce more innovation, transparency, and attention to risk than in male-dominated enterprises;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #

2016/2237(INL)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 d (new)
8d. Integrating gender in all the phases of the business process (e.g. product design, production, marketing, sales) has the potential to make social enterprises more resilient, successful, and impactful; social enterprises can also increase productivity through improved engagement of female employees and investments in capacity building for women;
2018/04/11
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2016/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Praises Mongolia for its sustained commitment to the consolidation of democratic progress and the rule of law, including multi-party elections, more independent media, and a vibrant civil society; welcomes, in this respect, the participation of Mongolia in the Community of Democracies;
2016/11/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #

2016/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Points out that in 2014 Extractive Industries in Mongolia accounted for 17% of the GDP and 89% of the total export of the country; welcomes, in this respect, the active participation of Mongolia in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative aimed at making this sector more accountable and transparent;
2016/11/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 64 #

2016/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16 b. Underlines that the Oyu Tolgoi copper and gold mine is the single largest mining project, which from 2020 should account for a third of Mongolia’s GDP and that Tavan Tolgoi is the world’s largest undeveloped coal mine; welcomes the public debates held on the environmental impact of mining and the public participation in resources management at local levels;
2016/11/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 66 #

2016/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Urges the EU to provide the Mongolian authorities with a comprehensive technical assistance for the adoption of stringent norms on the exploitation of natural resources and an effective legislation on the environmental impact assessment; stresses the importance that the EU companies operating in Mongolia adopt a conduct based on high ethical standards and corporate responsibility;
2016/11/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 68 #

2016/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17 b. Highlights that the massive urbanisation process that led 15% of the population to move from the rural areas to the cities over the last 15 years abandoning the traditional nomadism created serious problems like poverty and marginalisation that are not yet solved; calls on the EU to assist and support the local authorities in the development of a credible network of social protection and a reliable social security system aimed at assisting the most disadvantaged and vulnerable parts of the society and facilitating their integration in the new environment;
2016/11/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 70 #

2016/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 c (new)
17 c. Draws the attention to the need to improve the use and conservation of natural resources with regard, in particular, to the competing interests in some parts of the country on water between the nomadic population and the mining industries and the importance of preserving biodiversity;
2016/11/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
– having regard to the conventions and recommendations of the International Labour Organisation (ILO), in particular Convention 102 and Recommendation 202,
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 18 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
– having regard to UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, ratified by the EU in 2010,
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 34 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
– having regard to the European Pact for Gender Equality (2011-2020),
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 b (new)
– having regard to the Commission recommendation of 3 October 2008 on the active inclusion of people excluded from the labour market (2008/867/EC),
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 36 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 c (new)
– having regard to the European Commission Recommendation on Investing in Children: Breaking the Cycle of Disadvantage of 2013,
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 26 January 2014 on an EU homelessness strategy,
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 b (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 13 May 2015 on the EU Strategy for equality between women and men post 2015
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 14 April 2016 on meeting the antipoverty target in the light of increasing household costs,
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 66 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 a (new)
– having regard to the Eurofound report of 2014 on ‘Pay in Europe in the 21st century’[1] [1] Eurofound (2014), Pay in Europe in the 21st century.
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 b (new)
– having regard to the Eurofound report of 2014 on ‘Access to healthcare in time of crisis’,[1] [1] Eurofound (2014), Access to healthcare in time of crisis.
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 69 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 c (new)
– having regard to the Eurofound report of 2015 on ‘Access to social benefits: reducing non-take-up’,[1] [1]Eurofound (2015), Access to social benefits: Reducing non-take-up,
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 70 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 d (new)
– having regard to the Eurofound report of 2015on ‘New forms of employment’,[1] [1] Eurofound (2015), New forms of employment
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 e (new)
– having regard to the Eurofound report of 2015 on ‘Inadequate housing in Europe: Costs and consequences’,[1] [1] Eurofound (2016) Inadequate housing in Europe: Costs and consequences,
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 f (new)
– having regards to the forthcoming 2016 Eurofound 6th European Working Conditions Survey overview report,
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 19 a (new)
– having regard to the judgement of the Court C-266/14 on the organisation of working time for workers who are not assigned a fixed or habitual place of work,
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 84 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 22 a (new)
– having regard Article 9 of TFEU obliging the EU to promote high level of employment, guarantee adequate social protection, fight against social exclusion, and ensure a high level of education, training and protection of human health,
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 104 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the European Union needs a paradigm shift towards a strong European social model based on solidarity, social justice, a fair distribution of wealth, non- discrimination, gender equality, a high- quality inclusive public education system, quality employment and sustainable growthand inclusive development - a model that ensures goodadequate social protection for all, empowers people in vulnerable groupsituations, enhances participation in civil and political life, and improves the living standards for all citizenspeople, delivering on the objectives and rights set out in the EU Treaties, the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Social Charter;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 143 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the negative impact of the crisis on access to healthcare has often come with a delay, and many people have found themselves unable to access healthcare even if services are formally covered, in particular because they cannot afford co-payments or experience waiting lists;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 169 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR) cannot be limited to a declaration of principles or good intentions but must consist of real matterconcrete and specific tools (legislation, policy-making mechanisms and financial instruments), delivering positive impact on citizens’ lives in the short term and enabling support for European construction in the 21st century by effectively upholding social rights and Treaty objectives, strengthening cohesion and upward convergence, and helping to complete EMU;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 194 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that the EPSR should equip European citizenseveryone living in the EU with stronger means to keep and regain control over their lives and make markets work for wellbeing and sustainable development;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 210 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines that the implementation of social rights depends on the EPSR being mainstreamed into EU economic policy and governance to ensure that policies do not undermine social rights;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 242 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the enactment of a directive on fairdecent working conditions for all forms of employment, ensuring for every worker a core set of enforceable rights, including equal treatment, equal pay, adequate social protection, protection in case of dismissal, health and safety protection, provisions on working time, travelling and commuting time and rest time, freedom of association and representation, collective bargaining, collective action, access to training, and adequate information and, consultation and participation rights; underlines that this directive should apply to employees as well as to all workers in non-standard forms of employment, such as fixed-term work, part-time work, on-demand work, self-employment, crowd-working, so- called public work programmes, internship or traineeship; requests that the EU acquis be updated accordingly so as to apply to all workers;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 261 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses the role of the EU in ensuring the proper and swift implementation and enforcement of existing legislation in the field of employment and social affairs; notes that enforcement is to be guaranteed legally (e.g. through proceedings, infringement procedures, collective agreements), administratively and politically;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 269 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Considers that the initiative on a European Pillar of Social Rights should support the development of an integrated European anti-poverty strategy, with effective poverty and inequality reduction targets;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 273 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Quality and fair working conditions
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 287 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Calls for decisive steps towards legal certainty on what constitutes ‘employment’, also for work intermediated by digital platformsself-employed, outsourced and subcontracted workers in de-facto dependent work relationships, as well as for work intermediated by digital platforms and not based on a standard employment contract; underlines that open- ended contracts providing sound workload should remain the norm given their importance for socio-economic security; calls for the directive on fairpromotion of employment models that could be applied as an alternative to currently used employment models resulting in precarious work; calls for the directive on decent working conditions to include relevant minimumhigh-level standards to be ensured in more precarious forms of employment, in particular:
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 313 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point a
a. decent working conditions for internships, traineeships and apprenticeships, prohibiting those that are unpaid or paid so little that they do not enable workers to make ends meet; to this end, quality frameworks for internships, traineeships and apprenticeships must be established to ensure they are time-bound and to guarantee access to worker’s rights and adequate social protection, as well as the educational content of these work experience opportunities for young people;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 331 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point b
b. for work intermediated by digital platforms, a definition of employment, including the status of the platform, the client and the worker, that is less dependent on full cumulation of the relevant criteria;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 347 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – point c
c. limits regarding on-demand work: zero-hour contracts and similar type contracts should be banned and certain core working hours should be guaranteed to all workers;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 352 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to prepare a study in cooperation with the social partners on the possibility of creating a European Labour Court to ensure proper implementation of European labour regulation;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 380 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises the need for renewed upward convergence in wages throughout the EU and closing the gender pay gap; calls on the Commission to actively support a wider coverage for collective bargaining; considers that to ensure decent living wages, minimum wages set at a decent level are necessary; recommends the establishment of national wage floors through legislation or collective bargaining, with the objective of attaining at least 60 % of the respective national averagemedian wage and exceeding the national or regional living wage;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 382 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for a European living wage calculation program with the aim of calculating official EU living wages on a regional basis in every Member States based on a standardised method in conjunction with reference budgets; calls on the Commission to prepare the call for proposal, and allocate the necessary funding; suggests the creation of a voluntary framework, supported by social partners, to look into the development of an EU Framework on Living Wages;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 401 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls that the right to healthy and safe working conditions also involves limitations on working time and provisions on minimum rest periods and annual leave; awaits Commission proposals for legislation and other concrete measures to uphold this right for all workers, reflecting all current knowledge about health and safety risks; recalls that combatting violence against women in the workplace, particularly sexual harassment, is an integral part of health and safe working conditions;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 431 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Is concerned about the high and rising number of workers who are forced into bogus self-employment while they are performing the same tasks as employees, with subsequent less coverage in social security and pension rights;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 435 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Emphasizes the need for comprehensive, reliable and regularly updated data on quality of work and employment which can be used for monitoring quality of work and employment over time and provide evidence into policy making on the topic; calls on Eurofound to further develop its activities in monitoring job quality and working life throughout its European working conditions survey based on its concept of job quality as comprising earnings, prospects, physical environment, social environment, work intensity, skills use and discretion, working time quality; calls on Eurofound to further develop its research on policies, social partner agreements and companies practices which are supportive of better job quality and working lives;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 440 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Adequate and sustainable social protection and quality services
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 448 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Supports the individualisation of social protection rights and more integrated and quality provision of social protection benefits and social services as a way to make the welfare state more understandable and accessible, providing a personalized support, while not weakening social protection; points to the importance of informing citizenseveryone about social rights and to the potential of e- government solutions, possibly including a European social security card with strong data protection guarantees, which could improve individual awareness and also help mobile workers clarify their contributions and entitlements;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 465 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Agrees with the importance ofStresses the need to ensure the availability of and universal access to timely, good-quality and affordable preventative and curative health care; emphasises that all workerseveryone must be covered by health insurance and that out of the pocket payments must be restricted; urges Member States to reverse cost-saving measures related to health care taken during the economic crisis;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 487 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Is aware that rising life expectancy and workforce shrinking pose a challenge to the sustainability and adequacy of pensions systems and to intergenerational fairnesssolidarity; reaffirms that the best response is to increase the overall employment rate through employment models linked to full pension insurance coverage and with particular attention given to those most excluded from the labour market; considers that pensionable ages should reflect, besides life expectancy, other factors including gaps in healthy life years, periods spent out of the labour- market for caring responsibilities, labour market trends, the economic dependency ratio, the birth rate and differences in job arduousness;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 517 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Insists that all workers should be covered by insurance against involuntary unemployment or part-time employment, coupled with job-search assistance and investment in (re)-training; urges the need of benchmarking unemployment schemes highlighting that duration should at least cover the national average job seeking period and support and encourage active job search;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 544 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for a European framework fordirective on adequate minimum income schemes that sets common methodologies for defining their adequacy (e.g. 60% at risk of poverty indicator, material deprivation, reference budgets) and establishes common principles, definitions and methods to achieve a level playing field across Europe; highlights the importance of such schemes for maintaining human dignity as well as their role as a form of social investments enabling people to undertake training and/or look for work;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 557 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Agrees that all persons with disabilities must be ensured enabling services and basicindividualised services provided by well- qualified professionals, and adequate income security allowing them a decent standard of living and social inclusion;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 581 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Considers universal access to quality and affordable community-based long-term care services and independent living schemes, including home-based care, to be a right that should be upheld with the help of suitably qualified professionals employed under decent conditions; believes that low- income households should therefore be targeted by adequate public services and tax deductions; repeats its call for legislation on carers' leave accompanied by adequate remuneration and social protection;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 600 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Considers child poverty to be a major issue on which Europe should 'act big'; calls for the swift implementation of the Recommendation on Investing in Children and of a Child Guarantee in all Member States, so that every child now living inat risk of poverty can havehas access to free healthcare, free and inclusive education, free childcare, decent housing and proper nutrition;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 616 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for Member States to promote access to quality and affordable housing of adequate size for all, to prevent and reduce homelessness with a view to its gradual elimination; calls on them to deliver on the right to adequate housing through i.e. legislation to ensure that access to social housing or adequate housing benefits are provided for those in need, obviously including homeless people, and that vulnerable people and poor households are protected against eviction; calls for tax incentives toemphasizes the need for benchmarking, monitoring, transnational exchange, mutual learning, and support for social innovation in this context; calls for an independence- supporting approach to youth-housing, helping young people on low incomes set up their own households, for example through tax incentives; calls for greater use of the EFSI to support urban renewal and affordable housing provision; calls for targeted provisions and incentives to develop the social housing sector in macro regions where they are insufficient or non-existent;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 626 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Highlights that investment in energy efficient social housing is a win- win for the environment whilst guaranteeing social rights that can have a real impact on tackling energy poverty; considers this should be combined with a strategy to ensure fair pricing adapted to actual incomes, and should ban cut-offs to vulnerable households;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 634 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for legislation ensuring fairthe availability of and access for all to good- quality and, affordable and accessible social services of general interest and other essential services, such as e- communications, energy, transport and financial services; highlights the role of social enterpriswell-equipped and well-staffed public sector providers, social enterprises and not-for-profit organisations in providing these services;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 646 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls for legislations abolishing all form of criminalisation of poverty such as unfairly sanctioning homelessness, energy poverty, or other forms of material deprivation;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 665 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Supports a Skills Guarantee as a new right for everyone to acquire fundamental skills for the 21st century, including digital literacy, skills needed for the green and circular economy as well as transversal and social skills; highlights this as an important social investment, requiring adequate financing;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 698 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 – point a
a. social insurance schemes must be broadened in order to enable all workers to accumulate entitlements providing income security in situations such as unemployment, involuntary part-time work or career breaks for familycare or training reasons;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 734 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for full implementation of the Youth Guarantee for all people under 30, ensuring they are provided with a quality offer of employment or education, and of the recommendation on the long- term unemployed; highlights these as important structural reforms and social investments that are in need of adequate financing from both EU and national level;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 753 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – point a a (new)
aa. the Commission should adopt, as repeatedly requested by the Parliament a post-2015 Gender Equality Strategy in line with the recommendations of the European Pact for gender equality for the period 2011-2020;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 754 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – point a b (new)
ab. the Council should swiftly move forward with an agreement on the Women on Boards Directive;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 761 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – point b
b. there is a need for new legislative proposals on family leave schemes, includingCommission should bring forward a comprehensive package of legislative and non-legislative measures regarding the work-life balance, the reconciliation of professional, private and family life; including legislative proposals on maternity leave, paternity leave, parental leave and carers' leave, encouraging equal take-up of leave arrangements by men and women across all categories of workers in order to improve women's access to and position within the labour market and facilitate work-life balance;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 784 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Commission to set out new concrete measures to ensure non- discrimination and equal opportunities for all, throughout the lifecycle; calls for the rapid adoption of the proposal for a directive on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation, to close the gap in protection against discrimination in access to goods and services;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 798 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Fair mMobility
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 822 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Is concerned that the regional differences between wage levels and social security systems of Member States are putting a downward pressure on working conditions and social security and can only be countered by EU level measures tackling diverging working and social conditions;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 827 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24b. Stresses that, for this to happen, social security coordination across the EU must be better enforced to ensure income- support, pension rights (including second and third pillar) and other social benefits are not lost when moving to another country or when moving back to the country of origin;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 829 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 c (new)
24c. Calls on the EU and Member States to take into account the social impact of mobility on the increasing number of transnational families for example by providing leaves to care for a family member in another country and the transferability and comparability of education systems for the mobility of children in school age;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 830 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 d (new)
24d. Considers that all trade unions should be further assisted in setting up transnational agreements and networks to provide information, counselling, legal advice and seamless protection for mobile and posted workers;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 831 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 e (new)
24e. Calls on Member States to make it mandatory for employers to provide an employment contract in a language known by EU mobile citizens, in order to make the labour contract understandable for workers;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 844 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission to propose a clear roadmap for legislative updates and other measures that are necessary for full practical application of the EPSR; highlights that in cases of conflict of law, the horizontal social clause (Article 9 TFEU), the gender mainstreaming clause (Article 8 TFEU) and the horizontal non-discrimination clause (Article 10 TFEU) should be properly applied;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 860 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – introductory part
26. Considers that the objective of upward social convergence should be underpinned by a set of binding targets, building on the Europe 2020 strategy and the Sustainable Development Goals and serving to guide the coordination of economic, employment and social policies in the EU; suggests that these targets should be further adapted to relative improvements of the performance within a Member State once the originally set target is met; believes that these targets could also form part of the Convergence Code currently being discussed for the euro area, and could be based on the following indicators which are directly affected by public policies and which should be disaggregated, including by age and gender:
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 892 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point e a (new)
ea. income inequality using the income quintile share ratio;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 903 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point g a (new)
ga. access to care services for dependent persons;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 904 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – point g b (new)
gb. homelessness and housing exclusion rates;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 941 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls for a rebalancing of the European Semester so that the existing scoreboard of key employment and social indicators and the new Convergence Code are directly and transparently taken into account in formulating CSRs and the euro area recommendation as well as for the activation of EU instruments; urges a stronger role for the Macroeconomic Dialogue with social partners; considers ‘macro-social surveillance’ to be of great importance for avoiding that economic imbalances are reduced at the expense of worsening the employment and social situation;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 947 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Calls for the creation of a new integrated EU indicator measuring the intergenerational social mobility enabling cross country comparison of equal opportunities;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 960 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls, in the short run, for a 'silver rule' on social investment to be applied when implementing the Stability and Growth Pact, namely to consider certain public social investments having a clear positive impact on economic growth (e.g. childcare or education and training) as being eligible for favourable treatment when assessing government deficits and compliance with the 1/20 debt rule; calls on the Commission to explore was to actively encourage Member States to make use of this silver rule; calls, in the longer run, for a wider 'golden rule' on social investment which establishes a threshold or benchmark below which spending on social protection should not fall;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 978 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Highlights that today's phenomena of capital-intensive production, high rates of inequality and the continuing rise in 'atypical' work imply a need to increase the role of general tax revenue in cofinancing social insurance schwelfare systemes in order to provide adecentquate social protection for alland quality services for all; calls therefor to step up actions to effectively fight tax avoidance and evasion;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1005 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 – point b
b. an increase in the volume of the European Social Fund, the EGF and the FEAD, and safeguarding the ring-fencing of at least 20% of ESF for the fight against poverty and social exclusion;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1006 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 – point b a (new)
ba. the application of gender budgeting to all financial instruments;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1019 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Considers a social fiscal union the most effective environment to restart the upward social convergence in Europe; highlights that the E.P.S.R. should commit the EMU to the establishment of the European social fiscal union where this first phase sets the minimum social standards and the second phase creates the effective solidarity mechanisms;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1020 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 b (new)
30b. Calls for the Commission to closely monitor and report annually on how Member States are fulfilling the ex- ante conditionalities of the European Social Fund and on the 20% earmarked spending for poverty reduction and social inclusion;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1035 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Calls on the Commission and the EIB to refocus the EFSI on sustainable and quality job creation and social investment and adapt its risk/return requirements accordingly;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1077 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point b
b. a European unemployment insurance scheme, also accessible for self- employed workers, complementing national schemes in cases of severe cyclical downturn and helping prevent the translation of an asymmetric shock into structural disadvantage;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1078 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to explore a possible European social security system in the future and the funding thereof;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1100 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Calls on the Commission, the EEAS and the Member States to translate the EPSR into relevant external action, in particular by promoting the implementation of the UN SDGs, the UNCRPD, the ILO conventions and European social standards through trade agreements and strategic partnerships;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1113 #

2016/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
35. Considers that the EPSR should be adopted in 2017 as a binding agreement between the European Parliament and the European Council, genuinely involving all social partners and civil society organisations, in line with art 11 TEU, as equal partners at the highest level, and should contain a clear roadmap for implementation, with concrete commitments and target dates; stresses that this requires providing the necessary funding to support social partners' and civil society's engagement, as well as developing explicit guidelines for transparency, visibility, and quality of involvement, at both EU and national level;
2016/10/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas in recent years the security situation in and around Europe has significantly worsened and has created arduous challenges that no single country or organisation is able to face alone; whereas solidarity and resilience requires the EU to stand and to act together, and to do so in concert with our allies; whereas the fight against terrorism is a priority for the EU and should be engaged within as well as outside the EU’s bordersending armed conflict, overcoming widespread human rights abuses, the spread of democracy and the rule of law, and the fight against terrorism are priorities for the EU;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 29 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the security and defence building capacityLisbon Treaty requires the Member States to the make available appropriate capacities for civilian and military CSDP missions and operations; whereas this objective of security and defence capacity building for CSDP as enshrined in the Treaties has yet to be accomplished; whereas it is the responsibility of the Member States to build a European Securityn effective and Defence Unionficient CSDP which is able to implement the Union's objectives of Article 21 TEU;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 42 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas Article 42 of the Treaty on European Union requires the progressive framing of a common Union defence policy as part of the common security and defence policy, which will lead to a EU common defence when the European Council so decides by an unanimity vote; whereas Article 42(2) TEU also recommends to the Member States the adoption of such a decision in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 54 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas that same articlearticle 42 TEU also provides for the creation of defence institutionsthe European Defence Agency as well as for a European capabilities and armaments policy to be defined; whereas it also requires that the EU's efforts will be NATO-compatible; whereas a European Defence Unionfective CSDP will enable a stronger North Atlantic Treaty Organization, consequently promoting further a more effective national (territorial), regional and global security and defence;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 66 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas except for the creation of the European Defence Agency (EDA), none of the other missing elements of the EU common security and defence policy have so far been conceived, decided or implemented; whereas the EDA still needs to be harnessed to develop its full potential; and prove that it generates an added value, makes CSDP more effective and can lead to harmonized national defence planning processes in those fields which are relevant for CSDP military operations in line with the Petersberg tasks described in Article 43 TEU;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 74 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy requires that the EU systematically encourage defence cooperation, over the full spectrum of capabilities, in order to respond to external crises, build our partners’ capacities, to guarantee Europe’s safety, and to create a solid European defence industry, which is critical for Europe’s autonomy of decision and action relevant for a CSDP fulfilling the Petersberg tasks, in order to respond to external crises;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 80 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas the European Council of June 2015, which focused on defence, called for fostering greater and more systematic European defence cooperation with a view to delivering key capabilities, including through the use of EU funds for CSDP;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 83 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas France invoked the Article 42(7) TEU on 17 November 2015 and subsequently requested and managed the other Member States' aid and assistance contributions on a purely bilateral basis; whereas a limited number of Member States have the necessary management capacity to follow this example;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 90 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas the EU level white book on security and defence will represent the first steps towards the European Defence Union (EDU),a more effective CSDP as provided for in the Lisbon Treaty;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 91 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1
European Defence Union
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 102 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Encourages the European Council to lead the progressive framing of the EDUa more effective CSDP, with a view to its establishment undertil the next multiannual political and financial framework of the EU (MFF)European elections; takes the view that the Lisbon Treaty provides a solid basis for the EDUdevelopment of an effective CSDP;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 103 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Urges the EU Member States to unleash the full potential of the Lisbon Treaty with regard to CSDP in particular with regard to the permanent structured cooperation of Article 42(6), or the start- up fund of Article 41(3) TEU; reminds that the Petersberg tasks of Article 43 TEU list a long list of ambitious military tasks such as joint disarmament operations, humanitarian and rescue tasks, military advice and assistance tasks, conflict prevention and peace-keeping tasks, tasks of combat forces in crisis management, including peace-making and post-conflict stabilisation; reminds that the same article also states that all these tasks may contribute to the fight against terrorism, including by supporting third countries in combating terrorism in their territories; stresses that the current state of CSDP does not allow the EU to fulfil all the tasks listed; believes that the order of the day should be to systematically work on ways to allow the EU to fulfil the objectives of the Lisbon Treaty and to not to further enlarge the list of military tasks which would severely endanger the EU's credibility;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 121 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Takes the view that the Union should dedicate own means to fostering greater and more systematic European defence cooperation among the Member States, including permanent structured cooperation (PESCO); is convinced that the use of EU funds would be a clear expression of cohesion and solidarity, and that this would allow all Member States to improve their military capabilities in a more common effort and the establishment of a permanent military planning and conduct capability which would make military CSDP much more effective, faster and less dependent on the foreign policy and other interests of the lead or host nation;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 126 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that the Member States which are willing to make more binding commitments to one another should establish permanent structured cooperation within the Union framework; encourages those Member States to establishpermanently pool national contingents forming multinational forces within the Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) and make these forces available to the common security and defence policy; believes that the Council should normally entrust the implementation of a peace-keeping, conflict prevention and strengthening international security task to those multinational forces; is convinced that the EU battle group system should be further developed to that endwill only become a useful and available CSDP capability in case the lead nation concept is abandoned, joint training is done on a regular basis and groups are created according to specific military functions for an unlimited period of time; underlines that PESCO is open to all Member States;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 147 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages the Member States participating in the EDA to establish a common European capabilities and armaments policy; encourages the Commission to work in liaison with the EDA to that end, and to strengthen the industrial and technological base of the on the basis of a catalogue of very precise capability requirements for CSDP operations and harmonized national defence planning and procurement processes with regard to those specific capabilities; encourages the Commission to work in liaison with the EDA to that end, and to strengthen the industrial and technological base of the defence sector with regard to areas which are relevant for specific CSDP capability requirements; urges the Commission and Member States to guarantee the full implementation of the two defence-related directives of the so called Defence Package and to consider further steps towards the introduction of internal market rules to the defence sector; is convinced that such steps will lead towards a more transparent and efficient defence sector;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 168 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the ongoing work on setting-up a preparatory action for a futReminds that collectively EU Member States spend almost EUR 200 Billion annually on defence and rank as second largest defence spender globally; notes the fact that according to latest EDA figures EU defence research programme starting in 2021 as requested by the European Council (EUCO) 2013 and 2015; calls on the Member States to outline future cooperative programmes in which EU fundedMember States loose more and more interest in collaborative research and development and deplores that Member States are far from meeting the 20% target of collaborative defence research spending fixed in 2007; rejects any attempts to use EU budget funds for defence research can build a starting poid development;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 181 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the importance of putting in place the necessary measures to allow a working, accessible, transparent and simple European market in defence equipment in order to enable Member States to reach bettera much more efficient better use of their respective defence and security budget maximisation; is concerned that the progress towards improved competitiveness, greater transparency, and less red tape in the defence sector has been slow so far, and that a sound European defence industrial policy and the respect for internal market rules is still missing;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 188 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Is convinced that in progressively framing the common Union defence policy, the EU should make provision, in agreement with the Member States concerned, for participation in capability programmes they undertake, including the participation in the structures created for the execution of those programmes within the Union framework;deleted
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 205 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the joint declaration by the presidents of the European Council and the Commission, and the Secretary-General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization of 8 July 2016; emphasises the need for stronger cooperation between the EU and NATO in the area of security and defence; is convinced that EU-NATO cooperation should involve building resiliencecooperating together in the east and the south as well as harmonising national defence investments; considers that cooperation on capabilities offers the prospect of improving compatibility and synergy between both frameworks; is convinced that this would also strengthen NATO's role in security and defence policy, and in collective defence;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 210 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Is deeply concerned by reports that administrative procedures unnecessarily slow down the cross-border movement of rapid response forces inside the EU; calls on the Member States to establish an EU- wide system for the coordination of rapid movement of defence forces personnel, equipment and supplies for the purposes of the common security and defence policy, where the solidarity clause is invoked, and where there is an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power, in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 217 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Member States to make the necessary arrangements for the implementation of the Article 42(7) TEU, in order to allow the Member States to effectively manage other Member States' aid and assistance contributions, or to have them effectively managed within the Union framework; calls on the Member States to aim for the 2 % GDP target to be spent on defence, and; calls on the Member States to spend 20 % of their defence budgets on major equipment, including related research and development;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 230 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Invites the VP/HR to propose an initial EU security and defence white book which will be based on the EU global strategy endorsed by the European Council; takes the view that the security and defence white book should guide the Union contributions in security and defence policy for each multiannual political and financial framework of the EUlegislative term;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 240 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Considers that, based on the EU global strategy, the white book should encompass the EU's security and defence strategy, the capabilities deemed necessary for the deployment of that strategy and the EU levelMember States measures and programmes to deliver those capabilities, which should be based on a common European, inter alia, on a collaborative national capabilities and armaments policy;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 242 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Takes the view that the white book should take the form of an interinstitutional agreement of a binding nature which would set out all Union initiatives, investments, measures and programmes over the respective multiannual political and financial framework of the EU; is convinced that the Member States, partners and allies can take this interinstitutional agreement into account in their own security and defence planning, with a view to being mutually consistent;deleted
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 251 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 1
- the preparatory action on CSDP research starting in 2017, which will be continued until 2019;deleted
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 254 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 2
- a subsequent and more ambitious defence research programme, bridging the gap to the next MFF;deleted
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 264 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 3
- support for the placing of multinational battalions in the Member States on the eastern flank;deleted
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 274 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 4
- development of the regular white book process, for a first application in the planning for the next MFFwhich specifies possible scenarios of military CSDP operations, and reviews national defence investments and capability development measures in view of specific military CSDP capability requirements;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 275 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 4
- development of the regular white book process, for a first application in the planning for the next MFF which specifies possible scenarios for military CSDP operations, reviews national defence capabilities and investments with regard to specific military CSDP capability requirements;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 280 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 5
- a stakeholder conference on the development of a common Europeanproposals regarding the harmonisation of national armaments and capability policyies;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 282 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 5 a (new)
- establishment of a permanent military planning and conduct capability;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 283 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 5 b (new)
- reform of the EU Battle Groups concept aiming at the establishment of permanent units, independent of a lead nation and subject to systematic joint training;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 284 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 5 c (new)
- creation of the military start-up fund as foreseen in Article 41(3) TEU which would help to launch military CSDP operations in a much faster way;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 285 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 5 d (new)
- reform of the ATHENA mechanism aiming at enlarging its potential for cost sharing and common funding especially with regard to the deployment of EU Battle Groups, other rapid response assets' deployment or for building the capacity of military actors in partner countries (training, mentoring, advice, provision of equipment, infrastructure improvements and other services);
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 288 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 6
- a reflection process on foreign direct investment in defence and security critical industries and service providers with a view to developing EU-level legislation;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 290 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 7
- a reflection process on dual-use standardisation with a view to developing EU level legislation;
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 294 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 8
- an EU-wide system for the coordination of the rapid movement of defence forces personnel, equipment and supplies;deleted
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 301 #

2016/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 10
- initial EU-NATO projects on countering hybrid threats, on operational cooperation including at sea, and on migration, on cyber security and defence, on defence capabilities, on strengthening the defence technological and industrial base, on exercises, and on building the defence and security capacity of our partners in the East and South;deleted
2016/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #

2016/2047(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that, in view of the dynamic developments taking place in the global security and humanitarian situation, EU crisis response mechanisms need to be reinforced; strongly rejects the proposed cuts to26 % cut to the crisis response component of the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace and stresses that weakening the Union’s unique crisis response, crisis preparedness and conflict prevention instrument would amount to a strategic mistake; highlights the importance of providing sufficient funds for the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) budget, funding civilian crisis-management missions that contribute to the building of peace and security around the world;
2016/07/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2016/2047(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Rejects the Commission proposal on a new preparatory action on defence research with a budget of EUR 25 million in 2017; recalls the decision of 19 November 2007 taken by the EU defence ministers on a framework for a joint Strategy on Defence Research and Technology which contained four benchmarks on collaborative spending, and in particular a benchmark on research and development aiming at increasing the percentage of collaborative research and development from 10 to 20 percent; notes that the Member States have been, on a national level, unable to implement their own decisions in this respect for the last 9 years and that according to the latest publications of the European Defence Agency the level of collaborative research is even decreasing; is convinced that any EU budget contribution in this field would not be justifiable under these circumstances;
2016/07/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 14 #

2016/2047(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Notes the proposal of the Commission of 5 July 2016 on Capacity Building in Support of Security and development (CBSD) amending the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace; rejects the attempt to use a development policy-based instrument for security and military objectives at the expense of its conflict prevention function; believes that the provision of military training, mentoring, advice, equipment, infrastructure and services to military actors cannot be funded by a regulation based on Articles 209 and 212 TFEU also for legal reasons, as a number of European Court of Justice rulings have already confirmed; urges the Commission to clarify the precise source of the additional EUR 100 Million funding for CBSD under the IcSP;
2016/07/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 18 #

2016/2047(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines that youth exchange programs are one of the most successful measures to increase intercultural skills and to foster understanding and connectivity between people and countries; draws therefore particular attention to the funds which are annually transferred to the Erasmus+ Programme from ENI, IPA2 and the PI; believes that the potential of Erasmus+ as a foreign policy instrument is much underrated and urgently calls for an increase of the Youth programme, in particular, in the field of non-formal and informal learning (starting from the age of 13), which so far only receives 10% of the overall funds, but is in high demand.
2016/07/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the EU is now surrounded by an arc of instability, as large parts of the Middle East and North Africa are engulfed in ethno-religious conflicts and proxy wars and terrorist groups such as ISIS and the Jabhat al-Nusra Front proliferate throughout the regionFateh al-Sham, while an aggressive, revisionist Russia continues to violate its neighbours' sovereignty and openly challenges the European security order;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 42 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas Russia aggressive action has turned common neighbouring countries into an area of competition with the EU violating neighbours' sovereignty, undermining their independence and openly challenging the current European order;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 49 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas these conflicts have direct and serious consequences for the security and well-being of European citizens, as they increasingly spill over into the EU, be it in the form of terrorism, massiveincreased refugee flows, or disinformation campaigns aimed at dividing our societies;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 74 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls what many seem to have forgotten, namely that the European Union is one of the greatest achievements in European history and that the transformative power of the EU has brought peace, stability and prosperity to its citizens; emphasises that the EU remains the largest economic power, the most generous donor of humanitarian and development assistance, and a frontrunner in global diplomacy on issues such as climate change, international justice, non- proliferation and human rights;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 99 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Takes the view that in order to make the Common Foreign and Security policy more assertive, effective and value- based the EU should enhance its energy security reducing immediately and freeing it in the medium term from the current dependence on oil and gas supplied by authoritarian regimes;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 101 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Regrets the inability of the EU to communicate and present properly to the European public opinions the actions, merits and achievements of the Common Security and Defence policy with regard, in particular, to its numerous CSDP missions and the assistance provided in many parts of the world; urges the Council, the Commission and the Member States to fill up this gap making the EU external action more accountable and visible;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 109 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that an effective implementation of the EU Global Strategy presented by the VP/HR in June 2016 is not possible without strong commitment, ownership, political will and leadership from the Member States; highlights that the appropriate resources need to be allocated to the implementation of this strategy, in particular in the crucial area of conflict prevention, security and defence; reminds that the EU Global Strategy calls for investments in conflict prevention but that in reality far reaching cuts have been proposed by both the Commission and the Council on the 2017 budget for the EU's only instrument for conflict prevention (IcSP); stresses the need to redouble efforts in the field of conflict prevention, mediation, reconciliation given the many security challenges in the European neighbourhood and beyond;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 120 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the intention of devising an implementation plan on security and defence; underlines that this implementation plan should be complemented by a White Book process, which would define and specify the level of ambition, taskshe way the Petersberg tasks (Article 43 TEU) are to be implemented, requirements and capability priorities for European defencemilitary CSDP; calls on the VP/HR, in close cooperation with Member States and the Commission, to start working on such a White Book as a matter of priority in order to deliver first results in the first semester of 2017;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 145 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Taking responsibility for our security: DefPrevendt, deterDefend, rReact
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 149 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasises that the EU must strengthen its security and defence capabilities, as it can only use its full potential as a global power if it combines its unrivalled soft power with hard power; recalls that stronger civilian and military capacities are key elements for the EU to, fully respond to crises, build the resilience of partners and protect Europe; notes that since power politics is again dominating international relations, defence and deterrencit is even more important to adopt a comprehensive capabilities are critical for our leveproach which ensures strong coherence between the EU's economic weight as superpower in terms of tragde in diplomatic talkswith CFSP and CSDP; in this regard, reiterates that the Common Security and Defence Policy needs to be strengthened via increased efficiency and effectiveness, as the only realistic way to strengthen our defencemilitary capabilities in a time of budgetary constraints is to increase synergies by stepping up defence cooperation between Member States;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 175 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recalls the UN-EU Strategic Partnership on Peacekeeping and Crisis Management and its priorities for 2015- 2018 as agreed in March 2015; encourages further work by the EU in order to take account of the key role of other organisations and countries and facilitate Member State contributions; deplores that only 11 of 28 EU Member States made pledges at the 28th September 2015 Leader's Summit on Peacekeeping; calls on the EU Member States to significantly increase their military and police contributions to UN peacekeeping missions;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 178 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Calls on a more active role of the EU in the field of disarmament and arms control; calls in this respect on the HR/VP and the Member States to urgently develop a legally binding EU Common Position on the use of armed drones and urges the EU Member States to fully comply with the eight criteria of Common Position 944/2008/CFSP on arms exports including with regard to export of unmanned aerial vehicle technology;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 187 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 – introductory part
10. Takes the view that it is of crucial importance that the instruments provided by the Treaty of Lisbon be finally implemented, notably Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO); welcomnotes the joint paper by the defence ministers of France and Germany on the 'renewal of the CSDP' and the Italian proposal 'for a stronger European defence', and fully supports itstheir aim of taking a positive decision on the establishment of PESCO at the November 2016 Foreign Affairs and Defence Council; calls on the VP/HR to take the lead on this initiative, as well as on other recent proposals for strengthening the CSDP with a view to paving the way for further ambitious decisions on the CSDP to be taken at the November Foreign Affairs and Defence Council and the December European Council, including the following:
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 201 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 – indent 1
- creating a permanent civil-military headquarters, which would strengthen strategic and operational planning, enhance civil-military cooperation and improve the EU's ability to react speedily to crises;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 211 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 – indent 3
- extending the common financing of CSDP operations, including through a review of the Athena mechanism which could also be used for CBSD in the context of CSDP military training missions;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 227 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the ongoing work on the European Defence Action Plan and the Commission's efforts to maximise defence cooperation, including through incentives in areas such as researchinternal market, public procurement, transport, space, cyber, energy and industrial policies; notes the proposal by the French President for a European Security and Defence Fund, and supports the development of new and innovative financing and investment concepts, including through the European Investment Bank; supportf based on contributions from Member States defence budgets; notes the proposals for a 'European Semester for Defence' and calls on the VP/HR to present concrete proposals to this effect; commends the European Defence Agency's role in fostering and coordinating capability development, and calls for its strengthening, notably by increasing its budget;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 238 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Recognises the increasing interdependence between internal and external security, and takes the view that the current security challenges require a profound overhaulcritical analysis of our security policies with a view to creating a consistent and unified policy covering both internal and external dimensions, including aspects such as counter-terrorism, cybersecurity, energy security, hybrid threats, strategic communication, and critical infrastructures; urges Member States' security services to enhance coordination, and calls on all Member States to comply with their legal obligation to share intelligence with Europol and Eurojust in the fight against terrorism and organised crime; urges the EU to further strengthen its cooperation with third countries in the fight against terrorism while respecting international humanitarian law and international human rights law;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 254 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. WelcomNotes the Warsaw Summit Declaration, particularly the Joint Declaration on NATO-EU cooperation; fully supports deepened cooperation between NATO and the EU in the areas of cybersecurity, migration, and the response to hybrid threats; invites the VP/HR to present specific proposals for the follow-up to the Warsaw Joint Declaration by the end of 2016; is convinced that NATO is crucial for the collective security of Europe;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 295 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Takes the view that it is time to define a new, more realistic strategy for the EU's relations with Russia, based on credible deterrence but also on dialogue in areas of common interest; stresses that sanctions have proven to be the most effective means for deterring Russian aggression; recalls that the full implementation of the Minsk agreement is a prerequisite for the suspension of the related sanctions; insists that the EU should consider imposing further sanctions in case Russia continues to violate international law; believes it is in the common interest of the EU and Russia to achieve a better relationship, provided international law is applied;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 320 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Urges the EU to step up its cooperation with its Eastern partners in order to strengthen their resilience and independence; takes the view, in this respect, that protracted and frozen conflicts in the Eastern neighbourhood deeply undermine the resilience and the independence of the countries concerned and calls, in this regard, on the High Representative/Vice-President and Council to play a more active and effective role as regards conflict resolution and peace-building;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 331 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Welcomes the progress made as regards the Eastern Partnership with regard, in particular, to the signing of the association agreements with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine; stresses the importance for the EU to avoid double standards in dealing with the human rights situation in our Eastern Neighbours; reminds that enhanced mobility is one of the priorities of the ENP review and calls, therefore, on the Council to give the green light to the visa liberalisation agreements with Georgia and Ukraine;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 333 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Regrets that the EU enlargement, in practice, has been put on hold until 2019; expresses its concern at the growing frustration of most candidate countries about some contradicting messages coming from Brussels; urges the Council and the EEAS to adopt a coherent approach based on objective and transparent criteria in the negotiations with the accession countries and send a clear message that the doors of the EU are open for membership once all these criteria are met;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 352 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Emphasises that ensuring peace and stability on our continent, in our neighbourhood and in Africa must now be at the heart of Europe's action; takes the view that it is necessary to tackle the root causes of instability and forced and irregular migration, namely poverty, the lack of economic opportunities, armed conflict, bad governance, climate change and mistaken trade policies; believes that security, economic and social development and trade are parts of the same comprehensive strateg, in a context of premature reciprocal liberalisation; recalls that the nexus connecting trade, economic development and poverty reduction does not function automatically; believes that security, economic and social development and trade are parts of the same comprehensive strategy and must be consistent with the principle of Policy Coherence for Development as enshrined in Article 208 of the Lisbon Treaty; calls for European and international action (UN/G20) against illegal financial transfers out of Africa;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 357 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Urges the EU to define its trade policy in full respect of the "special and differential treatment" granted to developing countries; reasserts equally that governments and parliaments must retain the right to regulate investment, both to discriminate in favour of investors that support the country's development and to ensure that there are obligations and duties on all investors, including foreign, so that labour, environmental, human rights and other standards are respected;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 361 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses that the EU must pay particular attention to improving the living conditions in its neighbourhood, using all available policy tools, including trade, development aid and diplomacy, as well as crisis management capabiUnderlines the important role of the EU in reaching the Agenda 2030 objectives; believes that these objectives can best be achieved by strictly respecting the internationally agreed principles of development effectiveness like absence of conditionality of aid, aligning to the priorities of beneficiary countries and ownership; is seriously worried by the increased side-lining of such principles by the EU and its Member States, in particular when it comes to the problematic links between migration and development politcies; welcomes in this regard the EU’s new migration partnerships and the External Investment Plan; underlines the need to develop a new approach towards Africa, providing better opportunities for trade, investment and economic growth and supporting African countries in building democratic, transparent and effective institutions; is convinced that the EU should review its develop as foreseen for example in the migration partnerships; believes that the private sector could play an important role in development if it acts within a legally binding framework defining business responsibilities concerning the respect for human, social and environmental rights; considers the excessive focus on the private sector as proposed by the Commission in the External Investment Pland trade policies to make sure thato be premature given the absence of such a framework; recalls they contribute to these goals;rucial importance of domestic resource mobilisation for developing countries and calls on the EU, and in particular thets Member States, to significantly increase their financial commitments to the region, including through the Africa Trust Fund and the European Development Fundupport developing countries in this endeavour and to fight against illicit financial tax flows and tax dodging by multinational corporations; stresses that development cooperation should be aimed at eradicating poverty and delinked from cooperation on readmission and migration management;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 385 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Underlines also the need to intensify the fight against the root causes fuelling Islamist terrorism, which affects ever larger parts of the Middle East and North Africa and has also been creeping intoaffected Europe; urges the EU to undertake concerted diplomatic efforts, together with the US and other international allies, to convince partners in the region, such as Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Iran, of the need for a common and legally based strategy towards this global challenge; believes that there can be no sustainable solution to this challenge without addressing the root causes fuelling extremism in the region, namely protracted human rights violations and impunity, crony capitalism, pervasive corruption, sectarianism, marginalisation and discrimination against entire groups, including Arab Sunnis, as well as a long history of external manipulation and intervention by regional and Western actors; also, highlights the need to address the ideological roots of Islamist extremism notably Wahhabism, and its sponsors;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 406 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Highlights the importance of finding a sustainable solution to the conflict in Syria; supports the UN-led efforts to facilitate negotiations between all parties to the Syrian conflict on an inclusive political settlement; calls on the EU to depart from its position of diplomatic marginalization and to use its leverage over key actors such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Russia to ensure that they take a constructive position; emphasises that the use of sanctions should be considered in case some of the actors involved do not deliver on their commitments; expresses grave concern about the mass and widespread violations of international humanitarian and human rights law by all sides in the Syrian conflict and stresses the importance of ensuring accountability for such abuses; reiterates its support to the neighbours of Syria who are facing monumental challenges in hosting millions of refugees;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 431 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Recognises Turkey's role as an important partner in solving the Syrian conflict and the fight against Da'esh in both Syria and Iraq; strongly condemns the attempted military coup against the democratically elected government of Turkey; encourages the Turkish government to protect the constitutional order, while underlining the importance of respect for the rule of law and independence of the judiciary in the aftermath of the coup, in cooperation with the Council of Europe;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 444 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Stresses the importance of ensuring coherence of EU policy towards situations of occupation or annexation of territory; recalls that international humanitarian law should guide EU policy towards all such situations, including in cases of protracted occupation such as in Palestine, Western Sahara, Northern Cyprus and the multiple frozen conflicts in the Eastern Partnership countries;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 447 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 b (new)
25b. Underlines that the lack of progress towards a negotiated two-state solution in the Israel-Palestine conflict only leads to further violence and bloodshed; calls on the EU to take its responsibility and become a genuine actor and facilitator in the diplomatic process; calls on the EU institutions and Member States to take urgent steps to protect the viability of the two-state solution and to create a positive dynamic towards genuine peace negotiations; in this regard, calls on the EU to respond to the expansion of Israeli settlements by applying measures based on international law; calls on the Israeli authorities to immediately halt and revert its settlement policy; stresses that respect for international human rights and humanitarian law by all parties and in all circumstances remains an essential precondition for achieving a just and lasting peace; underlines the particular responsibility under international law of Israel, as the occupying power, to comply with international humanitarian and human rights law;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 495 #

2016/2036(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Underlines the role of Non State Actors and Civil Society Organisation as actors of diplomacy and key partners of the EU and stresses the importance of EU assistance to and engagement with them;
2016/10/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 30 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 13
(13) Following the Paris Agreement adopted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change4 , the EIB should aim to sustainincrease the current high level of climate relevant spending under the ELM, contributing to increasing its climate-related investment in developing countries from 25 % to 35 % by 2020, in accordance with the commitment taken as part of its climate strategy. _________________ 4 Council Decision (EU) 2016/590 of 11 April 2016 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Paris Agreement adopted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (OJ L 103, 19.4.2016, p. 1).
2017/02/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 43 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Decision 466/2014/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
EIB financing operations supporting the general objectives set out in point (c) of paragraph 1 shall back investment projects in climate change mitigation and adaptation that contribute to the overall objectives of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and of the Paris Agreement adopted under that Convention, in particular by avoiding or reducing greenhouse gas emissions and reducing the carbon footprint in the areas of renewable energy, energy efficiency and sustainable transport, or by increasing resilience to the adverse impacts of climate change on vulnerable countries, sectors and communities.
2017/02/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 51 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a a (new)
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 1– point c
(a a) Article 11(1)(c) is amended as follows: "an assessment of the contribution of EIB financing operations to the fulfilment of Union external policy and strategic objectives, taking into account the regional technical operational guidelines referred to in Article 5;" content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014D0466&qid=1487606632536&from=EN) The Commission, in cooperation with the EEAS, shall establish a framework and methodology for annual reporting by the EIB on its operations covered by the Community Guarantee and their compliance with the general principles guiding Union external action as referred to in Article 21 TEU. The key objective of the reporting is to monitor the compliance of the EIB with its Treaty obligations and with Article 21 TEU in particular, including the respect and promotion of human rights, the eradication of poverty, and the management of environmental risks; The methodology shall be developed by the Commission and the EEAS during the first year following the entry into force of this Decision and shall build upon the reporting on human rights compliance by the EIB, as requested by the EU Strategic Framework and Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy; Based on the annual reporting from the EIB, the Commission shall produce each year for the European Parliament its own evaluation of the information provided by the EIB and suggest possible changes to the policies and procedures followed by the EIB for adoption by the Member States after taking into account the opinion of the European Parliament on such changes. Any future recommendations made by the Commission and the European Parliament on how to improve EIB reporting to that end shall be reflected during the updating of the Regional Technical Operational Guidelines for EIB financing operations;" Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-
2017/02/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 4 #

2016/0274(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The Guarantee Fund is endowed by one annual payment from the general budget of the Union which cannot go to the detriment of existing activities under heading IV, by interest on Guarantee Fund resources invested and by amounts recovered from defaulting debtors.
2017/02/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 138 #

2016/0264(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) This Regulation sets up a framework for European statistics relating to persons and households based on data at individual level collected from samples. It specifies the data and information to be collected and submitted by Member States, and includes the fundamental quality requirements to be met by the data. It provides for more detailed technical specifications to be given in delegated acts and implementing measures. It allows the various data collections to be integrated with one as well as the frequency of data collection. It allows the various data collections to be integrated with one another and with the use of administrative data, while consolidating and simplifying existing legislation. In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, it provides for more detailed technical specifications (statistical classifications, technical requirements relating to samples, the order of placing of certain questions in the questionnaires) to be given in implementing measures. It also provides for the possibility to adopt delegated acts in order to supplement or amend this Regulation in a democratic, flexible and inclusive manner. The latter concerns, in particular, the number and description of variables, the precise characteristics of the statistical populations, of the observation units and of the respondents anod ther and with the use of administrative data, while consolidating and simplifying existing legislation. reference periods and dates, as well as the characteristics of the "core social variables" that are of prominent political importance, especially since, as they are common to several data sets, they serve as a basis for statistical modelling. With regard to these delegated acts, it is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
2017/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 139 #

2016/0264(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) The current Union legislation concerning statistics based data at individual level has been adopted to answer policy needs existing at the time of their adoption. Today, new social circumstances and phenomena have emerged, which have made necessary updating the existing legal framework at Union level, and further social circumstances and phenomena are likely to emerge in the future. This Regulation provides a rich statistical base that adequately covers and reflects today's needs and keeps aligned the content of the data collections with the needs of the users that are evolving rapidly over time in the social field. Therefore, this Regulation provides a high flexibility for further developments in the field of statistics relating to persons and households.
2017/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 218 #

2016/0264(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 15 to specify the following items of the individual data sets: (a) the number, list and description of variables. These number, list and description of variables shall cover the needs identified in the relevant detailed topics; (b) the precise characteristics of the statistical populations, the observation units and the respondents; (c) the reference periods and dates.
2017/03/23
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2015/2353(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that Erasmus+ has been one of the most successful EU programs to foster mutual understanding between people of different European countries; urges therefore that the funding for youth exchanges between the EU and third countries be substantially increased, that the budget should be guaranteed over the 7 year period in order to allow for planning security and to assure coherency between the different regional programs;
2016/05/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 16 #

2015/2344(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that an adequate fiscal capacity to deal with asymmetrical shocks, based on automatic mechanisms and consolidated indicators could strengthen the confidence in the future of the EMU;
2016/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2015/2344(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls for launching a roadmap towards the creation of an Unemployment Insurance Scheme, and points out that this scheme would limit moral hazard by providing funds only to countries experiencing large increases in cyclical unemployment and should be balanced over the cycle;
2016/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 39 #

2015/2344(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out that a Rainy Day Fund featured prominently in the academic literature could be established within the current Treaty;
2016/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 77 #

2015/2344(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the importance of not linking any unemployment benefit system with any other economic conditionality for the Member States than those oriented to increase the employability of the unemployed and jobs creation, and of promoting social policies which fight poverty, social exclusion and social dumping;
2016/06/09
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 15 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the European Union is resolved to frame a common defence policy leading to a common defence which reinforces its European identitydegree of integration and autonomy in order to promote peace, security and progressstability in Europe's neighborhood and in the world;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 30 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the Treaty on European Union clearly defines the principles and objectives in the area of the CSDP in Articles 21 (1, 2) and 42(1) and the mechanisms and framework for their achievement; whereas very limited progress has been achieved in fulfilment of these objectives;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 32 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas the tasks of CSDP are clearly defined by the so called Petersberg Tasks of Article 43(1) TEU and exclusively focus on missions and operations in third countries;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 40 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the development of the CSDP requires shared values and common interests, and, over all, political will from the Member States, as well as the setting- up of robust institutional cooperation structures; whereas the CSDP should be an effective common policy which generates an added value and not a mere sum of the national policies of the Member States or their lowest common denominator;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 53 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the EU now hashas, according to Article 42(2) TEU, competence to define and implement a common security and defence policy that includes the progressive framing of a common Union defence policy when the European Council, acting unanimously, so decides; whereas the European Council has not yet decided on the progressive framing of a common defence policy; whereas the Union should use this competence to coordinate and supplement the actions of the Member States, without thereby prejudicing or superseding their competence in defence;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 64 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas EU citizens are calling for more European intervention in defence and security, with two thirds wishing to see greater EU engagement in matters of security and defence policyaccording to the 2015 Eurobarometer 74% of EU citizens are calling for a common defence and security policy among EU Member States;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 77 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the European Council should establish the European Defence Union without delay, as advocated by Parliament, as well as the Union’s commonincrease its efforts to develop a common security and defence policy; whereas the Member States should adopt the decision on a more common defence policy in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 90 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas Parliament actively supports the European Defence Union and will continue to make appropriate proposals to that end; whereas the interparliamentary conference on the CFSP and CSDP should become the forum for the implementation of effective and regular interparliamentary cooperation on the CSDP and the progressive framing of a common Union defence policy;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 94 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas the VP/HR is required, in accordance with Article 36 TEU, to regularly consults Parliament on the progressive framingimplementation of athe common Unionsecurity and defence policy, (CSDP) and to ensures that the views of Parliament are duly taken into consideration in that process, and informs Parliament on the progress made towards the European Defence Union;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 105 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas the Union’s future annual and multiannual programming should include defence policy; whereas the Commission should initiate the work on appropriate interinstitutional agreements, including an EU Defence White Book, for a first implementation under the next multiannual financial and political framework of the EUCommission should enforce the two defence-related 2009 directives and ensure that single market rules are also being respected in the defence sector;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 136 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the CSDP, as provided for in the Treaty on European Union (TEU), includes the progressive framing of a common Union defence policy that will lead to a future common defence when the European Council, acting unanimously, so decides; calls on the Member States to commit as a matter of priority to the provisions of the Treaty on the CSDP, and to ensure tangible progress in the achievement of the objectives as defined in those provisions;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 162 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. CRecalls that operational expenditure having military or defence implications cannot be charged to the Union budget as referred to in Article 41(2) TEU; considers that even where the TEU provides that the Council acts by a qualified majority to adopt decisions under the CSDP, in particular those under Articles 45(2) and 46(2) TEU, operationall expenditure to which the implementation of such decisions gives rise should be charged to the Union budget; considers that, to that end, there is a need for additionalreceive funding or co-funding from Member States;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 171 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Considers, therefore, that the European Defence Agency (EDA) and PESCO should be treated as Union institutions sui generis, as is the case with the European External Action Service (EEAS); considers that this requires amending the Financial Regulation in order to include EDA and PESCO in Article 2(b) thereof, with a specific section in the Union budget;deleted
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 182 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Is convincedPoints out that Article 41(1) TEU applies to the administrative expenditure of EDA and PESCO;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 185 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Is furthermore convinced that Article 41(2) TEU applies to the operating expenditure of EDA and PESCO, provided that such expenditure is not directly linked to the implementation of a military mission as referred to in Article 42(1) TEU, to defence operations of a Member State where it is the victim of an armed aggression on its territory, or to defence operations of Member States where they fulfil their obligation of aid and assistance under Article 42(7) TEU;deleted
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 192 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Considers, therefore, that for EDA and PESCO the funding of their administrative and operating expenditures from the Union budget is the only option under the treaties, notwithstanding that both institutions may administer funds directly provided by Member States;deleted
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 200 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Urges the Council to revise Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1835 defining the statute, seat and operational rules of the European Defence Agency to those ends;deleted
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 202 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Believes that deepening defence cooperation among Member States at the EU level should go hand in hand with strengthening of parliamentary oversight and control by both the European Parliament and national Parliaments;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 246 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the projected increase in national defence expenditure to 2 % of EU GDP; highlights that thiRecalls that according to the Commission the Member States wcould mean extra expenditure of nearly EURsave and re-invest between EUR 25 and 100 bBillion on defence by the end of the coming decade; considers that this boost should be used to launch more strategic cooperative programmes within and through the Union, by better structuring the demand and supply sides and making both sides more efficient and more effectiveannually if they reduce the high level of inefficiency of their defence spending and pool investments with regard to research, development and also procurement;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 261 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Is convinced that the Union’sjoint investments in defence should ensure that all Member States can participate in a balanced, coherent and synchronised improvement of their military capabilities; considers that thispooling of national investments in defence constitutes a strategic opportunity for the Union to improve its security and defence;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 275 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Highlights the continued need for the establishment of a Council format of Defence Ministers, in order to provide sustained political leadership and coordinate the implementation of the CSDP, and the setting up of a permanent military EU Operational Headquarters for the effective implementation of the Petersberg Tasks and the abolishment of current ad hoc structures at EU level and structures which are dependent on the foreign policy of the Member State which provides one of the five national operational headquarters made available to the EU or acts as framework nation in the context of the Battle Groups;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 278 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Defence Steering BoardPreparatory bodies
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 283 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Considers that the Steering Board of the EDA, made up of the representatives of Member States’ defence ministries, is the body that is suitable to exercise the advisory and supervisory functions required to implement parts of Articles 42, 45 and 46(3) TEU and Article 45 TEU;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 287 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Considers that Article 4(4) of Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1835 defining the statute, seat and operational rules of the European Defence Agency provides a necessary and powerful basis for the EDA steering board to act as the Union’s third permanent representatives’ committee, the Defence Steering Board; considers that this committee should also exercise the advisory and supervisory functions required to implement permanent structured cooperation once it is established;deleted
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 291 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Is convinced that the mandate of the Political and Security Committee (PSC) referred to in Article 38 TEU needs to be interpreted narrowlyand its role on defence needs to be strengthened; considers that, under the treaties, its mandate only covers the situation and missions outside the Union as well as certain aspects ofmonitoring the implementation of the solidarity clause; considers in particular that its developed working arrangements are not adapted to the further implementation of that part of the CSDP which is defined by Article 42(2) TEUagreed policies without prejudice to the powers of the High Representative;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 294 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Urges the Council to revise Council Decision 2001/78/CFSP setting up the Political and Security Committee, as well as Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1835 defining the statute, seat and operational rules of the European Defence Agency to those ends;deleted
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 297 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Emphasises the underused potential of the EDA in supporting the development of the CSDP; calls on the Member States to define and commit to a common level of ambition within a reformed EDA; calls for the reinforcement of the EDA’s political backing, funding, and resources, as well as of its coordination with the actions of the Commission and other actors, especially in the areas of capability development, defence procurement and research;deleted
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 317 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. RegretNotes that Member States have not yet developed a common European armaments and capabilities policy (EACP) within the EDA as foreseen by Article 42(3) TEU; calls on the VP/HR to inform Parliament of the results achieved by the existing working relationship between the EDA and the Commission and of both with the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR);
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 332 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Encourages the Member States to establish and join PESCO within the Union framework, with a view to sustaining and improving their military capabilities through doctrine and leadership development, personnel development and training, defence material and infrastructure development, and interoperability and certification; believes that in line with the tasks described in Article 43 TEU PESCO could also be used for permanent cooperative arrangements on specific military tasks such as combat forces for high intensity conflicts, stabilisation forces which secure cease-fires or peace agreements, military logistics, military engineering tasks, transport, evacuation tasks, or medical services including mobile field hospitals;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 339 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Considers that the Union should make provision, in agreement with the Member States concerned, for participation incoordinating capability programmes undertaken by them; considers that the Union’s financial contribution to such programmes should not exceed the contributions made by the participating Member States;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 348 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Takes the view that the some EU Battlegroup system shs could be brought under PESCO, alongside the creation of a European-level headquarters; considers that other European multinational structures such as the European Air Transport Command, and Eurocorps and OCCAR shcould also be brought under PESCO; considers that the EU’s privileges and immunities should apply to those multinational structures being part of PESCO;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 360 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that during the stand-up, standby and stand-down phases the Uniona revised ATHENA mechanism should cover all EU Battlegroup costs;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 364 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27 a. Calls on the HR/VP and the Council to mainstream climate change action into all the EU's external action guidelines, strategies and actions and, to that end, to appoint a Special Representative on Climate Security;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 365 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 b (new)
27 b. Calls on HR/VP and the Council to fully implement UN Security Council Resolution 1325 and appoint a Special Representative for Women and Conflict;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 389 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Reiterates that the relationship between the CSDP and NATO offers a political opportunity for collaboration and complementarity at every level; recalls that, within the current international context and in view of the deterioration of security, a comprehensive and wider partnership is needed, with the aim of developing joint capabilities and avoiding duplication of actionsCSDP should not prejudice the obligations that certain Member States have under NATO;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 413 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 10
PoliticalOther recommendations
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 425 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Calls on the Council and the VP/HR to elaborate a EU White Book on Security and Defence that will include a roadmap with clear phases and a calendar for progressive steps to be taken towards the establishment of a European Defence Union and a more common defence policy; believes that such a White Book should be as comprehensive as possible and should integrate the different measures foreseen by the Union;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 430 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Notes the European Defence Action Plan put forward by the Commission in November 2016; calls in this regard on the Commission to further clarify the governance and financing of the possible European Defence Fund; considers that the effective implementation of that plan requires strong support and political commitment from the Member States and the EU institutionsrejects the ideas presented by the Commission in the context of the European Defence Fund, in particular on the so called capability window which promotes the idea that national capital contributions would be treated as "one-offs" under the Stability and Growth Pact which will prioritise defence expenditure over social expenditure and increase public debt with defence expenditure; regrets in this regard that the Commission, the EDA and the Member States have not yet delivered on all the tasks resulting from the European Council meetings on defence of 2013 and 2015;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 440 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
38. Considers that the adoption of a EU White Book on Security and Defence should build on the Global Strategy's Implementation Plan on Security and Defence, in order to drive the progressive framing of a common Union defence policystrengthen the CSDP; stresses that this document should not only reflectassess the current military capabilities of Member States, but also analyse the type of cooperation necessary and the means to achieve it, the kind of operations that the EU may conduct, and the required capabilities and funds, while also contributing to coordination and cooperation between NATO and the EU;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 448 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
39. Underlines the need for deeper discussions on the future relation between the Union and the United Kingdom in CSDP matters, and in particular in the field of military capabilities, should the UK decide to trigger Article 50 TEU; considers that new command arrangements need to be found with regard to the Northwood Operational Headquarters for Operation Atalanta;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 451 #

2015/2343(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
40. Calls on the Council and the VP/HR to ensure coordination at all levels of interaction: civilian and military, EEAS/ Commission, and EU/ Member States; welcomes the internal/external security nexus established by the Global Strategy, and calls on the VP/HR and the Commission to ensure coherence and ensure that the internal and external aspects of security are duly coordinated, including at administrative level;
2017/01/13
Committee: AFETAFCO
Amendment 21 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 11 June 2013 on Social housing in the European Union1 a __________________ 1 a Textes adoptés, P7_TA(2013)0246
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 32 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Aa (new)
Aa. whereas bad or inadequate housing greatly reduces chances to lead a normal life; whereas quality of housing (including appropriate insulation, etc.) of groups in vulnerable situations has decreased during the crisis, because of inability to fund maintenance;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas not having adequate housing and heating hasve a negative impact on a person's health, in particular for children and older persons;, older and weaker persons; whereas people are suffering from not being able to heat their houses both in the Northern and Southern Member States; whereas EU- SILC figures show that housing cost overburden (by tenure status) is higher for tenants housed in the private rented sector, which may be explained by low housing quality and high prices
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 51 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas Eurofound's forthcoming report Housing in Europe will include a model estimating that due to existing levels of housing (dwelling) inadequacies (as per 2011 data), total cost of the medical expenditure is over EUR170 billion per annum to the economies of EU28; whereas if all the repair work was undertaken, there would be medical cost savings of some EUR8 billion in the first year, which will continue to accrue benefits in the future;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas 22,348,834 households (approximately 11% of the EU population) spend more than 40 % of disposable income on housing ; whereas the European Semester has identified housing cost overburden as a 'social trend to watch'; and whereas 21,942,491 households (approximately 10.8% of the EU population) experience difficulty maintaining adequate household temperature, whereas the EU and the Member States should urgently identify, implement and maintain policy measures that enable households to meet housing costs, including housing allowances.
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 68 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas the distribution of population in different dwelling types shows a high diversity across Europe with 50% or more share of detached houses in most of the central and eastern European and Balkan countries and significantly larger portion of flats and semi-detached houses in other regions of Europe;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 72 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
D b. whereas the social rental stock as a percentage of total housing stock indicates that Western and Northern countries have a higher share of public social housing compared to the EU average, while Mediterranean and Eastern countries maintain minimal (around 5%) social housing stock or lacking social housing sector completely; housing deprivation and energy poverty are higher in countries with a lower share of social rental housing i.e. Eastern and Mediterranean countries;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
D c. whereas Eurofound research argues that for many people with low incomes, 'utility arrears' are a principal type of debts which is sometimes overlooked;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 76 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D d (new)
Dd. whereas Eurofound report on "Access to benefits: reducing non-take- up" clearly highlights the problem that social benefits and minimum income schemes do not always reach those who are entitled to it, so it's not enough to establish such systems, but take-up should be ensured by those who are entitled; whereas the savings realised in the longer term as a result of benefits reaching their target populations promptly, effectively and efficiently, must also be taken into account;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 121 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Member States to ensure a more efficient and targeted use of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) by national, regional and local authorities in order to tackle energy poverty and housing deprivation especially amongst poor households;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 145 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 2 a (new)
- taking measures to address extreme forms of poverty that currently fall beyond the scope of the target, i.e. homelessness;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 3
- ensuring that the Member States provide everyone with accessible adequate income support, including minimum income above the poverty threshold throughout the life cycle, especially addressing non-take up ;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 154 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 4
- targeting household expenditure so that disproportionately higher costs such as housing and energy spending can be reduced in a sustainable manner;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 204 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop, adopt and implement an EU framework to reduce poverty and social exclusion in line with the Europe 2020 Strategy, consisting of concrete measures and actions, including housing exclusion and energy poverty;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 223 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that a decent income is a fundamental element for being able to live your life in dignity; recalls that 16.7 % of the population in the EU 28 in 2013 were at-risk-of-poverty after social transfers, meaning that their disposable income was below their national at-risk-of-poverty threshold; invites the Commission to present in 2016 in the context of the announced social pillar an EU framework directive on adequate minimum income;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 236 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Recommends that an EU framework directive on minimum income should specify which criteria Member States’ minimum income schemes would need to meet so as to lift people out of poverty; considers that such a framework would need to be rights-based, address the level of income, the non-discriminatory, efficient and easy access and the take-up, targeting especially those groups, who currently are excluded from or at risk of exclusion from minimum income schemes; points out that reference budgets reflecting household expenditure could be used to construct cash benefits and to test their adequacy; considers such an instrument to be of crucial value to revive the EU's social cohesion, reduce inequalities and achieve the Europe 2020 Poverty and Social Exclusion Target;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 252 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls on Member States to ensure that dissemination of information is reaching the most vulnerable groups which are often left untouched by relying on client-based dissemination; recalls that dissemination of information is often restricted to people who are al-ready receiving some sort of social support but that it is important to reach beyond them;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 263 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Recalls that housing cost are a large share of household expenditure; reminds the Commission, the Member States and local and regional authorities that spending on social and affordable housing is in keeping with fundamental rights, enables urgent social needs to be met and, as strategic social investment, helps in a sustainable way to provide local jobs that cannot be 'off-shored', to stabilise the economy by reducing the risk of property bubbles and household over- indebtedness; points out that acknowledging and implementing the right to housing affect the implementation of other fundamental rights, including political and social rights;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 265 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13 b. Stresses that lowering the housing costs for the vulnerable cannot only be achieved with stricter rent controls or higher housing benefits but should be accompanied by long-term housing and community programmes to increase the housing stock for different socially disadvantaged target groups and middle income households;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 276 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Recalls that, in combating child poverty, social housing policies play an important role through the eradication of family poverty and the prevention of the intergenerational transmission of socio- economical disadvantages; and that rising housing and energy costs are aggravating the risks of disease, poverty and social exclusion; notes the increase in several Member States in the number of evictions and properties seized by banks; urges that measures be taken in response to these challenges
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 287 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses that there is a lock-in effect as regards energy poverty, as poor households cannot afford the initial upfront investment needed to combat energy poverty; points out that this creates a vicious circle of continuously spending a larger share of household income than needed on the utilities bill while the root of the problem - energy inefficiency or lack of energy - can't be tackled;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 293 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Calls on the Member States and the EU to provide microcredits or loans free of interest or at low rates via e.g. the EIB to low-income households to support them in the upfront investment in renewables or energy efficiency, such as insulation, solar energy and energy efficient appliances;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 296 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16 b. Calls on the Member States and regional authorities to provide targeted energy advice, and train energy advisors to work with poor households on how to save energy and how to use renewable energies;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 300 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16 c. Emphasises that there are a range of barriers to ensuring that the EU Structural and In-vestment Funds available for energy efficiency reach those living in the poorest quality and most energy inefficient housing, including limited household savings for those living in cold homes and the split incentive between landlords and tenants ; Calls therefore on the Com-mission, national, regional and local authorities, and the European Investment Bank to develop innovative funding mechanisms which overcome these barriers, working with stake-holders and building on existing good practice;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 306 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Recalls that targeting Union funding towards reducing energy costs of poor households by investing in renewables or energy efficiency has multiple positive effects: at household level, it improves living conditions and the health of those concerned as well as decreasing household costs and therefore provides budgetary relief for poor families; at regional and local level, funding will provide for local investment; supporting the local labour market, the economy and progressing towards energy sustainability; at Union level it helps to both decrease poverty, improve energy efficiency and decrease energy emissions thereby delivering towards the EU 2020 targets on climate change and energy sustainability and on fighting poverty and social exclusion;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 328 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. Calls on the Commission to assess in its midterm review of the ESIF 2014-2020 the use of funds for energy poverty- related measures and make full use of the relevant ex-ante conditionalities relating to poverty, housing and energy efficiency; recalls that so far the European Social Fund (ESF) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) have not been used to their full potential when tackling energy poverty;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 329 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 b (new)
21 b. Stresses that the housing quality of low income households in rural regions tends to be very poor, be it for tenants or owners; recalls that this adds to the so- called lock-in effect of high utility cost with no room for investment in lowering energy cost; calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve targeting of LEADER and EAFRD towards tackling energy poverty in rural areas, by directing the Operational Programs and the funding towards especially generating diversified renewable energy within local networks that includes energy efficiency measures for buildings targeted at energy poor households;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 330 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 c (new)
21 c. Reminds that tenants have limited access to energy efficiency funding as they are not the property owners; recalls that tenants may have a lower incentive to invest as they move out more easily and frequently than homeowners; welcomes the Commission Pilot project on "Fuel/Energy poverty - assessment of the impact of the crisis and review of existing and possible new measures in the Member States "which is meant to tackle this issue; based on the outcomes of this pilot project calls on the Commission to develop provisions to open EU funding for energy efficiency measures taken by tenants;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 331 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 d (new)
21 d. Reminds Member States that at least 20% of the total ESF resources in each Member State shall be allocated to the thematic objective "promoting social inclusion, combating poverty and any discrimination" and that the European Fund for European Aid for the most deprived can also be used for social inclusion measures;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 332 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 e (new)
21 e. Stresses the immediate relief and the improved living conditions for the most deprived households when those households are provided with small-scale low cost renewable energy resources such as solar panels for houses not connected to the energy grid;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 336 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the fact that European energy policy legislation recognises social aims in energy efficiency policies, notably in Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency and Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings; finds regrettable that the relevant provisions of Directive 2012/27/EU to target households affected by energy poverty and social housing (Article 7(7)) are not used to their full potential by the Member States; calls on the Commission in its review and impact assessment of the energy efficiency package to evaluate the implementation and use of Articles 7(7) and 5(7); calls also on the Commission based on this evaluation to consider strengthening Article (7), in particular paragraph 7 thereof, so that the Member States in their energy efficiency obligation schemes are obliged to include requirements containing social aims;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 339 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Calls on the Commission to assess in its energy and cost report the distributionary aspects as regards social aims and meeting the EU antipoverty target; calls on the Commission to ensure that the Member States must invest a minimum share of 30% of energy efficiency measures to be implemented as a priority in households affected by energy poverty or in social housing;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 348 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23 a. Calls on the Member States to use among others the Funds for capacity- building under the Structural Funds to organise seminars and programmes in schools and lifelong-learning infrastructures on energy efficiency/saving in the private sphere, including on how to save household and transport costs;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 355 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24 a. Stresses that, while such a moratorium is an important emergency tool to support the poorest in a crisis situation, it has to be complemented by an appropriate action plan to lift people out of poverty or social exclusion, including the provision of adequate income support throughout the life-cycle; points out that reference budgets reflecting household expenditure can be used to construct cash benefits and to test their adequacy;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 363 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24 b. Calls on the Commission to develop an Observatory on Energy Poverty with the following duties: 1) assess and monitor the causes and consequences of energy poverty, 2) record the energy consumption of households, 3) provide reliable socio-economic indicators 4) ensure coordinated action plans are developed, and implemented with progress monitored;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 364 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 c (new)
24 c. Points out that the "split incentive" problem may hinder investment in energy efficiency in rented housing; considers that gross lease schemes, where the rent includes the cost of the utility bills, could be considered one effective tool to incentivise the landlord to decrease utility household costs through renewable and energy efficiency retrofits;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 365 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 d (new)
24 d. Highlights that effective consumer alliances can ensure that rental costs will not increase after successful energy efficiency investments and improvements;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 366 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 e (new)
24 e. Highlights that public support and facilitation of agreements between tenants and landlords associations can ensure that total housing costs will not increase after successful energy efficiency investments and improvements;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 367 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 f (new)
24 f. Calls on the European Commission to prioritise energy efficiency investment in social rental housing through EFSI spending in the next three years;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 368 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 g (new)
24g. Calls on the Commission and the Council to acknowledge all EU citizens' universal right of access to energy as an essential commodity;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 369 #

2015/2223(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 h (new)
24 h. Calls on the Commission to map the problem of fuel poverty in the EU, and in particular winter deaths amongst people living in cold homes; and to support the Member States in developing solutions; Calls on the Commission to ensure that Eurostat collects relevant data from Member States on the different forms of energy poverty (energy deprivation, severe energy poverty, constraining energy poverty) and that Eurostat monitors regularly the development of SILC energy poverty indicators the framework of Energy Efficiency Directive Review;
2015/11/18
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
– having regard to the Council conclusions on the EU Strategy for Central Asia as adopted by the Foreign Affairs Council on 22 June 2015,
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 3 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
– having regard to the Joint Communiqué of the Fifth EU-Central Asia High Level Conference of Energy and Water Cooperation held in Milan on 12-13 October 2015,
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 4 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 b (new)
– having regard to the Foreign Affairs Committee's support and positive evaluation to the newly appointed EU Special Representative for Central Asia, Mr Peter Burian, at its hearing on 1 June 2015,
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 18 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the EU-Central Asia Strategy was adopted in a context of growing importance of the region and increased EU engagement in neighbouring Afghanistan, the extension of the European Neighbourhood Policy to the Caspian region, ongoing EU support for reform and modernisation of post-Soviet societies, and EU energy security interests; whereas it also recognised the security threats and challenges that require cooperation between Central Asia and the EU; whereas the Strategy has been implemented for almost 8 years;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 23 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the geopolitical context of Central Asia is being affected by the political and security transition in Afghanistan, the implications of the crisis in Ukraine, the impact of the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union, China's economic developments, diminishing US presence in the region;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 24 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas despite the common past Central Asia is a heterogeneous region with a multi-ethnic and multi- denominational character; whereas the lack of mutual trust and persisting tension over the use and sharing of natural resources have so far undermined the development of a genuine regional cooperation;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas serious failings in rule of law, in respect of human rights and fundamental freedoms hamper Central Asian states' chances of a sustainable development and good governance at the detriment of their societies;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 26 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A d (new)
Ad. whereas some Member States have developed and deepened bilateral relations with some of the countries of Central Asia; whereas the EU needs a coherent and consistent approach towards the region in order to avoid any overlapping and sending mixed and confusing signals;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 89 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Recommends that the review is presented at a forthcoming EU-Central Asia ministerial meeting and supports holding of an EU-Central Asia summit to promote EU objectives in the region and to address matters of concern and cooperation;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 103 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Agrees that concrete and constructive engagement and adoption of democratic reforms and governmental programmes can be taken as contributing indicators of achievements made in many fields; however, urges the Commission/EEAS to base its assessments on facts established on the ground, since many of those laws are either only of declaratory character or are not properly put in practice;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 108 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the EU and its Member States to speak with one voice fostering foreign policy coherence and coordination in this region, and to introduce joint programming of aid and projects with Member States in order to achieve a full impact and synergy; urges the Council/EEAS/Commission to adopt a concrete action plan with measureable benchmarks enabling proper evaluation of progress made in the future; welcomes closer involvement and ownership on the part of Member States in terms of implementing the strategy;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 113 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Takes note of the re-establishment of the post of EU Special Representative (EUSR) for Central Asia after a year-long gap, and expects the newly appointed EUSR to make an important contribution to the implementation of the strategy for Central Asian countries by ensuring consistency of the external actions of the Union in the region; requests the EUSR to focus on strengthening democracy, the rule of law, good governance and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, promoting regional cooperation and facilitating the dialogue and peaceful resolution of outstanding contentious issues, developing contacts not only with governments, parliaments but also civil society and mass media, contributing to conflict prevention and promoting regional security and promoting sound environment and climate change management, in particular water and hydrocarbon resources; asks the EUSR to report orally and in written to the EP on major challenges, as provided in Article 36 of the Treaty and his mandate;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 117 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Request the EEAS to provide regular analysis on Central Asia, taking into account the region's diverse neighbourhood, including issues touching on integrating Afghanistan, Iran, and providing a comprehensive approach to the Caspian Sea;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 122 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Requests the EEAS, Commission and the EUSR to make the EU presence more prominent in Central Asia, ensuring increased EU's visibility among the population, civil society, local media, the business and university communities; urges the EEAS to balance the quiet diplomacy with increased public diplomacy;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 124 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Encourages the EU Delegations in Central Asia to use their potential to the maximal effect in contributing to implementation of the EU Strategy, in particular with regard to support for and engagement with civil society;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 125 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10c. Supports continued inter- parliamentary cooperation and highlights the role of its standing Delegation for the region in monitoring of implementation of PCAs with the countries of the region;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 144 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Highlights the added value and further potential of the Rule of Law Platform, coordinated by Germany and France with active support from Finland, in organising several events aimed at constitutional and administrative law and training of judges; insists, however, that it be enhanced to cover actual democratisation and human rights issues; calls for the full involvement of and closer cooperation with civil society in this platform; calls on the EU and Member States' embassies to support genuinely independent non- governmental partners;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 148 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Recommends that the EU tailors its human rights policy and external financing instruments, better keeping a consistent long-term democratic reform as the guiding light;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 152 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Expresses it deep concern at the growing trend to clamp down on civil society and opposition forces under the pretext of security and stability; welcomes the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Mun's statements warning against a shrinking democratic space during his visit to the region in June 2015;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 153 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Urges, in this regard, the EEAS to make forthright declarations condemning repressive steps taken by Central Asian regimes in the name of preserving public security, whilst recognising legitimate security concerns;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 171 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the establishment of Human Rights Ddialogues with all five countries of Central Asia; points out, however, the lack of transparency of the process, and calls on the VP/HR to review the role, mandate, objectives and follow-up of the Human Rights Dialogues with the countries of the region, and in particular to involve all stakeholders and introduce systematic human rights monitoring mechanisms in countries with which the EU has entered into legally binding agreements; asks for these dialogues be part of a comprehensive human rights engagement in the region; calls, in this regard to raise and convey human rights concerns at all levels including the Heads of State or governments; urges the EU to raise individual concrete cases coherently and publicly;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 177 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Draws the attention to the discrepancies between adoption of laws and their implementation in practice, resulting in incorrect assessment of progress; urges the EEAS/Commission to evaluate progress on real practical results rather than legislative or declaratory based assessments;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 179 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Condemns the targeting of exiled opposition representatives by some of the Central Asian regimes, including murders and abuse of extradition procedures though Interpol; urges Member States to provide better protection and to avoid deporting them in line with the principle of non-refoulement, forbidding the rendering of a true victim of persecution to his or her persecutor;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 180 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 c (new)
19c. Reiterates its concern over the situation of children, in particular the occurrence of forced child labour; urges all countries in the region to implement their international commitments, in particular those under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the ILO Minimum Age Convention and the ILO Convention on the Worst Forms of Child Labour;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 181 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 d (new)
19d. Recalls the Central Asian governments of their commitments within the human dimension of the OSCE;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 189 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Welcomes the commitment of Latvia, with the help of Poland, to lead the regional programme on education, following a disappointing long-term unwillingness by Member States to do so; regards investment in education as the best way to improve the socio-economic situation of the region;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 195 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Urges the EU to devote more of its attention to promotion of quality education amongst youth, both as basic means of building sustainable democratic societies and the best prevention against violent extremism, regards this as a priority due to the demographic challenge of a youth bulge of 25-35 % of 14 years old or less;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 197 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Encourages the Commission to address the identified shortcomings of the EU-Central Asia Education Initiative such as fair access to education and training by disadvantaged groups;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 203 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20c. Invites the Commission to promote participation of the Central Asian scientists, institutes and businesses in collaborative research and innovation projects financed under the HORIZON 2020 programme;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 204 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 d (new)
20d. Urges the EU to further broaden and facilitate youth's participation in Erasmus + and other EU educational and visit programmes, in particular from Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, in order to break their isolation; calls on the EU to agree on an equal and transparent process of selection of participants based on objective criteria, whist avoiding contributing to a brain-drain from those countries;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 222 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Urges the EU to avoid unnecessary tensions and to identify compatible areas of cooperation and economic integration with the Eurasian Economic Union; however, emphasises that any such cooperation must be based on respect for WTO rules, international standards and the free and sovereign decision of states to participate;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 228 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Regards the deepening of regional economic integration as an important element to regional stability and peace- building;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 229 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 c (new)
22c. Notes that the current review was purposefully disconnected from the 2014- 2020 programming exercise of the Development Cooperation Instrument for Central Asia concluded in 2014 in order to avoid any confusion or duplication, while preserving the coherence of EU action in the region;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 230 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 d (new)
22d. Urges development assistance to focus on rural development and sustainable farming, in particular to wean off from monocultures, such as cotton growing;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 231 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 e (new)
22e. Calls on the EU to monitor the effectiveness of its technical and financial assistance to the public sector reform in the countries of Central Asia;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 232 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 f (new)
22f. Takes note of the continued sectorial budget support in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, emphasises, however, that it must be accompanied by more stringent criteria including a strong reform agenda and effective anti-corruption measures;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 233 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 g (new)
22g. Urges the Commission to develop programmes facilitating the social reintegration and employment of returnees from abroad and a stronger dialogue on migration and mobility;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 234 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 h (new)
22h. Notes the deep negative impact on the region of the economic slowdown in Russia and China;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 235 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Supports promotion by the EU of renewable energy, energy efficiency and the integration of energy markets in Central Asia and with neighbouring countries, as well as with the EU;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 238 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23b. Regards the region as an additional potential source of energy security for the EU, in particular the potential of increased cooperation with Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan; however, emphasises that energy agreements and dialogues must be coupled by strong human rights elements;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 239 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 c (new)
23c. Reiterates its opinion that re- investment of revenues from natural resources is crucial for sustainable socio- economic development;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 240 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 d (new)
23d. Takes note of the EU support for energy projects which could expand the Southern Gas Corridor including through the Trans-Caspian and possibly Iran routes; calls, nevertheless, on the EU to conduct full feasibility studies of such projects, including environmental and social impact assessments, as a pre- requisite to any financing decision on these projects;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 247 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Welcomes and encourages further efforts in adaptation and resilience to climate change, and urges Central Asian counties to contribute constructively to the success of the 2015 Paris Climate Conference;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 248 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24b. Calls on the EU to further intensify its Disaster Risk Reduction programmes in Central Asia as a high natural disaster prone region;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 253 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Calls for renewed efforts to cope with and tackle the dramatic consequences of the environmental disaster of the dry-up of the Aral Sea; urges the Commission to increase its support for the International Fund for the Aral Sea and calls on the EEAS to include this question as a top priority in its regular relations with Uzbekistan;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 256 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 b (new)
25b. Advocates an enhanced pro-active role for the EU in terms of environmentally sustainable development, in this context, emphasises the importance of the principles of environmental sustainability in the course of extraction of processing of natural resources in the region promoted by the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI); notes that only Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan comply with the EITI in the region whilst Tajikistan's candidate status was temporarily suspended in 2015;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 257 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 c (new)
25c. Supports EU continued efforts towards development of safe and secure air and maritime transport in Central Asia, as well as adoption and enforcement of security and, environmental standards in all transport modes;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 258 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 d (new)
25d. Encourages further EU coordination with China's transport policy in the region;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 259 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 e (new)
25e. Urges the EU to continue provide financial and technical assistance addressing the health, humanitarian, environmental, and economic and awareness issues related to consequences of the past nuclear testing by the USSR at the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site (SNTS) in the north-east of Kazakhstan near the city of Semey, previously known as Semipalatinsk;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 260 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 f (new)
25f. Expresses its deep concern at the massive die-off of Kazakhstan taiga antelope herds in May 2015; urges the EU to contribute with research and environmental measures to the prevention of possible future cases;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 299 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Supports the EU's long-term goal of transforming the nascent EU-Central Asia High Level Security Dialogue into a genuine cooperative forum aimed at cooperation in addressing common security challenges, such as the spill-over effects of the war in Afghanistan, including the threat of the Islamic State, drug trafficking, trafficking of human beings, extremism and terrorism, border security and chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) risks; encourages further prioritisation of the preventive aspects of countering terrorism; believes that focus on human security rather than purely state security must be integrated in the Dialogue;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 304 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Takes note of multi-vector foreign policies by which the countries of Central Asia strike a careful balance between different regional actors, given their geographical positioning, therefore urges the EU to find common ground wherever possible with regional partners, such as China and its 'Silk Road Economic Belt' policy, the US and its 'New Silk Road Initiative', Turkey and others, and possibly Russia, depending on its political trajectory, in the face of mutual challenges such as socio-economic development, security and environment;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 307 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 b (new)
28b. Encourages the EU to address with the Central Asian governments the mutual challenges of recruitment of fighters and supporters by the Islamic State, through focusing on political and administrative failures, such as promoting religious freedom while safeguarding secular constitutions and revising discriminatory laws and policies, implementing outreach programs for both men and women and focusing on employment for disadvantaged youths, prioritising policing reform and ensuring better coordination of security services, as well as learning from European or Asian experiences in rehabilitating and reintegrating Islamist radicals;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 308 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 c (new)
28c. Urges the EU to continue with the regional support programmes aimed at conflict prevention and peace-building, including promotion of inter-communal and inter-ethnic reconciliation, as well as at border demarcation in Central Asia, financed from the ISP;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 309 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 d (new)
28d. Highlights the role of the UN Regional Centre for Preventive Diplomacy for Central Asia (UNRCCA) based in Ashgabat since 2007, as well as of the OSCE, in conflict prevention in the region;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 310 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 e (new)
28e. Takes note of the slowing down of the flow of remittances from nationals working abroad, mainly in Russia and to a certain extern in Kazakhstan, and the very low capacity to reintegrate returnees in particular in Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan; therefore requests the EU to enhance the assistance in this field in order to facilitate the reintegration of migrants and prevent social destabilisation;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 324 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Regrets that despite the urgent need for Security Sector Reform (SSR) in Central Asian countries, the EU has not been able to integrate it in its strategy; calls on the EU to develop specific SSR programmes for Kyrgyzstan, and possibly Tajikistan, focusing on rule of law and human rights standards in criminal justice, and civilian policing;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 326 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Encourages the involvement of Afghanistan in programmes aimed at stability and security in the region and welcomes the improvements in coherence between the EU Strategies for Afghanistan and Central Asia, respectively;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 328 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 b (new)
31b. Underlines importance of cooperation with OSCE and UN in all policy fields;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 329 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 c (new)
31c. Takes note of the adoption of the EU- Central Asia Drug Action Plan for 2014- 20, however, is alarmed by the record opium cultivation and related trafficking from Afghanistan through Central Asia; requests the EEAS/Commission to address the issue of involvement of organised crime as well as elites in trafficking, and the negative public health effects in the region;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 347 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Regrets, in this regard, the increasing deterioration in the fields of freedom of the media, freedom of expression, and freedom of association and assembly; and calls on the Kazakh authorities to take concrete and effective measures to implement the recommendations made by the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of peaceful assembly and of association in the outcome report on his mission to Kazakhstan in January 2015; expresses its deep concern at the Law on Non-profit organizations that undermines the independence and even challenges the very existence of NGOs in Kazakhstan and calls for its revision;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 350 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34a. Reminds Kazakhstan of its OSCE commitments to democratic reforms and urges Kazakhstan to match its foreign policy ambitions, as a member of the UN Human Rights Council for 2013- 2015, hosting of the 2017 International EXPO, and being a candidate for a non- permanent seat at the UN Security Council in 2017-2018, with important domestic political reforms;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 354 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 b (new)
34b. Recognises the positive role played by Kazakhstan by hosting and facilitating the 2013 E3+3 – Iran negotiations on Iran's nuclear programme, the country's contribution to global nuclear security and safety initiatives, including the hosting the new international nuclear fuel bank, operated by the IAEA, commencing operations in 2017, the tentative mediating role with regard to the crisis between Russia and Ukraine, and the good offices provided to consultations among the Syrian opposition;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 355 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 c (new)
34c. Call for the release of all political prisoners, including the leader of the Alga! opposition party, Vladimir Kozlov;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 356 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 d (new)
34d. Encourages the full implementation of all OSCE/ODIHR recommendations before the next parliamentary elections, scheduled for late 2016 or January 2017;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 363 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35a. Regrets the backsliding of Kyrgyzstan, the country of the region in which the EU placed its expectations most in the region in its pursuit of democratic ambitions; in particular, asks Kyrgyzstan to reject the draft legislation discriminating LGBTI persons and targeting civil society under the so-called "foreign agents law";
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 365 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 b (new)
35b. Urges the Commission/EEAS to assist Kyrgyzstan in delivering justice to the victims of the 2010 ethnic clashes;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 366 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 c (new)
35c. Welcomes the preliminary statement by the International Election Observation Mission that the parliamentary elections of 4 October 2015 were competitive and provided voters with a wide range of choice, whilst highlighting the need for better procedures and increased transparency; expresses its concern, however, at the mandatory registration of biometric data as a pre-requisite for voting resulting in significant problems with the inclusiveness of the voter list;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 367 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -36 a (new)
-36a. Urges Tajikistan to comply with international human rights commitments and to protect freedom of assembly and independence of the legal profession; draws the attention to the problematic situation of media after the signing by the President of a new regulation according to which all information about official events will be channelled through the state information agency, thus restricting access to other media; calls on Tajikistan to refrain from undue interference into the work of NGOs and not to implement the new legislation on NGO funding;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 368 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -36 b (new)
-36b. Continues to express concern over the inefficiency of EU development aid in the country; urges the EEAS/Commission to prioritise programmes aimed at prevention of torture in detention centres and media freedom in Tajikistan;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 374 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36a. Takes note of the conclusions of the OSCE/ODIHR election observation mission to the March 1 parliamentary elections in Tajikistan that the elections "took place in a restricted political space and failed to provide a level playing field for candidates";
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 378 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Stresses that according to the main international indexes give Turkmenistan a very lowis given a bottom ranking as regards the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; regrets, that in the reporting period, the situation in the field of rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms practically did not change despite some legislative efforts in the political, judicial, economic, social and educational fields; believes that the new legislation should be subject to international experts' review in the light of international human rights obligations;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 390 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38a. Calls on Turkmenistan to stop the ongoing campaign of removing satellite dishes and blocking access to some websites and put an end to intimidation and harassment of independent journalists, and civil society activists;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 392 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 b (new)
38b. Underlines the importance of a continued Human Rights Dialogue, especially with regard to continued pressure to release individuals detained on politically motivated grounds, and to the disclosure of the fate of those who have disappeared in prison;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 398 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 a (new)
39a. Takes the view, in this regard, that some of the past EU's development aid in Uzbekistan, including the capacity building of its parliament, was misdirected and should, instead, be redirected to more meaningful areas such rural development and environmental and water management;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 402 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 b (new)
39b. Deplores the systematic and routine violation of fundamental rights and freedoms despite the adoption of improved laws on the matter and the ratification of international human rights instruments; urges the Uzbek authorities to take meaningful steps to fully address the concerns and effectively implement all the recommendations of the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, the Committee Against Torture and the Human Rights Committee;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 404 #

2015/2220(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 c (new)
39c. Insists that Uzbekistan authorities release all those who have been imprisoned in retaliation for their peaceful exercise of freedom of expression, association and assembly, and highlights the need of prevention and investigation of cases of torture in prison; expresses its concern at the arbitrary extensions of prison terms; calls on the Uzbek authorities to allow independent human rights NGOs to work without hindrance;
2015/12/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 3 #

2015/2205(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Acknowledges the good practices of synergies and coopecollaboration among the agencies on, in the areas of living and working conditions and, vocational training, which maximise the purpose of mutual complementarity between the agencies and occupational safety and health, which maximise synergies and cooperation and enhance complementarity;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2015/2173(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that the Foundation operates in a dynamic environment which demands a high level of flexibility in continually updating and adjusting its activities to meet expected results in the delivery of support to partner countries; reminds that the 2014 context was marked in particular by ongoing political instability in the southern and eastern Mediterranean and in eastern Europe owing to the crisis in Ukraine; suggests to take full advantage of the work done by ETF in the area of migration and skills.
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/2165(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Acknowledges that Eurofound remained an essential contributor to policy development, the use of its expertise in key Union policy documents remained significant; welcomes the fact that the key performance indicators suggest a high visibility and recognition of the scientific value of Eurofound’s research; Appreciates the close cooperation between Eurofound and the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

2015/2154(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes furthermore the Court’s recommendations that the Europe2020 strategy and the MFF need to be better aligned, the high-level political aims need to be translated into useful operational targets, and the focus on results should be reinforced, particularly in the cases of the employment and social headline targets, where the Commission does not have thehas limited competence to create a legally binding framework;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 6 #

2015/2154(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the Court’s observations about the increased risk of irregularities in cases of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) participating in Horizon 2020; supports the Commission’s reply that SMEs' involvement in the programme is crucial for the creation of growth and jobs and welcomnotes that the administrative rules for SMEs have been simplified;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 10 #

2015/2154(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Expresses its regretReminds that the intangible nature of investments in human capital, the diversity of the activities and the involvement of multiple, often small-scale partners in the implementation of projects continue to be the main risks to regularity of spending of European Social Fund (ESF) expenditure;require a proportionate approach with regard to the rules and control of spending of European Social Fund (ESF) expenditure; Highlights once again the importance of capacity building and calls on the Commission to continue with specific mitigating actions, including both preventative and corrective measures;
2015/12/15
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that climate diplomacy should beis an integral part of the comprehensive approach to the EU’s external action; calls for a debate on a forward-looking strategy at EU level to address the strategic and political consequences, allowing the EU to respond to and prepare for climate-induced geopolitical instability and paying particular attention tostepping up cooperation with countries most afflicted by the impacts of climate change;
2015/07/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 35 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to develop strategic priorities for the external climate policy enshrined in the general foreign policy objectives and to ensure that the EU’s delegations increase their focus on climate policies and climate monitoring issues; calls on the EU to cooperate more closely on climate issues with neighbours and candidate countries urging the alignment of their policies with the EU climate targets.
2015/07/14
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recommends that the EU's approach to Turkmenistan strike a balance between the promotion of democracy and the pursuit of EU's strategic interests provided that the EU founding values with regard, in particular, democracy, human rights and the rule of law, are not called into question; underlines that the ratification of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) will contribute tocould undermine the achievement of EU objectives in these areas and should not happen without Turkmenistan meeting basic human rights benchmarks set out by the European Parliament in 2009;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 20 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that similar Partnership and Cooperation Agreements with neighbouring countries in the post-Soviet region such as - Uzbekistan and Tajikistan - have not enabled the EU to meaningfully advance reforms in these countries , nor have these countries become more "incentivised" to protect and promote fundamental human rights;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 21 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Reminds, in this regard, that the Interim Trade Agreement with Turkmenistan concluded by the Council on 27 July 2009 and currently in force, in spite of the provisions on the respect for human rights and democracy and the expectations of the Council, the Commission and the European Parliament at the time of its adoption, did not bring about any substantial improvement in these fields;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 27 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Recommends a more ambitious, effective and coherent EU engagement in the country and in Central Asia, as reflected in the current review of the EU Strategy for Central Asia, whilst taking into account the differences between, and the uniqueness of each of, the countries in the region;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 28 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Is of the opinion that the establishment of a Cooperation Council and a Cooperation Committee, under Articles77 and 79 of the PCA, respectively, willmight revitalise EU-Turkmen relations in a constructive manner, both at the executive level and in civil society; reminds, however, that the establishment of these bodies in other countries in the region, such as for example Uzbekistan, have not proved to be successful;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 34 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. WelcomesTakes note of the fact that the establishment of a Parliamentary Cooperation Committee between the European Parliament and the Turkmen Parliament (the Mejlis) under Article 82 of the PCA, will leading to more regular and structured parliamentary dialogue and scrutiny of the implementation of the agreement; questions, nevertheless, the legitimacy of the Turkmen Parliament that is totally submitted to the president and is the result of blatantly undemocratic consultations;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 37 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the reinstatement of the position of EU Special Representative for Central Asia, non-existent since early 2014, provided that his/her action is result-oriented and aimed at addressing coherently and effectively the main problems of the region;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 41 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Council and the Vice- President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR), to proceed towards the setting up of a full- fledged EU Delegation in Ashgabat; emphasises that the new Delegation could monitor the situationhuman rights violations as well as individual cases of concern in the country and enable diplomacy on the ground, as well as manage projects under the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) in a better way;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 42 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Recognises the timid legal, political, social and economic reforms introduced by the current government since 2012 as an encouraging sign of a renewed climate of openness, most notably with regard to prison reform, laws on internet, public assembly and public association; notes that the state of democracy, the rule of law and the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms remain weak in TurkmenistanPoints out that Turkmenistan remains one of the most closed and repressive countries in the world, and that no real progress in human rights has been made in the last 5 years;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Regrets that several laws adopted between 2010 and 2015 which the Turkmen government shows as progress, either have not been implemented (the Criminal Code of 2010, the Criminal Procedural Code of 2011) or establish highly restrictive provisions contradicting international standard (for example, amendments to the Law on Public Organisations of 2014, the Law on Internet of 2015, and the Law on Assemblies, Meetings and Demonstrations of 2015); stresses that all key human rights concerns raised by the European Parliament from 2008 to 2011 remain unaddressed;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 55 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Notes that a new Law on Public Association was adopted in May 2014 and a first-ever Law on Assemblies entered into force in July 2015; points out that efforts to develop legislature on freedom of assembly and association are a welcome step, although these laws provide for restrictions that are incompatible with international human rights standards and it is unlikely that any real progress can be achieved in these areas as long as no systemic measures are taken to improve the current repressive civil society climate;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 57 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Underlines that access to information is strictly controlled by the government; points out, in this regard, that Internet penetration is less than 15 per cent of residents, according to the UN specialised agency for information and communication technologies (International Telecommunication Union - ITU) and access to news, social media and other sites is restricted;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 58 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Is concerned that lack of independent media, censorship and the use of media for political purposes in Turkmenistan undermine the freedom to seek, receive and impart information protected by national and international law;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 59 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 e (new)
7e. Expresses its concern at the persistent trend of persecution of journalists working for foreign media, as well as other individuals who are considered "inconvenient" by the authorities; draws the attention, in particular, to the case of Saparmamed Nepeskuliev,- a freelance journalist working with the RFE/RL's Turkmen service and the Netherlands- based Alternative Turkmenistan News (ATN) that was sentenced to three years in prison on spurious narcotics possession charges in August 2015 after being held incommunicado since the summer; underlines that the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention concluded that Nepeskuliev's detention was arbitrary and expressed serious concern that he may have been subjected to ill-treatment and torture;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 60 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 f (new)
7f. Underlines that freedom of movement is severely restricted and that the Turkmen authorities continue to arbitrarily restrict foreign travel; stresses that thousands of people are believed to feature on "blacklists" for travelling abroad, and young people have been stopped at the border on the basis of alleged concerns about their safety; underlines at the same time that policies for granting visas to travel to the country are highly restrictive, and among others, international human rights monitors are barred access;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 61 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Takes note of the constitutional reform announced for this year, possibly including a strengthening of the separation of powers between the executive, legislative and judiciary branches, reinforcing the role of Mejlis, and the creation of an office with the function of Ombudsman; notes, however, that the draft constitution abolishes the previous upper age limit of 70 years for presidential candidates, thus paving the way for President Berdymukhammedov to remain in office for life;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 77 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the ratification by Turkmenistan of a number of international treaties on human rights but deplores the fact that most of these treaties have not been implemented;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 84 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Underlines the need for the European Parliament to closely follow and monitor developments in Turkmenistan and the implementation of all parts of the PCA in coming years; calls, in this context, on the VP/HR to honour the agreement reached with her predecessor regarding a monitoring mechanism, allowing Parliament to be properly informed by the EEAS about the implementation of the PCA, once it enters into force, and, in particular, of its objectives and of compliance with its Article 2;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 86 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls, in this regard, for the postponement of the consent procedure until the monitoring mechanism has not been finalised and agreed between the European Parliament and the EEAS;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 88 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Takes the view, furthermore, that the ratification of the PCA should be conditioned upon the Turkmen government meeting concrete, measurable benchmarks based on recommendations made by the UN and the OSCE with regard, in particular, to enforced disappearances, prison access, arbitrary detention, freedom of movement, freedom of expression and access to information, freedom of association and access to the country;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 89 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 c (new)
12c. Calls for the sending of an ad hoc EP delegation to Turkmenistan before the ratification of the PCA in order to verify directly the situation on the ground and address the main concerns with the Turkmen authorities;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 93 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Notes that the EU has held seven rounds of Human Rights Dialogue with Turkmenistan since 2008, and that while the last round in SeptemberJuly 20145 was held in a constructive and open atmosphere, ithis and previous rounds of the Dialogue hasve, disappointingly, so far had very scant resultsnot resulted in any meaningful changes as regards the improvement of protection and promotion of human rights in Turkmenistan;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 100 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the invitation to Turkmenistan of a UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion in 2008, the first UN special rapporteur to visit the country; calls, at the same time, on the Turkmen authorities to allow entry to the remaining nineother 12 rapporteurs, all of whom have asked to visit the country;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 109 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. RecommendsCalls on Turkmenistan to ratify and implement the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and the Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 115 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Takes note of some limited improvements regarding freedom of the media, including a new law adopted in 2013; calls on the Turkmen authorities to fully guarantee freedom of speech, to lift any state controls on print and electronic media and, to allow foreign media outlets access to the country and to information and to stop the on-going campaign to forcibly dismantle privately owned satellite dishes which provide an alternative to national state-controlled media;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 123 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Notes the modest improvements introduced in the new law on public associations adopted in 2014; calls on the Turkmen authorities to remove restrictions on civil society organisations and to permit the development of a genuinely independent civil society;deleted
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 128 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Notes the adoption in March 2015 of a new law allowing certain groups to organise peaceful rallies;deleted
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 133 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Urges, in this context, the Turkmen Government – as a positive sign of cooperation facilitating Parliament’s consent to the PCA – to adopt the draft National Action Plan on Human Rights, prepared with the assistance of the UNDP in 2013Takes note of the adoption in January 2016 of the National Action Plan on Human Rights, which contains the recommendations made during Turkmenistan's appearance before the Universal Periodic Review process at the UN Human Rights Council in 2013; recommends that a constructivcalls for the resolution of the issue of forced disappearances be included in the Plan;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 136 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Notes the mixed results of EU assistance for the period 2011-2013, amounting to EUR 39 million; points out that no substantial changes can be observed in the area of modernisation of the education system, strengthening national capacities to promote and protect human rights, and support to the development and modernisation of the parliament of Turkmenistan – areas to which the EU development assistance was allocated in the previous period; notes that for the period 2014-2017, the EU allocated EUR 37 million, with a primary focus on the development of human capital;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 142 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Notes that Turkmenistan will probably be listed as upper-middle income country from 2017 (likely change of the country status from the OECD Development Assistance Committee) and the countries eligibility for DCI funds will be evaluated based on these assessment; calls on European Commission and EEAS to coordinate allocation of the EU development assistance to Turkmenistan and only disburse funds where and when these benefit the whole population;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 143 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Turkmen authorities to fully implement the laws banning child labour in a better wayand forced labour; calls, at the same time, on the Commission to assist the Turkmen authorities in developing sustainable ways of cultivating cotton;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 151 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Notes that a major component of the PCA is the further development of trade relations; notes, anyhow, that trade and trade-related matters are already covered by the Interim Trade Agreement with Turkmenistan that is still in force;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 153 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Stresses that the energy dependence on authoritarian regimes and non- renewable sources of energy deeply undermines the credibility, the effectiveness and the coherence of the EU foreign policy; takes the view, in this regard, that an increased reliance of Turkmen gas would neither help nor strengthen the energy security of the EU;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 160 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Underlines that the EU is relying on Turkmenistan for its energy security and diversification; notes that opaque system surrounding gas and oil industry in Turkmenistan does not make it a reliable partner for the EU since Turkmen government fully controls vast hydrocarbon reserves and uses the revenues from it to consolidate its rule by sponsoring security services and patronage networks;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 164 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Urges the EU to finalise talks withTakes note of the ongoing talks between Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan on facilitating an accord on building a trans- Caspian gas pipeline (TCP); urges Turkmenistan to resolve the legal disputes and infrastructural deficiencies with the potential transit countries;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 166 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Notes that public investment funds (from international financial institutions) will be needed to build the pipelines and infrastructure across the Caspian, Turkey and the Western part of the route connecting Turkey to Europe; underlines the need to include transparency and accountability issues when pursuing these projects for the European energy diversification;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 179 #

2015/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Is concerned that the disastrous over- use of the scarce water resources in Central Asia has created diplomatic tensions, and calls on the EU to develop efficient water- saving and water management programmes and to engage its water diplomacy more effectively;
2016/04/21
Committee: AFET
Amendment 5 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that the 2016 budget has to play a key role in enhancing the Union's contribution to inclusive and sustainable growth and jobs, especially in combating youth unemployment;
2015/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that growth is the keycan only contribute to more jobs and increased prosperity if it is inclusive and sustainable, and that it is necessary to direct the structural funds more effectively towards promoting growthsustainable growth and social inclusion;
2015/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Highlights that the 2016 budget should provide adequate support for the promotion of social inclusion and for actions with the aim of eradicating poverty and empowering people experiencing poverty and social exclusion;
2015/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 45 #

2015/2074(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises employ many workers in the EU and that one of the main problems in setting up such enterprises and keeping them going is that of obtaining finance; proposes, therefore, that the microfinance element be expanded and the accompanying mentoring support further developed and always ensured;
2015/05/13
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2015/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas, under Chapter 13 the EU and Korea confirms the parties' right to regulate, while aiming at a high level of protection in the fields of environment and labour;
2016/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 17 #

2015/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls that a Party shall not weaken or reduce the labour protection afforded in its laws to encourage trade or investment; is concerned about the recent labour law revisions of South Korea and therefore calls on the Commission to investigate non-compliance and prepare adequate measures in case of breaches of requirements laid down in Chapter 13;
2016/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 19 #

2015/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls for a strengthening of the chapter on sustainable development in the EU-Korea FTA agreements through the establishment of accountability mechanisms in the event of non- compliance;
2016/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 26 #

2015/2059(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Is concerned about the continuous difficulties of establishing good working relations of the Domestic Advisory Groups (DAGs) of both sides that were created through the FTA with the particular task of monitoring the implementation of the Treaty; Commends the role of the DAGs in the preparation of a joint project regarding the implementation of ILO Convention 111 and suggests to the DAGs to prepare a similar project on the implementation of all ILO core conventions in the near future;
2016/04/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 9 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for the ILO’s eight core labour standards and the four ILO Priority Conventions for the industrialised countries to be systematically included in all bilateral and multilateral EU trade agreements, and for the binding application of these standards;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 14 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls the interplay of social and environmental standards, human rights, labour rights, and development policy in EU external relations, and the important role the EU has to play to promote these rights and standards particularly in external trade policy and agreements;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 33 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for a strengthening of the chapter on sustainable development in bilateral and multilateral agreements through the provision of a complaints procedure open to the social partners, and the establishment of accountability mechanisms in the event of non- compliance;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 35 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Considers better implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights essential to uphold core labour, social and environmental standards in workplaces;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 49 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the important role global supply chains play in monitoring and enforcing social, environmental and labour standards, and in this respect, calls on the Commission to work with the ILO and propose actions along the supply chain to enable compliance, (including obligatory reporting requirements), in line with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and recognises that this will require significant support for such companies;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 54 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to include systematically in all free trade agreements negotiated with non-EU countries a series of social standards that include the full implementation of the ILO’s Decent Work Agenda, that sets out key objectives to ensure dignified, stable and peaceful work environments and the importance of social partner engagement in promoting this agenda; also calls on EU businesses to fully implement these core objectives both within the Union, and in dealings with non-EU actors;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 60 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Urges the Commission and the Council to strengthen the implementation of all binding agreements in the case of breach of standards including social, human rights, environmental standards by providing accessible complaint procedure open to social partners, appeal mechanism to an independent body accepted by both parties and enforceable sanctions in the form of fines or temporary suspensions of certain trade benefits provided under the agreement;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 63 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Stresses that EU institutions consider as a priority a business’s record and proven commitment to sustainable and ethical conduct when awarding public procurement contracts, and urges contracting authorities to use these criteria in accordance with the procurements directives;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 65 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the fundamental role ofat corporate social responsibility (CSR) can fulfil its role in ensuring sustainable economic growth both in the European Union and around the worldnvironmental, human right, labour standards and fighting corruption both in the European Union and around the world only if it includes adequate transparency standards and reliable accountability mechanisms; urges the Commission to adopt a new strategy on CSR that establishes stronger reporting and compliance requirements ensuring better implementation of the UN Guiding Principle on Business and Human Rights, and urges the Member States to endorse the promotion of CSR.
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Continues urging the Commission to ban all sort of EU import of goods and services using modern forms of slavery, forced labour, especially of vulnerable groups, or in violation of basic human rights;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 83 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Calls on the Commission to execute a mid-term review on bilateral or multilateral EU trade agreements where social or human rights provisions are suspected or considered to be breached and prepare proportional fines or suspension of trade benefits as long as requirements are met;
2016/02/22
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation -1 a (new)
– having regard to the Treaty on the European Union and in particular to its Articles 2, 8(1) and 21,
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) was created to deepen the relations, enhance the cooperation and strengthen the European Union's (EU) partnerships with neighbouring countries in order to develop an area of shared stabilprosperity, securtability and prospesecurity;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 17 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the neighbourhood is currently in a state of flux and is lesssince the launch of the ENP the neighbourhood has undergone sudden and deep changes and has experienced an overall deterioration of the human rights situation and a reversal of democratisation trends in most countries, with some rare exceptions such as Tunisia; whereas the situation is far from stable and less secure than when the ENP was launched; ; whereas the main challenge of the ENP should be to facilitate the ongoing transition towards inclusive, accountable, stable and viable democracies;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 37 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas peace and stability are fundamental elements of the ENP; whereas partner countries must abide by these principles and strive for a peaceful solution of existing conflicts; whereas the existence of conflicts, including frozen or protracted ones hamper the economic, social and political transformation as well as regional cooperation, stability and security; whereas these conflicts are undermining the development of a genuine and effective multilateral dimension of the ENP;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 41 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas foreign occupation or annexation remains one of the main obstacles to peace and security in the neighbourhood; whereas the right to self- determination and ownership of natural resources is violated in the territories of Western Sahara and Palestine; whereas the EU has a contrasting approach to cases of occupation, notably in its own neighbourhood; whereas coherence and strict compliance with international law by the EU in relation to cases of occupation or annexation are key to the effectiveness and credibility of the ENP;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the EU should play a more active role in the peaceful resolution of the existing conflicts, notably those of frozen or protracted nature, which represent currently an insurmountable obstacle to the full development of the ENP both in the East and in the South hindering good-neighbourly relations and regional cooperation;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 65 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas, in particular, progress in the resolution of conflicts and controversies between ENP countries should be considered an important criterion to be assessed in the annual Progress Reports;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 72 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas differentiation is needed, especially as the EU neighbourhood has become more fragmented than ever, with the countries differing in many respects, including in their ambitions and expectations as regards the EU; whereas the EU's bilateral relations with ENP countries are at different stages of development; whereas the effective use of the "more for more" principle is of fundamental importance in shaping and differentiating the relations with partner countries;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 87 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas in no way the development of the ENP should be seen as an effort to create new areas of influence aimed at cutting traditional and historic relations of partner countries with other neighbours;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 88 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
Hb. whereas the development of an effective ENP East should be regarded by the Russian Federation as an opportunity for improving the cooperation with the EU with a view to defining synergies and meeting common challenges;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 92 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the consultation process carried out by the Commission should be comprehensive and inclusive so as to ensure that all relevant stakeholders are consulted; whereas further efforts should be made so as to raise the visibility and the awareness of the ENP in the public opinions of the partner countries;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 100 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the importance and timeliness of the review of the ENP; emphasises that the revised ENP should be able to provide a quick, flexible and adequate response to the situation on the ground, while also putting forward a long-term vision for developing relations with the neighbouring countries in both a bilateral and multilateral framework;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 159 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the renewed policy must be more strategic and coherent, with a real political vision, and politically driven; calls for special envoys to be appointed for the East and the South, with the task of politically coordinating the revised policy, in this regard, on the EU to avoid double standards with regard, in particular, to human rights and frozen or protracted conflicts and must be strictly in line with the international human rights and humanitarian law framework; takes the view that the same principles should apply on these questions to all the partner countries regardless of the parties in power or the geopolitical interests of the EU;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 195 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Takes the view that annual Progress Reports must reflect these priorities and should contain comparative data regarding previous years so as to measure advancements and shortfalls and that all the main stakeholders of ENP countries, including civil society, should be genuinely involved and consulted before drafting these reports;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 208 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that economic reforms must go along with political reforms and that good governance can only be achieved through an open, accountable and transparent decision-making process based on democratic institutions;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 232 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the EU to improve its coordination with other donors and international financial institutions and calls for joint programming with its Member States; considers that better coordination with the Member States as well as between the various EU instruments is necessary in order to achieve a common approach to the short- and medium-term goals of the EU's cooperation with neighbouring countries;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 272 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls, in this respect, for consistent implementation of the "differentiated approach" and emphasizes that the principle of "more for more", which is the cornerstone of the revised ENP, implies also "less for less" for those ENP countries that show no will to undertake the agreed reforms;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 273 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Insists that the additional assistance provided under the "more for more" principle should be substantial in order to effectively reward and support partner countries which are genuinely committed to and make tangible progress towards democratisation and respect for human rights;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 274 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 c (new)
11c. Calls on the EU to continue to provide support to Tunisia under the "more for more principle" at a level that is commensurate to the remarkable efforts and commitments made by the Tunisian people and their authorities;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 299 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Takes the view that the possibility of granting a European perspective to EaP countries most committed to deepening relations with the EU and willing to undertake and implement the necessary reforms both at political and economic level should be duly taken into account and proposed as an incentive for further European integration;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 303 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Considers support for democracy, the rule of law and human rights to be central to the ENP; stresses that the EU should be willing to offer incentives and know-how to help overcome the social challenges and economic costs of undertaking democratic reformsundertake and support democratic reforms; underlines that the EU should implement accountability measures to ensure that those responsible for violations in partner countries are neither supported nor encouraged;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 327 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the continuous need to focus on strengthening and consolidating democracy, the rule of law, the independence of the justice system, respect for minorities and diversity; emphasises in particular the importance of promoting the rights of women and their equal participation in political, economic, social and cultural affairs; calls on the EU to ensure the mainstreaming of a gender perspective in all its policies; highlights that capacity-building in national institutions, including their national assemblies, together with support for civil society, pro- democracy groups and political parties, will enhance political dialogue and pluralism;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 368 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the need to implementapply effective conditionality in relation to reform processeshuman rights, rule of law and democratic reform; emphasises that the EU cannot compromise its fundamental values and should avoid creating double standards; stresses that countries that are making progress in implementing reforms and following European policy should be granted more substantial support; underlines the importance of fully applying the "more for more" principle;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 402 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Notes that security and stability are basic concerns in the neighbourhood and that current developments in the region call for a strong security component in the ENP, which has regrettably been missing to date; recalls that universal values should be at the core of this policy in any circumstances; stresses that ENP efforts in the security field should be pursued in a comprehensive manner, taking into account the root causes of the current instability, including the lack of democratic and inclusive governance, widespread human rights violations and impunity, exclusion or discrimination of entire social groups, pervasive corruption and socio-economic inequalities;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 417 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Reiterates its view that frozen or protracted conflicts hamper the full development of the ENP; regrets, in this regard, that since the launch of the ENP no progress was made in the resolution of the existing conflicts; calls on the VP/HR to play a more active role making clear that the deepening of bilateral relations is linked to peaceful conflict resolution and the respect for international law; underlines in this context, the importance of pursuing a principled policy of promoting accountability for all violations of human rights and international humanitarian law; urges the Commission to step up confidence-building programmes in conflict areas with a view to restoring dialogue and facilitating people-to-people exchanges;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 455 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Reminds EU Member States of their obligations under the EU Common Position on arms exports (944/2008), which inter alia requires Member States to deny an export licence for military technology or equipment to any neighbourhood country, if there is a clear risk that the military technology or equipment to be exported might be used for internal repression, in the commission of serious violations of international humanitarian law, would provoke or prolong armed conflicts or aggravate existing tensions or conflicts in the country of final destination, or be exported aggressively against another country or to assert by force a territorial claim;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 474 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Urges the EU to apply to regional conflicts the spirit and lessons deriving from the historical experience of European integration since bilateral issues must be solved peacefully and good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation are fundamental elements of the ENP; calls, in this regard, for the involvement of citizens and the engagement of public actors in horizontal partnerships and twinning with counterparts from the Union, and the engagement with society and the younger generation as a factor for change;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 485 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24b. Stresses that as regards in particular Eastern partners energy security concerns are an integral part of the security dimension and should be duly addressed in the review of the ENP with a view to aligning these countries with EU energy targets and reducing their dependence on fossil fuels;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 499 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Calls, in this respect, for complementing EU's bilateral relation with ENP countries with its multilateral dimension by increasing the number of activities and initiatives in this context paying particular attention to strengthening cross-border projects, stepping up people-to-people programmes, developing incentives for regional cooperation and further enhancing an active dialogue with civil society; considers that the future ENP should offer a regional, inclusive platform for discussing human rights issues, in line with the core principles of the ENP;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 515 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Calls for increasing efforts to boost regional cooperation in the Mediterranean, through greater political support and a revised role of the Union for the Mediterranean, allowing the Secretariat to fulfil its efforts in becoming an effective and dynamic platform for Euro-Mediterranean dialogue and cooperation; calls for greater articulation between the regional dimension of the ENP and the activities of the UfM; expresses the need to follow-up on the commitments and disbursement of funds for the 29 projects, which have been labelled by the UfM since 2008;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 520 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 c (new)
27c. Stresses that for both the Union for the Mediterranean and the Eastern Partnership the main Non Governmental Organisations have set up a common platform; takes the view that these platforms play a crucial role in raising the awareness of the ENP in the relevant public opinions and should be duly and timely consulted both in the drawing-up and the implementation of the ENP Action Plans;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 574 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Stresses the importance of free movement of people, and supports enhancing visa facilitation and visa liberalisation within the neighbourhood, particularly for students, young people and researchers; calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, to further enhancreconsider the mMobility pPartnerships, delinking them from re-admission agreements, within the neighbourhood and develop possibilities for circular migration schemes, which would encourage and reward regulaopen safe and legal routes for migrants;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 595 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Notes that high unemployment, social exclusion, corruption and poverty, combined with the low political participation of women, are root causes of instability, and demands engagement beyond the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas (DCFTAs); calls, in this regard, on the Commission to monitor closely the implementation of DCFTAs in order to avoid social and environmental dumping; calls for more transparency and engagement of all relevant stakeholders on the process of ENP policy formulation, notably in the areas of trade, investment, energy and migration; calls for systematic impact assessments of trade and investment and migration agreements as well as of EU assistance within the framework of the ENP, notably in relation to human rights, public services, decent work and social development;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 623 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37 a (new)
37a. Takes the view that European political parties bear a crucial responsibility as regards the promotion of a political culture based on fully-fledged democratic institutions, rule of law, multi- party democracy and full participation of women in decision-making; calls, in this regard, on them to refrain from any power game based on forced political affiliation and the recruitment of oligarchs in order to gain power and extend influence in the partner countries;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 632 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38a. Stresses that the civil society organisations have an essential role to play in promoting values the ENP is founded on, human rights and democratisation, as well as their involvement in implementation of projects under ENI and in monitoring the implementation of ENP Action Plan; points out the importance of developing a consultation process with CSOs as regards the definition of benchmarks;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 640 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
40. Stresses that progress reports should focus on the implementation of the priorities identified in the action plans and reflect the level of engagement of the partner country; upgrade the progress reports from working documents into official reader-friendly EU communications; calls on key documents such as Progress Reports to be readily available on the respective EU Delegation websites and translated into the local language; reiterates its call for the data contained in the reports to be put into perspective by bearing in mind the national context and by including trends from the previous years;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas, in reaction to and despite Russia’s after the EU-brokered ceasefire aggression against Georgia and violation of its territorial integrity inement between Russia and Georgia of 2008, the EU opted for an increased cooperation model as a way to appease Russia; whereas, in line with this, rather than taking restrictive measures,launched or deepened a series of generous initiatives for deeper cooperation – such as the common spaces, the Partnership for Modernisation, the negotiations on a New EU-Russia Agreement, and the Human Rights dialogue – have been launched or deepened;
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 43 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas Russia has – by illegally annexing Crimea and waging an undeclared war against Ukraine, with the direct participation of Russian military units, and by deliberately destabilising this neighbouring sovereign and independent country – profoundly and for a long time damaged its relationship with the EU by jeopardising the basic principles of Europe’s security order and by breaking its international commitments, notably under the United Nations Charter, the Helsinki Final Act and, the Budapest Memorandum and the bilateral Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership;
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 54 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas Russia is the instigator of and, directly or indirectly, party to a number of 'frozen conflicts' in its neighbourhood – in Transnistria, South Ossetia, Abkhasia, and Nagorno Karabakh – that constitute serious impediments to the development and stability of the neighbouring countries concerned and undermine their independence;
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 98 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the current strife and confrontation between the EU and Russia are not in the interest of both parties; whereas concrete efforts should be made in order to keep the channel of dialogue open avoiding the building of a new iron curtain in Europe; whereas the new division of the continent is jeopardising the security of both the EU and Russia;
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 104 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the EU has firmly supported Russia's accession and participation in different international organisations and fora, such as the G8, the G20 and the WTO; whereas this strategy of including Russia in international decision-making bodies has not had the results expected but instead created tensions owing to Russia’s habit of breaching rules, e.g. its non-; whereas Russia failed to compliancey with WTO standards andits obligations (by introducing a number of discriminatory measures against individual EU Member States and other countries in its neighbourhood), its failure to implement more than a thousand judgements of the European Court of Human Rights, etc.;
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 112 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the Russian Federation, as a full member of the Council of Europe and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, has committed itself to the principles of democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights; whereas continued serious violations of the rule of law and the adoption of restrictive laws during the past months are increasing questioning Russia's compliance with its international and national obligations; whereas Russia failed to implement more than a thousand judgements of the European Court of Human Rights;
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 120 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas Russia has developed policies and instruments for, and became an active user of, a new type of hybrid warfare, deliberately blurring the lines between military/paramilitary activity and political activism, employing a mix of weaponised information (information deliberately altered and aired to inflict damage to societal, political and institutional structures), using professional instigators of insurgency in foreign countries, targeting local minority-language groups abroad for destabilisation, controlling information space and combining cyber warfare with military means;deleted
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 146 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas the World Media Freedom Index 2014 ranks the Russian Federation at 148th place out of 180; whereas the financing of state-controlled media outlets has been significantly widened and increased; whereas freedoms of expression, association and assembly in Russia are still threatened and the initiatives and activities of human rights defenders, independent civil society organizations, political opponents, independent media and ordinary citizens are often restricted or hindered;
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 153 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas the human rights situation in Russia has been constantly deteriorating in recent years and the Russian authorities have adopted a series of laws containing ambiguous provisions that are used to place further restrictions on opposition and civil-society actors;
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 154 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J b (new)
Jb. whereas the Russian Federation has actively promoted the Eurasian Economic Union; whereas this project of economic integration should not be seen as competing with the European Union;
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 155 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J c (new)
Jc. whereas energy continues to play a central and strategic role in EU-Russia relations; whereas energy is a key instrument of Russian foreign policy; whereas the EU's strong dependency on fossil fuels undermines the development of a balanced, coherent and value-driven European approach vis-à-vis Russia; whereas it is of the utmost importance for the EU to speak with one voice and show strong internal solidarity;
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 164 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates that, in the light of Russia’s direct and indirect involvement in the war in Ukraine, amounting to a deliberate violation of the core of the democratic principles and values sustained by the EU and widely shared internationally, the EU cannot envisage a return to ‘busiStresses that enhanced cooperation and good-neighbourly relations between the EU and Russia are of crucial importance for the stability, security and prosperity of Europe; is of the opinion, furthermore, that cooperation at international level between the two partnesrs as usual’; calls for a critical re-assessment by the EU of its relations with Russia, and for the drafting, as promptly as possible, of a soft-power contingency plan to counter the aggressive and divisive policies conducted by Russia against the EU and its partnerin all institutions, organisations and forums is of the utmost importance with a view to improving global governance and addressing common challenges;
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 185 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Reiterates, nevertheless, that the EU cannot envisage a return to "business as usual" as long as Russia does not fully implement the Minsk agreement and restores the territorial integrity of Ukraine; calls, in this regard, for a critical re-assessment by the EU of its relations with Russia;
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 189 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that at this point, Russia, because of its actions, can no longer be treated as, or considered, a ‘strategic partner’; points out that that the relations with Russia can only be of a pragmatic nature, since "strategic partnerships are" can only conceivable with countries that do not jeopardise the international order, which is based on democracy, state sovereignty (including the choice of internal constitutional order and foreign policy orientation), the inviolability of state borders, respect for the rule of law and the principles of international trade, and mutual trustbe built and developed on shared common values and the respect of international obligations;
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 224 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Is deeply concerned by the fact that Russia now openly positions itself, and acts, not as a partner of, but as a rival to the international democratic community, seeking to challenge the current international order, and is in the process of redrawing borders within Europe; is extremely worried by the tendency of the Russian authorities to systematically denigrate liberal democracy and to consider democratic neighbouring countries as a threintroducing areas of influence and redrawing borders within Europe; regrets that security in Europe is still a highly sensitive and divisive issue but believes that the EU and Russia should spare no efforts so as to overcome the existing differences and diverging views with a view to enhancing dialogue and cooperation in this field once the curreant to their own rulcrisis is overcome;
2015/03/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 239 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that EU-Russia relations must henceforth be based on the rule of law and on preconditioned dialogue, whereby the EU would be ready to relaunch cooperation with the authorities in Moscow on the condition that Russia unambiguously and without pretence takes its share of responsibility and fully implements the Minsk Agreements; stresses that in order to ensure that such a dialogue – if renewed (for which the return of Crimea to Ukraine would be a prerequisite) – is not conducted at the expense of European values, standards and international commitments, it would be necessary to specify very clearly the EU’s expectations of Russia, along with the retaliatory measures it would take should Russia not keep to its commitmentstakes the view, in this regard, that the eventual resumption of the Partnership for Modernisation should not be limited to economic cooperation and technological innovation but must go along with an ambitious process of domestic reforms that include the consolidation of democratic institutions and of a reliable legal system, the respect of the rule of law and the unhindered development of a genuine civil society;
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 318 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Firmly supports the swift creation of a robust European Energy Union, specifically the interconnection of national energy networks in order to reduce considerably the dependence of individual Member States on external energy suppliers; stresses, in this regard, the role that an ambitious policy of energy efficiency and renewables can play in this regard; is of the firm conviction that the challenges to and vulnerability of European solidarity, and the exposure of individual Member States, to the illegitimate use of energy as a political and diplomatic bargain chip can only be combatted efficiently through the full implementation of the Third Energy package and the completion of a transparent, integrated, synchronised and resilient European internal energy market;
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 323 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Regrets, in this respect, the decisions of Finland and Hungary to step up the energy cooperation with Russia with regard, in particular, to the recent agreements on nuclear energy that will further increase the dependence on Moscow;
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 346 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Reiterates once more that the development of the Eastern Partnership is not aimed against Russia; stresses, in this respect, that the current level of confrontation between the EU and the Russian Federation is not in the interest of the Eastern Partnership countries and calls on the Commission to find ways in order to broaden the areas of cooperation and compatibility between the EU and the Eurasian Economic Union;
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 370 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Renews its call for the development of EU reconnaissance capabilities of weaponised information and the preparation of information contingency plans, including the strengthening of analytical and monitoring capabilities, especially in the Russian language, in order to be able to identify, and respond swiftly and appropriately to, purposefully biased information; calls on the Commission to earmark without delay adequate funding for concrete projects aimed at counteringresponding to Russian propaganda within the EU and abroad with professional reporting in line with journalism ethics, standards and good practice; calls on the Commission and the Member States to devise as well a mechanism for the collection, monitoring and reporting of financial, political or technical assistance provided by Russia to political parties and other organisations within the EU, with a view to assessing its involvement in, and influence over, political life and public debate in the EU;
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 430 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. EUnderlines that the development of genuine and independent NGOs should not be seen as a threat but, on the contrary, an enrichment of the society of a country; expresses its deep concern for the state of human rights and the rule of law in Russia, and strongly condemns the crackdown on independent civil society and the persistent and multiform repression of activists, political opponents and critics of the regime, which has in some cases led to their murder (Anna Politkovskaya, Natalya Estemirova, Boris Nemtsov, Sergey Magnitsky, Alexander Litvinenko, and others); demands that all assassinations of political activists, journalists and whistle blowers be investigated properly and independently; reiterates its call on the Council to deliver on its commitment to defend these principles, and to adopt restrictive measures for the officials involved in the well-documented Magnitsky case;
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 431 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Expresses its deep concern for the state of human rights and the rule of law in Russia, andparticularly as regards to the foreign agents law, anti-LGBTI legislation, the treason law and the legislation regulating public protests; strongly condemns the crackdown on independent civil society and the persistent and multiform repression of activists, political opponents and critics of the regime, which has in some cases led to their murder (Anna Politkovskaya, Natalya Estemirova, Boris Nemtsov, Sergey Magnitsky, Alexander Litvinenko, and others); demands that all assassinations of political activists, journalists and whistle blowers be investigated properly and independently; reiterates its call on the Council to deliver on its commitment to defend these principles, and to adopt restrictive measures for the officials involved in the well-documented Magnitsky case;
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 438 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Regrets the lack of results and the absence of any evolution on the modalities of the EU-Russia Human Rights consultations; expects, in case of resumption, concrete efforts to make it more result-oriented in consultation with the CSOs of both sides;
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 439 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on Russia to repeal fully the federal law on 'propaganda for non- traditional sexual relations'; is deeply concerned about the negative consequences of this law on society, creating an environment in which discrimination, hate speech and hate violence against LGBTI people go unpunished; calls on the High Representative, the EU Delegation to Russia and EU Member states, to condemn acts of violence against LGBTI people and human rights defenders, to raise the issue with relevant Russian officials and to support civil society and governmental initiatives on monitoring cases of violence and educating law enforcement personnel;
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 456 #

2015/2001(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Commission to develop and launch in the framework of the European Neighbourhood Instrument and the Partnership Instrument cross- border programmes that facilitate cooperation and people-to-people contacts and exchanges between the EU and Russia at the levels of civil society and local communities with a view to defusing tension, improving mutual understanding and starting concretely to build confidence between the parties;
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 23 #

2014/2817(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the Association Agreement and the relevant gradual integration of Moldova in the EU policies should not exclude Moldova from its traditional, historical and economic ties with other countries in the region but, on the contrary, should create the conditions so that the country can fully benefit from all of its potential;
2014/10/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 47 #

2014/2817(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Moldovan authorities to ensure that the upcoming electoral process takes place according to the highest European and international standards and to adopt the necessary measures in order to facilitate the participation of Moldovans living abroad; highlights the important role that political actors and parties play and the need to adopt an effective legislation that ensures transparency in party financing;
2014/10/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #

2014/2817(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Expresses its concern at the lack of transparency of media ownership and concentration of mass-media ownership that weakens the plurality of the media landscape; calls, in this regard, on the Moldovan authorities to ensure that especially during the electoral campaign all the political forces have a fair and balanced access to media;
2014/10/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 55 #

2014/2817(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on Moldova to tackle with renewed strength the reform of the judiciary and the necessity to ensure its independence and the law enforcement systems; stresses the need to intensify the fight against corruption at all levels, inter alia by fully implementing the legislative package adopted in 2013; calls on the Moldovan authorities to ensure that the mechanisms belonging to the anti- corruption system, particularly the National Anti-Corruption Centre and the National Integrity Centre, are properly financed and staffed and free from undue influence;
2014/10/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 59 #

2014/2817(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the need to investigate properly and fully all allegations of violations of human rights, and in particular to tackle impunity and effectively prosecute perpetrators for ill- treatment and torture;
2014/10/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #

2014/2817(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Highlights the importance of anti- discrimination legislation to ensure equality and protection for all minorities, and in particular for LGBT persons, and calls on the Moldovan authorities to remove all the remaining discriminatory provisions;
2014/10/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 76 #

2014/2817(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. SNotes that the DCFTA has been provisionally applied since 1 September 2014, following the signature on 27 June and the Council Decision 2014/492/EU on the signing and provisional application of the Association Agreement; notes that the Commission normally follows the established practice to wait for EP's consent before starting the provisional application of Association Agreements; strongly deplores the continued use of trade by Russia as a means to destabilise the Moldovan economy, first before the Vilnius Summit and then in the aftermath of the signature of the Association Agreement; recalls that Russia has banned imports of wine and fruits from Moldova on the basis of unfounded SPS concerns and has also suspended trade preferences under the CIS FTA; supports fully the Commission's initiatives aimed at countering the effects of the Russian embargo on Moldovan products, including by providing financial support and extending and deepening the Autonomous Trade Preferences; adopting Autonomous Trade Preferences; believes that the provisional application of the DCFTA will contribute to alleviating the economic impact of the Russian sanctions, but stresses that a clearly- defined roadmap for implementation and adequate financial and technical support are necessary conditions for a successful implementation and for Moldova to really benefit from increased access to the EU market;
2014/10/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 80 #

2014/2817(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Takes note of the recent revision of the energy strategy and calls on Moldovan government to review and strengthen the 2013-15 national action plan for energy efficiency, develop a credible and effective plan on renewable energy with a view to diversifying energy sources and align with EU climate-change policies and targets;
2014/10/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 90 #

2014/2817(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Stresses the importance, in this respect, to enhance people-to people contacts at all levels in order to create the conditions for a sustained dialogue and further promote confidence-building with a view to stepping up the peace process and achieving the reconciliation between the parties;
2014/10/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 10 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas there is strong national and cross-party consensus in Georgia in favour of European integration; whereas such consensus should pave the way to defusing the current polarization of the political landscape and create the conditions for a constructive dialogue between majority and minority forces;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 17 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas in the last few years Georgia has made significant progress in reforms and in strengthening relations with the EU; whereas as a result of the progress made on reforms promoting human rights and democracy Georgia benefitted from an additional financial allocation under the Eastern Partnership Integration and Cooperation Programme;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas stronger political and economic ties will bring greater stability and prosperity to the whole European continent; whereas stronger ties with the EU should not exclude or cut off Georgia from its traditional, historical, political and economic ties with other countries in the region but, on the contrary, should create the conditions so that the country can fully benefit from all of its potential;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 47 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Underlines, in this regard, the importance of a cross-party constructive dialogue for the adoption of the basic reforms and obligations stemming from the Association Agreement in the spirit of a consensual European choice; calls on the Georgian political forces to avoid the "winner takes it all" approach that has characterised also the previous governments in order to overcome the long-standing polarization of the Georgian society;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 64 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Notes the efforts by the Georgian authorities in the area of democratic reforms, including tackling the reform of the judiciary, and the need to investigate properly and fully all allegations of violations of human rights; recognises the fundamental principle of equality before the law; notes with concern that numerous officials who had served under the previous government and some members of current opposition were charged with criminal offences; stresses, however, that all prosecutions should be transparent, proportionate and free from political motivation, and should adhere strictly to due process;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 79 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Georgian authorities to continue the fight against corruption at all levels and in all spheres of life, and to develop a fully independent judiciary, inter alia, to increase public trust in the judiciary; stresses, furthermore, the importance of the depolitisation of the public administration in order to make it more efficient and free from political interference;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 85 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Deplores, in this regard, the violent outbreaks of islamophobia and homophobia that took place in the country and the failure of the prosecution and judiciary to bring the perpetrators to justice in an effective way;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 87 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the work carried out by Georgia in implementing the visa facilitation and readmission agreements; welcomes, also, the progress made in the visa dialogue; supports a visa free regime for Georgia once all the conditions are met as a tangible positive development for the benefit of Georgian citizens;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 90 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Georgian Government to promote free media, the freedom of expression and media pluralism, and to allow the media to report independently and objectively without political or economic pressure; calls, in this regard, for the full implementation of the law on transparency of media ownership;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 94 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the Commission to closely monitor the implementation of the DCFTA in order to prevent social and environmental dumping especially during the transition period for some sectors;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 112 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Regrets, in this regard, the lack of substantial progress in the Geneva talks in spite of the efforts of the Georgian authorities to engage constructively to address all security and humanitarian concerns in the conflict areas; calls, in this regard, for a more effective role of the EU in the process;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 116 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Stresses the importance to enhance people-to people contacts at all levels in the conflict areas in order to create the conditions for a sustained dialogue and further promote confidence-building with a view to stepping up the peace process and achieving the reconciliation between the parties;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 128 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Points out that the entry into force of the EU-Georgia Association Agreement and the likely inclusion of Armenia in the Customs Union with Azerbaijan remaining outside all economic blocs including the WTO could disrupt the traditional economic relations in the region; calls, therefore, on the Commission to assist Georgia in dealing with the possible problems ensuing from such a situation and help the country make fresh efforts to promote new forms of cooperation in the South Caucasus region;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 129 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Reminds Georgia of the generous European solidarity when Russian adopted trade and economic sanctions on Tbilisi and expects, therefore, Georgia not to profit from the current Russian sanctions on the EU;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 130 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20c. Draws the attention to the crucial position of Georgia as regards the development of the Southern corridor and the transit of oil and gas pipelines that could be of strategic importance for the European energy security; calls, in this regard, for the full respect of EU environmental standards in the construction of energy infrastructures; stresses, furthermore, the importance to diversify energy sources with regard, in particular, to renewables, and align with EU climate-change policies and targets;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 131 #

2014/2816(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 d (new)
20d. Calls on the Commission to closely assist and monitor the Georgian authorities in their investment programme for the construction, rehabilitation and reconstruction of hydropower plants urging them to comply fully with EU standards and norms with regard, in particular, to the Environmental Impact Assessment of the larger ones;
2014/10/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 27 #

2014/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the EU needs to make a decisive change in an economic policy that has allowed the Union to drift away from the EU 2020 targets, and that has increased the risks of secular stagnation as well as negative social impact and insufficient environmental progress, which is undermining credibility and support for the EU; whereas an ecological transformation is needed to ensure a shift towards a resource efficient economy and ensure sustainable development; whereas the EU is worryingly losing weight in the world economy, while most other countries are showing solid signs of recovery; whereas in October 2014 the IMF estimated that the probability of a recession in the euro area had increased and would reach 35-40% at year's end;
2015/01/30
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 1 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2
– having regard to Articles 21 and 36 of the Treaty on European Union,
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 10 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Points to the dramatically aggravated economic, social and security environment both around and inside the EU, where the international law-based order and stability and security of Europe are challenged to a degree unprecedented since the beginning of European integration; points to the ongoing transformation of the global political order;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Is concerned that the EU, due also to its internal crisis, has so far not been able to use its full potential to shape its political and security environment, and that a lack of policy coordination and coherence between EU policies, and financial limitations pose additional restraints on Europe's influence in the world;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 24 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 1
– protecting and promoting European values and enforcing the political and legal order in Europe, thereby safeguarding peace and stability,
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 30 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 2
– improving the EU's contribution to territorial defence in all of its aspects and in particular to peace keeping and peace enforcement in the context of CSDP,
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 38 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 3
– supporting social and human development, security, stabilisation and the rule of law in the EU's southern neighbourhood,
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 53 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 4
– strengthening, together with partners, the rules-based, pluralistic global political and, economic and financial order, including the protection of human rights, and
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 60 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – indent 5
– improving the EU's internal structures and working methods in order to strengthen its resilience and transparency and allow it to unleash its full potential as a global player;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 79 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Insists that the political, economic, financial and defence resources of the EU and its Member States must be combined to maximise the EU’s influence in the worldglobally strengthen the values and norms enshrined in Article 21 of the Lisbon Treaty , produce synergies and ensure peace and stability in Europe;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 113 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recalls that the EU has the obligation under Article 21 of the Treaty on the European Union to ensure coherence between its various external policies and notably to ensure that its external action and policies are designed and implemented in order to consolidate and support democracy, the rule of law, human rights and the principles of international law; calls on the HR/VP to report regularly on Article 21 compliance and to explore means to improve external policy coherence notably in relation to human rights and international law; in this context, calls on the HR/VP to consider the establishment of an External Policies Monitoring Mechanism, an independent EU body, which could receive and investigate complaints from individuals, or their representatives inside or outside the EU, alleging that their rights or interests have been or risk to be affected by EU action that results from the non-compliance by the EU to its Article 21 obligations;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 124 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Reiterates that the internal structures of the EEAS need to be reformed so as to enable it to assist the HR/VP in all her roles and to enable her to advance strategic planning and coordinate political processes within the Council and the Commission; insists on the need to rationalise the EEAS top management structure and to speed up and streamline decision-making processes; reiterates its call for closer integration of the EU Special Representatives into the EEAS, including through a transfer of their budget from the CFSP operational budget into the EEAS budget; urges, in this respect, a political and cost-effective evaluation of the role played by these Special Representatives;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 128 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for the modernisation of the EU delegations network so as to reflect the needs of EU foreign policy in the 21st century, including by adapting staff numbers and expertise; asks the HR/VP to strengthen the authority of the head of delegation over all staff, irrespective of their institutional origin, and to simplify the administrative budgets of delegations towards a single funding source; poinregrets tohat the potential for synergies and economies of scale afforded by the strengthening of cooperation between Member State embassies and EU delegations has yet to be fully exploited;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 134 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Is deeply concerned about the shortage in payments regarding the two major EU budgetary sources for crisis management and conflict prevention such as the CFSP budget which funds the civilian CSDP missions and the budget lines of the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP); is deeply convinced that the current security environment in the East and the South of Europe requires additional investments instead of substantial cuts;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 140 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Underlines the vital importance of collective defence guaranteed by NATO for its members; urges the Member States, as a matter of urgency, to step up their ability to contribute to territorial defence, commit more resourcestake the Pooling and Sharing methodology seriously and cooperate and cooperrdinate more closely to build synergies, to reduce inefficiencies, industrial overcapacities and corruption; stresses that all the Member States must enjoy the same level of security, in line with Article 42(7) TEU; stresses that a credible EU foreign policy needs to be underpinned by adequate defence capabilities in the Member States and an effective Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP); takes the view that the CSDP is an important component of Europecurrently structured and defence and can contribute to it in many ways, including by fostering defence cooperation, enhancing interoperability and increasing efficiencsigned in a way which allows the Union to prevent and manage violent conflicts abroad but not the effective organisation of the Union's territory; welcomes the HR/VP's commitment to actively engage on defence matters, including by chairing meetings of the Foreign Affairs Council in the Defence Ministers configuration;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 154 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – introductory part
16. WelcomNotes the impetus given to the CSDP by the European Council on Defence in December 2013 and looks forward to the forthcoming debate in June 2015; calls for further ambitious decisions to be taken at this summit, in particular:
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 161 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 1
– launching – on the basis of the review of the EU's strategic framework – a process of strategic reflection on objectives and priorities in the field of security and defence, setting out the required capabilities and options for deepening defence cooperation and coordination;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 163 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 2
– strengthening the European Defence Agency by providing it with the necessary resources, so that it can play its full role in coordinating and stimulating armaments cooperation;deleted
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 183 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 5
– strengthening the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base, inter alia by coordinating defence budgets and harmonising requirements, reducing overcapacities and inefficiencies, harmonising requirements without using EU budgetary resources for defence research;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 189 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 6
– addressing existing problems in the areas of the planning and conduct of military operations, including by establishing a permanent operational military headquarters alongside the already existing Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability (CPCC);
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 196 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 7 a (new)
- the adoption of an EU Common Position aiming at establishing a legal framework for the use of armed drones in line with the relevant European Parliament resolution adopted on 27 February 2014;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 197 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – indent 7 b (new)
- strengthening the EU's commitment to arms control and nuclear disarmament in a world with a growing number of conflicts and instable regions;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 204 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for the industrial and technological resources needed to improve cyber security to be developed, including by promoting a single market for cnotes the EU's Cyber sSecurity products; emphasisStrategy; urges the EU Member States, the need to mainstream cyber defence into external action and the CFSP, and calls for closer coordination on cyber defence with NATO; welcomes the EU’s Cyber Security Strategy; urges the European Defence Agency to strengthen coordination on cyber defence among Member States and calls on the Member States to provide the EDA with the means to achieve this goalEEAS and the Commission to focus on how to strengthen the resilience of relevant infrastructure; calls for a comprehensive and strict EU policy on the export of mass surveillance technology to non- democratic and authoritarian regimes, including the revision of the regulation of dual-use technology;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 213 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for a reform of the EU's approach to migration policy; insists on the need to address the root causes of irregular migration, using all policy and assistance instruments, including development social and trade policies, humanitarian aid, conflict prevention and crisis management; reiterates its call to step up humanitarian support to countries which host refugees and to strengthen Regional Protection Programmes, run in collaboration with UNHCR close to regions of origin; stresses that migration management should be a priority in EU cooperation with neighbours in the east and south;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 233 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Stresses that EU energy dependence deeply undermines the effectiveness and the consistency of its foreign policy with regard, in particular, to its addiction on fossil fuels; takes the view, in this regard, that the development of renewables and of energy efficiency will strongly benefit the credibility of the EU external action freeing it from the current dependence on authoritarian regimes that act in blatant contradiction to the EU founding values;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 266 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Takes the view that an overarching political strategy is needed, aimed at reinvigorating the European political and legal order, which was laid down with the Helsinki Final Act of 1975 and which binds all European states, including Russia; insists that this order is based on respect for human rights, minority rights and fundamental freedoms, the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of states, and the peaceful resolution of conflicts; sees the development of a constructive dialogue with Russia on cooperation to strengthen this order as a basis for peace and stability in Europe;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 273 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Takes the view that a new approach to the EU's relations with its eastern neighbours is needed based on merits, differentiation and the relevant "more for more" principle; believes that supporting those countries that want to draw closer to and step up the integration with the EU must be a top priority for EU foreign policy; is committed, in accordance with Article 49 TEU, to the European perspective for the EU´s eastern European neighbours;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 284 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Welcomes the conclusion in 2014 of Association Agreements including Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, which is a major step in their political and economic convergence towards the EU; takes the view that the association process should be used by the countries concerned to modernise democratic governance, strengthen the rule of law, reform public administration and undertake economic reforms while avoiding social and environmental dumping; urges a substantial increase in EU political, financial and technical assistance to support these reforms; insists, however, on strict conditionality and the need to guarantee accountability for resources spent;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 291 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Welcomes the resultspeaceful and successful conduct of the parliamentary elections held in Ukraine and Moldova in October and December 2014 respectively in line with international democratic standards, and urges the Governments of Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine to progress with reforms relating to political and economic governance and the rule of law; calls on the HR/VP to use all available political, security and economic tools to provide comprehensive support to the Ukrainian and Moldovan Governments on this path;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 296 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls for a close engagement with those eastern European neighbours which have not yet concluded Association Agreements with the EU or wish to deepen and strengthen the relations in different frameworks; recalls, however, that EU assistance can only be effective if there is sufficient ownership on the part of the partner countries; calls on the EU to be more consistent and uniform on the basic principles underlying its approach towards Eastern partners with regard, in particular, to the questions of territorial integrity and sanctions;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 301 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Urges Russia to honour its commitments and international and bilateral obligations, including those enshrined in the UN Charter, the OSCE Helsinki Final Act and, the Budapest Memorandum and the Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership between Russia and Ukraine; strongly condemns Russia´s military intervention and hybrid war against Ukraine, as well as the illegal annexation of Crimea; urges Russia to de- escalate and to withdraw its troops from Ukrainian territory; calls for the immediate and full implementation of the Minsk Protocol;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 325 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Emphasises the need for the EU and its Member States to speak with one voice vis- à-vis Russia; calls on the HR/VP to develop, as a matter of priority, a common EU strategy on Russia, aimed at securing a commitment from Russia on peace and stability in Europe; believes that a good relationship between Russia and the EU would be in the common interest and hopes that Russia will show itself open to such a development by respecting international law and improving its democratic and human rights standards;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 333 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Insists on the need to substantially revise the EU´s policy towards its southern neighbourhood, and to develop a comprehensive strategy focusing the EU’s instruments and scarce budgetary resources on support for the development of civil society, the building of functioning, accountable and inclusive states capable of addressing the socio-economic challenges of and delivering security for their citizens, upholding human rights, confronting religious extremism and enhancing the rule of law, which is a key precondition for investment and economic development; points to the unused potential of cross- border trade within the region; insists on close cooperation on managing migration flows, while respecting human rights;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 344 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Takes the view thatInsists that the revised approach of the EU towards its southern neighbours should be based on differentiation and "the more for more principle", under which additional EU support should be granted to partner governments which are genuinely committed to and make tangible progress towards democratisation, such asnotably Tunisia, Jordan and Morocco;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 350 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33a. Underlines that the lack of progress towards a negotiated two-state solution in the Israel-Palestine conflict only leads to further violence and bloodshed; calls on the EU to take its responsibility and become a genuine actor and facilitator in the Middle East peace process, including through a comprehensive peace initiative for the region; calls on the EU institutions and Member States to take urgent steps to protect the viability of the two-state solution and to create a positive dynamic towards genuine peace negotiations; in this regard, calls on the EU to respond to the expansion of Israeli settlements by applying measures based on international law; calls on the Israeli authorities to immediately halt and revert its settlement policy; stresses that respect for international human rights and humanitarian law by all parties and in all circumstances remains an essential precondition for achieving a just and lasting peace; underlines the particular responsibility under international law of Israel, as the occupying power, to comply with international humanitarian and human rights law;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 355 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Urges the EU leadership to develop, in close coordination with the US and involving major powers (e.g. Russia and China), a strategy encouraging regional actors (including Turkey, Iraq, Jordan, Egypt, Gulf Cooperation Council governments, Iran, the Arab League and Kurdish forces) to unite in order to put an end to proxy wars and halt financial support to fundamentalists, and to develop a solution for peace and stability in the region; supports the engagement of all parties involved in the Middle East peace process in finding a comprehensive, constructive and sustainable solution to the Middle East conflict; emphasises the need to preserve the territorial integrity and national unity of Libya and urges the HR/VP to provide impetus for a stronger engagement of regional actors on mediation and conflict resolution;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 399 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Believes that the US is the EU's key strategic partner, and encourages closer coordination with the US on EU foreign policy, in support of international law and pursuing common approaches to challenges in the EU neighbourhood and at global level; underlines the strategicnotes the ambitious nature of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, which has thewould bypass the existing multilateral system in its potential to enable the transatlantic partners to set global standards and strengthen global governance; believes that Latin America is an important partner for the EU and that various modalities of triangular transatlantic cooperation should be developed;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 408 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
38. WelcomNotes the conclusions of the NATO summit of September 2014 in Wales and calls for the implementation thereof; believes that EU-NATO cooperation should be strengthened and closer planning and coordination undertaken between NATO's smart defence and the EU's pooling and sharing in order to avoid duplication and to make best use of the scarce resources available; reiterates the need to respect the security policies of those EU Member States which are not NATO members;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 422 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
40. WCalls on the HR/VP and the EU Member States to give the EU's nuclear disarmament and arms control policy a new and strong impetus; welcomes the forthcoming UN review of the Non- Proliferation Treaty as a major step towards international peace and security and urges the Member States to take a coordinated and proactive position in the negotiations; welcomes the entry into force of the Arms Trade Treaty and calls for its effective and full implementation; urges the Member States to strictly adhere to the norms established by the EU's Common Position on arms exports;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 428 #

2014/2219(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. CallsStresses that the fight against climate change is an integral part of the EU foreign policy and a fundamental element of its external action and diplomacy; calls, in this regard, for the development of a coherent climate security strategy at EU level that addresses the strategic and political consequences of climate change, allowing the EU to respond to and prepare for climate-induced geopolitical instability; calls for a debate on a forward-looking strategy to address migration occurring as a result of climate change;
2015/01/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 12 #

2014/2040(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make full use of the funds dedicated to support the unemployed youth population; reminds of the decision about the frontloading of the funds under the Youth Employment Initiative as well as the corresponding amounts programmed within the European Social Fund in order to provide the necessary help in the first years of the programming period; Expresses its concerns about the absorption capacity of some Member States with regard to the Youth Employment Initiative; recalls that according to the Council regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020, margins left available below the MFF ceilings for commitment appropriations for the years 2014-2017 shall constitute a Global MFF Margin for commitments, to be made available over and above the ceilings established in the MFF for the years 2016 to 2020 for policy objectives related to growth and employment, in particular youth employment;
2014/07/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 13 #

2014/2040(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for an increase in the financing of EU-level networks in the promotion of social inclusion as these organisations play a key role in promoting actions to eradicate poverty and empower people experiencing poverty and social exclusion in times of an on-going economic and social crisis in Europe;
2014/07/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 16 #

2014/2040(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls for an increase in the financing of EURES as this instrument plays an important role in cross-border employment mobility and can therefore contribute to the fight against unemployment in Europe;
2014/07/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2014/2040(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Proposes to launch a pilot project in form of a feasibility study to be carried out with the objective of identifying possibilities to finance certain highly effective low cost energy efficiency measures in low income households from available EU funds and budget lines, considering also the existing barriers and including a cost-benefit analysis of longer-term energy efficiency measures and possible funds for financing.
2014/07/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The free movement of workers is a key element to the development of a more integrated Union labour market which allows worker mobility from high unemployment areas to areas characterised by labour shortages. It also contributes to increasing diversity and finding the right skills for vacant positions and overcoming bottlenecks in the labour market.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 52 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The provisions of Regulation 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (codification)19 established mechanisms for clearance and for information exchange and the Commission Implementing Decision 2012/733/EU of 26 November 2012 has laid down provisions on the functioning of a network entitled EURES (European Employment Services) in accordance with that Regulation. This regulatory framework needs to be revised to reflect new mobilitytypes of work-, mobility-, and worklife patterns, enhanced requirements for fair mobility, changes in the technology for sharing job vacancy data, the use of a variety of recruitment channels by job seekers and employers and the increasing role of other labour market brokers next to the Public Employment Services ('PES') in the provision of recruitment services. __________________ 19 OJEU, 27.5.2011, L141, p.1 19
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 57 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) Growing interdependency between labour markets calls for reinforced cooperation between employment services and bodies responsible for equality and countering discrimination to bring about freedom of movement for all workers through voluntary and fair labour mobility within the Union in accordance with Article 46 (a) of the Treaty, and therefore a common framework for cooperation should be established between Member States and the Commission on labour mobility within the Union. This framework should bring together job vacancies from across the Union and the possibility of applying for those job vacancies ('clearance'), define the provision of related support services to workers and employers and provide for a common approach to shareing information and providing personalised counselling services necessary to facilitate said co- operation.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 71 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The transnational and cross-border co- operation and the support to all EURES advisors and organisations operating for EURES in Member States would be facilitated by a structure at Union level ('the European Coordination Office') that should provide common information, training activities, tools and guidance, cooperate with Union-level support and antidiscrimination bodies, collate information regarding complaints and issue recommendations on obstacles to mobility. That structure should also be responsible for the development of the 'European Job Mobility portal' (EURES portal), the common IT platform. To guide its work, multiannual work programmes should be developed in consultation with Member States.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 78 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The social partners' participation in the EURES network contributes in particular to the analysis of obstacles to mobility as well as the promotion of fair and voluntary labour mobility within the Union, including in the cross-border regions. Social partners representatives at Union level should therefore be involved in the overall governance structure of the EURES network, while national employers' organisations and trade unions mayshould be involved at national and regional level and should be able to apply to become a EURES Partner.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) A broader membership of the EURES network has social, economic and financial benefits. It improves efficiency in service delivery by facilitating partnerships, enhancing complementarity and quality improvements. It increases the market share of the EURES network insofar as new members make available job vacancies, job applications and curriculum vitae ('CV’s'). Transnational and cross- border co-operation, which is a key feature of the operation of the EURES network, could generate innovative forms of learning and co-operation between employment services, including on quality standards for job vacancies and support services. The EURES network would therefore enhance its relevance as one of the key Union tools available to Member States and the European Commission for supporting concrete measures towards a high level of high-quality employment within the Union.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) One of the EURES network objectives is to support fair intra-Union labour mobility and therefore the minimum common criteria for authorising organisations to join should include the requirement that those organisations commit themselves to fully respect applicable labour standards and, legal requirements and the principle of non- discrimination.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 97 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) To communicate reliable and up to date information to workers and employers on the different aspects of labour mobility and social protection within the Union, the EURES network should seek synergies between, and cooperate with, other bodies, services and Union networks facilitating mobility and informing citizens about their rights under Union law, such as the Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems, the European network of equality bodies (Equinet), Your Europe portal, the European Youth portal and SOLVIT, the organisations responsible for the recognition of professional qualifications and the bodies for the promotion, analysis, monitoring and support of equal treatment of workers, designated in accordance with Directive ../2013 (EU) of [the European Parliament and of the Council on measures facilitating the exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of the freedom of movement for workers].
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 100 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The right of freedom of movement entails the necessity to improve personalised counselling and to set up the means to support clearance, that is to say, the exchange of job vacancies, job applications and CV's, in order to make the labour market fully accessible to both workers and employers in accordance with Article 46(d) of the Treaty, and therefore a common IT platform should be established at Union level and run by the Commission. Securing this right means empowering workers to actually gain access to all employment opportunities throughout the Union.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) A wider and more comprehensive choice of assistance on intra-Union labour mobility opportunities benefits workers, and it is needed to improve the EURES network's potential to provide personalised counselling and support to workers throughout their entire working life, securing their transitions and careers, social rights and careers, in accordance with the life-cycle approach.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 119 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) Support services, including personalised counselling, will help to decrease the obstacles faced by job seekers when exercising their workers' rights under Union law as well as, to make well-informed decisions with regard to social security and to exploit more efficiently all job opportunities, thus securing better individual employment prospects.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 122 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) A profound understanding of labour supply and demand in terms of occupations, sectors and needs of employers would benefit the right of free movement of workers within the Union and therefore support services should include good quality assistance to employers, small and medium sized enterprises in particular. Close working relationships between employment services and employers will increase the pool of job vacancies and job matching of suitable candidates, secure pathways for job seekers in particular those in vulnerable groups and improve labour market intelligence.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 125 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The support services common to all Member States should be defined on the basis of the emerging consensus on successful Member State practices for information, personalised counselling and advice to job seekers and employers. The Commission should ensure that technical and financial assistance is provided to support services, including to EURES advisors.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 129 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Particular attention should be paid to supporting mobility in the cross-border regions for and providing services to frontier workers who are living in one Member State and working in another and have to cope with different national practices and legal systems and encounters specific administrative, legal or tax obstacles to mobility. Member States may choose toshould set up specific support structures in the form of EURES cross-border partnerships, to facilitate this kind of mobility, such structures should, within the framework of the EURES network, address the specific needs for information, guidance, cross- border matching between labour demand and supply and the resulting placements. The EURES cross- border partnerships should involve regional and local authorities, employment services, the social partners and other stakeholders within the EURES network that have cross-border activities.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 142 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) A programming cycle should be established to support the coordination of action on mobility within the Union. To be effective, and to ensure fair mobility, the programming of Member States' activity plans should take into account data on mobility flows and patterns, the data analysis of existing and forecast labour shortages and surpluses, and recruitment experiences and practices under the EURES network and it should consist of a review of the existing resources and tools at the disposal of the organisations in the Member State to facilitate intra-EU labour mobility.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 147 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The sharing of draft activity plans under the programming cycle among Member States should enable the National Coordination Offices, acting on behalf of the Member States, together with the European Coordination Office and with the appropriate involvement of the social partners, to direct the resources of the EURES network toward appropriate actions and projects, and thereby steer the development of the EURES network as a more result-oriented tool responsive to the needs of workers according to the dynamics of labour markets.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 152 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) In order to obtain adequate information for measuring the results of the EURES network, common quantitative and qualitative indicators should be established. Those indicators should guide the organisations participating in the EURES network in identifying their results and should help assess the progress made against the objectives set for the EURES network as a whole, including its contribution towards the implementation of a coordinated strategy for employment in accordance with Article 145 of the Treaty.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 153 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) Whenevere the measures provided for in this Regulation entail the processing of personal data, they must be carried out in accordance with EUnion law on the protection of personal data20 as well as the national implementing measures thereto. Personal data should not be retained for longer than necessary for the purpose for which that data was collected. __________________ 20In particular Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regards to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31) and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.01.2001, p. 1).
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 179 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) related mobility support services to be provided to workers and employers, including by the EURES advisors.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 221 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) The EURES advisors, which are trained specialists who provide personalised information, guidance and placement to jobseekers and employers interested in the European job market and which have specialised expertise in the practical, legal and administrative matters.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 222 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new)
(cb) The EURES cross-border partnerships, which are cross-border bodies established for the purposes of long-term cooperation, on an equal footing, between regional and local employment services, trade unions and employer organisations involved in supporting rights-based labour mobility.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 231 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. EURES cross-border partnerships shall provide cross-border support services in cross-border regions.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 236 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) non-discriminatory access to job opportunities, applications and relevant labour market information;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 245 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) increased social inclusion and integration of persons excluded from the labour market.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 258 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii
(iii) a common training programme for EURES staff; and continuing development for EURES staff, including updates on the coordination of social security, in line with common, high-quality standards;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 259 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii a (new)
(iiia) directly available professional support services for EURES advisors, including technical and financial assistance, coordination and supervision;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 262 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv a (new)
(iva) the widest possible access of EURES services on a non-discriminatory basis;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 265 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the analysis of geographic and occupational mobility with a view to ensuring fair mobility;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 271 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the monitoring and evaluation of EURES activity and its employment performance, and the development of annual country-specific reports and recommendations in co-operation with EURES Members;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 272 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) the collaboration with the Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems, with SOLVIT and with the European network of equality bodies (Equinet).
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 287 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) consultation of stakeholders, including the social partners and relevant civil society organisations.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 291 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the provision of pre-training activities relating to EURES activity, the selection of staffpersons for participation in the common training programme and in mutual learning activities;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 296 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
For the purpose of publication, including on the EURES portal, in the interest of workers and employeand in relation to the provision of tailor-made information to workers and employers by the EURES advisors, the National Coordination Office shall validates, regularly updates and timely disseminatesdisseminate, in a timely manner, in the official language(s) of the Member State and in the most relevant languages taking into account demands of its labour market, information and guidance available at national level on:
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 312 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) access to social and tax advantages, information on pension;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 313 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d b (new)
(db) access to employment;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 314 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d c (new)
(dc) conditions of employment and work, in particular as regards remuneration, dismissal, health and safety, reinstatement and re-employment;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 315 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d d (new)
(dd) trade union membership and the eligibility criteria for workers' representative bodies;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 316 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d e (new)
(de) access to training;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 317 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d f (new)
(df) access to housing;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 318 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d g (new)
(dg) access to education, apprenticeship and vocational training;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 319 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point d h (new)
(dh) assistance provided by the employment offices;
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 323 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) where applicable, and in close cooperation with EURES cross-border partnerships, the situation of frontier workers in particular in cross- border regions.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 329 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. The National Coordination Office shall provides general support to the organisations participating within its own territory in the EURES network regarding collaboration with their EURES counterparts in other Member States. This shall includes support in the case of complaints related to EURES job vacancies and recruitments, as well as cooperation with public authorities such as labour inspectorates. The outcome of complaints procedures shall be made available to the European Coordination Office with a view to synthesising and resolving mobility obstacles.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 341 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. The National Coordination Offices shall collaborate in particular with national equality bodies, the social partners and stakeholders, such as organisation representing unemployed people and vulnerable groups, career guidance services, universities, chambers of commerce and organisations involved in apprenticeships and traineeships schemes.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 342 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. Each Member State ensures that its National Coordination Office gets the staff and adequate financial and other resources necessary to carry out its tasks as defined under this Regulation and that the National Coordination Offices provide services in accordance with common, high-quality standards and in a timely manner.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 388 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7
7. To amend the Annex, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 33.deleted
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 442 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
3. Organisations participating in the EURES network ensure that the information and promotional material they provide is coherent with the overall communication activities and common, high-quality standards of the EURES network and with the information coming from the European Coordination Office.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 444 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. The European Coordination Office facilitates the collaboration of the EURES network with other Union information and advisory services and networks and shall seek synergies with the Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems, SOLVIT, and the European network of equality bodies (Equinet).
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 480 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. The consent of workers referred to in paragraph 1(b) shall be explicit, unambiguous, freely given, specific and informed. Workers shall be able to withdraw at any time their consent and require the deletion or modification of any of all of the data made available. Workers shall be able to choose from a number of options to restrict access to their data or to certain attributes, such as deciding whether their data may only be searchable via general data categories or whether their CV and personal data may be directly available to registered potential employers.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 489 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that in the internal tools for caseworkers managed by the public employment services all job vacancies, job applications, and CVs made available on the EURES portal, in accordance with Article 14, shall be available on a par with any national data in those tools.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 501 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission, building on the existing tools such as the European Qualification Framework, shall develop a European classification of skills, competences, qualifications and occupations. This classification is the tool facilitating on line job application across borders for the European Union by performing job matching, identifying skills shortages, recognising qualifications and providing career guidance on the EURES portal.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 510 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission provides financial and technical support to Member States who choose to replace national classifications with the classification referred to in paragraph 1.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 517 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. The public employment services shall ensure that workers using their services, by making available job applications and/or CVs with them, can choose to have those employment services assist those workers with their registration on the EURES portal, using the national hub referred to in Article 15(5). That service shall be offered on a non-discriminatory basis and without delay.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 525 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
4. Workers and employers shall have access to generaldetailed information on how, when and where they can update, revise and withdraw the data concerned.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 528 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that workers and employers can gain access to support services at national level without delay.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 532 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(c a) through EURES cross-border partnerships; or
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 550 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) is non-discriminatory and easily accessible and is presented in a user friendly manner.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 555 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall develop specific information for frontier workers in those cross border regions where the Member States concerned together deem it necessary to set up specific co-operation and service structures, including EURES cross-border partnerships.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 557 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. The European Coordination Office supports the development of basic information under this Article and assists Member States in ensuring an adequate language coverage, taking into account the demands of the Member States’ labour markets.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 561 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. The EURES Partners concerned proactively offer all workers seeking employment the opportunity to access the services defined in this Article without delay. Where appropriate, this offer is repeated during the job search process.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 564 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. If workers are interested in further assistance, the EURES Partners concerned provide information and guidance on individual employment opportunities and in particular offer them the following servicespersonalised services, free of charge:
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 565 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(a a) to provide information and guidance as referred to in Article 7(3);
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 583 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. If workers are interested in further assistance and there is a reasonable likelihood of an intra-EU placement, the EURES Partners concerned provide further job search assistance, consisting of services such as the selection of suitable vacancies, assistance with drawing up job applications and CV's and providing translations and/or obtaining clarifications on specific job vacancies in other Member States.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 617 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. The EURES Partners concerned shall provide, upon request of workers and employers, general information on post- recruitment assistance and about where to obtain post-recruitment assistance such as training on intercultural communication, language courses and support with integration.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 634 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1, Member States shall support the development of integrated online access as a first source of information for workers, frontier workers and employers and further personalised services provided by the EURES advisors.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 640 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. Upon request of workers, frontier workers, their representatives and employers, the EURES Partners concerned shall provide general information on the rights related to social security and undertake to refer those requests for specific information to the competent authorities and, if applicable, other bodies supporting workers exercising their rights in the framework of the freedom of movement.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 666 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Each National Coordination Office shall evaluate and share the European Coordination Office's country- specific report and recommendation with the EURES partners.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 667 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1
1. Each National Coordination Office shall draws up each year aan annual work programme based on the European Coordination Office's country-specific report and recommendation for the organisations participating in the EURES network on that Member State's territory.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 678 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) results about service efficiency and quality, obtained by the completion of a standardised questionnaire by EURES- advisors.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 679 #

2014/0002(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States and the European Coordination Office shall ensure that personal data produced or collected in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 is retained for a period no longer than is necessary for the purpose for which it was collected.
2015/02/05
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 4 #

1998/0031R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas respect for democracy and fundamental and human rights, and for the principles of a market economy, which constitute essential elements of the ITA (as set out in both Article 1 therein and Article 2 of the PCA), should remain long-termfundamental goals for Turkmenistan; whereas the unilateral suspension of application is a possibility in the event that either party were to violate these elements;
2018/12/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 5 #

1998/0031R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the Interim Trade Agreement with Turkmenistan concluded by the Council on 27 July 2009 and currently in force, in spite of the provisions on the respect for human rights and democracy and the expectations of the Council, the Commission and the European Parliament at the time of its adoption, did not bring about any substantial improvement in these fields;
2018/12/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 7 #

1998/0031R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas similar Partnership and Cooperation Agreements with neighbouring countries in the post-Soviet region such as Tajikistan and previously Uzbekistan have not enabled the EU to meaningfully advance reforms in these countries, nor have these countries become more "incentivised" to protect and promote fundamental human rights;
2018/12/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 12 #

1998/0031R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1– point i
(i) A clear division between the executive, legislative and judiciary branches, including a consultation with international experts such as the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe and the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), on the compliance of the Constitution of Turkmenistan with these democratic principles, and a demonstrated willingness to incorporate into law the recommendations for reform proposed by these organizations;
2018/12/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 16 #

1998/0031R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point iv
(iv) An end to enforced disappearances, the provision of information to the families of the forcibly disappeared about the fate or whereabouts of their relatives, allowing families of the forcibly disappeared to have letters, visits, phone calls, with their loved ones in custody, the release of those disappeared whose term is due to expire, acknowledgment by the country’s authorities of the existence of political prisoners and unhindered access to the country for international organisations and independent monitors, including the International Committee of the Red Cross;
2018/12/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 26 #

1998/0031R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point v a (new)
(va) End the persecution and intimidation of independent journalists and civil society activists based in the country as well as abroad and their family members;
2018/12/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 29 #

1998/0031R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point vi
(vi) Freedom of movement within the country and abroad to ensure that people who have been denied – formally and informally – permission to leave the country are able to travel freely, demonstrating over a significant period of time that the government will desist from further interference with foreign travel;
2018/12/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 39 #

1998/0031R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point v
(v) General freedom of movement, both within and outside the country; , and an amendment of the constitution to specifically include the right to foreign travel;
2018/12/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 41 #

1998/0031R(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point vi
(vi) Allowing access for UN special procedures and to those rapporteurs that have asked to visit the country and for international and regional human rights organizations;
2018/12/12
Committee: AFET