BETA

14 Amendments of Marc JOULAUD related to 2018/2054(INI)

Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 17 April 2018 on strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU: the 7th report of the European Commission1a
2018/05/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Emphasizes the importance of sport for the economic and social development of cross-border regions, as demonstrated by the numerous territorial cooperation projects that used sport as a tool for social and cultural integration;
2018/05/24
Committee: CULT
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses the need of a more substantial economic commitment to the promotion of cross-border sports activities and in particular for the construction of small-scale infrastructures for grass-roots sports;
2018/05/24
Committee: CULT
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas several challenges faced by the external border regions of the EU, especially the outermost regions, would also merit a stance being adopted by the Commission;
2018/05/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines the fact that language barriers are still an important obstacle to cross-border cooperation, especially in border areas without a longstanding tradition of cooperation; believes that a more targeted use of ESI funds can support the systematic promotion, also through the organization of sporting and cultural events, of multilingualism in education and training in border regions, from early childhood education onwards;
2018/05/24
Committee: CULT
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Points to the challenges related to business activities carried out in the border regions, in particular when related to taxation, public procurement or social security systems; calls on the Member States to better align and harmonise the relevant legal provisions and achieve convergence in regulatory frameworks, in order to allow for more flexibility in the implementation of national legislation, as well as to improve the dissemination of information on cross-border issues, e.g. by creating one-stop-shops, while guaranteeing funding for existing cooperation structures;
2018/05/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Underlines that regions have a proved capacity in developing cross- border cooperation in the sector of the cultural and creative industries (CCIs) and notes the positive effects of smart specialisation; asks the Commission and the Member States to maintain and strengthen the policies in this field and to use effectively the funding available under EU programmes and the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIFs);
2018/05/24
Committee: CULT
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that transport services are still insufficiently developed in the border regions, which hampers cross- border mobility; stresses, furthermore, that cross-border transport infrastructure is also particularly adversely affected by complex regulatory and administrative arrangements; awaits the forthcoming Commission study on missing railway links along internal EU borders; underlines that any such study or future recommendations should be based on information and experience from local and regional authorities; calls for a CEF axis, with an adequate budget, to be dedicated to filling the missing links in transport infrastructure in border regions;
2018/05/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines that sports tourism is an increasingly important sector of the European economy; therefore calls for the allocation of financial resources to the construction of sports infrastructures with a view to promoting tourism through sport;
2018/05/24
Committee: CULT
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that mutual trust, political will and a flexible approach among multi-level stakeholders are vital to overcoming the abovementioned persistent obstacles and boosting growth and development in border regions; calls, therefore, for better coordination, dialogue and a further exchange of best practices among authorities; urges the Commission and the Member States to enhance such cooperation and provide funding for cooperation structures;
2018/05/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that some border regions face serious migration challenges, and encourages the measured use of Interreg programmes, as well as the exchange of good practices between local and regional authorities in the border areas, in the framework of the integration of refugees under international protection, while respecting the sovereignty of the Member States; underlines the need for national governments to support local and regional authorities in addressing these challenges;
2018/05/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Awaits the Commission’s position on internal maritime as well as external border regions; reiterates, in this context, that the features of and the challenges faced by all border regions are common to some extent, while requiring a differentiated approach; stresses the need to give special attention and adequate support to outermost regions along the external borders of the EU;
2018/05/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Stresses that future cohesion policy must provide adequate support to the European regions most exposed to the consequences of the UK's exit from the European Union, in particular those that will, as a result, find themselves situated on external EU (sea or land) borders;
2018/05/23
Committee: REGI
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Underlines the positive role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes in the development and cohesion of border regions; calls on the Commission to preserve ETC as an important objective, with a more distinct role within cohesion policy post-2020, as well as a significantly increased budget, particularly for the cross-border component; underlines at the same time the need to simplify the programmes and reduce the administrative burdens for beneficiaries;
2018/05/23
Committee: REGI