BETA

Activities of Angélique DELAHAYE related to 2016/2100(INI)

Plenary speeches (1)

Annual report on EU competition policy (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2016/2100(INI)

Amendments (16)

Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas the most recent reform of the common agricultural policy (CAP) sought to strengthen the position of farmers in the food supply chain through a series of derogations and exemptions from the provisions of Article 101 TFEU, but whereas that reform does not provide the Member States with the tools they need to implement it effectively;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that competition policy must attach the same importance to defending the interests and well-being of agricultural producers as it does to defending consumers’ interests, ensuring that the conditions for competition are fair so as to foster investment, employment and innovation in agricultural markets;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that the current crisis situation in farming calls for fresh initiatives to ensure that competition policy takes better account of the specific nature of agriculture, through the use of fast- working, tailored and effective risk- and crisis-management tools;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Finds it regrettable that the scope of the current derogations is unclear, that implementation problems have arisen and that national competition authorities do not apply them derogations in a uniform way; calls, in that connection, on the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council a survey of the use made by farmers in the Member States of the derogations available under Article 225 of the CMO Regulation;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to broaden its approach in terms of criteria for determining whether an agricultural undertaking, or a number of such undertakings linked by a horizontal agreement, is deemed to be in a ‘dominant position’ or 'abusing a dominant position', taking into consideration the degree of concentration in sectors downstream;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 56 #
5. Considers that the concept of the ‘relevant market’ needs to evolve and to be understood primarily from an EU-wide perspective so as not to jeopardise efforts to concentrate agricultural supply by narrowly compartmentalising the activities that agricultural undertakings may engage in;(Does not affect the English version.)
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that the collective activities of producer organisations and their associations, such as production planning and sales negotiation, are necessary for achieving the aims of the CAP and that they should benefit from a presumption of compatibility with Articles 39 and 101 TFEU;, so that the Commission encourages and supports any measure designed to give a sector a clear structure and to strengthen the position of farmers in negotiations between producers, industry representatives and distributors.
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the recent publication of guidelines on the application of the specific rules set out in Articles 169, 170 and 171 of the CMO Regulation and calls for competition law to be adapted on the basis of an overview which takes the specific features of each sector into account;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 110 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission and the national competition authorities to address the concerns raised by the cumulative impact – particularly at the upper end of the food supply chain – of, on the one hand, rapid national- level concentration in the distribution sector and, on the other, the development of European-level alliances of major distributors, both at the upper end of the food supply chain and on distributors and consumers, as this structural development is raising concerns as regards possible strategic alignments, reduced competition and a narrowing of the margins which make investment in innovation possible.
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 116 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Deplores the fact that initiatives taken by food supply-chain actors to lend collective support to a link in the chain which is experiencing difficulties are giving rise to problems connected with the differing interpretations of competition law by European and national authorities;
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 124 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Takes the view that it is for the Commission to establish a framework which guarantees legal security for farmers, since the latter cannot be expected to acquire expertise in the area of competition law.
2016/10/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 329 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Recalls that Article 42 TFEU accords the agricultural sector a special status as regards competition law that is specified in the latest reform of the common agricultural policy by strengthening the position of farmers in the food supply chain and allowing for general or specific derogations to Article 101 TFEU;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 337 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Notes that the increased volatility of agricultural prices and the crises in the agricultural markets, especially in the dairy sector, accentuate the structurally weak position of farmers in the food supply chain;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 341 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20c. Considers that the lack of clarity as to the scope of these derogations, difficulties in implementation and the lack of uniform application by national competition authorities do not provide sufficient legal certainty for farmers and their organisations wishing to apply the right of derogation;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 345 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 d (new)
20d. Calls on the European Commission to adopt new initiatives to take better account of the specific nature of agriculture in the application of competition policy and to ensure a complete and satisfactory implementation of the general derogation for agriculture and the specific derogations for the dairy, olive oil, beef and veal, and arable crops sectors;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 348 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 e (new)
20e. Calls on the Commission and the national competition authorities to address the concerns raised by the cumulative impact at the upper end of the food supply chain of national-level concentration in the distribution sector and the development of European-level alliances of distributors;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON