7 Amendments of Cláudia MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR related to 2018/0012(COD)
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 32 a (new)
Recital 32 a (new)
(32a) The specificities of the Outermost Regions, enshrined under Article 349 of the TFEU, must be taken into consideration when ensuring the adequacy of port reception facilities to those regions. Specific measures must therefore be put in place.
Amendment 123 #
4a. Member States shall be able to grant a two years' derogation from the obligations laid down in Article 4 for their Outermost Regions, if they consider that those Regions are not able to ensure the adequacy of port reception facilities.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. An appropriate waste reception and handling plan shall be in place and implemented for each port following ongoing consultations with the relevant parties, in particular with port users or their representatives. Those consultations should be held both during the initial drafting of the plans and after their adoption, in particular when significant changes have taken place, with regards to the requirements in Articles 4, 6, and 7. The detailed requirements for the development of such plans are set out in Annex 1. Small ports with rare or low traffic from recreational crafts are exempted from the obligation set out in this paragraph. The Commission shall develop guidelines for the interpretation of this exemption.
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
This requirement shall not apply in small unmanned ports, small ports or in remotely located ports, provided that the Member State where such a port is located has reported this information electronically in the part of the information, monitoring and enforcement system referred to in Article 14 of this Directive.
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) in order to provide for a maximum incentive for the delivery of waste as defined in Annex V to the MARPOL Convention, including the waste that has been collected in nets during fishing operations, the indirect fee to be charged shall cover all the costs of port reception facilities for this waste, in order to ensure a right of delivery without any additional direct charges. The indirect fee shall cover quantities normally delivered with respect to the category, type and size of the ship;
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) The indirect fee of subparagraph (c) shall not cover services provided outside normal operating hours in the port and hazardous waste;
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 5
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. The fees shallmay be reduced if the ship’s design, equipment and operation are such that it can be demonstrated that the ship produces reduced quantities of waste, and manages its waste in a sustainable and environmentally sound manner. The Commission shall be empowered by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 19, to define the criteria for determining that a ship meets the requirements stated in this paragraph in relation to the ship’s on-board waste management.