9 Amendments of Cláudia MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR related to 2020/2260(INI)
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
Citation 1
— having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and, in particular Article 192(1) and Article 349 thereof,
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 b (new)
Citation 8 b (new)
- having regard to the Commission communication of 24 October 2017 entitled ‘A stronger and renewed strategic partnership with the EU’s outermost regions’ (COM(2017)623),
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
Citation 9 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission communication of 20 June 2012 entitled ‘The outermost regions of the European Union: towards a partnership for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ (COM(2012) 287),
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 a (new)
Citation 21 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 14 June 2017 on promoting cohesion and development in the outermost regions of the EU: implementation of Article 349 of the TFEU (2016/2250(INI)),
Amendment 319 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the implementation of this strategy will have to take into account the different starting points and differences in potential for improvement of the various Member States and their regions; whereas, consequently, the transition to a healthy and sustainable food system will naturally have an impact on the economic fabric of many EU regions, such as the outermost regions, with natural disadvantages, such as distance, the fact that they are islands, small surface area, rugged terrain, harsh climate and undiversified agricultural sectors that account for a large proportion of their economies; whereas, on the other hand, there is potential for the exploitation of those regions’ renewable resources and biodiversity;
Amendment 1035 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Emphasises that the EU quality schemes already incorporate the guidelines laid down in the farm to fork strategy, and therefore already contribute to sustainable farming and to the development of rural communities in the EU; urges the Commission to increase the total amounts allocated to promotion, awareness-raising and recognition campaigns in respect of these schemes, in particular those relating to:(i) Products bearing the labels of the protected designation of origin (PDO), protected geographical indication (PGI), traditional speciality guaranteed (TSG) and voluntary certification schemes;(ii) The organic production method;(iii) The logo for quality agricultural products specific to the outermost regions of the Union;
Amendment 1066 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the notion of rewarding carbon sequestration in soils; stresses, however, that intensive and industrial agriculture and farming models with severe and proven negative impacts on biodiversity should not receive climate funding or be incentivised; calls for the proposals to be in line with the environmental objectives and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the Green Deal; stresses, therefore, the need to measure effectively the negative impact of agriculture on biodiversity and the environment; recalls that the outermost regions constitute prime areas for introducing pilot projects; urges the Commission, in this connection, to establish a programme to support the reconversion of farms that employ intensive agriculture methods by making support, qualified technical advice and adequate funding available in these regions;
Amendment 1253 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for CAP National Strategic Plans to ensure adequate financial support and incentives to promote new ecological ‘green’ business models for agriculture and artisanal food production, notably through fostering short supply chains, in particular for local and regional products, and quality food production;
Amendment 2101 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Underlines the importance EU funding for research and innovation as a key driver in accelerating the transition to a more sustainable, healthy and inclusive European food system while facilitating investments needed to encourage agro- ecological practices in both social and technological innovation, and the crucial role of farm advisory services in ensuring the transfer of knowledge to the farming community, drawing on the existing specialised training systems for farmers in Member States; emphasises the importance of higher education institutions in fostering the promotion of research and innovation, and providing advice on agroecological best practices; recognises the role of universities in the development and transition of the agri- food sectors of regions with distinct characteristics, such as the outermost regions;