Activities of Gilles LEBRETON related to 2015/2326(INI)
Legal basis opinions (0)
Amendments (12)
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the Framework Agreement on Relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission provides for sharing of information concerning all infringement procedures based on letters of formal notice, but does not cover the informal EU Pilot procedure which precedes the opening of formal infringement proceedings;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that the primary responsibility for the correct implementation and application of EU law lies with the Member States, but points out that this does not absolve the EU institutions of their duty to respectPoints out that the EU institutions are required to comply with EU primary EU law when they produceadopt secondary EU law or impose policies on the Member States;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out that the EU institutions are bound by the subsidiarity principle and must not encroach on the prerogatives of the Member States; calls for closer dialogue with the national parliaments, in particular when they express concerns about compliance with the subsidiarity principle;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. WelcomNotes the Commission’s 32nd ‘Annual Report on Monitoring the Application of EU Law’, and notes that environment, transport, and internal market and services were the policy areas in 2013 in which most infringement cases remained open in 2014;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Deplores, more specifically, the fact that there has been no follow-up to its call for binding rules in the form of a regulation setting out the various aspects of the infringement and pre-infringement procedure – including notifications, binding time limits, the right to be heard, the obligation to state reasons, and the right for every person to have access to his or her file – so as to reinforce citizens’ rightthe rights of natural or legal persons from the Member States and guarantee transparency;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls, in this context, that the Committee on Legal Affairs has set up a new Working Group on Administrative Law which has decided to elaborate an actual draft regulation on the administrative procedure of the Union’s administration as a ‘source of inspiration’ for the Commission, not in order to question the Commission’s right of initiative, but to show that such a regulation would be both useful and feasible to enacadopt;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Believes that the intent of this draft regulation is not to replace existing EU legislation, but rather to supplement this when there are gaps, and to bring more clarity and coherence to the interpretation of existing rules, for the benefit of citizepersons and businesses from the Member States and of the administration and its officials;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12