BETA

11 Amendments of António MARINHO E PINTO related to 2015/2092(INI)

Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas current innovations that improve the selectivity of fishing gear are frequently hindered by legislation;
2015/10/20
Committee: PECH
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas the discard ban involves a radical change of approach to fisheries management, with special attention to demersal fisheries, and hence to technical measures in key areas such as catch composition;
2015/10/20
Committee: PECH
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that, in order to make CFP rules more acceptable to the fisheries sector and ensure compliance therewith, fishermen must be more involved in decision making, in particular within the RAC, given incentives such as more aid for innovation and encouraged to use more selective fishing gear;
2015/10/20
Committee: PECH
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Considers that the new legislative framework shall facilitate the further use of innovative fishing gears which have scientifically proven to increase the selectivity and simultaneously have a reduced impact on the environment;
2015/10/20
Committee: PECH
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Considers it necessary to maintain the co-decisionordinary legislative procedure for the adoption of rules common to all sea basins or for those are not likely to be amended within the foreseeable future; believes that measures adopted at regional level - through regionalisation - should be in line with the technical measures framework and coherent with the objectives of the CFP; considers that measures that need frequent changes shall be evaluated at regular periods on order to ensure they remain relevant purposeful;
2015/10/20
Committee: PECH
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Believes codecision to be unnecessary for measures adopted at regional level or possibly subject to frequent changes;Deleted
2015/10/20
Committee: PECH
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that rules regarding technical measures should be structured on three co-decisional axes and a fourth regionalisation axis. The first three would comprise a set of common centralised rules, a set of specific rules for the larger sea basins and a number of specific technical regulations, all off which would be adopted by co-decision; Notes that regionalisation would apply to rules applicable at regional level or subject to frequent changes;Deleted
2015/10/20
Committee: PECH
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Considers it necessary to assess the suitability, effectiveness and socio- economic implications for EU fleets of specific regulations based on technical measures, such as those concerning driftnets, incidental cetacean catches, the ban on on-board shark finning or deep- sea fishing;Deleted
2015/10/20
Committee: PECH
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that there is an urgent need to establish a coherent set of technical operational procedures for each of the three main basins, taking account of the specific nature of each, especially that of the Mediterranean, where Community decisions may have a significant impact on competition between European and third-country fishing fleets;.
2015/10/20
Committee: PECH
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Maintains that, notwithstanding the discard ban, provisions regarding technical measures in areas such as catch composition must be sufficiently flexible to adapt in real time to progress in the fisheries and more selective fishing techniquesin order to provide more opportunities for the fisheries sector to implement innovations regarding selective fishing methods into practice;
2015/10/20
Committee: PECH
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Maintains that it is necessary to devise future multiannual plans for achieving and maintaining stocks above the maximum sustainable yield, including an advance timetable, a conservaprecautionary safeguard trigger, a minimum target biomass, a mechanism for adapting to changes inupdated scientific thinkingadvice and a review clause; ;
2015/10/20
Committee: PECH