10 Amendments of Marie-Christine ARNAUTU related to 2018/2023(INI)
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the decarbonisation of transport will strengthencould improve Europe’s energy security and independence vis-à-vis imported energy and fossil fuels, and will therefore requires a swift and substantial change in the type of energy, fuels and powertrains used, as well as an increase in energy efficiency, by deploying the most efficient technologies and changing mobility behaviour;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas transport is the only major economic sector in the European Union where greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have increased since 1990, in particular as a result of the desired increase in the trade in goods between the Member States of the Union; whereas it is responsible for 23 % of CO2 emissions, and this share is still growing; whereas road transport accounts for almost 75 % of all energy used in transport and causes almost 73 % of the transport sector’s greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas, in order to keep the increase in the global temperature to well below 2°C while pursuing the 1.5°C target as signed up to in the Paris Agreement, road transport needs to be fulat least partly decarbonised with zero net emissions by 2050 at the latest;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas switching to alternative fuels and powertrains is the best means to decarbonise the existing and future vehicle fleet; whereas the overall effect will be even greater when combined with increased vehicle efficiency, use of public transport and bikes, the development of shared mobility and improvements to the overall efficiency of transport systems through C-ITS systems and automation and digitalisation technology; whereas urban and spatial planning can support and complement the technological efforts; whereas the will to develop short supply chains is essential for dealing with the problem comprehensively;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the price disadvantages of alternative-fuel vehicles compared to regular internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles are still one of the main barriers to customers’ purchasing decisions; whereas, in this context, buyers’ premiums, tax exemptions and non-fiscal incentives have proven to accelerate market uptake and should reflect the GHG performance of different alternative fuels;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the recast of the Directive on emission standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles will hopefully set ambitious reduction targets and incentivise low and zero- emission vehicles, thus leading the way to a decarbonised European vehicle fleet that emits lower amounts of carbon pollutants, which will require the deployment of an adequate infrastructure network for alternative fuels;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Suggests an annual evaluation of the Member States’ implementation status and broadening of the Directive’s scope to shift it from deployment along the TEN-T network to also covering urban and regional nodes and the infrastructure for public fleets and heavy goods vehicles;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to create a level playing field between the different alternative fuels, thus makpromoting hydrogen infrastructure mandatory other alternative solutions with deployment requirements equal to those for CNG, but adjusting these deployment requirements in accordance with their contribution to decarbonisation;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Suggests setting up a European Clean Mobility Fund to cover the estimated necessary investment of EUR 25 billion up to 2025; calls for the fund to be co- financed, with the European Union contributing 150 % and 950 % coming from industry, notably manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, energy and fuel producers and other interested parties; suggests that, by contributing to the fund, companies or consortia should be granted preferential access to grants and loans provided by the CEF, EIB and EC IPE; requests that financial resources from the fund should be awarded according to the criteria of feasibility, European added value, and the achievement of deployment goals and cohesion policy; asks that the INEA, which already oversees the CEF, become the responsible agency;