BETA

12 Amendments of Mireille D'ORNANO related to 2018/2974(RSP)

Amendment 12 #

Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that European citizens already face direct impacts of climate change, especially in the overseas territories; underlines that according to the European Environment Agency, average annual losses caused by weather and climate-related extremes in the Union amounted to around €12.8 billion between 2010 and 2016, and that, if no further action is taken, climate damages in the EU could amount to at least €190 billion by 2080, equivalent to a net welfare loss of 1.8% of its current GDP;
2019/02/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 27 #

Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that, according to the IPCC 1.5 Special report, limiting global warming to 1.5°C with no or limited overshoot implies to reach net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally by 2060 at the latest, and to cap global GHG emissions by 2030 to around 25-30 GtCO2eq per year, which involves considerable effort;
2019/02/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 40 #

Paragraph 4
4. Recalls its demand expressed in its COP23 resolution for the Commission to prepare by COP24 a mid-century zero emissions strategy for the Union; welcomes takes note in this regard of the publication of the Commission Communication "A Clean Planet for all – A European strategic long- term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy"; asks the Member States to agree on a net- zero 2050 strategy, as part of the future Europe debate, at the special EU summit in Sibiu in May 2019;
2019/02/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 48 #

Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the strategy presents eight pathways for the economic, technological and social transformation needed for the Union to comply with the long-term temperature goal of the Paris Agreement; stresses that there are many ways to reach net-zero GHG emissions by 2050 at the latest, but that this requires swift action from the local and regional levels to the national level; calls on and implies considerable efforts on the part of all the economic actors; invites the Member States to put in place clear targets and policies and provide investment support for net-zero pathways and adopt long-term strategies as foreseen in the Governance Regulation;
2019/02/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 60 #

Paragraph 7
7. Points that the EU GDP is expected to increase more under zero emissions scenarios than in scenarios with lower emission reductions (although these forecasts are always risky and must be taken with great care), however this may be spread unevenly across the EU; considers that the price of non-action would be by far the costliest scenario and would not only result in massive GDP loss in Europe, but also further increase economic inequalities between Member States as some are expected to be harder hit than others by the consequences of inaction;
2019/02/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 88 #

Paragraph 9
9. Notes however that those pathways rely to a large extent on carbon removal technologies, including through carbon capture and storage and direct air capture, that yet have to prove their feasibility and will only be possible at the cost of heavy investment in research and development; considers that the EU net-zero strategy should not overly rely on such technologies, which should complement direct emissions reductions; believes that further action by 2030 is needed if the Union is to avoid relying on carbon removal technologies that would entail significant risks for ecosystems, biodiversity and food security as confirmed by the IPCC 1.5 report;
2019/02/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 112 #

Paragraph 10
10. WelcomNotes that the Commission clearly expresses that net-zero emissions are possible without net job losses and that they put a lot of emphasis on the transition in the energy intensive industry; highlights that a just transition towards net-zero GHG emissions has the potential to create a net gain of more than 1 million additional jobs in the Union;
2019/02/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 122 #

Paragraph 11
11. BelievesInsists on the fact that Europe's climate transition must be ecologically, economically and socially sustainable; emphasises that tailor-made and sufficiently funded strategies will need to be designed in close collaboration with local and regional public authorities, trade unions, educational institutions, civil society organisations and the private sector, to ensure equal opportunities are offered to all European citizens in this transition;
2019/02/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 193 #

Paragraph 18
18. Emphasises that emissions will have to be reduced close to zero in all sectors of the economy which should all contribute in the joint efforts to reduce emissions; stresses the importance of the polluter pays principle in this regard; insists on the urgency of a massive and rapid reduction of carbon emissions linked to the production of electricity, and therefore of a rapid abandonment of thermal power stations, in particular those operating on coal;
2019/02/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 212 #

Paragraph 19
19. Considers that technology developments and solutions, energy efficiency and sustainable renewable energy in the transport and power sectors will be key; underlines in this respect the importance of technology-specific strategies, such as for hydrogen or methane; considers that the nuclear industry must also be considered as one of the solutions of the future provided that it is safe and monitored;
2019/02/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 352 #

Paragraph 29
29. Stresses the importance of creating a just transition fund, especially for the most affected regions and in those that could be in the future, with a general horizontal streamlining of social aspects into existing climate funding;
2019/02/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 358 #

Paragraph 30
30. Highlights the significant impact of behavioural change in achieving GHG emissions reduction, including from the transport sector and particularly the aviation sector; calls on the Commission to explore as soon as possible policy options to encourage behavioural change; recalls that changes in behavior are affected by the examples given by the "elites" and in particular the managers of large companies or administrations, whose current behavior in terms of CO2 emissions is far from exemplary
2019/02/04
Committee: ENVI