Activities of Dominique MARTIN related to 2016/2242(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on control of spending and monitoring of EU Youth Guarantee schemes’ cost-effectiveness
Amendments (7)
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that effective mechanisms to discuss and resolve difficulties experienced when implementing YG schemes are needed, together with a strong commitment byand that the Member States are urged to implement the scope of the YG in fullsuch mechanisms, including partnership- building, ensuring an effective outreach to young Europeans, enabling skills enhancement and putting in place proper evaluation structuretargeted and transparent evaluation structures with a view to rationalising the YG and taking the requisite measures to address any imbalances in terms of cost effectiveness;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that preventive interventions and structural reform efforts by the Member States are neededthe Member States are encouraged to take preventive intervention measures in order to reap the benefits of the YG and ensure the success of young Europeans’ school-to-work transitions of young people;: stresses in this regard the importance of training PES personnel, capacity building and cooperation national programmes to help young people enter the workforce, bridge traineeships and sandwitch NGOs, where relevantcourses, as well as training PES personnel;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that a more diversified approach in the provision of services to different groups within the youth population is needed in order to avoid ‘cherry-picking’;: stresses that a merit- based approach must be central to the YG, and calls for a stronger outreach to young people facing multiple barriers (e.g. young people with disabilities);
Amendment 102 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to ensure the provision ofprovide follow-up data to assess the long- term sustainability of outcomes, ensuring that such data are protected and anonymous;
Amendment 106 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Finds it regrettable that the Commission should include the evaluation of the YG in the European Semester process; considers that the indicators used in the two programmes must necessarily be different and that separate evaluation is thus called for;
Amendment 117 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Cautions against the repeated take- up of the YG, which goes against the spirit of labour market activation and, the aim of transition into permanent employment and the principle of the sound use of public money.