4 Amendments of Jean-Luc SCHAFFHAUSER related to 2016/2273(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that the development of eGovernment is a key element of the Digital Single Market; welcomes the Commission Communication entitled ‘EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016-2020’; supports the underlying principles of the Action Plan, which will make public administrations more inclusive, trustworthy and efficient, providing open and interlinked digital services; wWelcomes the fact that administrative burdens and costs will be reduced by adopting the once- only principle;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that adequate, reliable and high-performance infrastructure, such as ultrafast broadband and telecommunications networks, are essential for the functioning of eGovernment services; notes that the continuous adoption of innovative technologies, such as big data and the internet of things or the uptake of mobile services for eGovernment will be essential for keeping up with technological development; believes that the development of eGovernment services must not be used as a pretext for discontinuing the physical presence of public administrations across large swathes of territory, such as in rural and island areas;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises the importance of developing cross-borderonline public services, such as the full deployment of highly secure eID and e-signatures; notes that there is still a lack of interoperability of different public services between Member States; welcomes in this regard the revision of the European Interoperability Framework and the swift implementation of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 (eIDAS)believes strongly that the development of eGovernment ought not to create competition between administrations in Europe or 'administrative shopping', which would destroy user trust in the digitisation and modernisation of procedures and result in civil servants no longer subscribing to these;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that public administrations should have open data by default especially when the volume of data generated is very large, such as in the case of the INSPIRE programme; stresses the importance of making data and services securely available for re-use through third parties; highlights the vital role that public-private partnerships and the privattakes the view that in order to protect their vital interests States are entitled to restrict the usector can play in developing new and innovative services and solutions and localisation of strategic public data; highlights the fact that most public- private partnerships are financial black holes for the budget of the States concerned;