BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps

70 Amendments of Joëlle MÉLIN related to 2017/0114(COD)

Amendment 58 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) All heavy duty vehicles have significant impact on road infrastructure and contribute to air pollution, while light duty vehicles are at the source of the majority of the negative environmental and social impacts from road transport related to emissions and congestion. In the interest of equal treatment and fair competition, it should be ensured that vehicleslight duty vehicles intended for the carriage of goods which are so far not covered by the framework set out in Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council15 in respect of tolls and user charges are included into this framework. The scope of that Directive should therefore be extended to heavy duty vehicles other than those intended for the carriage of goods and to light duty vehicles, including passenger carlight duty vehicles. _________________ 15 Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1999 on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures (OJ L 187, 20.7.1999, p. 42).
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 82 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) In order to promote vehicles whose direct emissions of CO2 are zero (electric, hydrogen, etc.), the Member States should be allowed to remove user charges and tolls for these vehicles.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 87 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) Road congestion, to which all motor vehicles contribute in different proportions, represents a cost of about 1 % of GDP. A significant part of this cost can be attributed to interurban congestion. A specific congestion charge should therefore be allowed, on condition that it is applied to all vehicle categories except for private and utility vehicles which are not transporting goods. In order to be effective and proportionate, the charge should be calculated on the basis of the marginal congestion cost and differentiated according to location, time and vehicle category. In order to maximise the positive effect of congestion charges, corresponding revenues should be allocated to projects addressing the sources of the problem.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 94 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) In case a Member State introduces a system of road charging, compensations granted may, according to the case, result in the discrimination of non-resident road users. The possibility to grant compensation at such occasion should therefore be limited to the cases of tolls and should no longer be available in the case of user charges.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 96 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) Member States should be able to set up a compensation mechanism for both road tolls and user charges in order to limit the impact of such a measure, notably on very small, small and medium- sized enterprises.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 102 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) Road charges can mobilise resources that contribute to the financing of the maintenance and development of high quality transport infrastructure. It is therefore appropriate to incentivise Member States to use revenues from road charges accordingly and, to this end, to require that they adequately report oninform users about the use of such revenues. That should in particular help identifying possible financing gaps, and raising the public acceptance of road charging.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 107 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 1 – point b
b) tolls and user charges imposed on goods transport vehicles.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 115 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 2 – Point 19
19) ‘light duty vehicle’ means a passenger car, a minibus or vancar intended for the carriage of goods or a van intended for the carriage of goods;
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 121 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall be without prejudice to the right of Member States, in compliance with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to apply tolls and user charges on other roads, provided that the imposition of tolls and user charges on such other roads does not discriminate against international traffic and does not result in the distortion of competition between operators. Tolls and user charges applied on roads other than roads belonging to the trans- European road network and other than motorways, shall comply with the conditions laid down in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Article, Article 7a and Article 7j(1), (2) and (4).
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 122 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. Tolls and user charges shall not discriminate, directly or indirectly, on the grounds of the nationality of the road user, the Member State or the third country of establishment of the transport operator or of registration of the vehicle, or the origin or destination of the transport operation.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 137 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7a – point 3
Insofar as user charges are applied in respect of passenger cars, the use of the infrastructure shall be made available at least for the following periods: 10 days, a month or two months or both, and a year. The two-monthly rate shall be no more than 30 % of the annual rate, the monthly rate shall be no more than 18 % of the annual rate, and the 10-day rate shall be no more than 8 % of the annual rate.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 140 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7a – point 4
4. For minibuses and vanvans for the transport of goods, Member States shall comply either with paragraph 2 or with paragraph 3. Member States shall however set higher user charges for minibuses and vans than for passenger cars as from 1 January 2024 at the latest.;
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 152 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7da – point 3
3. A congestion charge imposed on any section of the road network shall apply in a non-discriminatory manner to all vehicle categories,to all vehicles, both light and heavy, for the transport of goods in accordance with the standard equivalence factors set out in Annex V.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 153 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – point 1
1. After informing the Commission, a Member State may add a mark-up to the infrastructure charge levied on specific road sections which are regularly congested, or the use of which by vehicles causes significant environmental damage, where the following conditions are met: a) the revenue generated from the mark- up is invested in financing the construction of transport infrastructure of the core network identified in accordance with Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013, which contribute directly to the alleviation of the congestion or environmental damage and which are located in the same corridor as the road section on which the mark-up is applied; b) the mark-up does not exceed 15 % of the weighted average infrastructure charge calculated in accordance with Article 7b(1) and Article 7e, except where the revenue generated is invested in cross- border sections of core network corridors, in which case the mark-up may not exceed 25 %; c) the application of the mark-up does not result in unfair treatment of commercial traffic compared to other road users; d) a description of the exact location of the mark-up and proof of a decision to finance the construction of core network corridors referred to in point (a) are submitted to the Commission in advance of the application of the mark-up; e) the period for which the mark-up is to apply is defined and limited in advance and is consistent, in terms of the expected revenue to be raised, with the financial plans and cost-benefit analysis for the projects co-financed with the revenue from the mark-up.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 155 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – point 1 – point a
a) the revenue generated from the mark-up is invested in financing the construction of transport infrastructure of the core network identified in accordance with Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013, which contribute directly to the alleviation of the congestion or environmental damage and which are located in the same corridor as the road section on which the mark-up is applied;deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 156 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – point 1 – point b
b) the mark-up does not exceed 15 % of the weighted average infrastructure charge calculated in accordance with Article 7b(1) and Article 7e, except where the revenue generated is invested in cross- border sections of core network corridors, in which case the mark-up may not exceed 25 %;deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 158 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – point 1 – point c
c) the application of the mark-up does not result in unfair treatment of commercial traffic compared to other road users;deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 159 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – point 1 – point d
d) a description of the exact location of the mark-up and proof of a decision to finance the construction of core network corridors referred to in point (a) are submitted to the Commission in advance of the application of the mark-up;eleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 160 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – point 1 – point e
e) the period for which the mark-up is to apply is defined and limited in advance and is consistent, in terms of the expected revenue to be raised, with the financial plans and cost-benefit analysis for the projects co-financed with the revenue from the mark-up.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 161 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – point 1a
1a. In case of new cross-border projects, mark-ups may only be added if all Member States involved in such project agree.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 163 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – point 2
2. A mark-up may be applied to an infrastructure charge which has been varied in accordance with Article 7g or 7ga.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 164 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – point 3
3. After receiving the required information from a Member State intending to apply a mark-up, the Commission shall make that information available to the members of the Committee referred to in Article 9c. Where the Commission considers that the planned mark-up does not meet the conditions set out in paragraph 1, or where it considers that the planned mark- up will have significant adverse effects on the economic development of peripheral regions, it may, by means of implementing acts, reject or request amendment of the plans for charges submitted by the Member State concerned. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 9c(2).deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 165 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – point 4
4. The amount of the mark-up shall be deducted from the amount of the external-cost charge calculated in accordance with Article 7c, except for vehicles of EURO emission classes 0, I and II from 15 October 2011, III and IV from 1 January 2015, V from 1 January 2019, and VI from January 2023 onwards. All revenues generated by the simultaneous application of the mark-up and the external cost charges shall be invested in financing the construction of core network corridors listed in Part I of Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 166 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7f – point 5
A mark-up may not be applied on road sections where a congestion charge is applideleted.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 168 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 1999/62/EC
Until 31 December 2021, the infrastructure charge may be varied for the purpose of reducing congestion, minimising infrastructure damage and optimising the use of the infrastructure concerned or promoting road safety, where the following conditions are met: a) the variation is transparent, made public and available to all users on equal terms; b) the variation is applied according to the time of day, type of day or season; c) no infrastructure charge is more than 175 % above the maximum level of the weighted average infrastructure charge as referred to in Article 7b; d) the peak periods during which the higher infrastructure charges are levied for the purpose of reducing congestion do not exceed five hours per day; e) the variation is devised and applied in a transparent and revenue-neutral way on a road section affected by congestion by offering reduced toll rates for hauliers who travel during off-peak periods and increased toll rates for hauliers who travel during peak hours on the same road section.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 169 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7g – point 1 – subparagraph 2
A Member State wishing to introduce such variation or changing an existing one informs the Commission thereof and provides it with the information necessary to assess whether the conditions are fulfilled.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 170 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7g – point 2 – subparagraph 1
Until 31 December 2020, in respect of heavy duty vehicles, Member States shall vary the infrastructure charge according to the EURO emission class of the vehicle in such a way that no infrastructure charge is more than 100 % above the same charge for equivalent vehicles meeting the strictest emission standards. Existing concession contracts may be exempted from this requirement until the contract is renewed.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 172 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7g – point 2 – subparagraph 2
A Member State may nevertheless derogate from the requirement of varying the infrastructure charge where any of the following applies: i) it would seriously undermine the coherence of the tolling systems in its territory; ii) it would not be technically practicable to introduce such differentiation in the tolling system concerned; iii) it would lead to diversion of the most polluting vehicles with negative impacts on road safety and public health; iv) the toll includes an external-cost charge.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 173 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7g – point 2 – subparagraph 3
Any such derogations or exemptions shall be notified to the Commission.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 174 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7g – point 3
3. Where, in the event of a check, a driver or, if appropriate, the transport operator, is unable to produce the vehicle documents necessary to ascertain the emission class of the vehicle for the purposes of paragraph 2, Member States may apply tolls up to the highest level chargeable.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 175 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7g – point 4 – subparagraph 1
Within one year after official CO2 emission data are published by the Commission pursuant to Regulation (EU) …/…*****, the Commission shall adopt a delegated act, in accordance with Article 9e, to define the reference values of CO2 emissions, together with an appropriate categorisation of the heavy duty vehicles concerned.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 176 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7g – point 4 – subparagraph 2
Within one year from the entry into force of the delegated act, Member States shall vary the infrastructure charge taking into account the reference CO2 emission values and the relevant vehicle categorisation. Charges shall be varied in such a way that no infrastructure charge is more than 100 % above the same charge for equivalent vehicles having the lowest, but not zero, CO2 emissions. Zero- emission vehicles shall benefit from infrastructure charges reduced by 75 % compared to the highest rate.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 180 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7g – point 5
The variations referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 shall not be designed to generate additional toll revenue. Any unintended increase in revenue shall be counterbalanced by changes to the structure of the variation which shall be implemented within two years from the end of the accounting year in which the additional revenue is generated.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 181 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7g – point 4 – subparagraph 1 – footnote
***** Commission Regulation (EU) …/… of XXX implementing Regulation (EU) No 595/2009 as regards the certification of the CO2 emissions and fuel consumption of heavy-duty vehicles and amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L …, …, p...).;deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 184 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 8
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7ga – point 4
The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9e amending Annex VII in order to adapt the modalities specified in the Annex to technical progress.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 185 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
(a) in paragraph 1, the introductory wording is replaced by the following: ‘At least six months before the implementation of a new or substantially amended infrastructure charge tolling arrangement, Member States shall send to the Commission:’;deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 186 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 7h – point b
(b) paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: ‘3. Before the implementation of a new or substantially amended external-cost charge tolling arrangement, Member States shall inform the Commission about the network concerned, the foreseen rates per vehicle category and emission class.;’deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 187 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Directive 1999/62/EC
(10) Article 7i is amended as follows: (a) in paragraph 2, point (b) and (c) are replaced by the following: ‘(b) such discounts or reductions reflect actual savings in administrative costs of the treatment of frequent users compared to occasional users; (c) such discounts or reductions do not exceed 13 % of the infrastructure charge paid by equivalent vehicles not eligible for the discount or reduction.;’ ‘3. Subject to the conditions provided for in Article 7g(1)(b) and (5), toll rates may for specific projects of high European interest identified in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013, be subject to other forms of variation in order to secure the commercial viability of such projects where they are exposed to direct competition with other modes of transport. The resulting charging structure shall be linear, proportionate, made public, and available to all users on equal terms and shall not lead to additional costs being passed on to other users in the form of higher tolls.’;deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 192 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. RMember States are called upon to use the revenues generated from congestion charges, or the equivalent in financial value of these revenues, shall be used, to address the problem of congestion, in particular by:
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 193 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point b
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point b
b) eliminating bottlenecks on the trans-European transport network;
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 195 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Directive 1999/62/CE
Articles 9d and 9e
(15) Articles 9d and 9e are replaced by the following: ‘Article 9d The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9e to amend Annex 0, the amounts in Tables 1 and 2 in Annex IIIb, and the formulas in sections 4.1 and 4.2 of Annex IIIa in order to adapt them to scientific and technical progress. Article 9e 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 7g(4), Article 7ga(4) and Article 9d shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from [date of entry into force of this Directive]. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 7g(4), Article 7ga(4) and Article 9d may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. 5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 7g(4), Article 7ga(4) and Article 9d shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.’;deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 196 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Directive 1999/62/EC
Articles 9f and 9g
(16) Articles 9f and 9g are deleted;
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 197 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 17
Directive 1999/62/EC
Article 10a
(17) Article 10a is replaced by the following: ‘1. The amounts in euro as laid down in Annex II and the amounts in cent as laid down in Tables 1 and 2 in Annex IIIb shall be adapted every two years in order to take account of changes in the EU-wide Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices excluding energy and unprocessed food, as published by the Commission (Eurostat). The first adaptation shall take place by 31 March [the year following the two years after the entry into force of this Directive]. The amounts shall be adapted automatically, by increasing the base amount in euro or cent by the percentage change in that index. The resulting amounts shall be rounded up to the nearest euro with regard to Annex II, rounded up to the nearest tenth of a cent with regard to Annex IIIb. 2. The Commission shall publish in the Official Journal of the European Union the adapted amounts referred to in paragraph 1 by 31 March of the year following the end of two calendar years referred to in paragraph 1. Those adapted amounts shall enter into force on the first day of the month following publication.’;deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 198 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point b – point i – indent 1
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex III – section 2 – point 2.1 – indent 6
— Costs shall be apportioned to heavy dutyand light duty goods transport vehicles on an objective and transparent basis taking account of the proportion of heavy dutyand light duty goods transport vehicle traffic to be carried on the network and the associated costs. The vehicle kilometres travelled by heavy dutyand light duty goods transport vehicles may for this purpose be adjusted by objectively justified ‘equivalence factors’ such as those set out in point 4 (*).
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 199 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point b – point i – indent 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex III – section 2 – point 2.2 – indent 2
— Such costs shall be apportioned between heavy duty vehicles and other trafficand light duty goods transport vehicles on the basis of actual and forecast shares of vehicle kilometres and may be adjusted by objectively justified equivalence factors such as those set out in point 4.;
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 200 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point b – point ii
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex III – section 4 – indent 1
- The calculation of tolls shall be based on actual or forecast shares of heavy dutyand light duty goods transport vehicle kilometres adjusted, if desired, by equivalence factors, to make due allowance for the increased costs of constructing and repairing infrastructure for use by heavy dutyand light duty goods transport vehicles.;
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 206 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point c
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
For each vehicle class, type of road and time period, the Member State or, where appropriate, an independent authority shall be encouraged to determine a single specific amount. The resulting charging structure shall be transparent, made public and available to all users on equal terms. The publication should occur in a timely manner before implementation. All parameters, data and other information necessary to understand how the various external-cost elements are calculated shall be made public.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 207 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point c
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
When setting the charges, the Member State or, where appropriate, an independent authority shall be guided byencouraged to follow the principle of efficient pricing that is a price close to the social marginal cost of the usage of the vehicle charged.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 208 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point c
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
TBefore setting the charge, it shall be set after havingencouraged to considered the risk of traffic diversion together with any adverse effects on road safety, the environment and congestion, and any solutions to mitigate these risks.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 209 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point c
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 5
The Member State or, where appropriate, an independent authority, shall be encouraged to monitor the effectiveness of the charging scheme in reducing environmental damage arising from road transport. It shall be encouraged to adjust every two years adjust, where appropriate, the charging structure and the specific amount of the charge set for a given class of vehicle, type of road and period of time to the changes in transport supply and demand.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 210 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point c (new)
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.1 – subparagraph (–a) new
Each Member State must be able to calculate the cost of traffic-based air pollution in accordance with procedures connected with its own taxation policy.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 211 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point c
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.1 – subparagraph 1
Where a Member State intends to apply higher external-cost charges than the reference values specified in Annex IIIb, that Member State or, where appropriate, an independent authority shall calculate the chargeable cost of traffic–based air pollution by applying the following formula: nulldeleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 213 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point c
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annexe IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.1 – subparagraph 1
where: [...]deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 214 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point c
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annexe IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.1 – subparagraph 2
The emission factors shall be the same as those used by the Member State to establish the national emissions inventories provided for in Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council of on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants * (which requires use of the EMEP/EEA air pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook**). The monetary cost of pollutants shall be estimated by the Member State or, where appropriate, the independent authority referrred to in Article 7c(4), using scientifically proven methods.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 215 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point c
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.1 – subparagraph 3
The Member State or, where appropriate, an independent authority may apply scientifically proven alternative methods to calculate the value of air pollution costs using data from air pollutant measurement and the local value of the monetary cost of air pollutants.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 216 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point c (new)
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annexe IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.2 – subparagraph (–a) new
Each Member State must be able to calculate the cost of traffic-based noise pollution in accordance with procedures connected with its own taxation policy.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 217 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point c
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.2 – subparagraph 1
Where a Member State intends to apply higher external-cost charges than the reference values specified in Annex IIIb, the Member State or, where appropriate, an independent authority shall calculate the chargeable cost of traffic–based noise pollution by applying the following formulae: nulldeleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 219 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point c
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIa – paragraph 4 – point 4.2 – subparagraph 1
where: [...]deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 221 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point d
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annexe IIIb – paragraph 1
This Annex sets out reference values of theMember States may refer to this Annex to set their national external-cost charge, including the cost of air pollution and noise.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 224 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 1 – point d
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex IIIb – table 2
Table 2: reference values of the external- cost charge for coaches [...] (1) ‘Suburban’ means areas with a population density between 150 and 900 inhabitants/km2 (median population density of 300 inhabitants/km2). (2) ‘Interurban’ means areas with a population density below150 inhabitants/km2.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 227 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex V (new) – paragraph 1
This Annex sets outproposes the minimum requirements for levying a congestion charge.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 228 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex V (new) – section 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall be called on to specify precisely:
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 229 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex VI (new)
ANNEX VIdeleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 230 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex VI (new) – title
MAXIMUM LEVEL OF CONGESTION CHARGEdeleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 231 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex VI (new) – paragraph 1
This Annex sets out the maximum level of congestion charge.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 232 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex VI – paragraph 2
The maximum levels provided for in the table below shall be applied to light duty vehicles. Charges for other vehicle categories shall be established by multiplying the charge applied to light duty vehicles by the equivalence factors provided in the table in Annex V.deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 233 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex VI (new) – table
Table : Maximum level of congestion charge for light duty vehicles [...]deleted
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 234 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Sylvie GODDYN, Jean-François JALKH
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 2
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex VII (new) – paragraph 3
The lower rates shall apply for any passenger car and light commerciallight goods transport vehicle with specific CO2 emissions, as measured in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 715/2007of the European Parliament and of the Council**, that are below the levels corresponding to the applicable EU fleet wide targets set out in Regulation (EC) No 443/2009of the European Parliament and of the Council*** and Regulation (EU) No 510/2011of the European Parliament and of the Council****.
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 235 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Jean-François JALKH, Sylvie GODDYN
Proposal for a directive
Annex – paragraph 2 – point 1
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex V – section 1 – table 2
Vehicle category Coefficient of equivalence Light-duty vehicles 1 Rigid heavy goods vehicles 1.9 Buses and coaches 2.5 Articulated heavy goods vehicles 2.9
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 236 #
Joëlle MÉLIN, Jean-François JALKH, Sylvie GODDYN
Proposal for a directive
Annex – paragraph 2 – point 3
Directive 1999/62/EC
Annex VII – table
Conformity 1.5-2.1 1-1.5 below 1 Zero- factor emission emission vehicles Charge per 10 % below 20 % below 30 % below 75 % belowNone km highest rate highest rate highest rate highest rate
2018/02/06
Committee: ENVI
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation