9 Amendments of Jean-François JALKH related to 2021/2106(DEC)
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
Paragraph 49
49. Notes that the MFF subheading 1a ‘Competitiveness for growth and jobs’ accounts for 13,9 % or EUR 24,1 billion of the Union budget: of this amount, EUR 13,6 billion (56,4 %) is spent on research, EUR 3,1 billion (12,8 %) on education, training, youth and sport, EUR 2,4 billion (10,2 %) on transport and energy, EUR 1,6 billion (6,5 %) on space, and the rest on other actions and programmes; recalls the total planned expenditure under this sub- heading of the 2014-2020 MFF is EUR 142 billion, of which EUR 104,6 billion had been paid out by the end of 2020; points out that 37,4 billion EUR of non disbursed funds represent 26 % out of total planned expenditure; questions the budgetary efficiency and ambitiousness of the budgetary planning for this heading;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60
Paragraph 60
60. Notes that MFF sub-heading 1b 'Economic, social and territorial cohesion' accounts for 34,3 % or EUR 59,5 billion of the Union budget: of this amount, EUR 32,4 billion (54,5 %) is spent on the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), EUR 10,2 billion (17,1 %) on the Cohesion Fund (CF), EUR 14,7 billion (24,7 %) on the European Social Fund (ESF), and EUR 2,2 billion (3,7 %) on other actions; is alarmed by the fact that by the end of 2020 only EUR 194,8 billion (52%) out of EUR 371 billion had been paid out of the total planned expenditure under this heading in the 2014-2020 MFF;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 74 a (new)
Paragraph 74 a (new)
74 a. Reminds that the ESF/YEI/Multi- Fund amounted to 88 billion EUR in the 2014-2020 programming period, however, according to the European Parliament study1a, sophisticated methods, such as counterfactual analysis, theory-based approaches and cost-benefit analysis were rarely used in the assessment of the intervention outcomes and results pursued with the ressources of this multi- fund; _________________ 1a https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/ etudes/STUD/2020/629219/IPOL_STU(20 20)629219_EN.pdf
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 79
Paragraph 79
79. Notes that the MFF heading 2 ‘Natural resources‘ accounts for 35 % or EUR 60,6 billion of the Union budget: of this amount, EUR 41,6 billion (68,7 %) is spent on direct payments under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), EUR 2,6 billion (4,3 %) on market-related expenditure under the EAGF, EUR 14,6 billion (24,1 %) on the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EARDF), EUR 0,9 billion (1,4 %) on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) and the rest on other areas; is questioning the non disbursement of 53 billion EUR out of 420 billion EUR of the total planned expenditure under this heading in the 2014-2020 period;
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 92
Paragraph 92
92. Notes that the MFF heading 3 ‘Security and citizenship’ accounts for 3,7% or EUR 6,3 billion of the Union budget: of this amount EUR 2,6 billion (40,5 %) is spent on instrument for Emergency Support within the Union, EUR 1,6 billion (25,3 %) on migration and security, EUR 1,2 billion (18,5 %) on decentralised agencies, EUR 0,2 billion (3,7 %) on Food and Feed, EUR 0,2 billion (3,8 %) on Creative Europe, and the rest on other areas; recalls that the total planned expenditure under this heading in the 2014-2020 MFF was 22,4 billion EUR, of which only €17,5 billion had been paid out by the end of 2020; sees as problematic the non-disbursement/non absorption of the remaining 4,9 billion EUR, currently qualified as outstanding commitments; raises a question about the budgetary efficiency and ambitiousness of the budgetary planning for this heading;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 106 a (new)
Paragraph 106 a (new)
106 a. Is alarmed by doubling of the budgetary support to other countries from 824 million EUR in 2019 to 1.7 billion EUR in 2020; reminds that the budgetary support is financed from the general EU budget and the ECA audit cannot trace what happens beyond the moment the Commission pays aid to the recipient country, since these funds then merge with that country’s own budget resources;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 106 b (new)
Paragraph 106 b (new)