BETA

8 Amendments of Tiziana BEGHIN related to 2017/2193(INI)

Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to conclude and publish as soon as possible its assessments of the potential impact of such a trade deal, with a view to being able to thoroughly evaluate possible gains and losses from the enhancement of the EU- New Zealand trade and investment relationships, in particular to check the market access for EU agriculture products and its volume, for the benefit of citizens, farmers and businesses on both sides, including in the outermost regions and the overseas countries and territories;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Council to authorise the Commission to start negotiations for a trade and investment agreement and an investment protection agreement with New Zealand on the basis of the outcome of the scoping exercise and with clear targets and having consulted the relevant stakeholders on specific sensitive sectors;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Council to clearly distinguish between an agreement on trade and the liberalisation of foreign direct investment (FDI), only containing issues under EU exclusive competence, and a second agreement on investment protection, including on FDI and non-direct investment, which would be subject to an Investment Court System;deleted
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to conduct negotiations as transparently as possible and fully respect best practice as established in other negotiations; requests that the Council make the negotiating mandate publicwelcomes the Commission decision to release the draft negotiating mandate although believes it should be updated according to the European Parliament requests and taking into account the Brexit;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point a
a) Real market access opportunities for both sides to each other’s goods and services market through the elimination of regulatory barriers: nothing in the agreement however should prevent either side from regulating to achieve legitimate national policy objectives; considering in this respect that no EU trade agreement has ever privatised in public services, such as water, education, health and social services, nor decreased our high European health, food, consumer, environmental, animal welfare, labour and safety standards, nor constrained public funding of the arts, audiovisual and culture, education, and health and social services;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point d
d) A separate chapter taking into account the needs and interests of SMEs with regard to free market access information and facilitation issues in order to generate concrete business opportunities;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point g
g) A balanced outcome in the agriculture and fisheries chapters which gives due consideration to the interests of all European producers and consumers, for instance by introducing appropriate transitional period and effective quotas in the most sensitive sectors; considers that only then can it boost competitiveness and be beneficial to both consumers and producers such as sheepmeat, beef and dairy products; a particular attention should be given to the organic sector and envisages the possibility to have a dedicated part in the market access chapter;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point g a (new)
g a) an easy applicable safeguard clause to better factor in respect for seasonal cycles of production of sensitive agriculture goods in Europe, particularly for sensitive products;
2017/09/21
Committee: INTA