BETA

7 Amendments of Tiziana BEGHIN related to 2021/0402(COD)

Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) The modern interconnected world economy creates an increased risk of, and opportunity for, economic coercion, as it provides countries with enhanced, including hybrid, means to deploy such coercion. It is desirable that the Union contribute to the creation, development and clarification of international frameworks for the prevention, correction and elimination of situations of economic coercion.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Whilst always acting within the framework of international law, it is essential that the Union possess an appropriate instrument to deter and counteract economic coercion by third countries in order to safeguard its rights and interests and those of its Member States. This is particularly the case where third countries take measures affecting trade or investment that interfere in the legitimate sovereign choices of the Union or a Member State by seeking to prevent or obtain the cessation, modification or adoption of a particular act by the Union or a Member State. Such measures affecting trade or investment may include not only actions taken on, and having effects within, the territory of the third country, but also actions taken by the third country, including through entities directly or indirectly controlled or directmanaged by the third country and physically or virtually present in the Union, that cause harm to economic activities in the Union.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The Commission should examine whether third-country measures are coercive, on its own initiative or following information received from any source, including legal and natural persons or a Member State or the European Parliament. Following this examination, the Commission should determine in a decision whether the third-country measure is coercive. The Commission should communicate any affirmative determination to the third country concerned, together with a request that the economic coercion cease and a request, where appropriate, that any injury be repaired.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) In pursuing the objective of obtaining the cessation of the measure of economic coercion, Union response measures consisting of restrictions on foreign direct investment or on trade in services should only apply with regard to services supplied, or direct investments made, within the Union by one or more legal persons established in the Union which are owned or directly or indirectly controlled by persons of the third country concerned where necessary to ensure the effectiveness of Union response measures and in particular to prevent their avoidance. The decision to impose any such restrictions will be duly justified in implementing acts adopted pursuant to this Regulation in the light of the criteria specified in this Regulation.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules and procedures in order to ensure the effective protection of the interests of the Union and its Member States where a third country seeks, through measures affecting trade or investment, to coerce the Union or a Member State into adopting or refraining from adopting a particular act. This Regulation provides a framework for the Union to respond in such situations with the objective to deter, correct or have the third country desist from such actions, whilst permitting the Union, in the last resort, to counteract such actions.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
- counteracting with appropriate actions
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall enter into consultations or cooperation, on behalf of the Union, with any other country affected by the same or similar measures of economic coercion or with any interested third country, with a view to obtaining the cessation of the coercion. This may involve, where appropriate, coordination in relevant international fora and coordination in the different type of responses to the coercion.
2022/05/30
Committee: INTA