10 Amendments of Maria GRAPINI related to 2015/2089(INI)
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas it is the concept of shared responsibility that should frame how the Union seeks to improve single market regulation in order to set the foundation for a solid social system in all Member States;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas we have a single market for goods but not a single market for services;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that improving single market regulation should be both a priority and a shared responsibility of the Union institutions; believes that good legislation should contribute to competitiveness, the creation of jobs and growth, SME development, and must do so in a way that stimulates, rather than frustrates, the European economy European economy, lawful competition and consumer protection;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Understands ‘better regulation’ in the context of the whole policy cycle, whereby all elements contribute to efficient and effective regulation, while assuring lawful competition within the Single Market in relation to non-European products; considers that improved Single Market regulation must also take into account the relations with non-European countries;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that single market legislation should be to the benefit of competitiveness, innovation and growth,sustainable growth based on lawful competition and views effective impact assessments as an important tool for informing policymakers on how best to design regulation to achieve these aims and their single market objectives;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that in order to be effective as tools, impact assessments should be prepared on the basis of strong verifiable and quantifiable evidence; believes that careful consideration of scientific advice should form part of the impact assessment process and, in particular, substantiate how or why policy choices have been made in preparatory phases, which will assist the political process;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses that it is not only the formal targets for transposition and implementation that are important, but also the practical implementation on the ground and its impact;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Believes that the analysis should also undertake to identify instances of gold- plating, which present similar challenges and extra costs for people and businesses seeking to understand and apply law originating at EU level;
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Notes that the cumulative cost of regulation often represent barriers for participants in the single market, particularly for SMEs; welcomes, therefore, the commitment by the Commission to examine this issue; underlines, however, that any such analysis should only address economic factors and consumer protection and should not be equated with a broader impact assessment, which includes assessments of other elements;
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Stresses that a single market that does not over-burden or frustrate production, innovation and commerce and has adequate measures to ensure trade defence against counterfeit products and dumping prices, is a structure that will bring jobs and growth back to Europe that previously would have been located outside of it, where standards are lower;