[ParlTrack]

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35

(35) A Member State of allocation may decide not to accept the allocated applicants during a twelve months-period, in which case it should enter this information in the automated system and notify the other Member States, the Commission and the European Union Agency for Asylum. Thereafter the applicants that would have been allocated to that Member State should be allocated to the other Member States instead. The Member State which temporarily does not take part in the corrective allocation should make a solidarity contribution of EUR 250,000 per applicant not accepted to the Member State that was determined as responsible for examining those applications. The Commission should lay down the practical modalities for the implementation of the solidarity contribution mechanism in an implementing act. The European Union Agency for Asylum will monitor and report to the Commission on a yearly basis on the application of the financial solidarity mechanism.deleted

2017/03/28
Committee: AFET

Laurenţiu REBEGA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3

3. Before applying the criteria for determining a Member State responsible in accordance with Chapters III and IV, the first Member State in which the application for international protection was lodged shall: (a)examine whether the application for international protection is inadmissible pursuant to Article 33(2) letters b) and c) of Directive 2013/32/EU when a country which is not a Member State is considered as a first country of asylum or as a safe third country for the applicant; and (b)examine the application in accelerated procedure pursuant to Article 31(8) of Directive 2013/32/EU when the following grounds apply: (i)the applicant has the nationality of a third country, or he or she is a stateless person and was formerly habitually resident in that country, designated as a safe country of origin in the EU common list of safe countries of origin established under Regulation [Proposal COM (2015) 452 of 9 September 2015]; or (ii)the applicant may, for serious reasons, be considered a danger to the national security or public order of the Member State, or the applicant has been forcibly expelled for serious reasons of public security or public order under national law.deleted

2017/03/28
Committee: AFET

Laurenţiu REBEGA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4

4. Where the Member State considers an application inadmissible or examines an application in accelerated procedure pursuant to paragraph 3, that Member State shall be considered the Member State responsible.deleted

2017/03/28
Committee: AFET

Laurenţiu REBEGA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2

2. The Member State in which the applicant is obliged to be present shall continue the procedures for determining the Member State responsible even when the applicant leaves the territory of that Member State without authorisation or is otherwise not available for the competent authorities of that Member State.deleted

2017/03/28
Committee: AFET

Laurenţiu REBEGA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1

Where it is established, on the basis of proof or circumstantial evidence as described in the two lists mentioned in Article 25(4) of this Regulation, including the data referred to in Regulation [Proposal for a Regulation recasting Regulation (EU) No 603/2013], that an applicant has irregularly crossed the border into a Member State by land, sea or air having come from a third country, the Member State thus entered shall be responsible for examining the application for international protection. It shall continue to bear this responsibility for a period of six months after the date of illegal entry.

2017/03/28
Committee: AFET

Laurenţiu REBEGA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37

Article 44(1) shall in that case apply the number of applications for which they are the Member States responsible below their share pursuant to Article 35(1), with the benefitting Member State. The automated count each application which would have otherwise been allocated to the Member pursuant to Article 36(4) for the share of 3.At the end of the twelve-month period referred to in paragraph 2, the automated system shall communicate to the Member State not taking part in the corrective allocation mechanism the number of applicants for whom it would have otherwise been the Member State of allocation. That Member State shall thereafter make a solidarity contribution of EUR 250,000 per each applicant who would have otherwise been allocated to that Member State during the respective twelve-month period. The solidarity contribution shall be paid to the Member State determined as responsible for examining the respective applications. 4.The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt a decision in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 56, lay down the modalities for the implementation of paragraph 3. 5.The European Union Agency for Asylum shall monitor and report to the Commission on a yearly basis on the application of the financial solidarity mechanism. Obligations of the benefitting Member State The benefitting2. deleted The automated system referred to in reference key during this twelve-month period to those Member States with a exception of the Member State which entered the information, as well as the system referred to in Article 44(1) shall State which entered the information that Member State ~~shall:~~.

2017/03/28
Committee: AFET

6 Amendments of Laurenţiu REBEGA related to 2016/0133(COD)

ParlTrack - 2011-2024