20 Amendments of Isabella DE MONTE related to 2018/0228(COD)
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) Whereas efficient and good transport infrastructure and services are vital for growth and competiveness in Europe and ERTMS large-scale transport horizontal projects will further integrate Railway transport infrastructures.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 b (new)
Recital 7 b (new)
(7b) In order to accelerate the installation of ERTMS and incentivize the participation of private investors to the financing of ERTMS, the Commission should launch a pan-European initiative, such as a Joint-Undertaking aimed at scaling up the ERTMS deployment pace over the TEN-T core network corridors.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 c (new)
Recital 7 c (new)
(7c) It has been estimated than the completion of the ERTMS deployment over the TEN-T core network corridors requires at least 15 Billion €. In order to attain such objective as a matter of priority, as stated in the Regulation 1315/2013 on the Guidelines for the development of the Trans-European network corridors* and on the 2011 White Paper for Transport**, a large scale project on ERTMS should be supported at European level. __________________ * Regulation (EU)No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans- European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU ** COM(2011) 144 White Paper on a Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 d (new)
Recital 7 d (new)
(7d) The launch of a large scale project on ERTMS would give a profitable financial return to private investors thanks to an innovative mix of grants, loans, public and private funds that could leverage innovative financing schemes and finalize long-standing investments
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) Following the Joint Communication on improving military mobility in the European Union of November 201724 , the Action Plan on Military Mobility adopted on 28 March 2018 by the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy25 highlighted that transport infrastructure policy offers a clear opportunity to increase synergies between defence needs and TEN- T, with the overall view of improving mobility across the Union. The Action Plan indicates that by mid- 2018, the Council is invited to consider and validate the military requirements in relation to transport infrastructure and that, by 2019 the Commission services will identify the parts of the trans-European transport network suitable also for military transport, including necessaryuse of the infrastructure, including where there is the possibility to upgrades of existing infrastructure. The infrastructure will always be for dual use. Union funding for the implementation of the dual-use projects should be implemented through the Programme on the basis of specific work programmes specifyingthrough measurable actions complying with the applicable requirements as defined in the context of the Action Plan. __________________ 24 25JOIN (2017) 41. JOIN (2017) 41. 25 JOIN (2018) 5. JOIN (2018) 5.
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) The policy objectives of this Programme will be also addressed through financial instruments and budgetary guarantee under the policy window(s) [...] of the InvestEU Fund. The Programme's actions should be used to address market failures or sub-optimal investment situations, in a proportionate manner, without duplicating or crowding out private financing, taking into account the geographical proportion of the projects to be funded, and have a clear European added value.
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
(ra) “infrastructure for civilian- military dual-use” means infrastructure for which civil/military synergies exist, which are generally used for civilian purposes but which are of strategic importance for military use and are of comparable importance for civilian and military use, and for which hybrid standards for dual-use exist or will be developed jointly by the national transport and defence ministries;
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii
(ii) to adaptintegrate military mobility needs into the TEN-T networks, to military mobility needshus enabling dual use of infrastructure;
Amendment 657 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 a (new)
Article 8 a (new)
Amendment 677 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i
(i) actions implementing the core network in accordance with Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013, cross- border, missing links, bottlenecks, including actions relating to urban nodes, maritime ports, inland ports and rail-road terminals of the core network as defined at Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013. Actions implementing the core network may include related elements located on the comprehensive network when necessary to optimize the investment and according to modalities specified in the work programmes referred to in Article 19 of this Regulation;
Amendment 717 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii
(ii) actions supporting telematic applications systems as ERTMS, including for safety purposes, in accordance with Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013;
Amendment 974 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c
Amendment 997 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the action has not started within one year following the starting date indicated in the grant agreement in case of studies, or within two years for all other actions eligible for financial assistance under this Regulation;
Amendment 1000 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 1076 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part II – paragraph 1
Annex I – part II – paragraph 1
Amendment 1117 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 1 – table – Core network corridor “Baltic-Adriatic”
Annex I – part III – point 1 – table – Core network corridor “Baltic-Adriatic”
Core network corridor "Baltic – Adriatic" Alignment Gdynia – Gdańsk – Katowice/Sławków Gdańsk – Warszawa – Katowice Katowice – Ostrava – Brno – Wien Szczecin/Świnoujście – Poznań – Wrocław – Ostrava Katowice – Žilina – Bratislava – Wien Wien – Graz– Villach – Udine – Trieste Udine – Venezia – Padova – Bologna – Ravenna – Ancona – Foggia Graz – Maribor –Ljubljana – Koper/Trieste Pre- Cross- Katowice – Ostrava Rail identified border sections Katowice – Žilina Opole – Ostrava Bratislava – Wien Graz – Maribor Trieste – Divaca Katowice – Žilina Road Brno – Wien Missing Gloggnitz – Mürzzuschlag: Rail link Semmering Base tunnel Graz – Klagenfurt: Koralm railway line and tunnel Koper – Divača
Amendment 1125 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part III – point 1 – table – Core network corridor “Mediterranean”
Annex I – Part III – point 1 – table – Core network corridor “Mediterranean”
Amendment 1130 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part III – point 1 – table – Core network corridor “Mediterranean”
Annex I – Part III – point 1 – table – Core network corridor “Mediterranean”
Core network corridor "Mediterranean" Alignment Algeciras – Bobadilla –Madrid – Zaragoza – Tarragona Sevilla – Bobadilla – Murcia Cartagena – Murcia – Valencia – Tarragona/Palma de Mallorca – Barcelona Tarragona – Barcelona – Perpignan – Marseille – Genova/Lyon – Torino – Novara – Milano – Bologna/Verona – Padova – Venezia – Ravenna/Trieste/Koper – Ljubljana – Budapest Ljubljana/Rijeka – Zagreb – Budapest – UA border Pre- Cross- Lyon – Torino: base tunnel and access Rail identified border routes sections Nice – Ventimiglia Trieste – Divača Ljubljana – Zagreb Zagreb – Budapest Budapest – Miskolc – UA border Lendava – Letenye Road Vásárosnamény – UA border Missing Perpignan – Montpellier Rail link Koper – Divača Rijeka – Zagreb Milano – Cremona – Mantova – Porto Inland Levante/Venezia – Ravenna/Trieste - Waterways Ferrara/Porto Garibaldi
Amendment 1172 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 2 – table
Annex I – part III – point 2 – table
Amendment 1174 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 2 – table
Annex I – part III – point 2 – table
Dublin – Strabane – Letterkenny Road Pau – Huesca Rail Lyon – CH border Rail Athus – Mont-Saint-Martin Rail Antwerpen – Duisburg Rail Mons - Valenciennes Rail Gent – Terneuzen Rail Heerlen – Aachen Rail Groningen – Bremen Rail Stuttgart – CH border Rail Berlin – Rzepin/Horka – Wrocław Rail Prague – Linz Rail Villach – Ljubljana Rail Pivka – Rijeka Rail Plzeň – České Budějovice – Wien Rail Wien - Gyor Rail Graz - Gyor Rail Neumarkt-Kalham - Mühldorf Rail Amber Corridor PL-SK-HU Rail Via Carpathia Corridor BY/UA border-PL-SK-HU-RO Road Budapest – Osijek – Svilaj (BiH border) Road Faro – Huelva Rail Porto – Vigo Rail Giurgiu – Varna/Bourgas Rail Svilengrad – Pithio Rail Gallarate/Sesto C. – Laveno/Luino Rail