11 Amendments of Norbert LINS related to 2021/2006(INI)
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that methane in the agricultural sector has been reduced by 22% since 1990;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Notes that innovative technologies in the area of animal feed are promising, but in some cases have not yet been authorised for use;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Notes that methane sources are diffuse and very variable across Member States;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Notes that that represents a significant challenge as regards measurement, reporting and verification and must be taken into account when mitigation actions are disseminated and reported on;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 e (new)
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Notes that methane is a short-lived greenhouse gas;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 f (new)
Paragraph 1 f (new)
1f. Notes that, because atmospheric methane is short-lived, constant methane emissions do not cause additional warming, but, rather, maintain the existing warming effect;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 g (new)
Paragraph 1 g (new)
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 h (new)
Paragraph 1 h (new)
1h. Notes that, with regard to methane, the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report gives different values for the 100- year warming potential (GWP100) for biogenic methane (GWP100: 28) and fossil methane (GWP100: 30) and that the values are presented differently in the IPCC report;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights that research and investment in mitigation measures and technologies is of paramount importance; considers that there is great potential in adapting diet of and developing feed additives for ruminant and bovine species, which could reduce methane emissions without having negative effects on the livestock sector; highlights the need to screen all measures so as to establish whether they are compatible with the other objectives of a sustainable agricultural policy, such as, for instance, animal welfare;
Amendment 172 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Highlights the fact that the overall strategy for reducing emissions from livestock farming must also take into account possible effects on international agricultural trade and the possible transfer of emissions to third countries;
Amendment 181 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Calls on the Commission to take account of the difference between biogenic and fossil methane emissions in the design and implementation of the methane strategy;