5 Amendments of Laura AGEA related to 2017/2044(BUD)
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Committee on Budget of the European Parliament, in coordination with the sectorial committees of this Parliament, to promote a real culture of results in respect of the optimisation of the use of expenditure by removing expenditures from programmes showing low performance; calls for the Commission, in this regard, to submit a detailed assessment of those programmes which have not hitherto demonstrated any added value from an economic, social and environmental point of view, so that steps can be taken to abandon them;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Underlines that Parliament, as discharge authority, is called upon to express views on the political objectives and indicators presented by the Commission in the draft budget and thatthe Parliament should scrutinise the European added value of each budget lines, not only from a purely financial standpoint but also by assessing the economic, social and environmental impact of the projects funded;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Stresses the importance of considering the option of excluding from the calculation of national deficits, in the framework of the Stability and Growth Pact, the share of funding that is committed to cohesion programmes and that which is co-financed through the ESI Funds and allocated to Thematic Objective 5 (prevention, promoting climate change adaptation, risk prevention and management);
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Takes note that the Commission considered that it is “difficult if not impossible to provide an estimated cost paid for migrants/seeker country by country as the management of migratory flows comprises a wide range of activities”2; would therefore like to be informed on how the Commission has been able to draft precise estimates regarding that policy area and what criterion has hitherto been used to determine the allocation of AMIF funds in the various Member States; _________________ 2 Reply to written question 23- CONT hearing of Commissioner AVRAMAPOLOS of 29 November 2016
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Points out that the 2018 programme statements contain paragraphs referring to financial instruments financed by specific programme but that the Commission considers that such information does not constitute the official reporting on the financial instruments financed by the Union budget as provided for under Article140(8) of the Financial Regulation"; calls on the Commission to supply a full set of data on the allocation of financial instruments and on the results hitherto achieved from an economic, social and environmental point of view, also with regard to the expected and actual leverage effect;