8 Amendments of Beatrix von STORCH related to 2016/2225(INI)
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that information revealed by big data analysis is only as reliable as the underlying data permits, and that strong scientific and ethiclegal standards are therefore needed for judging the results of such analysis and its predictive algorithms;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the prospects and opportunities of big data can only be fully enjoyed by citizens, corporations, governments and institutions when public trust in these technologies is ensured by strong enforcement of fundamental rights and legal certainty for all actors involved; insists that state bodies, when using these technologies, be strictly bound by the law;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. PStresses the importance of the right to anonymity; points out that Union law for the protection of privacy and personal data, as well as the rights to equality and non- discrimination, are applicable to data processing even when that processing is preceded by pseudonymisation and anonymisation techniques, insofar as there are risks of re- identification, or, in any case, when use of non-personal data might impact on individuals’ private lives or other rights and freedoms;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights the fundamental role that the Commission, the European Data Protection Board and other independent supervisory authoritireliably predictable law and clearly defined legal rules should play in the coming years and decades to promote legal certainty concerning concrete standards protecting fundamental rights and guarantees associated with the use of data processing and analytics;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Acknowledges that data loss and theft, infection by malware, unauthorised access to data and unlawful surveillance are some of the most pressing risks associated with contemporary data processing activities, such as big data techniques; believes that tackling such threats requires genuine and concerted cooperation between, in the light of these threats, it is important to preserve the distinction between the spheres of the private sector, governments, law enforcement authorities and independent supervisory authorities;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Encourages all law enforcement actors that use data processing and analytics to ensure appropriate human intervention, approved by court orders, throughout the various stages of the processing and analysis of data, especially when decisions may carry high risks for individuals;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Underlines the absolute need to protect law enforcement databases from data loss and theft, infection by malware and unauthorised access to data by non- authorised persons; believes that tackling such concerns requires genuine, concerted cooperation between law enforcement authorities and independent supervisory authorities; is concerned that, particularly in the hands of the authorities, centralised data have proved particularly vulnerable in the past, and takes the view that decentralised data banks mean lower security risks;