BETA

16 Amendments of Isabella ADINOLFI related to 2014/2256(INI)

Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the need for a common definition of ‘public domain’ so as to ensure the widespread dissemination of cultural content across the EUnion and guaranteeing a common level of protection of works out of copyright in Member States;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls for the revision of the Directive in the light of development of digital technologies in the last decade and their considerable impact on the way content is created, produced and disseminated;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Acknowledges the important role played by copyright legislation in safeguarding the interests of artists, creators and authors, whilst stimulating creativity, cultural and artistic livelihoods;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Underlines the need to provide for appropriate remuneration of authors and all categories of rightholders;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Acknowledges the role of producers, publishers and distributors in disseminating cultural works and highlights the need of safeguarding a fair balance between the interests of all parties;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Encourages, to fully exploit the possibilities offered by new digital technologies and favour learning and widespread culture dissemination, to provide for new mechanisms of content fruition such as e-lending;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Highlights that, in order to widespread disseminate culture and increase educational possibilities, new technologies should be used to increase the legal offer of content by encouraging re-use mechanisms and the birth of a digital second-hand market;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Suggests to the Commission to limit the cases of impediment of free movement of goods and services by blocking the access to content on a territorial basis so that measures put in place are proportionate and applied to avoid the creation of detrimental barriers to legitimate trade and therefore calls for providing safeguards against abuses;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for the introduction of a de minimis exception and limitation that applies analogically the discipline already provided in Article 5.3, in cases that are not regulated, especially bearing in mind the swift technological evolution; this de minimis exception should be evaluated in light of the qualitative and quantitative parameters of three-step test, as provided for by Article 5.5 of the Directive;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 106 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Suggests to follow the instructions included in António Vitorino's recommendations, of 31 January 2013 resulting from the last mediation process on private copying and reprography levies conducted by the Commission, especially with regard to the clear indication of the percentage to be allocated to private copying in sales to consumers and the introduction of the principle of perception of private copying proceeds directly by authors, ensuring that this allocation is not intermediated by a third party, or that there are intermediate steps that do not impair the right of the author to see themselves fully recognised the fair compensation; fair compensation may not apply to the business sector and professional users, given the incompatibility of such use with the concept of private copying;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 114 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Urges to establish that the orders against intermediaries to protect copyright are given only by the competent judicial authority with reference to the limits imposed by Directive 2004/48 (ex Art. 11), the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article. 51, par. 1, and Article. 6 TEU;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 118 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Suggests to strengthen the safe harbour principles in the matter of liability of service providers to guarantee widespread dissemination of culture within the EU and in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and ECHR;
2015/03/06
Committee: CULT
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to effectively safeguard public domain works, which are by definition not subject to copyright protection and should therefore be able to be used and re-used without technical or contractual barriers; also calls on the Commission to recognise the freedom of rightholders to voluntarily relinquish their rights and dedicate their works to the public domain;
2015/03/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 363 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Acknowledges the importance of full exploitation of new technologies in order to increase the legal offer of content by encouraging re-use mechanisms and the birth of a digital second-hand market;
2015/03/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 374 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls for the adoption of an open norm introducing flexibility in the interpretation of de minimis exceptions and limitations in certain special to analogically apply the discipline already provided in Article 5.3, in cases that doare not conflict with the normal exploitation of the work and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author or rightholderregulated, especially bearing in mind the swift technological evolution. Such de minimis exception should be evaluated in light of the qualitative and quantitative parameters of three-step test, as provided for by Article 5.5 of the Directive;
2015/03/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 552 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Urges to establish that the orders against intermediaries to protect copyright are given only by the competent judicial authority with reference to the limits imposed by Directive 2004/48 (ex Art. 11), the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article. 51, par. 1, and Article 6 TEU;
2015/03/05
Committee: JURI