9 Amendments of Rosa D'AMATO related to 2015/2329(INI)
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the current rise of ‘Euroscepticism’ – which culminated recently in the vote in favourreinforces the need to reflect on the causes of the European Union’s loss of Bcrexit – reinforces the need to encourage civic participation and to launch an in-depth debate on European values, while highlighting the opportunities brought about by belonging to the EUdibility and calls for constructive, self-critical thinking about the crisis in European values, which should involve the whole of civil society and the institutions themselves;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas further synergies with other direct and indirect financing programmes and better communication with other DGs are needed in order to reduce overlap and reinforce the impact of the programme, also with regard to the reporting of results;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that the overall funding available (EUR 185.47 million) to the only programme entirely dedicated to European citizenship, i.e. the Europe for Citizens programme, is negligible in comparison withot proportionate to that of other education and culture programmes, such as Creative Europe (EUR 1.46 billion) and Erasmus + (EUR 14.7 billion);
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that the main obstacle to the successful implementation of the programme is the insufficient financial allocation and deeply regrets that it was cut by 13.7 % under the MFF 2014-2020, which has dramatically reduced the number of financeable projects and means that the high demand cannot be met, causing frustration among candidates with valuable projectsreating an internal contradiction between the values that Europe seeks to transmit through that programme and the real financial contribution needed to support it;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Recommendgrets that the funds allocated to communication should not bare used to cover institutional communication of the priorities of the Union, as is currently set out in Article 12 of the present programme, butand recommends that they should be used to publicise the programme itself in the participating countries, especially those in which the level of participation is lower;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Recommends, in the next generation programme, formalising the multiannual approach in the definition of the priorities and enhancing synergies among the strands and the components of the programme; stresses that any changinges to the structure of the programme might lead to confusion andshould be made in such a way as to prevent the possibility of confusion for its end users, thereby reduceing its impact;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the need to enrichRecommends strongly that the programme be enriched with proposals regarding citizens’ participation in the democratic process and in EU decision- making, for instance through the implementation of e- democracy;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Recommends more internationalisation of the programme and proposes to promote cooperation between organisations in the EU and in neighbouringthird countries;