6 Amendments of Joachim SCHUSTER related to 2019/0273(COD)
Amendment 17 #
Draft legislative resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to opinion 2/15 of the European Court of Justice,
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to opinion 2/15 of the European Court of Justice,
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) Dispute settlement provisions, including in regional and bilateral trade agreements, might lack the specificity necessary to adjudicate disputes effectively, necessitating a reliance on this Regulation.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 654/2014
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new)
(aa) the following point (ab) is inserted: (ab) In the event of the adoption by commercial policy measures by a third country that nullify or impair the commercial interests of the Union and constitute a clear breach of international law and which the Union has challenged at the WTO;
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 654/2014
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b c
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b c
(ba) the following point (bc) is inserted: (bc) In trade disputes relating to other international trade agreements, including regional or bilateral agreements, if adjudication is not possible, including because of lack of specificity of provisions, leading to a non-functioning dispute settlement procedure.