BETA

58 Amendments of Daniela AIUTO related to 2018/0228(COD)

Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The Programme should guarantee a high level of transparency, providing access to the relevant documents especially in case projects affect the environment and the health of people, and the assessment procedure of projects should take into account social and cohesion criteria, and in particular the acceptance by local communities.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) In order to achieve the objectives laid down in the TEN-T guidelines, it is necessary to support with priority the cross-border links and, the missing links and the horizontal priorities defined in this Regulation, and to ensure, where applicable, that the supported actions are consistent with the corridor work plans established pursuant to Article 47 of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 and to the overall network development regarding performance and interoperability.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) It is necessary to promote investments in favour of smart, sustainable, inclusive, safe and, secure and multimodal mobility throughout the Union. In 2017, the Commission presented20 "Europe on the move", a wide-ranging set of initiatives to make traffic safer, encourage smart road charging, reduce CO2 emissions, air pollution and congestion, promote connected and autonomous mobility and ensure proper conditions and rest times for workers. These initiativesActions supporting these initiatives, including for telematics applications, should be accompanied by Union financial support, where relevant through this Programme. __________________ 20 Commission Communication "Europe on the move: An agenda for a socially fair transition towards clean, competitive and connected mobility for all" – COM(2017) 283
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Following the Joint Communication on improving military mobility in the European Union of November 201724 , the Action Plan on Military Mobility adopted on 28 March 2018 by the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy25 highlighted that transport infrastructure policy offers a clear opportunity to increase synergies between defence needs and TEN- T. The Action Plan indicates that by mid- 2018, the Council is invited to consider and validate the military requirements in relation to transport infrastructure and that, by 2019 the Commission services will identify the parts of the trans-European transport network suitable for military transport, including necessary upgrades of existing infrastructure. It is necessary to guarantee a balanced geographical and modal distribution of projects within the territory of the Union, in order to equally develop the North-South and East-West axes and the different modes of transport. Union funding for the implementation of the dual-use projects should be implemented through the Programme on the basis of specific work programmes specifying the applicable requirements as defined in the context of the Action Plan. __________________ 24 JOIN(2017) 41 25 JOIN(2018) 5
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) The Programme is primarily intended to develop the civil infrastructure, and adapting the existing infrastructure to dual-use requirements and military needs should increase its level of safety and of resiliency.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) ERTMS represents a large-scale transport horizontal project that will further integrate Railway transport infrastructures, increasing the safety and the interoperability of the networks. In order to speed up the installation of ERTMS, it is necessary to allocate a sufficient amount of money, favouring synergies with other financial instruments.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 b (new)
(16b) It is important to define an horizontal priority concerning safe, secure and resilient infrastructure, in order to guarantee high standards of safety, to strengthen the reliability of the existing infrastructure and to prevent further catastrophes in the Union. It is deemed appropriate to set a minimum threshold in terms of budget dedicated to the deployment of this priority.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) The Union has developed its own satellite Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) technology (EGNOS/Galileo) and its own Earth observation system (Copernicus). Both EGNOS/Galileo and Copernicus offer advanced services which provide important economic benefits to public and private users. Therefore any transport, energy or digital infrastructure funded by the Programme - that makes use of PNT or Earth observations services - should be technically compatible with EGNOS/Galileo and Copernicus. Transport applications and services should implement GNSS technologies, in order to enhance the connectivity, the safety of transport, and the enforcement of the EU legislation.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The positive results of the first Blending Call for proposals launched under the current programme in 2017, confirmed the relevance and added value of using EU grants for blending with financing from the European Investment Bank or National Promotional Banks or other development and public financial institutions as well as from private-sector finance institutions and private-sector investors, including through public private partnerships. The Programme should therefore continue to provide for dedicated Calls enabling combination between EU grants and other sources of financing. It is necessary to set a budgetary ceiling to the amount of money allocated under the blending calls within the Programme.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31 a (new)
(31a) It is deemed appropriate to allow a certain degree of flexibility in transferring budgetary resources to a higher spending performance sector in case the interim evaluation assessing the implementation of the Programme reveals that the total budgetary commitment of one sector is excessively lower than the total amount allocated to that.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31 b (new)
(31b) Investments co-financed by this Programme, in particular if related to the improvement of safe, secure and resilient infrastructure or if related to the achievement of climate objectives, should be deemed exempt from deficit and debt calculations in order to improve the investment capacity of the Member States.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) In order to adapt, where necessary, the indicators used for the monitoring of the Programme, the indicative percentages of budgetary resources allocated to each specific objective in the transport sector and, the definition of the transport core network corridors, the military requirements, the list of military priority projects, and their assessment procedures regarding the eligibility of actions, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amendments to Parts I, II and III of the Annex to this Regulation. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) “action” means any activity which has been identified as financially and technically independent, has a set time- frame and is necessary for the implementation of a project of common interest;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) “bottleneck” means a physical, technical or functional barrier which leads to a system break affecting the continuity of long-distance or cross- border flows and which can be surmounted by creating new infrastructure, or substantially upgrading existing infrastructure, that could bring significant improvements which will solve the bottleneck constraints;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) “cross-border link” means, in the transport sector, the link which ensures the continuity of a project of common interest between the nearest urban nodes on both sides of the border of two Member States or between a Member State and a neighbouring country;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
(ka) “missing link” means, in the transport sector, a section that is necessary to complete an efficient and interconnected transport network;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point p a (new)
(pa) “outermost regions” means regions which have to deal with a number of difficulties related to their geographical characteristics, in particular: remoteness, insularity, small size, difficult topography and climate. They are economically dependent on a few products (often agricultural products or natural resources). These features act as constraints on their future development potential.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
(ra) “infrastructure for civilian- military dual-use” means infrastructure used mainly for civilian purposes that could be adapted to civilian-military dual- use needs, implementing hybrid standards for infrastructure and on-board equipment;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i
(i) to contribute to the development of projects of common interest relating to efficient, multimodal and interconnected networks and infrastructure for smart, sustainable, inclusive, safe and secure mobility in all modes of transport;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 459 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii
(ii) to adapt the TEN-T networks to military mobility needs, and enable an effective dual-use, civil and military, of infrastructure;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 502 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
(a) up to EUR 30,615,493,000 for the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(2)(a), of which:
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 537 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) up to EUR 8,650,000,000 for the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(2)(b), out of which up to 120% for the cross-border projects in the field of renewable energy
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 550 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) up to EUR 3,000,000,000 for the specific objectives referred to in Article 3(2)(c).
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 557 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Investments co-financed by this Programme, in particular if related to the improvement of safe, secure and resilient infrastructure or if related to the achievement of climate objectives, shall be qualified as eligible investments for the application of the investment clause and shall be excluded from the assessment of the Member States’ budgetary position under either Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 and Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97; investment and fiscal measures as referred to in this paragraph put in place under this Programme shall be deemed exempt from deficit and debt calculations.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 584 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 9
9. Resources allocated to a Member States under shared management may, at theirits request, be transferred to the Programme. The Commission shall implement those resources directly in accordance with [point (a) of Article 62(1)] of the Financial Regulation or indirectly in accordance with point (c) of that Article. Where possible those resources shall be used for the benefit of the Member State concernedThose resources shall be used in the same category of regions, as defined in article 102 of Regulation [new Common Provisions Regulation], for the benefit of the Member State concerned, and shall be allocated to a project aimed at the same objective.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 592 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Following the interim evaluation referred to in Article 25.2 assessing the implementation of the Programme, in case one of the three sectors referred to in Article 4, paragraph 2(a), in Article 4, paragraph 2(b) and in Article 4, paragraph 2(c) is not on track and the total budgetary commitment is lower than the total amount allocated after, at the latest, the first three years of CEF implementation, and according to its objectives, allocated resources which have not been committed may be made available for a higher spending performance sector, up to 10% of the budget originally defined;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 598 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The third countries referred to in paragraph 1, and entities established in these countries, may not receive financial assistance under this Regulation except where it is indispensable to the achievement of the objectives of a given project of common interest and, under the conditions set in the work programmes referred to in Article 19, and according to the provisions set by Article 8 of the Regulation (EU) n. 1315/2013.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 603 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The Programme may provide funding in any of the forms laid down in the Financial Regulation, in particular grants and procurement. It may also provide financing in the form of financial instruments within blending operations. Blending operations shall not exceed 8% of the overall financial envelope of the CEF as referred to in Article 4. Blending operations decided under this Programme shall be implemented in accordance with the InvestEU Regulation and Title X of the Financial Regulation.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 670 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i
(i) actions implementing the core network in accordance with Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013, including actions relating to urban nodes, maritime ports, inland ports, airports, and rail-road terminals of the core network as defined at Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013, and including the horizontal priorities identified in Part III of Annex to this Regulation. Actions implementing the core network may include related elements located on the comprehensive network when necessary to optimize the investment and according to modalities specified in the work programmes referred to in Article 19 of this Regulation;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 688 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i i
(ii) actions implementing cross-border links of the comprehensive network in accordance with Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013, notably the sections listed in Part III of the Annex to this Regulation; actions relating to the relevant urban nodes, maritime ports, inland ports, airports, and rail-road terminals of the comprehensive network as defined at Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 693 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii
(iii) actions implementing sections of the comprehensive network located in outermost regions in accordance with Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013, including actions relating to the relevant urban nodes, maritime ports, inland ports, airports, and rail-road terminals of the comprehensive network as defined at Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 701 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii a (new)
(iiia) actions implementing sections of the comprehensive network if necessary to complement actions under Article 9(2)(c), in order to achieve the objectives referred to in Article 3(2)(a)(ii);
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 707 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b – introductory part
(b) Actions relating to smart, sustainable, inclusive, safe and, secure and multimodal mobility:
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 716 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii
(ii) actions supporting telematic applications systems, inter alia ERTMS and SESAR projects, including for safety purposes, in accordance with Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 775 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) Under the specific objective referred to in Article 3(2)(a)(ii): actions, or specific activities within an action, supporting transport infrastructure on the TEN-T Network in order to adapt it to military mobility requirements with the purpose of enabling a civilian-military dual-use of the infrastructure. By 31 December 2019, the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 24 of this Regulation in order to further specify the military requirements, the list of priority projects and the assessments procedure regarding the eligibility of the actions connected with military mobility. Such delegated acts should respect a balanced geographical distribution across the EU (North-South and East-West axes), and according to different modes of transport.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 783 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In order to enhance the interoperability in the Single European Railway Area and the improvement of the Single European Sky, guaranteeing the implementation of dual use standards, the horizontal priorities defined in Part III of Annex to this Regulation to deploy ERTMS and SESAR shall be implemented to complete the deployment in the TEN-T core network corridors by 2030, and the Commission shall adopt an action plan in order to achieve this aim. A sufficient amount shall be made available to the projects through a contribution from this Programme. The Funding shall be made available for infrastructure and on-board equipment.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 808 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Projects that according to their assessment are considered irremediably harmful to the environment and to the health shall not be funded under this Programme.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 854 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) innovation, safety, digitalization, interoperability and accessibility aspects;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 876 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) involvement of citizens and local communities through public consultations carried out by Member States or by local authorities;
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 894 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. The assessment of proposals against the award criteria shall take into account, where relevant, the resilience to the adverse impacts of climate chang the impact on the environment and on health, the will of local communities, and where relevant, the resilience to the adverse impacts of climate change under a range of scenarios from well below 2 degrees Celsius scenario to significantly above through a climate vulnerability and risk assessment including the relevant adaptation measures.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 899 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. In the transport sector, the assessment of proposals against the award criteria referred to in paragraph 1 shall, where applicable, ensure that proposed actions are consistent with the corridor work plans and implementing acts pursuant to Article 47 of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 and take into account the opinion of the responsible European Coordinator pursuant to Article 45 (8) thereof.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 996 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the actExcept in duly justified cases, the Commission shas notll cancel financial assistance granted for studies which have not been started within one year following the starting date indicated laid down in the conditions governing the grant agreement; ing of aid or within two years of that date for all other actions eligible for financial assistance under this Regulation.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 1011 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
may receive support from the European Regional Development Fund or the Cohesion Fund in accordance with [paragraph 5 of Article 67] of Regulation (EU) XXX [CPR], without any further assessment, and provided that such actions are consistent with the objectives of the programme concerned. The rules of the Fund providing support shall apply.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 1012 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 a (new)
Article 18a Transparency The Commission shall make available, upon request of the Member States concerned or of any other interested part, and provide access to all the relevant documents related to the projects financed under this Programme. The interest of third parties shall be considered preeminent on any other interest in case of possible danger of the health or of the environment due to the implementation of the granted project.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 1014 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. The Programme shall be implemented by work programmes referred to in Article 110 of the Financial Regulation. Work programmes shall set out, where applicable, the overall amount reserved for blending operations, taking into account the ceiling referred to in Article 6, paragraph 2.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 1033 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Evaluations shall assess the implementation of the Programme, according to its general and sectorial objectives, clarifying whether the different sectors are on the track, if the total budgetary commitment is in line with the total amount allocated, if the on-going projects reached a sufficient degree of completeness, if they are still feasible and convenient to be delivered.
2018/09/21
Committee: ITRETRAN
Amendment 1063 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part I – table – Transport – Indicators
Transport Efficient and Number of cross-border and missing links interconnected networks addressed with the support of CEF and infrastructure for (including actions relating to urban nodes, smart, sustainable, maritime ports, inland ports, and rail-roadirports, and inclusive, safe and secure rail-road terminals of the TEN-T core network)and secure mobility comprehensive networks) Number of CEF supported actions contributing to the digitalisation of transport Number of alternative fuel supply points built or upgraded with the support of CEF Number of CEF supported actions contributing to the safety of transport Adaptation to military Number of transport infrastructure mobility requirements components adapted to meet military mobility requirements
2018/09/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1064 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part I – table – Transport – Indicators
Transport Efficient and Number of cross-border and missing links interconnected networks addressed with the support of CEF and infrastructure for (including actions relating to urban nodes, smart, sustainable, maritime ports, inland ports and rail-road inclusive, safe and secure terminals of the TEN-T core networks) secure mobility Number of CEF supported actions contributing to the digitalisation of transport with a breakdown, inter alia, by ERTMS and SESAR projects Number of alternative fuel supply points built or upgraded with the support of CEF Number of CEF supported actions contributing to the safety of transport Adaptation to military Number of transport infrastructure mobility requirements components adapted to meet military mobility requirements
2018/09/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1065 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part I – table – Transport – Indicators
Transport Efficient and Number of cross-border and missing links interconnected networks addressed with the support of CEF and infrastructure for (including actions relating to urban nodes, smart, sustainable, maritime ports, inland ports and rail-road inclusive, safe and secure terminals of the TEN-T core networks) secure mobility Number of CEF supported actions contributing to the digitalisation of transport Number of alternative fuel supply points built or upgraded with the support of CEF Number of CEF supported actions contributing to the safety of transport and to the resiliency of the infrastructure Adaptation to military Number of transport infrastructure mobility requirements components adapted to meet military mobility requirements
2018/09/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1066 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part I – table – Transport – Indicators
Transport Efficient and Number of cross-border and missing links interconnected networks addressed with the support of CEF and infrastructure for (including actions relating to urban nodes, smart, sustainable, maritime ports, inland ports and rail-road inclusive, safe and secure terminals of the TEN-T core networks) secure mobility Number of CEF supported actions contributing to the digitalisation of transport Number of alternative fuel supply points built or upgraded with the support of CEF Number of CEF supported actions contributing to the safety of transport Adaptation to military Number of transport infrastructure mobility requirements components adapted to meet military mobility requirements , with a breakdown by geographical location and by mode of transport
2018/09/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1100 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part II – paragraph 2 a (new)
For the actions listed at Article 9 paragraph 2 (a) and (b), at least 20% of the budgetary resources dedicated to them should be allocated to actions improving the safety, the security and the resiliency of the infrastructures;
2018/09/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1101 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part II – paragraph 2 b (new)
For the actions listed at Article 9 paragraph 2 (b), at least 40% of the budgetary resources dedicated to them should be allocated to actions to implement ERTMS projects;
2018/09/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1104 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point -1 (new)
-1. 1. Horizontal Priorities – Single European Sky – SESAR system – Telematic applications systems for rail - ERTMS – Safe, secure and resilient infrastructure – New technologies and innovation to achieve the transition to a net-zero GHG emissions economy
2018/09/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1119 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part III – point 1 – table – Core network corridor “Baltic-Adriatic”
Core network corridor "Baltic – Adriatic" Alignment Gdynia – Gdańsk – Katowice/Sławków Gdańsk – Warszawa – Katowice Katowice – Ostrava – Brno – Wien Szczecin/Świnoujście – Poznań – Wrocław – Ostrava Katowice – Žilina – Bratislava – Wien Wien – Graz– Villach – Udine – Trieste Udine – Venezia – Padova – Bologna – Ravenna – Ancona – Foggia Graz – Maribor –Ljubljana – Koper/Trieste Pre- Cross- Katowice – Ostrava Rail identified border sections Katowice – Žilina Opole – Ostrava Bratislava – Wien Graz – Maribor Trieste – Divaca Katowice – Žilina Road Brno – Wien Missing Gloggnitz – Mürzzuschlag: Rail link Semmering Base tunnel Graz – Klagenfurt: Koralm railway line and tunnel Koper – Divača
2018/09/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1162 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part III – point 1 – table – Core network corridor “Scandinavian- Mediterranean”
Core network corridor "Scandinavian – Mediterranean" Alignment RU border – Hamina/Kotka – Helsinki – Turku/Naantali – Stockholm – Örebro – Malmö Narvik/Oulu – Luleå – Umeå – Stockholm Oslo – Goteburg – Malmö – Trelleborg Malmö – København – Fredericia – Aarhus – Aalborg - Hirtshals/Frederikshavn København – Kolding/Lübeck – Hamburg – Hannover Bremerhaven – Bremen – Hannover – Nürnberg Rostock – Berlin – Leipzig – München Nürnberg – München – Innsbruck – Verona – Bologna – Ancona/Firenze Livorno/La Spezia – Firenze – Roma – Napoli – Bari – Taranto – Valletta Napoli – Gioia Tauro – Palermo/Augusta – Valletta Cagliari Pre- Cross-border RU border – Helsinki Rail identified sections København – Hamburg: Fehmarn belt fixed link access routes München – Wörgl – Innsbruck – Fortezza – Bolzano – Trento – Verona: Brenner base tunnel and its access routes København – Hamburg: Fehmarn Rail/Road belt fixed link
2018/09/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1165 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 2 – introductory part

Amendment
The cross-border sections of the The related elements located on the comprehensive network referred to at Article comprehensive network referred to at Article 9(2)(a)(ii) of this Regulation include notably 9(2)(a)(i) and the cross-border links of the the following sections: comprehensive network referred to at Article 9(2)(a)(ii) of this Regulation include notably the following sections:
2018/09/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1175 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 2 – table
Dublin – Strabane – Letterkenny Road Pau – Huesca Rail Lyon – CH border Rail Athus – Mont-Saint-Martin Rail Antwerpen – Duisburg Rail Mons - Valenciennes Rail Gent – Terneuzen Rail Heerlen – Aachen Rail Groningen – Bremen Rail Stuttgart – CH border Rail Berlin – Rzepin/Horka – Wrocław Rail Prague – Linz Rail Villach – Ljubljana Rail Ancona – Foggia Rail/Road Pivka – Rijeka Rail Plzeň – České Budějovice – Wien Rail Wien - Gyor Rail Graz - Gyor Rail Neumarkt-Kalham - Mühldorf Rail Amber Corridor PL-SK-HU Rail Via Carpathia Corridor BY/UA border-PL-SK-HU-RO Road Budapest – Osijek – Svilaj (BiH border) Road Faro – Huelva Rail Porto – Vigo Rail Giurgiu – Varna/Bourgas Rail Svilengrad – Pithio Rail
2018/09/26
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 1176 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 2 – table
Dublin – Strabane – Letterkenny Road Pau – Huesca Rail Lyon – CH border Rail Athus – Mont-Saint-Martin Rail Antwerpen – Duisburg Rail Mons - Valenciennes Rail Gent – Terneuzen Rail Heerlen – Aachen Rail Groningen – Bremen Rail Stuttgart – CH border Rail Berlin – Rzepin/Horka – Wrocław Rail Prague – Linz Rail Villach – Ljubljana Rail Gallarate/Sesto C. – Laveno/Luino Rail Pivka – Rijeka Rail Plzeň – České Budějovice – Wien Rail Wien - Gyor Rail Graz - Gyor Rail Rail Neumarkt-Kalham - Mühldorf Rail Rail Amber Corridor PL-SK-HU Rail Rail Via Carpathia Corridor BY/UA border-PL-SK-HU-RO Road Road Budapest – Osijek – Svilaj (BiH border) Road Road Faro – Huelva Rail Rail Porto – Vigo Rail Rail Giurgiu – Varna/Bourgas Rail Rail Svilengrad – Pithio Rail
2018/09/26
Committee: TRAN