5 Amendments of Pina PICIERNO related to 2015/2095(INI)
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to introduce a mechanism for the relocation of 40.000 people over the course of 2016 and 2017, at a total cost of EUR 240 000 000; regrets however that the Council and the European Council were not able to agree on a higher figure of the people to be relocated among the Member States;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes, further, the Commission’s recommendation concerning a resettlement programme and the additional EUR 50 000 000 set aside for this purpose in 2015 and 2016; stresses that the amount set aside should correspond to the real needs depending on the future migration flows and therefore shall adapt accordingly;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to provide as accurate an assessment as possible of the appropriations needed for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund over the period to 2020 and, on that basis, to present a proposal for an increase inof the heading 3 appropriations and, if necessary, an adjusted allocation among the various implementing programmes whenin the context of the revision of the multiannual financial framework is revised, due by the end of 2016;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Acknowledges that the Council did not cut the main lines of AMIF (Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund) and ISF (Internal Security Fund) in heading 3, underlying that an increase would be needed. Criticise, however, that the migration and asylum line under the DCI (-200 000 in CA, -5 million in PA), and the poverty reduction lines for both Mediterranean countries (-50 million in PA) and Eastern Partnership (-12 million in PA) and more generally, the IPA, have been cut. Believes that the proposed cuts are counterproductive in relation to the general management strategy of the future migration's flows;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that staff at the JHA agencies must not be reduced or automatically redeployed; calls for a genuine medium- and long-term strategy to be drawn up for these agencies in order to increase their impact and support on the territories mostly affected by migrations flows;