4 Amendments of Elena GENTILE related to 2016/0397(COD)
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
2. A person who normally pursues an activity as a self-employed person in a Member State who goes to pursue a similar activity as a self-employed in another Member State shall continue to be subject to the legislation of the first Member State, provided that the anticipated duration of such activity does not exceed 24 months and that the person is not replacing another posted employed or self-employed person..
Amendment 523 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Documents issued by the institution of a Member State and showing the position of a person for the purposes of the application of the basic Regulation and of the implementing Regulation, and supporting evidence on the basis of which the documents have been issued, shall be accepted by the institutions of the other Member States for as long as they have not been withdrawn or declared to be invalid by the Member State in which they were issued or qualified as a fraudulent document pursuant Article 5a. Such documents shall only be valid if all sections indicated as compulsory are filled in.
Amendment 547 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 987/2009
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5 a (new)
7a. The following article is inserted : « Article 5a Fraudulent documents In a situation in which a court of the host Member State or a court of the home Member State finds that documents issued was obtained or invoked fraudulently, that court may disapply that document. In order to find that there has been fraud, justifying disapplication of the document, it is necessary to establish, first, that the conditions laid down in the provisions under which the document was issued are not satisfied in the present case and, second, that the persons concerned intentionally concealed the fact that those conditions are not met.”