2 Amendments of Emil RADEV related to 2014/2155(INI)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is convinced that the means of criminal law in the PIF Directive will be effective only if they succeed in providing a clear definition of commonly agreed PIF offences, minimum- maximum imprisonment penalties applicable in all participating Member States, and minimum rules on the statute of limitations;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates its call for an independent and efficient EPPO, operating as a single office which investigates, prosecutes and brings to court the perpetrators of criminal offences affecting the Union’s financial interests, while ensuring that procedural safeguards for the suspected and accused persons are protected; reiterates also the importance of ensuring that EPPO does not duplicate competences with OLAF and Eurojust; stresses the importance of a common agreement of Parliament and the Council in the selection and appointment procedures for independent prosecutors with investigative powers in Member States;