1 Amendments of Emil RADEV related to 2018/0900(COD)
Amendment 4 #
Draft regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) It is, moreover, clear from the review undertaken by the Court of Justice and the General Court that many appeals are brought in cases which have already been considered twice, initially by an independent administrative authority, then by the General Court, and that many of those appealssuch as the European Union Intellectual Property Office, the Community Plant Variety Office, the European Chemicals Agency, the European Aviation Safety Agency, then by the General Court. Many of those appeals relating to cases in which an independent administrative authority has already been seized prior to the action before the General Court are dismissed by the Court of Justice because they are patently unfounded, or on the ground that they are manifestly inadmissible. In order to enable the Court of Justice to concentrate on the cases that require its full attention, it is necessary, in the interests of the proper administration of justice, to introduce, for appeals relating to such cases, a mechanism whereby the Court determines whether an appeal should be allowed to proceed. It would accordingly fall to the party challenging a decision of the General Court in those cases first to convince the Court of Justice of the significance of the questions raised by its appeal with respect to the unity, consistency or development of Union law.