36 Amendments of Georgi PIRINSKI related to 2016/2151(DEC)
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the EU institutions and Member States should improve their communication policy in terms to properly inform the citizens about results achieved by the EU budget and their added value;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the European Parliament must have a strong engagement towards EU citizens concerns about where the EU budget is spent and how the EU protects their interests;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A d (new)
Recital A d (new)
Ad. whereas, cohesion policy brings a clear value added by improving the quality of life of citizens through Europe by being a key policy of solidarity and a vital source of public investment;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A e (new)
Recital A e (new)
Ae. whereas the EU institutions need to build a clear understanding and agree on which European policy priorities and public goods should be financed first to answer our citizens concerns and close the gaps in our policies.
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to put on the agenda of the next experts’' meeting on Budget Focused Results (BFOR) the suggestions made by the Court in its “"briefing paper on mid-term review”" of 28. 10.2016 (points 39 and 40) and the recommendations of the High-level group on own resources in order to prepare the next Conference on EU Budget focused on Results initiative that could debate on the policy areas in which the Union budget should be spent before deciding upon the financial framework;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission to orient its priorities towards the successful achievement of the Europe 2020 Strategy by using the instruments of the European Semester;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Regrets that the Commission did not performed full-scale review of the Europe 2020 Strategy in order to ensure its implementation under the Strategic Agenda for the Union in Times of Change, adopted by the European Council in June 2014, as this Agenda envisages;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls onUrges the Commission to propose measures to make Union Funding arrangements - which include, in particular, structuralfor implementation of the EU budget - which currently include different tools and combinations between them as for example programmes, structural and investment funds, trust funds, strategic investment funds, guarantee funds, facilities, financial instruments and, macro-financial assistance instruments, etc. - clearer, simpler, more coherent and better equipped to ensure sufficient transparency, accountability, performance and public understanding of how Union policies are funded and thewhat benefits they bring (see points 50 and 56 of the Court’s “briefing paper on mid- term review” of 28. 10.2016); regrets that the proposal for a new financial regulation from September 2016 does not address these problems in an adequate manner;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Asks the Commission to re- evaluate the ex-ante assessment for the Connecting Europe Facility debt instrument in the light of the creation of the EFSI and considerto present to Parliament an assessment of the impact of EFSI on other Union programmes and financial instruments;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes Commissioner Oettinger’s intention to bring the various shadow budgets, in the long run, back under the Union budget; Calls on the Commission to prepare a communication on this issuesent to co-legislators relevant proposals on this issue without delay;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Points out that five Member States (Czech Republic, Spain, Italy, Poland and Romania) account for more than half of the unused commitments of Structural Funds that have not led to payment for the programming period 2007-2013;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Finds inadmissible that by the end of 2015 fewer than 20% of the national authorities responsible for European structural and Investment funds with the exception of the European Agricultural Fund for Regional Development (EAFRD) had been designated by the Member States which is a necessary step for Member States authorities to submit statements of expenditure to the Commission; is of the opinion that the considerable novelties introduced for the 2014-2020 period lead to administrative difficulties despite efforts for simplification;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 b (new)
Paragraph 21 b (new)
21b. Notes that the global economic recession, which has a direct effect in the form of the budgetary restraint measures applied to public budgets and difficulties in obtaining internal financing is also a main factor for delaying absorption.
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Deeply regrets that, as a consequence, there is a risk that delays in budget execution for the 2014-2020 programming period will be greater than those experienced for the 2007-2013; expects the Commission to have learnt from this with a view to preventing similar delays in the future;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Requests that the Commission takes measures to reducestrictly observe the rules and timetables regarding outstanding commitments including, faster closure and earlier decommitment of the 2007-2013 programmes, widproper use of net correction in cohesion, a reduction of cash held by fiduciaries and the compilation of payment plans and forecasts where outstanding commitments are significant;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Requests that the Commission considers in its budgetary and financial management the capacity constraints of certain Member States and to use all available instruments through technical assistance and the new Structural Reform Support Programme to support these Member States in order to avoid the underutilisation of funds and to increase the absorption rates especially in the area of the ESI funds;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Reiterates the need for simplification and clarity of rules and procedures at both EU and national level in order to facilitate access to EU funds for beneficiaries and to ensure sound management of those funds by the administrative services; believes that simplification will contribute to the speedy allocation of funds, higher absorption rates, increased efficiency and transparency, fewer implementation errors and reduced payment periods; considers that a balance needs to be struck between simplification and the stability of rules, procedures and controls; notes that, in any case, providing potential applicants and beneficiaries with sufficient information and guidelines is a necessary precondition for successful implementation;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 b (new)
Paragraph 26 b (new)
26b. Calls on the Commission to refrain from new cuts of the technical assistance at its disposal and to come up with an action plan for effective and timely absorption with particular emphasis on those Member States and regions lagging behind and having low absorption rates;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
Paragraph 45
45. Points out that the Commission reports78 a total implemented financial corrections and recoveries amounting to EUR 3,9 billion; that aroundnotes that the ECA classified them in three categories: EUR1,2 billion of the corrections and recoveries were at source (applied before the Commission accepted expenditure) and that of the remainder: EUR 2,7 billion, around (Agriculture, Cohesion, Direct/indirect management); EUR 1,1 billion represents withdrawals by Member States applied after accepting expenditure by replacing ineligible amounts with new cohesion projects; EUR 1,6 billion net corrections (Agriculture, Direct/indirect management); _________________ 78 see paragraph 1.39 of the 2015 ECA annual report
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
Paragraph 46
46. Stresses that where there is a high risk of irregularity it is best practice to discuss the risk and to quantify the level and likely impact; regrets that Commission reporting on this subject pays significant attention to “corrective capacity” rather than to quantifying and analysing the nature of the errors it identifies, and undertaking relevant preventive measures for avoiding such errors; points out in particular that the Commission communications on “Protection of the Union budget” provides no estimate of the level of irregularity present in initial or in approved claims for reimbursement;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 59 a (new)
Paragraph 59 a (new)
59a. Draws attention to the need that the process of establishing performance indicators should be transparent and democratic involving all the EU institutions, partners and stakeholders concerned in order to make the indicators adequate for measurement of the implementation of the EU budget, as well as to answer the EU citizens expectations;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 64
Paragraph 64
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 70 a (new)
Paragraph 70 a (new)
70a. Regrets that the payment policy for researchers is applied with minor adjustments in the framework of the Horizon 2020 programme and thus it allows different payment for the same work within the same project based only on the nationality of the researcher, which stimulates the brain-drain of scientists from Central and Eastern Europe;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 73 – indent 3 a (new)
Paragraph 73 – indent 3 a (new)
– take measures ensuring the same pay for researchers doing the same work within the same project;
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 103
Paragraph 103
103. Regrets that most of the quantified errors which the Court found (33 out of 38) concerned the reimbursement of ineligible personnel and indirect costs declared by beneficiaries; and that almost all of the errors we found by the Court in cost statements were due to beneficiaries misinterpreting the complex eligibility rules or incorrectly calculating their eligible costs;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 120
Paragraph 120
120. Welcomes that ERDF/CF were able, to a certain extent, to counter balance the effects of the 2007-2008 financial crises, indicating that without structural funds’ intervention the economic and social divergence among European regions would have grown even more;
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 120 a (new)
Paragraph 120 a (new)
120a. Welcomes the achievements of the cohesion policy shown by the ex-post evaluations of the 2007-2013 programming period in relation to the EU 2020 targets: – by ERDF and Cohesion Fund: Headlines 1 "Employment" and 2 "R&D and innovations" - 41 600 research jobs were created and 400 000 SMEs were supported; Headline 3 "Climate change and Energy" - 3900 MW additional capacity of renewable energy production were created; – by the European Social Fund: Headlines 1 "Employment" - at least 9.4 million people gained employment (of which more than 300.000 people supported became self-employed); Headline 4 "Education" - at least 8.7 million people gained a qualification/certificate;
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 121
Paragraph 121
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 122
Paragraph 122
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 127 a (new)
Paragraph 127 a (new)
127a. Takes note of the preliminary results of the implementation of the ESF and YIE in 2014-2015 and that 2.7 million participants took part in ESF and YEI activities, including 1.6 million unemployed and 700,000 inactive people;
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 137
Paragraph 137
137. Regrets also that DG EMPL issues 23 reservations (down from 36) due to unreliable MCS in 11 Member States; takes note that the estimated financial impact of these reservations decreased from EUR 169,4 million in 2014 to EUR 50,3 million in 2015 for the ESF;
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 30 a (new)
Subheading 30 a (new)
European Investment Bank
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 144 a (new)
Paragraph 144 a (new)
144a. Is deeply concerned about the generally higher costs and fees for EIB/EIF-managed funds implementing financial instruments under shared management which have been revealed by the European Court of Auditors (ECA) findings in its Special report 19/2016 on 'Implementing the EU budget through financial instruments – lessons to be learnt from the 2007-2013 programme period' and encourages the ECA to conduct similar audit for the current period;
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 144 b (new)
Paragraph 144 b (new)
144b. Calls on the Commission to present annually by June every year starting from 2018 a report on implementation from the beginning of the current MFF and state of play, including results achieved, of all financial instruments managed and implemented by the EIB Group, which operate with resources from the EU budget, in order to use it in the discharge procedure;
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 147
Paragraph 147
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 150 – indent 4
Paragraph 150 – indent 4
– in line with the Court’s recommendation, to fundamentally reconsiderpropose necessary updates of the design and delivery mechanism for the ESI funds, including political and financial frameworks, when making its legislative proposal for the next programming period taking also into account the suggestions of the high level simplification group in order to strengthen the cohesion policy contribution to tackle disparities in inequalities between EU regions and Member States; calls on the Commission to prepare a communication on this issue at an early stage;